Does Russia REALLY want to take over Eastern Europe again? I mean they already had it and lost it not too long ago. I think the problem is strictly Putin. He obviously as security issues. What if an "Indifferent Ivan" comes to power?
Ok, but if America has invaded Russia, why are there no nukes flying? Also, wouldn't there be a bunch of other engagements in the air and sea? How can they think that Russians are stupid enough to believe this?
IF it were US forces directly fighting, there would be no Russians. This type of warfare is what the US excels at. And we have enough forces in the region to use shock and awe tactics. And it only gets worse if we bring friends. But we cant because as long as Putin has one working nuke and is willing to use it, he can continue to terrorize the planet.
I've been keeping up on the war through a channel called "The enforcer" they're annoying, think they're funny and worst of all, laugh about civilian deaths, and are very pro Israel. But the information is up to date and accurate. Does anyone have a better source that isn't two Alabama good ol boys who think they're funny? There's a supposedly Ukrainian guy who says he was a pilot, but he talks about Russia having the most advanced tech so it feels like he's a plant and he's rather pessimistic.
While the west is undoubtedly a reason Ukraine still exists, they are also one of the main reasons the war is still going. They have been drip feeding Ukraine the scraps from their armies and then telling them to perform miracles, then publicly doubting their chances of winning when they fail. If the EU, US and NATO gave Ukraine what it has been asking for, and stop putting restrictions on them, such as don’t bomb Russia, the death toll on both sides could be dramatically lower.
Why? Everything I said was a fact. Zelenskyy already said Russia knew exactly where Ukraines summer offensive would be before it even launched, which gave them lots of time to prepare. Germany then delayed the release of tanks and missiles, meaning the Ukrainians had to wait, by which time Russia had made an impenetrable wall of defence, which ultimately caused the summer offensive to fail. The west spends so much time worrying about hurting Putins feelings, while on the ground, Ukrainians die.
No, your last sentence wasn't fact, it was a hypothetical. *If* more weapons and no restrictions then... that's not a fact. It's not difficult to come up with other possible things after "then..."
Sure, America has been the boogyman only Putin can keep Russia strong enough to beat after a hard fight.
While Ukraine is a nothing state that has killed almost none of their people.
Which of those two would be more acceptable to have a "temporary incursion" they can't push out yet. One of the most powerful nations in the world or the state they said was pathetic.
They are allowed to struggle against the US as long as they eventually win. They can't loose ground to Ukraine.
Well it’s normal for Americans to meddle in other countries’ affairs and send troops to act like they own the place. So yeah, something like "don’t worry, it’s not Ukraine one-upping us, it’s just Americans being Americans" goes better than "oh shit our two-day operation is backfiring and now the 'losers' are invading us".
Russia thought of itself and was (by far too many people) considered to be the second-strongest military in the world prior to their invasion of Ukraine. It's of course preposterous (I consider the Fr*nch to have more powerful armed forces) and the same mistake is being made in regards to China right now, but the point is that even most Russians see the American military as more powerful, which is why it makes sense for Russian propaganda to claim that there can only be American forces in Kursk.
Russia does that thing where all enemies are simultaneously really overpowered & unfair brutes, but also completely incompetent and inferior in every way, for propaganda purposes.
Depends on what they're peddling.
It's the same logic that means all losses from enemy actions were actually "accidents" and all legitimate accidents were, instead, enemy sabotage.
I wish you wouldn't. There is a group of them asking for politics tags to bottle up the message. You never see them ask for tags in threads about Gaza. There's a reason.
Current Events is an appropriate tag. I tend to use Politics often when it isn't strictly necessary because lots of Imgurians don't want to be exposed to this content.
I hope people will learn from this - send more help, and sooner! Ukraine could've pushed out almost all the Russians out of mainland Ukraine by now, and with a destroyed bridge to Crimea, it would've brought Putin to the table.
I mean, I wish Ukraine had received more and faster help, but considering the Russians already had solid positions in Luhansk & Donetsk so I think you're being a tad optimistic here. But they could have fared much better for sure.
Comparing stuff to WW2 appeasement doesn’t really work in modern times. Russias threat to use Nuclear force has to be taken seriously even if we’d like to ignore it
Russia had to start threatening with nukes right from the start of the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Isn't that pretty telling that they knew they were pretty weak back then, and had to rely on their nuclear arsenal as a constant (!) threat to break the rules of a civilized war without anyone stepping in to stop the barbaric acts of the Russian Army? And where will it end - Ukraine? Moldavia? Baltic States? Finland? All the ex-Soviet states?
Letting Russia do whatever they want because of nuke threats IS appeasement. Are you happy with the idea of them being able to just roll into every country they border only to face no consequences for it just because they waggled their little radioactive micropenis?
Climate modelling has shown that it takes only couple of detonations in the megaton range to create a climate catastrophe (worse than global warming), and the world has few thousand of those. So yeah, we gotta play this game smart against that fuckhead.
Am I happy with it? No, but that’s the reality of Nuclear arms. You genuinely think the better alternative is unrestricted nuclear warfare just to say we didn’t appease anyone? It’s the reason the Cold War was fought as a series of proxy wars. The stakes are higher than your emotional desire to get immediate revenge on the Russian state. This war will likely lead to the dissolution of the Russian state as it exists now. But Nuclear annihilation is better you think?
Alright Russia can invade anywhere they want because if anyone is mean to them for doing that they'll nuke the world. Gotcha. By the way when you die please donate your body to science because it'll be fascinating to work out how someone can post comments online without a spine.
Maybe in Putin's mind. The last couple years have shown Russia to be fairly impotent. I doubt they could handle 1 EU country. Not even accounting for NATO.
And we are using Ukraine as shields. If the rest of the world really wanted to support Ukraine and ensure they win, and win fast, we'd be sending a hell of a lot more aid.
The three of them still use majority Russian gas. Austria legalized Russian spies as long as they don't spy on Austria. The Russian embassy in Austria has some really really big listening devices but they don't care if they're pointed towards the rest of the EU. Slovakia said they will block Ukraine EU help unless the EU eases up on sanctions.
Nato would crush them. Then only two options remain for them, and withdrawal/surrender isn't in Putin's playbook. Which is why there's reason to hope they wouldn't challenge nato.
If Ukraine falls it would be because NATO faltered in their unity to support it, in which case there is no guarantee that the alliance would act to protect its Russia-neighbouring members. Divide and conquer, one by one they will zerg rush everyone. Right now sending weapons, ammo and money while Ukrainians die on the battlefield is a far lower risk proposition than Canada or Spain sending their soldiers to die protecting Latvia.
Unless if an orange dumbass would become president again. After solving the war in 24 h hours by suggesting that Ukrain surrenders completely to Putin, he could very well remove USA from nato.
Doesn't really matter tbh. The EU may not have the defence budget of the US but our militaries are leaps and bounds ahead of Russia in terms of tech, training and sheer manufacturing capacity. Having Russia as a direct neighbour is still very, very bad and undesirable but not because they'd be absolutely fucktarded enough to invade.
Eh... I think it was accurate on day 1 of the invasion; not so accurate over 2 years later.
Russia has demonstrated it can't beat Ukraine let alone take on NATO; by the time Russia is In fighting shape again, even if they do eventually triumph in Ukraine which is still a big if, then Putin will be in his 90s.
Whilst there is a soft centre at the heart of Europe, mostly thanks to Germany, it has a very tough outer shell.
Poland has been howling like a horny dog on a leash who's just seen a 1/
Sexy looking leg go by ever since the invasion began, if finally let loose on Russia they would hump them into a particularly sticky R34 drawing.
Sweden is a tough nut to track also, as is France and Britain; Greece is nothing to be taken lightly and both Spain and Italy are rearming. Italy could easily handle what remains of the black sea fleet and the royal navy could handle the baltic "fleet".
None of that means we shouldn't help Ukraine though. 2
Also something I don't see talked about much is that even if they manage to conquer Ukraine they're going to be dealing with a massive widespread insurgency. In the early days of the war when it was looking like the worst-case scenario was a sure thing there were civilians mass-producing molotovs in preparation.
The Bundeswehr is woefully underfunded, undertrained and underequipped. It should arguably be at least one of the top 4 in Europe as Germany is a rich nation with a solid arms manufacturing industry; but political will has left it in a place where they don't view defence as a priority because they are a nation surrounded on all sides by allies legally bound to defend them and they know that NATO plans have always revolved around holding the Russians east of the Rhine.
Yeah but you know the Germans can switch that pretty fast (see the last 2 world wars) if it's necessary. I think it's pretty good of the politics to choose peace and social care above equipping the military. And in the last 2 years they changed that and spent much more money in the Bundeswehr.
Mxlespxles
GratuaCuun
#1
Rendova
Does Russia REALLY want to take over Eastern Europe again? I mean they already had it and lost it not too long ago. I think the problem is strictly Putin. He obviously as security issues. What if an "Indifferent Ivan" comes to power?
BuzzAldrinsPunch
Don't forget and don't forgive #nukesforukraine
daytimepajamas
Slava Ukraini.
samuelthastings5
#3 cut me like a knife
samuelthastings5
Slava ukraini
Kingdomonsterdeath
Ok, but if America has invaded Russia, why are there no nukes flying? Also, wouldn't there be a bunch of other engagements in the air and sea? How can they think that Russians are stupid enough to believe this?
XXXSpork
#1 pretty sure they’d know if the US armed forces were there
DSREX
IF it were US forces directly fighting, there would be no Russians. This type of warfare is what the US excels at. And we have enough forces in the region to use shock and awe tactics.
And it only gets worse if we bring friends.
But we cant because as long as Putin has one working nuke and is willing to use it, he can continue to terrorize the planet.
blaghart
Russia: I will invade a sovereign nation and be welcomed as a liberator

Ukraine:
IAmAMammal
#5 It's important to recycle.
CallMeMcGyver
I feel that’s a good general philosophy… hobby even.
pdarkfred
Reuse! (5 R's are better than 3, anti-consumerism is hot, recycle is the last resort: Refuse, Reduce, Reuse, Repurpose, Recycle)
AnythingMuchShorter
Bottles into bombs, and fascists into fertilizer, for sunflowers for example.
enderite
Why do all his propagandists look like a toddler caught mid-shitting themselves.
Mxlespxles
iquestionthepinappleeveryday
Highlighting all of the text defeats the purpose of highlighting, just saying.
khopesh87
#1 Weird way to become the 51st state, but ok. Welcome the Union!
MotherOfOctopi
Not Let them, HELP them strike back.
SacrificialClam
#5 recycling IS very important, I think that is the takeaway here
Strategicgnomer
I've been keeping up on the war through a channel called "The enforcer" they're annoying, think they're funny and worst of all, laugh about civilian deaths, and are very pro Israel. But the information is up to date and accurate. Does anyone have a better source that isn't two Alabama good ol boys who think they're funny? There's a supposedly Ukrainian guy who says he was a pilot, but he talks about Russia having the most advanced tech so it feels like he's a plant and he's rather pessimistic.
oukid
https://www.youtube.com/@Professor-Gerdes
Strategicgnomer
Thanks I'll check him out!
VibratingNipples
jlist
TootiesMagooties
All of the West would be so fucked right now had Russia's invasion gone according to Putin's hopes. Slava Ukraine
TheRiattAct
Fuck russia.
/gallery/LiUnapE
^^
My side project to raise money and give the middle finger to putin. DM me if you want a piece
OnoMichiosCharmingHassakuFace
#1 The shittiest action figure.
DdCno1
What do you mean by shitty? Blyatman is the perfect toy for future cannon fodder!
JohnThatcher
#1 This seems like a REALLY good way to get the US directly involved...
DarthVaderDidNothingWrong
Fuck Putin
fiddlewheelx
With a high velocity baseball bat
chooges
I'll pass, but you feel free
DarthVaderDidNothingWrong
Hand me the pineapple, I'm going in
Bardcrest
Use protection. Like bear mace levels of protection.
HandoB4Javert
How about a bear with a mace?
Bardcrest
(slow nod) Yes, yes, I like where this is going.
celestedrake
Just to be safe better give the bear both types of mace.
SURPRISEscience
Give Putin a can of mace with the nozzle reversed so it sprays directly in his face when he uses it
Bardcrest
yep
DarkRedCape
While the west is undoubtedly a reason Ukraine still exists, they are also one of the main reasons the war is still going. They have been drip feeding Ukraine the scraps from their armies and then telling them to perform miracles, then publicly doubting their chances of winning when they fail. If the EU, US and NATO gave Ukraine what it has been asking for, and stop putting restrictions on them, such as don’t bomb Russia, the death toll on both sides could be dramatically lower.
DarthVaderDidNothingWrong
That's a bit too much certainty on a hypothetical for my taste
DarkRedCape
Why? Everything I said was a fact. Zelenskyy already said Russia knew exactly where Ukraines summer offensive would be before it even launched, which gave them lots of time to prepare. Germany then delayed the release of tanks and missiles, meaning the Ukrainians had to wait, by which time Russia had made an impenetrable wall of defence, which ultimately caused the summer offensive to fail. The west spends so much time worrying about hurting Putins feelings, while on the ground, Ukrainians die.
DarthVaderDidNothingWrong
No, your last sentence wasn't fact, it was a hypothetical. *If* more weapons and no restrictions then... that's not a fact. It's not difficult to come up with other possible things after "then..."
Toqom
Fuck Republicans and conservatives everywhere, they are funded by Putin
woodworkerf
Of fuck-head trumP wins, it's over for UA. VOTE!
Sebastopol
Po vsiy zemli slava!
oukid
"Glory to all the earth!" — Google Translate
Sebastopol
Ay, we can all need a little glory these days.
LincLoud
#1 it softens the blow that it is Americans? Are Americans like super soldiers to them, some nigh invincible force? How does that make it better?
arhalts
Sure, America has been the boogyman only Putin can keep Russia strong enough to beat after a hard fight.
While Ukraine is a nothing state that has killed almost none of their people.
Which of those two would be more acceptable to have a "temporary incursion" they can't push out yet. One of the most powerful nations in the world or the state they said was pathetic.
They are allowed to struggle against the US as long as they eventually win. They can't loose ground to Ukraine.
iRegretThisUsernameAlready
Well it’s normal for Americans to meddle in other countries’ affairs and send troops to act like they own the place. So yeah, something like "don’t worry, it’s not Ukraine one-upping us, it’s just Americans being Americans" goes better than "oh shit our two-day operation is backfiring and now the 'losers' are invading us".
DdCno1
Russia thought of itself and was (by far too many people) considered to be the second-strongest military in the world prior to their invasion of Ukraine. It's of course preposterous (I consider the Fr*nch to have more powerful armed forces) and the same mistake is being made in regards to China right now, but the point is that even most Russians see the American military as more powerful, which is why it makes sense for Russian propaganda to claim that there can only be American forces in Kursk.
Feralkyn
Russia does that thing where all enemies are simultaneously really overpowered & unfair brutes, but also completely incompetent and inferior in every way, for propaganda purposes.
Depends on what they're peddling.
It's the same logic that means all losses from enemy actions were actually "accidents" and all legitimate accidents were, instead, enemy sabotage.
fancygiraph
Tag your post as political
TheRealArclight
russian simp...
oukid
Done. Thank you for the reminder.
newsguycraigevans
I wish you wouldn't. There is a group of them asking for politics tags to bottle up the message. You never see them ask for tags in threads about Gaza. There's a reason.
oukid
I've received warnings from Imgur saying I need to add tags due to complaints I've received.
newsguycraigevans
This post isn't tagged as politics. /gallery/e3ebAZs Why don't I see anyone in this post asking for a politics tag?
dontrike
How is this political?
oukid
Current Events is an appropriate tag. I tend to use Politics often when it isn't strictly necessary because lots of Imgurians don't want to be exposed to this content.
SneakyGaryTheSerialHorseDrowner
michiyl
I hope people will learn from this - send more help, and sooner! Ukraine could've pushed out almost all the Russians out of mainland Ukraine by now, and with a destroyed bridge to Crimea, it would've brought Putin to the table.
WhatTheFrog
I mean, I wish Ukraine had received more and faster help, but considering the Russians already had solid positions in Luhansk & Donetsk so I think you're being a tad optimistic here. But they could have fared much better for sure.
SneakyGaryTheSerialHorseDrowner
Limiting use of weapons on Russian soil is a mistake that'll go down in history right alongside "there will be peace in our time"... in 1938.
StoweMobile
Comparing stuff to WW2 appeasement doesn’t really work in modern times. Russias threat to use Nuclear force has to be taken seriously even if we’d like to ignore it
michiyl
Russia had to start threatening with nukes right from the start of the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Isn't that pretty telling that they knew they were pretty weak back then, and had to rely on their nuclear arsenal as a constant (!) threat to break the rules of a civilized war without anyone stepping in to stop the barbaric acts of the Russian Army? And where will it end - Ukraine? Moldavia? Baltic States? Finland? All the ex-Soviet states?
SneakyGaryTheSerialHorseDrowner
Letting Russia do whatever they want because of nuke threats IS appeasement. Are you happy with the idea of them being able to just roll into every country they border only to face no consequences for it just because they waggled their little radioactive micropenis?
AntiProtonBoy
Climate modelling has shown that it takes only couple of detonations in the megaton range to create a climate catastrophe (worse than global warming), and the world has few thousand of those. So yeah, we gotta play this game smart against that fuckhead.
StoweMobile
Am I happy with it? No, but that’s the reality of Nuclear arms. You genuinely think the better alternative is unrestricted nuclear warfare just to say we didn’t appease anyone? It’s the reason the Cold War was fought as a series of proxy wars. The stakes are higher than your emotional desire to get immediate revenge on the Russian state. This war will likely lead to the dissolution of the Russian state as it exists now. But Nuclear annihilation is better you think?
SneakyGaryTheSerialHorseDrowner
Alright Russia can invade anywhere they want because if anyone is mean to them for doing that they'll nuke the world. Gotcha. By the way when you die please donate your body to science because it'll be fascinating to work out how someone can post comments online without a spine.
CinnamonBunny
Geo80
Maybe in Putin's mind. The last couple years have shown Russia to be fairly impotent. I doubt they could handle 1 EU country. Not even accounting for NATO.
CinnamonBunny
Not anymore, luckily. But they could have handled many of the EU countries if it wasn't for NATO.
rbudrick
And we are using Ukraine as shields. If the rest of the world really wanted to support Ukraine and ensure they win, and win fast, we'd be sending a hell of a lot more aid.
Vorq89
Real missed opportunity to call it dam accurate
mormacil
Where's Hungary, Slovakia and Austria actively weakening the dam?
MadHatter69
Their politicians are the cracks
Fuyu159753
Ok I know Orban is a Putin buddy, but what did Slovakia and Austria do?
mormacil
The three of them still use majority Russian gas. Austria legalized Russian spies as long as they don't spy on Austria. The Russian embassy in Austria has some really really big listening devices but they don't care if they're pointed towards the rest of the EU. Slovakia said they will block Ukraine EU help unless the EU eases up on sanctions.
NonExistingWisper
Christ, appalling!
Selerox
Austria elected a pro-Russia party formed by a former Nazi SS officer.
NonExistingWisper
The eff?!?!?
TurdBurglar3000
They both voted in pro-Putin politicians, both have barely supported Ukraine in any way and at least Austria keeps giving Russia billions for gas.
unluckyandbored
Russia will not be satisfied with Ukraine, should they prove successful in conquering it. They WILL move westward.
CinnamonBunny
...as the image hints.
DarthVaderDidNothingWrong
Nato would crush them. Then only two options remain for them, and withdrawal/surrender isn't in Putin's playbook. Which is why there's reason to hope they wouldn't challenge nato.
SalmonTheWise
If Ukraine falls it would be because NATO faltered in their unity to support it, in which case there is no guarantee that the alliance would act to protect its Russia-neighbouring members. Divide and conquer, one by one they will zerg rush everyone. Right now sending weapons, ammo and money while Ukrainians die on the battlefield is a far lower risk proposition than Canada or Spain sending their soldiers to die protecting Latvia.
Valaar
Unless if an orange dumbass would become president again. After solving the war in 24 h hours by suggesting that Ukrain surrenders completely to Putin, he could very well remove USA from nato.
SimiKusoni
Doesn't really matter tbh. The EU may not have the defence budget of the US but our militaries are leaps and bounds ahead of Russia in terms of tech, training and sheer manufacturing capacity. Having Russia as a direct neighbour is still very, very bad and undesirable but not because they'd be absolutely fucktarded enough to invade.
FrancsTireur
Eh... I think it was accurate on day 1 of the invasion; not so accurate over 2 years later.
Russia has demonstrated it can't beat Ukraine let alone take on NATO; by the time Russia is In fighting shape again, even if they do eventually triumph in Ukraine which is still a big if, then Putin will be in his 90s.
Whilst there is a soft centre at the heart of Europe, mostly thanks to Germany, it has a very tough outer shell.
Poland has been howling like a horny dog on a leash who's just seen a 1/
FrancsTireur
Sexy looking leg go by ever since the invasion began, if finally let loose on Russia they would hump them into a particularly sticky R34 drawing.
Sweden is a tough nut to track also, as is France and Britain; Greece is nothing to be taken lightly and both Spain and Italy are rearming. Italy could easily handle what remains of the black sea fleet and the royal navy could handle the baltic "fleet".
None of that means we shouldn't help Ukraine though. 2
CinnamonBunny
Funny you mentioned Sweden yet ignored Finland that actually has an army.
FrancsTireur
I'll be honest I was falling asleep and couldn't remember if Finland was EU and NATO or just NATO
SneakyGaryTheSerialHorseDrowner
Also something I don't see talked about much is that even if they manage to conquer Ukraine they're going to be dealing with a massive widespread insurgency. In the early days of the war when it was looking like the worst-case scenario was a sure thing there were civilians mass-producing molotovs in preparation.
christimueller643000
What do you mean with soft centre? And what does it have to do with Germany?
FrancsTireur
The Bundeswehr is woefully underfunded, undertrained and underequipped. It should arguably be at least one of the top 4 in Europe as Germany is a rich nation with a solid arms manufacturing industry; but political will has left it in a place where they don't view defence as a priority because they are a nation surrounded on all sides by allies legally bound to defend them and they know that NATO plans have always revolved around holding the Russians east of the Rhine.
christimueller643000
Yeah but you know the Germans can switch that pretty fast (see the last 2 world wars) if it's necessary. I think it's pretty good of the politics to choose peace and social care above equipping the military. And in the last 2 years they changed that and spent much more money in the Bundeswehr.
FrancsTireur
Oh I don't disagree with their social policy but I do think that they put too much burden on the rest of their allies by not pulling their weight.
We would all love to be able to spend as Germany does and not concern ourselves with a national defence but someone has to.
CinnamonBunny
Way too slow. We need "10 years ago", not "in the next 10 years".