Glass houses don’t care about your feelings Ben.

Mar 23, 2022 10:22 PM

servingwithtg

Views

168338

Likes

1734

Dislikes

55

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If there's one thing Ben Shapiro knows, is the intellectual level of a 2 y/o

4 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 2

way to insult 2 year olds. They grow up. He's just evil and living in the land of dogwhistles.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

did she try to say she likes beer a lot? I hear it helps.

4 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 4

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Imagine if Republicans put as much effort into say improving infrastructure as they did trying to insult and challenge Democrats

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

improving infrastructure? can't be done, it sounds like something poors and/or liberals might benefit from.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ben, who paid Kavanaugh’s credit card debt and season tickets? Should be a simple answer, right?

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Stop giving attention to this waste of a human mind.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Will she be replacing Kavanaugh?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Vive la difference!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

“So easy a 2-yr old can answer it” Republicans confessing their logic and reasoning is at a 2-yr old level.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

4 years ago | Likes 616 Dislikes 6

"Senator Blackburn, if I did define it, you might fall short of the definition."

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think a two year old’s answer to that question would confuse the republicans just as much as a doctor’s.

4 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

Even if their argument is that it might be relevant to cases she may preside over, the question lacks context. It’s not pertinent.

4 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 1

Right? What's the context here, biological, social, lawsuit against health insurance?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Is this "the question" shithole shapiro is referring to?

4 years ago | Likes 133 Dislikes 1

Yes

4 years ago | Likes 102 Dislikes 1

Succinct. I love it.

4 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 2

And the inference of course being "And neither the fuck are you so shut up you transphobic clown". I love it.

4 years ago | Likes 300 Dislikes 5

Just like the convoy, GQP think EVERYTHING is in their lane. Jackson knows better!

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

She went on to explain in great detail how defining words is not her fucking job, ya moron.

4 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 5

Hey Bubba, I agree with Ketanji Brown Jackson.

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

oh, I meant she called out the questioner for being a dipshit, I wasn't talking about you.

4 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

I think the “ya moron” part might have been intended as “it’s not my fucking job, ya moron”. Just giving the benefit of the doubt though

4 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

I think a sociologist would give a better definition of woman. Female is the term for biologists i believe.

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Correct. Honestly, I think her answer played right into their hands. But, I probably would have been caught off guard if it were me too.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Probably best to just say "an adult female." Then when they ask to define "female," you ask to clarify, "gender" or "biological sex."

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

and THEN say “no”.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Just a reminder that he's a squeakier manlet than jordan peterson, who sounds like racist kermit the frog.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I chose not to pay attention to this sham trial. What was the question supposed to be?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

"Can you define a woman" apparently. Guess they wanted to either get her to accidentally be transphobic to upset non-bigots, or be pro-trans

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

to upset their bigots and inflame them against her (as her being a black woman wasn't enough to do it for them lol)

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sadly, it's rare to expect a decent discussion with the GOP today. They have no moral compass and will say or do anything to stay in office.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Why is that cunt still allowed to use Twitter?

4 years ago | Likes 285 Dislikes 12

Because they don't apply their Nazi-blocking algorithm to the USA.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

They'd lose a large number of right wing assholes. Which is good for us, but bad for ad revenue.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because of this particular cunt happens to be white and have a penis

4 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 6

Allegedly has.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

I'm not a typographer but I know shitty kerning when I see it. Agree with the sentiment though.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

/r/keming

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thank you, I hadn oknowled geof that site. But it's evil and gives me the boak.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Because his dumbassery drives engagement, which equals more dollars for Twitter. Isn't social media great.

4 years ago | Likes 82 Dislikes 1

i thought twitter was just a money sink ?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tbh, I don't know about Twitter in particular. Social media turning a blind eye to misinformation and conservatives is the general rule, tho

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it is, but as far as i'm aware twitter doesn't know how to monetize itself for profit. at least that was the rumor a while ago.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Doesn't stop it being "worth" $13 billion.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

isn't *capitalism great

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean, yeah, capitalism sucks ass, but no reason to take the focus off social media in this discussion.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A coherent critique of Capitalism does not exist in out political narrative. The more we call it out the better.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Despite being an asshole, it's within the platform's rules. Of course, that's part of the problem: good platforms prohibit asshole behavior.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He's regularly promoted misinformation, which is against Twitter TOS. But he, and many other conservatives (including actual Nazis)...

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Get a pass.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The truth right here, outrage is profitable

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Democracy being sold out from under us, and fascists are buying.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Because he doesn't break their T&C, he's just a fuck

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

He's repeatedly broken their T&C lol. As have you or anyone who uses twitter, the T&C are WRITTEN as an excuse to ban ppl.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Well, as I'm not on Twitter I'm unaware of their t&c

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

is Benny feeling threatened by an african american woman with more academic and professional experience than he has himself?

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

Enjoy it while you can. Ben's dismissive disdain phase will soon give way to "creepily detailed femme-dom fantasies" about her politics

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Absolutely. Don't you remember how triggered he was by Cardi B?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

To be fair, Cardi B drugged people and stole from them. Cardi B should be behind bars.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They got nothing… nuh-thing! So they’re shooting for sound bites.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Ben Shapiro needs a slap upside the head with a twelve pound trout for his assery.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Grifters gotta Grift, and get their SOUND BITE caught on film for their future GQP Funding Raising Efforts!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This gal is a Harvard grad.. she know they playing. Intelligent black woman and they all scared including justices cuz way smarter than all1

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

2/ All of them old butts out together !!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ben 'Deadly afraid of arguing with anyone competent ' Shapiro wrong on something? Are you sure he didn't run away before you explained?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I have listened to hours of this. This is beyond the pale. She has been a true woman. Why not ask so pedos in your ranks are OK?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They were playing games with her. If she answered, they would have had a number of follow up questions to ridicule or embarrass her. She 1/

4 years ago | Likes 730 Dislikes 7

All about the Fox News soundbite. They know she’ll get confirmed but if they get that clip on Tucker it’s a win.

4 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 0

decided not to play their game by their 'rules' and turned it back on them by going legal on them. Which is the reason she was there

4 years ago | Likes 582 Dislikes 4

Doesn't matter tbh. If you agree that gender =/= sex then you see a slam dunk. If you don't, you still get a slam dunk from her answer

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 22

Basketball Definition of a Slam Dunk

4 years ago | Likes 123 Dislikes 6

Bird Culture Definition of a Dick Move

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

This is what it takes to be in any public position in power in this country. Having to orchestrate this absurd behavior is embarrassing.

4 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 1

Yes! It’s like some alien mating ritual dance

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Uhhhh...

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's a trap!!!

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

wasn't she a trial lawyer? A public defender at that too. She's probably used to authorities playing games with her

4 years ago | Likes 242 Dislikes 1

…or, trying to.

4 years ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 0

She was almost every relevant job possible while climbing the legal ladder.

4 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 0

She represented prisoners in Guantanamo. She knows things need to be perfect to be considered.

4 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

What I don't get is all the flak she gets for doing that. *Someone* had to represent them. They mad she took it seriously?

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Yeah, they don't like her because she defended "terrorists". If these assholes had their way, there'd be no due process or justice or them.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, they all masturbate to the idea of Guantanimo used for Dems. It's all bullshit.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

It's theater, public defender's do not pick their clients and they know that. The whole thing is fishing for soundbites for their reelection

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Republicans trip over themselves by asking asinine questions. Grill all you want Jackson will be confirmed.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Wit as dry as Ben's wife's pussy.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

What the fuck are you on about Ben?? You couldn't get nominated to the Supreme Court, you couldn't even get a reservation for a tennis court

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

She asked KBJ is she agreed with Justice RBJ’s statement “that there are physical differences between men and women that are enduring.” 1/

4 years ago | Likes 146 Dislikes 2

Without context, the question is asinine. Also KBJ is the most qualified nominee in decades, the right is flailing.

4 years ago | Likes 186 Dislikes 5

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Mar 24, 2022 4:35 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Mar 24, 2022 4:35 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Mar 24, 2022 4:35 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

You feel better now sweetie, now that you got that little tantrum off your chest?

4 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 2

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Blackburn was getting ready to head into a transphobic rant with her question.

4 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 2

But what about important questions. Like does the like beer? And why does she spoil the white race purity with her interracial marriage? /s

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The right is hardly "flailing". Their brand of disingenuous chaos has consistently been beating Dems for decades. They are winning.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Exactly - this is their game. When stymied by theatre, the line becomes "can't answer and [insert supposition here]". When answered it

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Becomes "the leftists are trying to [oppress, steal, confuse] this away from you".

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Literally more qualified than any one of the current sitting members.

4 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Mar 24, 2022 4:35 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Mar 24, 2022 4:35 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

So basically everyone on there except for her lmao. She didn’t have a status and half those people didn’t have “trajectory” or skipped a lot

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Literally might be the most qualified of all time, no lie. I know that sounds “like a lot” but her being a PD, working her way up

4 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

Going to a public school THEN ivy. Nobody is accusing her of anything immoral, etc. has a great track record. She’s awesome

4 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 1

RBG?

4 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 2

Revolutionary But Gangsta

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Robert Brownie Guinor

4 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

Robbins, Baskins G.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Red Blue Green

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Ruth bader ginsburg

4 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 3

Yeah, but they were clarifying since the above post said RBJ

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Ah ha! And I totally didn't notice, thank you XD

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's confusing because it's pronounced jinsberg, like gif.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Don't put that evil out into the world

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Right but they said RBJ

4 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Holy shit I didnt catch that thank you XD

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The J is silent. >.>

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The Legal definition of what a woman is can only be explained by and expert in that field, like a doctor

4 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 5

It would be more accurate to say that she chose not to, and gave the appropriate excuse rather than going "because I know why you're asking"

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

No the LEGAL definition can be defined by a lawyer, judge, politician. The MEDICAL definition by a doctor, research scientist, etc.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 8

Actually, the legal definition is usually made by politicians. The judicial branch reviews laws against Constitution and precedence to -

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

determine if the law can stand. Politicians created the Voting Rights Act, for example, and Griswold decision eliminated anti-gay laws.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Eh, I feel like any lawyer would have to cite a doctor, or else precedent, or it would just be testifying.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I feel like everyone here is on the cusp of understanding why it is INSANE that lawmakers are creating medical rules for anyone

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I fell off that cusp long ago.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So if a lawyer defines it as someone with a penis, that's good enough for a court? I don't think you are saying what you want to say.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

If a politician defines a man as someone with a penis, and makes it a law, the law stands until someone files a lawsuit and brings it to -

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

a judge. At that point it knocks around the courts until someone gives up or it reaches the Supreme Court, which ideally bases decisions on-

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

the Constitution and legal precedence. Clearly the ideological leanings of the judges leaks into these decisions.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What’s the question? I don’t get it.

4 years ago | Likes 203 Dislikes 1

They were trying to get her to say something they could use against trans people.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

“Did you ever boof?”

4 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 4

I'm on that boof-pack.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The question was "can you define what a woman is?".

4 years ago | Likes 237 Dislikes 0

Biologically or the social construct?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or medical.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Republicans were honestly asking. They're not sure.

4 years ago | Likes 83 Dislikes 0

they cant define "it" but they sure as fuck wana tell "it" to birth and to "enjoy the rape as its gona happen anyway".

4 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

"Well it sure isn't a triflin-ass bitch..."

4 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

I guess Ben thinks a child's understanding of the world is good enough for him

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Same woman who asked the question went on TV to answer her own question and used the word "woman" in her definition. Brilliant!

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I think it’s kinda funny that the dictionary definitions of woman(adult female) and female(pertaining to a woman or girl) are cyclic so 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Even if she answered the question it doesn’t matter to “the point” they we’re trying to make 2/2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"what is anything really? What does it mean to be human?"

4 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 1

You think that’s air you’re breathing?

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

or dancer?

4 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

Are signs vital?

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Are my hands cold?

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

ArE yOU ReFuSiNg tO aNsWeR?

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

What was her answer?

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

She didn't answer, but the appropriate response would've been "Shut the fuck up, nerd."

4 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

She didn't answer because it lacked context. It was a "gotcha" question. Pure theater...

4 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 0

Effectively 'this is a hearing about my qualifications as a judge, not a biologist'.

4 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

What is this, a philosophy class?!?! What are our politicians even doing.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Trying to catch her in some Trans business, my guess.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Polititions are polititioning. They think they’re asking the important questions. They’re really seeking revenge because dems made Brett cry

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

ahh, if Ben Shapiro answered then it would be something like "well....they are dry"

4 years ago | Likes 288 Dislikes 3

To be fair, in his experience this is always the case.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"So dry. Never not dry. There's never been anything drier! You must understand I'm an intellectual who has studied women. Conclusion: Dry."

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Diogenes pointing at a Popeye’s biscuit “Behold! A woman”

4 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

“dry and unsatisfied”

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And no matter what Ben answered, it'd be wrong.

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

I mean "women are dry" would be the correct answer for any women in close proximity to Ben Shapiro.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

"What do you mean? African or European Swallow?"

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Laden or unladen?

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm so dumb. I took that to mean pregnant or not pregnant... Completely whiffed it.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0