Extinguish

May 31, 2026 9:41 PM

DOcelot1

Views

21474

Likes

717

Dislikes

6

The only thing more satisfying would be not having a fire to put out

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Missed a spot! Oh, nevermind. You went back and got it.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don’t miss a spot!

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All that pee pee practice finally pays for.

3 months ago | Likes 153 Dislikes 0

This kills the fire.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This kills the fire

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Dalek's mantra /S

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gotta be one of the most satisfying jobs.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

where's the tractor and plow?

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Could this have been on purpose? I know some farmers do controlled burns

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If it burns when you do this...go see a doctor.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've done this in the past. The smell is intense and its supe scary at night.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I've also worked hard to contain a grass blaze, and also for me the smell immediately came to mind.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Prescribed Burn?

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When I worked for a state park we had a bunch of Prarie grass they'd do control burns on. They used a couple of polaris ranger 6x6s with fire units in the bed. A guy would sit in the middle, throttle, brake and steer with his left, and hose with his right. They'd put around and put out embers after the burn.

Not high capacity but they're fast, nimble and can tackle any terrain in the park

3 months ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Not to be THAT GUY, but you really want to be fighting a fire from the black, and that is WAY more water flowing than needed.

That said, good luck lads

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

v

3 months ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 2

This kills the fire.

3 months ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

i never understood the point of a brush truck, but i do now...

3 months ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 0

Contained NOT EXTINGUISHED

3 months ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

I think they're talking about the specific bits of fire that are definitely extinguished, not the entire fire as a problem

3 months ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Did he say “hit it from the back so I can get into the seat a little better?”

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He did and that 100% proves these guys don’t know what they are doing. You always stay in the black when fighting a brush fire. The truck should have been there from the beginning.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Black", so the water spray goes beyond the burned area when sprayed from a better angle, and protects the unburned fuel (the actual at-risk area) instead of wasting the overspray on already torched ground or having to make a second pass to cover both the active flame wall and the nearby buffer line.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Also, if it's a clean/complete burn like this (leaving negligible fuel on the "spent" area), driving on the burnt side protects the vehicle and its occupants from the less predictable threat of a moving fire, so it can't overtake the brush truck and damage it from the underside or threaten the firefighters. Maybe a judgement call if the winds are changing rapidly, but driving on the burnt ground is a reasonable default.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That’s so selfish using all that water— think of the data centers.

3 months ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

That water could've sustained a village with AI slop for an entire week. #SAD

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Damn fine work fellas

3 months ago | Likes 186 Dislikes 2

Actually this video is reversed. He’s driving around spraying an accelerant

3 months ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Reminds me of those CoD convoi missions.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Needs more powercone.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Absolutely not fine work by these fellas. You always fight this kind of fire from the burnt side. That’s basic firefighting when it comes to brush fires.

3 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Bullshit. You do whichever side gets you the best bite at the base of the flames. Short grass, low wind.. ideal for either side attack. Me personally, id be walking this but it depends on how many miles of line is hot. Low flow (13 GPM) .. high pressure 100+ PSI, 0.5 to 1% foam, stay at driver's side window so he knows to slow down. GRAT JOB going back for the spot fire. SOMEONE has suffered a rekindle that lost hours of work before.. and it SHOWS.

3 months ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

Yeah what do I know. I am have just been a professional firefighter for 35 years now.

Hey do yourself a favor before you get yourself or someone else killed go take some wild land firefighter training. Because I have to do it EVERY spring and everything you just mentioned is wrong.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Since I've never put out large grass fires, I'm guessing if the wind is blowing to the dry grass vs wind blowing to the burnt grass makes a big difference on what side your on. I also guess whatever side is easier to get to the base of the flames.

3 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Lots of variables but biggest is ego. When the county "super firemen" show upo in their engine and pull 600 ft of 3 IN hose wearing full bunker gear and air packs... SMH.. you just.. damn them fokkin idgits. Meanwhile their 3000 gal tender is stuck 1/4 mile into the field because they drove it over a thorn ash stump and blew 3 tires. AND their brush truck is headed back to town for water after extinguishing NOTHING at 125GPM and 35 mph in cow pasture. "Praise the professional not the profession

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

3 months ago | Likes 119 Dislikes 0

Cuttin' it close!

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's progressing damn fast

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Farmers around here used to do this on purpose when I was a kid.
It was banned because it's damaging to wildlife.

3 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

I'm sure the wildlife prefers burning to death instead.

3 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

In case this wasn't a joke and you misunderstood the meaning, they are likely talking about controlled burns being banned.

Intentionally burning certain areas to assist with clearing of older growth for new growth, managing soil nutrients, burning dead material while it is manageable to avoid fuel buildup and uncontrollable fires, etc.

3 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Precisely.
Burning the harvested monocultures annually in late August as a routine operation doesn't help wildlife at all,
Removing leaf litter by controlled burning in ecosystems that are used to or even adapted to fire exposure is a different matter.

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0