do it now!

Aug 29, 2022 9:06 PM

LilithPazuzu

Views

178617

Likes

4470

Dislikes

144

Taxing churches would be the largest tax on the poor in American history. Most churches are under 100 people with meager budgets.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure feeding the hungry wouldn't take 71bil a year

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So punish the smaller local churches that are actually involved in local issues, to spite the large ones? By doing so, only the large...

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

...ones will be able to afford to actually pay taxes and exist, leaving you with nothing but the televangelists and larger churches anyway.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I hear you, but can we start actually taxing corporations first? I feel like churches is peanuts here, they're not the worse

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I volunterred 5 hrs/ day at my county food bank warehouse. The churches pick up truckloads of free food. That's what they feed the poor.

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

Just to be clear though, tax write offs are also bullshit

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 5

Especially since us poor folk can't really do it anymore.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are legitimate write offs. They just need to close all the loop holes which makes it so abused.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

tax write-offs have multiple good purposes and are also typically poorly understood. There's a very real chance you are angry about

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

something that isn't even real - no offense.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Billionaires first.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Churches are 501c3 organizations, non-profits. They work on donations that are already taxed. They have no profit to tax.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

In mean yeah. The small church in NY that is swimming in potentially debt struggling no. Joel olsteen? Devil Jesus man? No longer tax vn>

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Preacher? Yes, please, tax the hell out of them. They are a political entity at that point.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Satanic Temple pays their taxes, and thinks other churches should as well.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Churches do not have shareholders or owners, so by definition there are no profits to tax

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And taxing churches without teaching all nonprofits would violate the first amendment

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*taxing

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The grocery store I work at donated almost half a million in food last year. It's a write off. Also we don't tell people how to live.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the FREE exercise thereof"

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Uh no they dont. Had a friend leave the church when they found out theyd spent over 100k on a giant eyesore of a cross. It's 3 stories tall

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

We could also use that 71B to you know... feed the poor.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Had a model church years ago with an old preacher. Would house homeless and help them get back on their feet. Changed after he left

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thing is, once you start treating Churches like any other nonprofit... you can't tax them anyway. There's no special exemption for churches.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

look at the lifestyles of some off these preachers, and try to say "nonprofit" with a straight face.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yep, but that's a case of tax fraud enforcement, not an issue with the tax code.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

this is good but then you’ll have churches able to preach who to vote for at the pulpit. The reason they can’t now is tax exemption

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Keep in mind, if they pay taxes they'll start getting more involved in government.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The taxes could also just be used to house and feed the poor anyway, seems like a no brainer for a church trying to help the community.

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 11

Considering how picky they can be about whom they are willing to help.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Well they don't want to help, yknow, *those* people.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is that what you think your taxes go to?!?!

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Thats less than half a jeff bezos

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You can still report the churches that tell you how to vote to the IRS and get a percentage of the reward, btw.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why tax the nonprofits? Tax the oil companies and make WAY more.

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

Or, do both. Because church's have clearly not been upholding their end of the separation of church and state bargain.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Then you investigate that church and revoke its NPO status. There’s a process in place already.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Okay let me dumb this down. Joel olsteins prosperity gospel bullshit isn't even found to be in the wrong. And if *tried* investigating a 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Single church, even one as reviled as Joel's, it would be the same level of croc tear outrage as dropping church's exemption. If you want2/3

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My idea, make them actually list out EXACTLY what they do to provide charity services and be subject to scrutiny. I've yet to see a 3/4

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Going after churches just seems dumb. They are non-profits, there's much better targets - giant corporations and military budgets.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Then the non-profit part needs to be enforced. Put any pastor earning over 6 figures in jail for tax evasion.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That's fair, yeah. I think churches should remain non-profits... AND we can eat the rich who earn stupid money.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Pastors pay Income tax

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yet again, it doesn't work like that. Churches are 501(c) charities. The money was taxed before being donated.

4 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 10

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Recovering Catholic: How do they report the collection plate cash/checks (under $10k for tax reporting) every Sunday to Uncle Sam 1st?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Pretty sure your donations to a church can be written off. The Church isn't paying taxes on it. You aren't paying (income) taxes on it.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Personal donations to churches are usually tax deductible I think, so no, it's not taxed first.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Huh? So is nearly all the money I spend on goods and services. Do you think because $100 was taxed once it can't be taxed again?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Money is taxed before its tipped waitresses too but still gets taxed as income.

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

Correct. And church employees payroll is taxed as well.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

What about property taxes? Or capital gains on investments? Churches don't pay either. Also, businesses in support of a church not taxed.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They claim to be charities or nonprofits but spend as little as 0.7% of their revenue (example LDS) on charitable causes. The rest is profit

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

That's not what "for profit" means in this context. A church doesn't have shareholders.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

You don't need to be a publicly traded company in order to be a for-profit business. A hot dog stand is for-profit.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And every worker at a church pays tax just like the hot dog seller.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

So does any employee who works for any kind of business. Doesn't absolve the business owner or corporation from paying taxes as well.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You might as well point out that corporate end-customer sales revenue was already taxed multiple times. Payroll, income & sales tax, yet ...

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

there are still corporate income taxes. CEO and shareholder incomes are taxed too. The important question is if US churches operate like ...

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

actual nonprofit organizations or like businesses with sizeable profit margins. The numbers suggest the latter.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Aug 30, 2022 1:47 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

The same would apply to the Susan B. Komen foundation and numerous other huge charities. Rules are rules.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Program Expense Ratio. 77.4% ; Administrative Expenses. 9.9% ; Fundraising Expenses. 12.5%. Meaning 77.4% of revenue are spent toward the...

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

charitable cause. Takes 2 seconds to google. Again, a church like the LDS spends 0.7% on charity and pockets 99.3% as operating expenses.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

PS: Don't downvote facts because you hate admitting that churches are for-profit. I know you guys have trouble with reality, but come on.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Source for the low charity expenses of US churches: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzZBZGq02g8ZaXpldnhGMnRsQk0/view

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How dare you try to disrupt the echo chamber!

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 4

Churches don't deserve tax exempt status. Frankly they do more harm than good.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 14

The vast majority do plenty of good, sorry if you've had bad experiences

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And you base that on?

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

What are you basing the claim that they do good on?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Generally it’s the person that’s making a negative statement about a LARGE group of people is the one expected to back up their bigotry.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But just to show you what backing up an opinion looks like…

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Are you going to tax litterally EVERY other tax-exempt org as well? Charity? Battered women shelters? "Oh but Wraith, THEY provide..."

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

Logic and big picture thinking! Not jumping on the band wagon! You must be new here :). Joking aside, well put and thought out +1 to all

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

I don't think people realize how much charity churches do. They project that Joel ass hat as every church. Doctrine aside, they can be good

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

I think the general idea isn't to target churches, but rather to revoke their automatic tax-exempt status and instead require them to have

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the same standards as other tax-exempt orgs to retain tax-exempt status.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

no no no, that's not why they get tax breaks. There is a very specific set of criteria under which you do not need to be taxed. Most...

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

charities fall under this criteria. Several outreach programs fall under this criteria. And most churches fall under this criteria....

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

and no, "house of God" is not part of it. It's a specific set of rules about how your money comes in and what it's used on. If you want...

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

This is explicitly not true. 501(c)(3) tax code defines "charitable" as including "religious organizations". See following link

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

to tax churches, the only way you can do that is to alter this criteria. And I 100% promise you that the moment you do, thousands of...

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

other programs and organizations, who are ONLY tax-exempt because of the exact same rules that churches you, will suddenly find...

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Aug 30, 2022 1:09 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Cool story. Now tell me how it changes a single word I just said.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

They don't, but they do lobby things you support, so obviously that is different. /s

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

church and state should remain separate. note this doesn't only mean "no taxes," it means "no politics."

4 years ago | Likes 1040 Dislikes 16

Except if a church paid taxes and had no say in how it was spent, does seem like a major subjugation of church instead of separation.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It is impossible to remove religion from politics because both of them are about what people believe people should and shouldn't do.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Correct, which is why churches should pay taxes like any other corporate style entity that lobbies and bribes gov officials.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Bingo

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You are right. I would take it one step higher, and say that religion is the cause that sets humanity back.

4 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 6

And by that I mean. Religion is great, but don't let it rule your life. Come on, its 2022 not 1600!

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

USA was founded at 1776. take that in.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

"Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's..."

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

too late for that

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately this is no longer happening hence the taxation

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Too late for the latter. Evangelicals have been openly pushing their christofascism for decades.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I agree, but I believe a church should immediately disqualify when they cross that boundary. I hate religion, but I fought for that freedom

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But I WHOLLY believe they give it up, without a chance to get it back, when they cross that line.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Could not agree more. Feel free to pay taxes and then have your voice be heard. Otherwise, STFU.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Politicians who talk religion, 3strikes out of office. Churches who preach politics 3 strikes, revoked tax exempt status.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

A church is a business. Tax them.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

like.. the US constitution says? like 'democracy' is defined by separation of powers and religion is not one of them?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In Finland they have a state church and people claim it means the gov. regulates it more.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cool but no one is stopping it from happening anyway so may as fucking well tax them.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If they lobby or have political goals, tax em. Otherwise, don't, because taxes can be used to oppresss as well. But if they wanna mettle...

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think that ship may have sailed.

4 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Said Noahs tax agent...

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think if we sink a few of these sailed ships, the others may see the advantages of maintain the previous two harbors agreement.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

How does the taxation without representation work with that? Dont they get a voice then (same as now but taxed?)

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Individuals right to vote is the representation. The corporate entity is just a classification for a type of organization

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

But arent corporations deemed as people now? I'm all for it, i just want it without the loopholes

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Every member of the congregation can vote for their representative. But the church itself cannot lobby. Fair answer to a fair Question

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Change the "tax" to "fine for illegal solicitation" would be a welcome alternative

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

You can remain separate and still pay taxes.

4 years ago | Likes 107 Dislikes 3

Yeah, i'm as much a part of the state as a church is, I still pay taxes

4 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 2

Would this also apply to all other 503c organizations?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes. And they can deduct whatever expenses. Like the rest of us. Well except w2 employees Trump ended that.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

There's no reason a church couldn't file as a 501c3, with all the limits go with that, them getting the status by default is dumb

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yeah I am 100% okay with churches ACHIEVING a tax exempt status if they qualify like anyone else would have to.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Otherwise I should codify my philosophies into a religion and demand that I see a homestead as my "church" and therefore no property tax!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

But many churches are already classified as 501c3. I think the Catholic Church in the United States is (by way of the United States (1)

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Conference of Catholic Bishops).

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

TBH I'd be mostly ok with churches not paying taxes if they a) stayed out of politics and b) weren't for profit.

4 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 3

They’re not for profit. Income isn’t profit. They don’t have shareholders or an owner.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Does their income exceed their expenses? Then they are making a profit. You don't have to have shareholders or an owner to turn a profit

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Here's the owner talking about the board of directors wages:

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Prosperity doctrine might as well be for profit. Its the same shit as late night fortune teller ads.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Prosperity gospel is at best heresy and worst treason since the US declared “war on poverty”. That Joel guy should be tarred and feathered.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'll settle for publicly available documentation that shows monthly donations to the church and what the money is used for

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

NPO’s already have to do similar stuff. The details vary by state.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most churches actually do this already, even printing weekly donations in bulletins and having open funding meetings.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Every church I've been part of does this. I bet you could go to your neighborhood church and ask, they'd probably give it to you.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Lets be realistic that people who staunchly (say that they) believe in gods and angels and magic should not be in charge of decision making.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

should be a lot more common for churches that preach politics to be disbanded + prosecuted : )

4 years ago | Likes 244 Dislikes 8

Yes. Too many churches are telling people how to vote.

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

If you know of one, report it. They could lose tax exempt status.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Well that's straying rather far into the "law controlling people's beliefs" territory, but churches should definitely be taxed.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 13

The only one trying to control people are the churches telling people to vote Republican, buy guns and support laws that hurt people.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well the deal was the church doesn't get involved in politics, they recieve tax exemption. However, church's have clearly not kept their end

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

no, it's not.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Churches are teling people how to vote and indirectly forcing their views on nonmembers. When they start doing that they should lose al

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Protections and be deemed a harmful cult instead.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

In short-if your “beliefs”require you to force others into following the restrictions of your beliefs your beliefs deserve to be told no.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I don't think any organization that benefits from political work should be 501c3 status. That should prevent companies donating to them

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

not disbanded, just taxed retroactively

4 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 3

Taxed retroactively and disbanded...because of tax fraud.

4 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 4

The government can't disband a church goddammit. That's basically the same as banning Muslims. You can't disband ideology.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Noone is saying to ban religion. It's that congregation that lost tax status that needs to be disbanded. Not the same thing.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v

4 years ago | Likes 765 Dislikes 5

As long as people don't think this guy represents the average church goer. Definitely the false prophet they warn about

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I hate this man....and I do mean the word hate

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

My mom listens to this jackass. She used to play him on the radio when I watched TV, just loud enough to hope I wouldn't notice. Weirdo.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Low Rent Cotton Hill.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Covoid Mary

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Dude is 100% a demon in a cheap human suit.

4 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

This guy is 100% a paedophile

4 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

He just blew the entire audience.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

He looks like a TES IV Oblivion NPC. The kind you'd find after sundown selling you poison and weapons

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Imgur community is generally wishy-washy, but seeing this comment sitting at 666 points does show some grit being there.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And back to wishy-washy

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Never saw a more serious cosplayer. This dude is really convinced he has powers

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That sack of shit really said "Don't you stop your tithing!" when the pandemic hit

4 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

He was afraid he couldn't buy another private jet. He doesn't like to sit with us poor peasants.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Who is giving this man money? He's fucking terrifying. I've never seen someone less godly than this man.

4 years ago | Likes 96 Dislikes 0

Already forgot about Papa Emeritus?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Probably old people in the south

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

v

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I guess it's people that were raised by constantly being abused and beaten by their parents and then told that this is love and parental >

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

care needed to make them good humans. They see this vile ghastly grimace and think "Yeah, I know that! This guy loves me and cares for me."

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The simple folk. The common clay of the land. You know, morons.

4 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

Where might one view this movie?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It’s on Hulu

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Tell me this dude doesn’t look like the devil himself

4 years ago | Likes 263 Dislikes 1

Reading the bible, technically this is the kind of man their god would want

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've always thought of him as a demon in a skin suit

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Demon in a skinsuit.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Like a puppet of Vince McMahon.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Or Peter Greene when he put Loki's mask on.

4 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

It's the beady little fucking eyes

4 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

And the actualdemon face with human skin stretched over it, but yeah.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Combined with that weirdly big and round head

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

A devil, at least. No way this fucker rules the place.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Like some frog demon

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

yo don't pin that shit on lucifer, dude was a literal angel.

4 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 0

And the only people he killed was from a bet with god to test a man's faith.

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Arguably he doomed all of humanity to mortality but that gets into some real lawyery Bible semantics

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oddly enough, that wasn't specifically Satan so much as an unnamed son of God, i.e an angel.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

This has always bugged me, They can say it would generate $71B, but much of that would evaporate because of the last line.

4 years ago | Likes 101 Dislikes 15

Last time I dug around for numbers, charity was around 10% of the average church's budget

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

If that’s your experience with your church I think that’s great but it definitely isn’t the norm.

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

What church do you think I go to? There are plenty of deductions for non-profits, I think all operating expenses are deductible.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

No one pays tax on operating expenses. Only profits.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

So you agree with me?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Only profits are taxed. If they were spending all their money on helping the poor, they wouldn't have to worry about tax.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

That's a risk I'm willing to take because I bet that's not true.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Anything would be a benefit, but what would really make it worth it is then need to file tax documents and the possibility of being audited.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I have doubts that most churches could document what they claim to do for the poor. I suspect actual revenue would exceed that estimate

4 years ago | Likes 88 Dislikes 10

Especially since the majority of "feeding the poor" comes from donated food that they never had to pay for.

4 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 3

Absolutely, but that's not the only tax deductible thing they have, I think operating costs, salary, etc.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

For real. The insurance on our church is astronomical. We're spending on renovations to bring cost down. Eventual savings and more safety.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The catholic church I went to as a kid was definitely spending more money on itself than it was helping anyone else.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Yeah, we know. They're all like that

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Make their financials transparent like public companies

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That would be fantastic.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Then it holds them accountable to those alleged donations. It’s a win-win.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

yeah it is.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Property tax dgaf about your charitable deductions.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

At the moment that $71B is NOT going to poor people, so...

4 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 7

If even HALF of that went to poor people it'd be more than worth the tax write off & would do more for the community than taxes anyway

4 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

At the moment it's just untaxed money lining the pockets of rich liars

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

I'm not saying we shouldn't do it, we absolutely should. But we should also temper expectations. I'd expect closer to $1B than $71B.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

Boy do I have some news for you about how many churches there are and how much money they pull in. $71B is not even remotely unbelievable.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Your original comment implies it's the act of writing off charitable donations that would reduce the benefits of finally taxing them

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You're just wrong. The vast majority of churches are not run by the rich and do good things for their community. The few you see on TV

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

are the bad ones. About 50% of church spending is on workers/clergy, all who pay taxes. The other 50% go to the building and missions.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Or more importantly people are not going to donate money to a church in the first place if the money is going to be taxed

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Not as much as you think. The LDS, for example, pockets 99.3% of its revenue. A mere 0.7% go to charity. The average of all churches in ...

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

the US is 29%, and that's only because missionary work / proselytizing counts as charitable activity. For comparison, a real charity like...

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Red Cross spends over 91% of revenue on a charitable cause. Source: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzZBZGq02g8ZaXpldnhGMnRsQk0/view

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I'd heard more like 12-14%, but most is tax deductible but non-charity things, assuming the church operation itself isn't charity.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I agree, but you can't tax donations. That money has already been taxed. You can tax whatever money the church earns itself.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

I know some churches have separate for profit arms where they pay taxes on their other ventures. That's the way they all should.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's like saying you can't charge sales tax in a store because the customer already paid taxes on their income. That's just stupid.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

No, it's entirely different. One is a donation. The other is exchanging money for good or services. Bad analogy.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Church is essentially a "pay what you want" membership. It is a service, why else would ppl go to church if they didn't get anything back?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

If a person donates money, they're using money from their income to do that. They have already paid income tax on that money. So to then tax

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Aren't donations to churches tax deductible?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm a train driver, not an accountant. So I am not an expert in this stuff in any way. As far as I know, donations to charities are tax

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

deductible. Churches are considered charities. I'm guessing that because the money is to be put directly back into the community, and is not

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't think you understand how churches are classified. Not the same as a 501c. They do not have to report finances, and most don't. /1

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Nope. Not at all. Plus I'm Australian. So our tax system is different. I just trying to apply a broad concept that's relatable worldwide.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the church on the donation they receive, you are now changing that donation to income. So if you then tax that money, you are charging

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

income tax twice on that money. And you can't do that. This is why a non-profit that runs on donations doesn't pay tax. Because the money

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

they receive has already been taxed. So obviously, there needs to be strict rules as to how a non-profit uses their money. If they break

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1