Customer relations

May 7, 2017 11:23 AM

error01

Views

119097

Likes

1767

Dislikes

65

obviously photographed before sending it

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thought the rolled up paper said Christina Aguilera. It doesn't.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You crazy Europeans and your trains that actually go places and get used and cost less than airlines.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that's what you get for using paper mail?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He'd have been better sticking it up his own arse first before sending it. You know, to check it fits.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Found the Greater Anglia Rail Services employee.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yeah Greater Anglia are not brilliant with their customer services.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Just get the coach to London guys. It's longer but has free WiFi so all the imgur you could wish for. #norwich_problems

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If I am denied service or products that I have paid for, I want my money back. I get busy enough that not contacting for a month or 3 is

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

normal. I still want my money back

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Mar 20, 2021 5:44 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Replacement bus service anyone? Or train via Ely?!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh, you thought you paid for a first class train ticket all the way? Nah, last two hours you get a bus from Peterborough. -_- Greater Anglia

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

At least it's quicker than going via Cambridge. That always takes forever

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Rules is rules.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 9

And rolls is rolls.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And tolls is tolls. And if you don't pay no tolls, then we can't eat no rolls.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If your train is cancelled... why the fuck do you even have to make a request for a refund? Shouldn't they refund it automatically?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You cancelled your obligation, there's no time limit on your debt to me. Fuckwad!

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

What are you going to snort with that paperroll?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

28 days later

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As I read this all I think is... next time request within the 28 days...

9 years ago | Likes 502 Dislikes 18

I have done it many times. usually do it same day

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

I wonder how often this happens, that the customer should have known the deadline for requesting a refund for a cancelled train?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

all I think is why don't they automatically refund for a cancelled service, it shouldn't be the customer's responsibility

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Given they stated when the letter was dated it sounds like either the company waited too long to reply or the post took too long to deliver.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The wording gave me the impression that he had; he points out it is THEIR letter dated so late, suggesting he's miffed that they're saying1/

9 years ago | Likes 152 Dislikes 6

he applied late when they simply took months to respond. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 116 Dislikes 3

I think they sent the letter with the 28 day notice in April, 4 months after the cancellation. That was my read on it.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I don't get that impression. It says he applied late versus they processed late. Mail is date stamped

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

If you pay money and they cancel you should get an (immediate) refund without having to ask. Their way is shady to begin with.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He requested it within the time limit. THEY replied after the time limit saying that the time limit was passed.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 4

Did he? What's your evidence for that?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

That is how I understood the letter.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There's no point in this letter at which he says anything about *who* caused the delay, only that the reply was dated April. It may be 1/

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

either that he asked for a refund late, or that they responded late. I expect that if they responded late he would have explicitly said 2/

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

No shit if my trip got cancelled I would be getting my refund that week. OP's laziness is not their problem.

9 years ago | Likes 93 Dislikes 13

As a person in customer service, thank you for your understanding♡

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

However, their 28 day deadline is entirely arbitrary, they could have just as easily made 60 or 90 days. It is his money, why any deadline?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This should be the top comment

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

But.... If the train is canceled, shouldn't it automatically refund him?

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 2

if refund is not pending or email a week after, would you not follow up on it? Unless you don't care about the money then it's a moot point

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nonono, then you'll have to give ALL the money back, we can't have that!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They only give a refund if you can't actually complete your journey in a reasonable time frame. (i.e. if there isn't another train on 1/

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the same line, soon that can do it), since the tickets are for a journey on a day, not for a journey at a specific time. Because of that 2/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

to get a refund, you need to show that you really couldn't get to where you were going on that day, which requires sending a letter 3/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

True, but what's the logic behind the 28 day policy?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Finances would be a bitch if tey didn't have a limit, plus records get trashed.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The same as the logic behind most 30 day return policies - if you don't have some kind of limitation on how long, then you have no 1/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

time at which you're confident that you've actually made that money and won't have to refund it. I don't see that you having to send a 2/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

letter within 4 weeks is an overly burdensome problem. 3/3

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

28 days inst unreasonable though. If you missed by a day, fair enough, a week, or a month more, maybe not

9 years ago | Likes 161 Dislikes 9

The acceptable time frame a refund can be given is completely arbitrary. Them giving a time frame is just an excuse to keep your money.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

They are a business they're primary objective isn't to keep the costumer happy but to make money. Ex. Comcast and Time Warner

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why was the refund not automatically provided?

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

Because that's expensive

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

The train companies won't give your money to charity if you don't claim it. They keep it for a service they've not provided. That's theft.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Why should there be a time limit on paying someone back for a service that was not even provided?

9 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 5

Accounting issues really...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Finally, a reasonable counterpoint. That would likely be the most difficult part of the process.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Hello? Yes, I'd like to get a refund for a train that got canceled 65 years ago."

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I understand that it sounds ridiculous but actually think about it for a moment. Why not?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

So you dont have to keep a track record for >100 years for every sold ticket?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I invite you to read through the comments on the other user who replied

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Because otherwise you need to keep all records indefinitely to be able to tell which trains were and weren't cancelled, and whether the 1/

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

A) They only need a record of cancelled trains or else it's redundant data

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

customer really could complete their journey on the day their ticket was for. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

C) If a customer rides a different train, they should need to purchase a different ticket (which would handle the refund issue immediately).

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Nope - in the UK tickets are for a journey on a day, not a train at a time. A ticket might span multiple trains making up multiple legs, 1/

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

That's fine, then it's just a problem of solving whether they could have made the journey given trains a, b, c, .. were operating. Not hard

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and might have many possible different trains at different times, going to different places that can be used to make the journey. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

B) Not indefinitely, humans have a lifespan.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

There might be an infant on the train, and there's evidence that humans can live 125 years. So, 125 years of records of every train and 1/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

My main point is that 28 days is ridiculous. 10 years wouldn't even be overly difficult to manage in terms of records. It's a cash grab.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

C) Why would you assume paper records? Let's assume electronic records. You could get the appropriate digital storage for a trivial cost.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

B) Infants do not buy tickets and so would not be eligible for a refund. Let's assume generously the youngest buying their own ticket is 10.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

every ticket. There's 20,000 trains per day in the UK, which stop at an average of 20 stations. There's 2.75 million journeys per day, 2/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A) 122 years* Let's assume 100 and if there's any 101+ year olds, we can deal with the special case (they're 0.0173% of the US pop.)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0