Every Understaffed Air Traffic Control Tower in the U.S.

May 31, 2025 2:23 PM

whoatherebigfella

Views

28102

Likes

607

Dislikes

13

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/mapped-every-understaffed-air-traffic-control-tower-in-the-u-s/

...The fact that I lived in the greater Phoenix area for most of my life and didn't know that Scottsdale has an airport is mildly insane to me.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Republicans - Better die in a fuckup by too few overworked white guys than live in a world where DEI hires invisibly save your life

1 year ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

You can't save money if you keep paying people

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Why isn't the goal 100%???

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So, this isn't brain-sugery. It's was well known staffing for ATCs was already stretched thin before DOGE. That further cuts would be dangerous. So, more crashes must have been the intention.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Seems like a perfect time to freeze hiring and fire all the new ATCs hired in the last year.

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

So this is crying “wolf” because it’s two years out of date and the figures are all wrong? Is that what I’m reading elsewhere?

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Y'all motherfuckers need TRAINS.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Of course, those ALSO crash if the traffic controllers can't do their jobs.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And BRAINS. BRAINS AND TRAINS! Works for me.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That’s from September 2023 according to the footnote on the bottom right. I’d hate to see what it is now.

1 year ago | Likes 130 Dislikes 0

pretty sure its even worse now, hence the effort to try and get them to stick past the mandated retirement age for the position.

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Top comment

1 year ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

In 2025 there are 162 facilities (of the 290 total) that meet or exceed staffing goals with 52 at over 100% staffing. 84 facilities had staffing levels of over 85% and 44 were staffed at less than 75%. https://usafacts.org/articles/is-there-a-shortage-of-air-traffic-controllers/

1 year ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

In 2023. While the article is somehow dated in 2025 it relays no statics about the current year.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I have decided that I won't be flying anywhere for the next 8 years unless absolutely necessary.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How did you decide on 8 years as your number?

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4 years to ride out current admin, 4 years for next admin to hire and train next gen of ATC.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

“the FFA operates…” Federal Faviation Administration

1 year ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 1

Future Farmers of America

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

ffs

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

FFA? The Future Farmers of America? Man, we really are doomed.

1 year ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 1

Furious Fappers of America

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

FAA so understaffed itself they turned to farmers for help.

1 year ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

I don't know, herding sheep isn't all that different

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

My first reaction, also.

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"I believe in the future of farming, of a faith born not of words, but deeds..." had to memorize the pledge for FFA

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It stamds for For Fuck’s Air

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Seems the airlines don’t give a damn unless their bottom line collapses. They will push increased flights until a major incident with massive deaths then blame it on the ATC’s.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The stress of this job was literally the plot point of the movie Summer Rental

1 year ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 0

And the movie 2:22 starts with a great example of the stress of the job

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And the skills involved in it. I wouldn't want to trust any but the best for the job, and they deserve to be treated well and respected and given the resources to succeed. (As everyone deserves, but especially people that make sure planes land and take off safely)

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And Pushing Tin

1 year ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Also, why a plane crashed in Breaking Bad when Jane died. (Her dad was a air traffic controller)

1 year ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

That build up was great storytelling

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

and some of Breaking Bad

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Well now you've brought a huge problem to my attention while simultaneously making me feel nostalgic and also miss John Candy! I can't handle all these emotions!

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So whats the solution

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nationalize the major railways that avoid competing with each other like cable TV companies, make the freight system work properly, and use the resulting capacity to run passenger trains as transportation instead of as land-based vacation cruises.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

fly less

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Air Traffic Controllers should stage a collective strike. Shut this country the FUCK down. Easy for me to say because I am just posting on imgur though. And yes, I know it's illegal: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_Air_Traffic_Controllers_Organization_(1968) but something can absolutely be made un-illegal by the exigence of necessity. Let Congress blink first.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And Federal retaliation for failing to show up to work sounds like a job for the 13th Amendment.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A person has to be really ignorant to say “what’s the solution” here while probably imagining how realistic they are. Obviously the solution like every other public service is tax the rich to pay for better public services, instead of removing taxes on the rich and destroying public services (which is a leading ideology in USA culture, indoctrination, and politics)

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I wasnt saying there WASNT a solution. But the graph doesn't say what the reason is for this shortage of employees. So I am asking genuinely asking, since I am not an expert at FAA employment.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have ADHD to the point where I would need to inject meth to do ATAC

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm supposed to fly for a wedding in October and I'm legit considering cancelling cause I don't want to die

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's not that bad if you compare it to August 4, 1981!

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do they still run the rotating shifts? 2 days shifts, 2 swing shifts 1 grave and then 2 off. Along with overtime to pull down big numbers

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Knew a guy who worked air traffic control in Denver. The stress level is unreal

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Another reason not to visit USA ...

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Not super jazzed about Rochester being the worst considering I'm just south of the Twin Cities.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Imagine having a staff shortage, and then firing people but white men. Surely that will solve it!

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't know shit but...That's a lot. Right?

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Rochester only goes to Minneapolis so no biggy

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah, there are multiple times that life flights have had me circling RST. Not great. I think there's an ORD commuter too.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Commercial, maybe, but what about life flight to Mayo?

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I feel like air traffic control should have more of a 120% staffing goal, so the operators can safely take leave / be sick / have vacations / etc without airplanes falling out of the sky.

1 year ago | Likes 318 Dislikes 1

THAT'S COMMIE TALK

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That’s literally what they did. 100% of budgeted headcount covers expected gaps from callouts and turnover.

1 year ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

a staffing goal of 85% means consistent pressure on them not to be out, then, if 100% covers expected gaps, right? made even worse with, what, almost half not even meeting that?

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It means when callouts occur, or PTO is offered, they either absorb the workload (increasing stress) or call in someone on their scheduled day off. Not necessarily a service gap occurs.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Staffing goal" doesn't mean "staff required to run facility." If I have 8 positions, and want 30 people filling them, that could be my "100% staffing goal."

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also, it should be noted that this is 2023 data, and the 85% expectation was a new guideline put on 2024. Not suggesting the ATC staffing issue is copacetic, but this chart has zero to do with illustrating the current situation, for good or worse.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I feel like DFW has 0% staffing most of the time.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

ATC being out won't make planes fall out of the sky... It might make them hit other planes on the ground tho.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You might be in training/supervision 2-3 years to become a Certified controller. The 85% goal counts Certified people, not raw headcount/butts-in-seats. 85% is also the 'risk balanced' point where operations are efficient and risk is managed. 120% means you have every position staffed by a fully Certified controller, and have 20% sitting around 2080 hours/year doing nothing. PLUS all the people working toward Certification...cuz it's not counting every butt-in-seat, remember...

1 year ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 2

The ‘sitting around, doing nothing’ you speak of is the time where experienced operators transfer knowledge and expertise to the up and coming trainees - you’d have better trained air traffic controllers if they were allowed to observe without the stress of making the decisions - seeing what others see and how successful controllers keep the system flowing. It’s not something that you can just read a manual for. And appropriate leave for people, rather than begging or foregoing altogether…

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

This may be a though viewpoint for capitalist Americans to swallow: I *want* every position staffed by a certified worker. Trainees can pair with a certified worker.

1 year ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 1

That sounds very expensive for little return. Ever learn how to drive? How much of your learning was done in the passenger seat?

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

"very expensive for little return"
man, you really just proved their statement that a capitalist can't understand the concept 🤣

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It's not really a capitalist problem, though, is it? In magical make believe land we could have infinite food but in reality there's only so much available. There is no government system that will magically make labor appear out of thin air and given the problem is that they can't hire enough people to do the job, despite already having incredibly high salaries, throwing more money at it isn't going to solve the problem. Our government is already drowning in problems to callously throw money at

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In addition to this, I do not want ANY air traffic controller to be working at 100% capacity. I want them to be at 80% capacity tops, 100% in short bursts during emergencies or more than one person goes to the bathroom at the same time. But there shouldn't be a single ATC suffering burnout at any point.

1 year ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

While I love ripping on American immoral business practices, I don't think it's fair in this case. Firstly, 85% staffing does not mean that 15% of flights don't have a certified controller available. It means that in 100% utilization scenario(which is already pretty much a catastrophe in itself) there would be either 15% without a controller or overworked controllers to cover longer shifts.

Typically staffing targets include a buffer on top of what is a realistic maximum utilization scenario,

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

and in many cases that means that something like 85% may well cover even a worst case scenario.

Secondly, it costs money. And no, this is not a shitty "well there's gotta be a profit in it" capitalist excuse. They do cost money, and they need to be paid. That money has to come from somewhere, and that somewhere is either from the customer(higher prices for the airport if it's private) or from taxes. And while I agree that taxes in the US could be a lot higher, particularly for the rich, single

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

tax-funded institutions can't be looked at in a vacuum. You need to account for every single tax-funded institution that could do with extra staff and make prioritizations. That's really, really difficult, and is very questionable if the net expected result is as good with less funding(see point 1).

Thirdly, we need to take historical context into account. Covid did a number on global, but especially US, aviation. Those wounds were still healing at the time of the chart. The issue is that

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1