TheFolkman
61532
1106
57
Feb 7, 2023 7:01 PM
TheFolkman
61532
1106
57
QQTrain
#32 Wait John Locke's stocks? Wasn't there a documentary about him? Locke Stock and 2 smoking barrels?
caustickiwii
#3 Bad argument, if your goal is to escape suffering, not being able to appreciate that you succeeded does not render it a failure.
SometimesISayHistoryStuff
#2 Philosopher dude, 350 BC: So, me and the boys got drunk and started talking...
bluejolt
Despite the theme, #12 had me confused for a bit as a STEM background, thinking Léon Foucault (like the pendulum) not Michel Foucault.
justaguyinthebackrow
#69 Boo! Boo this man!
ilovebigmutts
#17 throwing the switch after the first set of wheels to force the second wheels to the next track, car derails. I've actually seen this.
Goldenteckel
FuzzyMedic
4
RealScienceMan
#11 He also hated Nazism, but his sister who inherited his estate after his death, she was all up in that shit.
Tredecim
Yes, his sister and her husband. They tried to create an Aryan colony in Paraguay called "Nueva Germania". It failed, and he killed himself.
Goldenteckel
3Hills
This is my dog!
FuzzyMedic
#45 @CodyBurkett
aiuta219
This post speaks to me and has been thusly accoladed Gemful.
aiuta219
Also, I sincerely wish Jordan B. Peterson owned us libs so hard that, in his owning, ended. I'd be SO OWNED. It would be great.
demizu
well #3 just blew my mind. aint suicidal but very much tired of suffering... the meme rephrased it to "live and stop suffering".
blaghart
#13 It's because plato's ideal of love was gay bros who don't fuck. He was such a misogynist he called women "worse than the enemy"
pmmestuffandthings
#69
Jak8714
#12 Finally! Someone else who hates Foucault as much as I do! Man made my English Lit classes an absolute misery!
johnvilnis
#2 what people forget is that back then, they didn’t know shit and now we stand on their shoulders to understand more.
Iatesomecoffeecups
#34 thats quite a clean room tho
michaelfire
carrotsonfire
The only thing I know about philosophers from the ones I've met is that if they were any more up their own arse, they'd be a singularity.
michaelfire
Question all the things...achieve enlightenment
easytigger
#69 reading's for nerds
111111111111111111111111112
#4 whalefall/ titanfall
TheGarbageCollector
#69 relativism would say it’s all the same
idiotsonfire
When one side has people like Noam Chomsky and Robert Reich, and the other has Ben Shapiro and Matt Walsh, it isn't a debate.
idiotsonfire
They know people hate their ideas. Its why they argue in bad faith. Some "ideas" are not worthy of debate, online, or in person.
idiotsonfire
If someone were to debate them, it would do the entire audience a disservice, because that would mean they consider fascism worthy of debate