Canada’s Population

Jan 28, 2018 5:44 AM

Entartika

Views

114031

Likes

1329

Dislikes

44

(The State of California has a larger population than Canada, by 3 million.)

Oh Canada...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 3

So everyone's in Toronto and Montreal?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Whats the murder ratio?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Damn, i was looking for about 5 seconds straight cause i kept seeing blue as the see and wondering if it was weirdly reversed.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Slot of our land is difficult to build on because of premifrost and the shield

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is it just me, or is that a blue and white stylized cat head?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's because California knows how to party. (knows how to party)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's a very good reason for this. Its fuckin cold up here so we huddle along the border to stay warm and not lose our healthcare.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah but one moose can weigh as much as 4 fat Americans.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now why does Canada have merit based immigration?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To be fair the projection chosen could be a bit misleading, but cylindrical equal-area projections are kind of ugly.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

90% of their population is massing on the border in an obvious prelude to invasion

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

With that skewed-ass map

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Toronto is in the smaller section of both pictures. Makes sense.

8 years ago | Likes 180 Dislikes 0

So are Montreal and Ottowa.

8 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 3

Ottawa*

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

No theyre not

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Also Halifax is on the square aswell.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They must be for it to be 50%. Hard to tell on the image though.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That red line seems to cross the Island of Montreal. Montreal, in, Laval out in the north/south

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Idk it looks pretty low. Hard to tell because the image quality is shit

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Montreal is along the St Lawerence river, just above Vermont. Ottowa is actually farther south than Montreal.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Somehow I live in Ottawa and have made that drive multiple times, and didn't realise this.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Canada: the Australia of the northern hemisphere

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Psssh, Australia: the Canada of the south more like it. Mommy loved us more so we were let go first.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You could a dot on Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver as say that's 1/3 of Canadas population.

8 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Jan 29, 2018 1:51 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Calgary is at 1.4M, Edmonton at 1.3M, Vancouver is at 2.4M. GVA also doesn't include 3 other places Abbotsford, Chillwack and Mission...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If these three were included that is another 260k people, which brings it to to the sum of the other two cities.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For reference, the DMV regulations for GVA apply to all of those areas, and many who live in those regions work in Vancouver.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No. They're not.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Greater Vancouver is a much larger metropolitan area than either Calgary or Edmonton's metropolitan areas.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yes southern Ontario is where most live and our leader is an idiot she has a monopoly on pot and said she’ll loss money selling it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The fact that the land is colored blue and the water is colored white is fucking with me. We have conventions for a reason, you monster!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We have areas larger than Texas solely inhabited by rabbits.

8 years ago | Likes 157 Dislikes 1

Any grants available to settle those areas?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Texas almost has as many people as all of Canada.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

But what about the foxes and hunter birbs that eat the rabbits?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, it's a paradise for rabbits, something like the Teletubbies (the presence of Teletubbies in these areas is debated, however).

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Really fucken cold rabbits

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

It's like, jeez why aren't more of these Californians moving to the bloody frozen tundra? Because its frozen and empty? Yah huh!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Out of all the continents. North America is the fucking best place to live! It's not completely overrun with people yet...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But do you have Alaska

8 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 2

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I think we all need to take a breath here. No need to cut so deep.

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

Better- we have the Yukon.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Checkmate atheists.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

First line isn't right. There's 37 million people in Canada, only 13.6 million in Ontario. That line needs to be higher.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You might be right, but keep in mind that the line also encompasses Saint John and southern NS

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

~8-9 million of those are strictly around Toronto, Niagara and Windsor.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hey, hey you... Move to fucking Regina. Do that then tell me why. Or Winnipeg. Fuck, Nunavut! Goddamn!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Winnipeg is God’s country

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

White Horse during the winter is truly a symbol of man’s arrogance

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's just Whitehorse now. We were not worthy of two capital letters and a space.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I don't think that first one is accurate. It leaves out a lot of major cities.

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Doesn't have to include them, Southern Ontario is like 12 million or so people. Only need to add in a few others to make the difference.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Assuming that line goes north of Montreal and Ottawa it's very plausible.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I was wondering that - it might just hit Montreal. Otherwise that line needs to be a bit higher.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It does make the point that Canada might well be one of the few countries to benefit hugely from global warming.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yeah, no. Not so much.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A warmer North Pole will result in an unstable polar vortex which would mean much, much harsher winters for Canada and the United States.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

will or could ? I've not seen that particular suggestion before.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When you get a moment, please research global warming, extreme weather, polar vortex, etc.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Please don't be quite so patronising.I would call myself an environmental scientist (f="B.Sc">B.Sc, M.Sc), but my speciality is soils,not climatology

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sorry if I seemed patronizing. It was not my intent.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do you know global warming can cause colder weather than before also. So basically we will freeze to death

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I have no idea why, but everytime @op posts a viral image, I get a notification "A post from Antartika made Most Viral"

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean the check symbol, it will become a + when you stop following him

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because you probably accidentally pressed the "follow" button. Go in his profile and click on the cross by his username

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thanks a lot! I guessed it was that but could not find anything on the website, it seems to be only available on the mobile version...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cheers

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And of course I accidentally followed a "glorious" user who goes viral everyday.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a Canadian I find your lack of sauce disturbing. Probably drawn up by an east coaster anyways. They think they're the centre of the world

8 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 15

French Canadians?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

And they always win the 6/49...

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It's always in Ontario

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Considering several of the largest cities in Canada are simply near Toronto by a quick google would point that out

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Tallying up several cities in the Southern Ontario Region, it has at least 7 million people, or roughly 20% of the country on its own.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And Ontario on the whole has 13.6 million people as of four years ago, literally 1/3 of the countries population

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And people wonder why politicians pander to us a bit.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

toronto is not the east coast.

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

anything east of say, Banff, is the east coast

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

I refer to everything east of Manitoba as the east coast. All those provinces have a coast so it’s not totally wrong

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So does Manitoba. Why don't we draw the line at Saskatchewan? ;)

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nah Manitoba can come when the west leaves and starts our own Canada without Trudeau.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lol amazingly you only pissed off 1 Albertan.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We don't matter anyway.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

so edmonton is the east coast?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Quick maths puzzle: So what's the % of people living in the bottom right corner?

8 years ago | Likes 262 Dislikes 7

I did figure out that no matter how you arrange densities, for a population of any number opposite corners are the same pervantage of pop.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10% purely by going on the area of each "bar" and assuming pcd (perfect Canadian distribution)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

so: this totally does not account for cities 'n shit.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

0 Canada doesn't really exist

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

About 1 million. Halifax, st John, some Quebec and some of Ontario.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Syrup.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

7,500,000,000 people

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Insufficient data. It could be that the northeast and southwest quadrants have 50% each and the other two are empty.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10% of russians

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Min 12%. Montreal (1.7 million) and Toronto (2.8 million) seem to be counted in both of those maps

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Many

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

2500%!!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Answer: None. You covered the whole area with a grey box crushing millions of people and rendering the land inhospitable.

8 years ago | Likes 451 Dislikes 4

That ain't gonna clear up itself. Into the wastelands with you!

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Okay buddy

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

its easy we take 2 +2 because 2 half 2 pictures is 4 and then get rid of the corner -1 is 3 quick maths

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Less than 50%

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Error: not enough information

8 years ago | Likes 115 Dislikes 0

Insufficient data for a meaningful answer.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

03.50%

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Going solely on the information provided by this post and the current population of California minus 3m / 4 is 9.06m people.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

I'm sorry.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My gut tells me we don't have enough information.

8 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:28 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

hahahha fuck you. you got me :p

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Well it's been a while since I've been hit with that.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Why does that remind me to Tweek from South Park?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tree fiddy.

8 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 2

Yes

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Dozens

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

50% out of 50%, that's a 25%.... right?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 10

Could be any number between 0% and 50%, with 50% minus that in each of the other two quadrants.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

no

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Several

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

9.0725 million Canadians

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You aren't getting the answer from me......work it out yourself.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Under 50%

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

50% or less*

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

No, under 50% is correct, unless the two areas excluded by the crosssection has literally 0 population, which is virtually impossible.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

but not mathematically impossible, therefore 50% or less is correct.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It’s still necessary to take real life into account outside of the class room.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Trick question, some canadians dont identify as people, so its unsolveable.

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 6

An integer value.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Hell no, the percentage (which is what they were asking for) could be something like 20.1. Captain pedantic, away!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

100% you fricking idiots. it clearly say 50% on the right and 50% at the bottom. 50+50=100 q.e.d.

8 years ago | Likes 203 Dislikes 13

That QED is the cherry on top...

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That Q.E.D was a beautiful detail.

8 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 1

150% because as they are all together they're probably having sex and reproducing.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

To one significant figure at least, 0%

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Between 0% and 50%. There's not enough info to determine any more

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You've got the GTA there, plus Halifax and maybe a bit of Ottawa and Montreal. So I'd say about a third.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

25% as 50% of 50% is 25%

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 10

Maybe nobody actually lives in there, and all of Canada lives in the NE and SW quadrants.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

but it has to be 25% right? because its half and half so in all the quadrants are 25%.... right? whats the right answer if Im wrong?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Could be any number between 0 and 50%, technically. There's insufficient data for a meaningful answer.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

no

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

then whats the right answer??

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1. Unknown. Unless you start making assumptions about population density and such. So, as an exercises, let's assume a perfect distribution.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

any questions? :D

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

mate ... You are a legend!! Im just gonna upvote all of those ! tbh I didnt expect a helpful explanation from a person over the internet :D!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

6. extra info: it would've been 25% if the overlap covered half of both the right and bottom bar. Which it clearly doesn't.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5. that overlap has a surface of 6.3cm² that times our average density of 15.88 people/cm² = 100 people almost exact. so 10% Q.E.D.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5.5 avg density: (23.81 + 7.94)/2 = 15.88. and 15.88ppl/cm² * 6.3cm² = 100.044 people

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4. bottom bar: 23.81 people/cm². Now that right bottom corner overlaps so let's average both those densities out, bringing it to: 15.88/cm²

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4.5 50% of 1000 = 500. 500 live in the right bar, 500 in the bottom. so 500ppl/21cm² = 23.81ppl/cm² and 500ppl/63cm² = 7.94ppl/cm²

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3. right bar surface: 63cm², bottom bar: 21cm, and lets assume canada only has 1000 inhabitants. so density would be: right bar: 7.94/cm³

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2. I used a simple online ruler to determine the dimensions of both bars (these aren't accurate but the important part is the ratio anyway)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Eh, probably about 9 million of so. maybe up to 12. it's a blurry image.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

did you count all of them in the picture?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

At least four.

8 years ago | Likes 402 Dislikes 3

Minus one that's three

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Actually, given the information presented, it could be, though is highly unlikely to be, 0%. And no, too busy nitpicking to go to parties.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Montreal (1.7 million) and Toronto (2.8 million) seem to be counted in both of those maps. The SE quadrant contains population counted twice

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, you're not wrong...

8 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 2

Unless it's completely uninhabited

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Four what?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

People

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Four speed

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Populations.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

%

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

25%?

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 6

Not necessarily no. The four quadrants could be (clockwise from top left) 45%, 5%, 45% and 5%, still meeting the criteria. All we can (1/2)

8 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

45+5+45+5=100 I thought it said 45+5+5+5

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

say is that two opposing corners (eg the gray box and most-of-Canada) have equal % shares. (2/2)

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

And between 0 and 50% of Canada's population, but that was kinda obvious, wasn't it?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Damn! Yeah I was getting stuck because it felt like I was missing key information.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0