I tried to fill out a job application. I had to talk to a chatbot to get my name, email, phone number and a few other questions. Like. Just give me the fucking form.
And after all of that, it emailed a link to the application(...where of course I have to upload my resume *and* fill out all the information that you know, is *on* my resume of course)
I'm doing all this and knowing I'll never hear from them again. Yay.
The worse thing is that there's think tanks/lobbying companies dedicated to getting organizations or companies to adopt AI as much as possible. My job place was one of it, and every time someone mentions chatgpt, I die a little inside
Company I work for has purchased several software suites that are 'powered by AI', Upper management purchased these suites without any involvement from anyone from IT. Why, because it was to replace a number of the staff, which they fired before the ink was dry on the contracts they signed for these packages. They weren't able to replace anyone with any of these and just dumped the extra work on those that remained.
Owners do stupid shit, fire a bunch of people, shove the workload into those left over, and make off with the lion's share without ever lifting a single finger themselves.
This shit wouldn't happen if workers owned the places they worked. We don't need owners, owners need us.
Everybody in tech knows that AI are bought by corporations who are trying to replace people. They aren't doing it to make you're job easier, they're doing it so they can fire you.
I know its not exactly the same, but when Snapchat added the ai chat you cant remove, and removed the ability to block/remove team Snapchat, i ditched it so damn fast.
Just once I was excited for AI.... now that I used it, it's like asking a drunken employee to do something.
It's... it's not AI. We should stop calling it that.
Lets go run this through AI. Yeah, of course.
/facepalm
I tried using AI instead of the usual formula I used to determine roof gutter and downspout sizes required for a 100 year storm. The answer seemed right, but just to check it I then asked for sizing for a 500 year storm… It suggested smaller gutter and downspouts. I input a 1000 year storm and it sized the gutter and downspouts even smaller still. AI is a suave moron. And eventually it's going to kill someone with its convincing ignorance.
Actually, I thought about that, and that is also stupid. Honestly? A lot of the reporting and tracking that is done via IT just plain doesn't need to happen at all anyway. Let the AI control manufacturing robots.
Blockchain Crypto NFTs and now AI And corporations are so eager to throw money at it hoping it'll be the next big thing, while the Ponzi scheme just rises and crashes repeatedly.
I feel like AI embedding is like the modern version of that interview where the guy says he's fast at math, gets a math problem and spits out an answer instantly, is told it's wrong, and replies, "But it was fast."
Except this case would be a complicated math problem that the interviewer doesn't actually know the answer to cause it's really just a "see how you think" question and the interviewee gives a very detailed and plausible (but is wrong in important ways) explanation of how they arrived at their answer. The interviewer has no idea the explanation and the answer are wrong since they don't really know the subject matter.
Or they do know how to arrive at the answer but are asking the question because apparently this guy is much faster at solving it. So in the end needs to take more time to not only ask the question in the first place and get the guys answer but now has to double-check that it's correct by solving it anyway.
This app we use at work gives us a place to document the details of the software we're going to build. It takes a lot of time with the customers to figure out and document what these this software will need to do. This fucking app has a new button where it will somehow generate this information with AI. I haven't pressed it yet but there's no way it'll produce anything useful, and it's one of those things where if it's even slightly wrong, it's worthless. I'm sure it was a very expensive button.
Remember the early days of the Internet? Everyone was throwing spaghetti at the wall with startup promises that got so much VC money... where 9 out of 10 of these companies crashed and burned.
It's like they're doing the same thing with AI. Throwing it at everything, seeing what sticks. But even what sticks... is flawed. It's useful at digging up data, but composing it into a smart document that is logically cohesive and accurate... rarely happens.
Yeah, they're making huge bets..and I think this is going to go the way of some of the Internet companies of yore: only a small number will rise from the ashes of the crash, and they'd have to have something exceptionally accurate.
There are practical applications of AI algorithms, but not everything has to be an LLM.
It's called 'money' that's what AI is all about. Fire people, let AI do all the things, and make more money. It's always about more money. Why does a company do anything? Money. Make...more...money.
Copilot: Hey do you want me to save a pic every 3 seconds of everything you do on your laptop and then AI will make it searchable!
Fuck No!
Copilot: What if we saved it to One Drive!
Then I’d have to pay a monthly fee and I just turned that shit off. Besides someone could steal my data.
Copilot: What if we pinky swear it’s super safe and we wouldn’t share it with anyone - except the govt if they had a warrant or they just asked us or somebody paid us for it or..
These comments always bother me as it is still, on your computer but also backed up. Screw AI and recall but I love using OneDrive to backup my documents folder and desktop, no pictures or movies. You only get 5gb but you can invite temp emails and get yourself 500mb per. I got mine to 8gb and more than I need. Nice thing is if you have folks who save everything to their documents folder, most their shit is backed up. Also shutup10 works on windows11
Tech bros and investors have a big raging hard on for AI because it promises to produce wealth without any of that pesky involvement with the miscreants who have been the ones to create that wealth in the past. It promises to make the money machine go brrr, that's all.
While AI has some useful purposes, there's a lot it's lousy or mediocre at that a human can do better. But companies are betting way too much on AI doing everything. There's gonna be a TON of mediocrity surrounding us by the end of 2027.
Cue all the imgur tech bros to come in and explain how prompting a computer is the same as making legitimate artwork. Never mind the entire creative process, that's for suckers!
AI artists are not artists, but the quote in the picture is still nonsense. We already automated both of those jobs; the dishwasher & washing machine. The only human interaction left in them is to load/unload the machines that do the rest of the job for us, and that's not something that AI, especially generative AI, can resolve. That's an issue for generalized robotics, which is a whole different field of tech.
Too true. Doing laundry before the washing machine was a chore that would take people days. I'm not sure there's anything in my personal life I need "AI" for, anyway.
Right, and then add in the invention of the dryer; beforehand you could only dry your clothes on days where the weather was good because the standard practice was to hang them on a line between two poles outside. It could take hours to dry that way. If it was raining all week, you weren't getting laundry done. Then the dryer was invented and suddenly you could dry any load in around an hour no matter the weather.
I get it, but I have never heard it expressed that way. I don’t hear people saying that AI is the same as making art. I think most people realize that it’s entirely different much like taking a picture with a camera is different than painting that same scene. That said, 99% of what is called AI art is pure garbage, a kin to someone’s lazy photographs on a crappy camera.
I agree, most people know the difference, but there are definitely some who can't comprehend putting AI art into a different category. They don't even understand the argument and automatically assume any criticism of AI art is coming from a failed, resentful artist. Trust me, I've talked to more than one on here before. Pretty recently, too
LLMs just *aren't* AI. They're an evolution of a google search, that's it. We'll look back at this AI gold rush and laugh at how many people blindly trusted their future to AI because it seemed like magic at the time.
The thing is, if you're ignorant enough, everything seems like magic.
Fair, but AI considers the good (wizard) chemist and the bad (incompetent) chemist the same. So maybe you get good advice, but maybe not. You get it fast though.
I can't wait for this bubble to explode and tank the economy.
Like, yeah, a lot of rich people will lose a lot of money, and the people who matter will lose some jobs.
But holy shit it's fucking exhausting, and the waste and bullshit... And the run-up of energy-prices and brownouts it's gonna cause as datacenters steal all the power... Fuck off.
My company has gone all in and my job has become about 75% more depressing since that happened. Not entirely for that reason, I have a lot of other complaints too. Basically, our corporate culture has dramatically transformed over the last few years and... I am waiting to see the results of some projects before I make any rash decisions. Might want to change industries, but I don't have any wonderful alternatives in mind either. I paid my dues already, as it were. Ugh.
I remember when companies were scrambling to find people that remembered COBOL, so they could fix the y2k bug. I suspect they are going to be looking for people that know how to un-AI things at some point.
“OK, hear me out what if we combine iPhone autocomplete, Geocities search engine, Spotify’s ‘shuffle,’ and Facebook algorithms but we make it exponentially more terrible?”
i get that shuffle i based off rng but computers don't really do random, but windows shuffle is soooo bad. i have30,000 songs and it literally plays the same 50-100 songs over and over again. they should just connect a pc to document like a cesium atom decaying and base their algorithms off that, kinda like how they did with the lottery numbers, and then use that like the world time zones thing where pcs dial into that server to grab their baseline and make calculations.. like OTP based onclock
I especially like their year-end round up “because we kept choosing this song at random, we have determined that this is your favourite song of the year!“
125 years ago, the magic word was electric. They sold electric toothbrushes and electric combs, which were not powered by electricity, but instead exposed to an electric current at one point.
Reminds me of the late 90's when you said your thing was On The Internet and everyone got excited and money was thrown around.... plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
My dad lost a bunch of money when the dot com bubble burst. A bunch of investors are going to be doing so soon. I don't usually do stocks, but I kinda want to short some companies.
I told my financial advisor to move my retirement acct funds out of big tech funds, I just see it coming crashing soon, and with good authority. One thing tech bros didn't do is factor in power resource adequacy. We literally don't have enough power to deliver to data centers. And we lost renewable energy as a way supplement power generation. Without power, there are no data centers. Without data centers, no AI.
Turns out if you type "FUCK OFF YOU USELESS AI TWAT AND PUT ME THROUGH TO AN ACTUAL HUMAN" and it will (if that's an option). TBH, just typing HUMAN will do but it's not as satisfying.
I am still fascinated by the 3d emulation on my parents tv. Did I use it out of novelty maybe 3 times? Yes. Did my parents ever use it? No. So money spent for a feature not used and unknown to the user, and consequently not wanted by the user.
I have a 3D TV, because I bought it in the year when that's all you could get. And for animates films like the Lego Movie, it's fantastic. So while it doesn't get much use, it's going to be a shame when it gets replaced.
I wouldn't go that far. It's not a tech fad. The tech is here and its sticking around. It's improving fast, and the only thing that will change is the acceptance of its limitations.
It's both. It is a fad and people are throwing everything AI (even other ML that has been around for ages) at the wall and seeing what sticks. But some of that will stick well and hang about and become a refined useful toolset. I love it for the simple case of giving me the right combination of commands from Linux man pages for things I rarely use.
It's "here" in the same since as VR. Both are only capable of performed 1% of their claimed function and make every process they are used in slower compared to the "old" way.
Depends on what you use it for. I use ChatGPT regularly as a better search engine. It functions really well for finding information and summarizing it. In contrast, I’ve never used VR, because it doesn’t seem to add anything to me life, so I’m not sure where the comparison is.
It should have just stayed as a fucking entertainment accessory and niche educational tool (which were areas it actually excelled at) but nope, corporates tried to sell it as this panacea for "office productivity" as if they could become fucking Tony Stark with one so now everyone thinks it's snake oil for not meeting inflated expectations.
When Meta bought-out Oculus that was the beginning of the end for it.
SixSixxtySix
Adobe in a nutshell.
Toqom
Cool, time for money to.be meaningless and let AI do all the work
ontarioOT
theinternetkeepsmealive
I love that!
Trallara
I tried to fill out a job application. I had to talk to a chatbot to get my name, email, phone number and a few other questions. Like. Just give me the fucking form.
And after all of that, it emailed a link to the application(...where of course I have to upload my resume *and* fill out all the information that you know, is *on* my resume of course)
I'm doing all this and knowing I'll never hear from them again. Yay.
WebDragonG3
why is there no way for me to upvote this enough.
Dobster
AI would let you.
WebDragonG3
QueTeValga
The worse thing is that there's think tanks/lobbying companies dedicated to getting organizations or companies to adopt AI as much as possible. My job place was one of it, and every time someone mentions chatgpt, I die a little inside
frustratedITguy
Company I work for has purchased several software suites that are 'powered by AI', Upper management purchased these suites without any involvement from anyone from IT. Why, because it was to replace a number of the staff, which they fired before the ink was dry on the contracts they signed for these packages. They weren't able to replace anyone with any of these and just dumped the extra work on those that remained.
TheDoctorCrankenstein
Tale as old as time
Owners do stupid shit, fire a bunch of people, shove the workload into those left over, and make off with the lion's share without ever lifting a single finger themselves.
This shit wouldn't happen if workers owned the places they worked. We don't need owners, owners need us.
tzahtman
LLMs have some legit uses but for the public it is entirely bullshit and, in fact, may cause harm in some instances.
ThrowAwayAcct0000
Everybody in tech knows that AI are bought by corporations who are trying to replace people. They aren't doing it to make you're job easier, they're doing it so they can fire you.
DeadeicPrints
I know its not exactly the same, but when Snapchat added the ai chat you cant remove, and removed the ability to block/remove team Snapchat, i ditched it so damn fast.
Fengor
I have been forced to sit through 3 meetings in the last month where various levels of management try to convince us to use AI to write code
benlepus
I work in tech . This is accurate. I hate it so much
fastjeff
Just once I was excited for AI.... now that I used it, it's like asking a drunken employee to do something.

It's... it's not AI. We should stop calling it that.
Lets go run this through AI. Yeah, of course.
/facepalm
NoTalentTech
Person who came up with idea to have AI part of the search bar for facebook and Instagram needs to serve 2 life sentences.
DarkSock
I tried using AI instead of the usual formula I used to determine roof gutter and downspout sizes required for a 100 year storm. The answer seemed right, but just to check it I then asked for sizing for a 500 year storm… It suggested smaller gutter and downspouts. I input a 1000 year storm and it sized the gutter and downspouts even smaller still.
AI is a suave moron. And eventually it's going to kill someone with its convincing ignorance.
MarkoSolo
Me 'chatting' with Microsoft Edge.
euphoricopportunity
I want AI to eliminate management and investor roles, more than rank and file roles.
euphoricopportunity
Actually, I thought about that, and that is also stupid. Honestly? A lot of the reporting and tracking that is done via IT just plain doesn't need to happen at all anyway. Let the AI control manufacturing robots.
cjandstuff
Blockchain
Crypto
NFTs
and now AI
And corporations are so eager to throw money at it hoping it'll be the next big thing, while the Ponzi scheme just rises and crashes repeatedly.
Sethiusalpha
I feel like AI embedding is like the modern version of that interview where the guy says he's fast at math, gets a math problem and spits out an answer instantly, is told it's wrong, and replies, "But it was fast."
LokiShade
Big Shaq?
iamgnat
Except this case would be a complicated math problem that the interviewer doesn't actually know the answer to cause it's really just a "see how you think" question and the interviewee gives a very detailed and plausible (but is wrong in important ways) explanation of how they arrived at their answer. The interviewer has no idea the explanation and the answer are wrong since they don't really know the subject matter.
StellarJay77
Or they do know how to arrive at the answer but are asking the question because apparently this guy is much faster at solving it. So in the end needs to take more time to not only ask the question in the first place and get the guys answer but now has to double-check that it's correct by solving it anyway.
PolarbearsToenails
This app we use at work gives us a place to document the details of the software we're going to build. It takes a lot of time with the customers to figure out and document what these this software will need to do. This fucking app has a new button where it will somehow generate this information with AI. I haven't pressed it yet but there's no way it'll produce anything useful, and it's one of those things where if it's even slightly wrong, it's worthless. I'm sure it was a very expensive button.
cytherians
Remember the early days of the Internet? Everyone was throwing spaghetti at the wall with startup promises that got so much VC money... where 9 out of 10 of these companies crashed and burned.
It's like they're doing the same thing with AI. Throwing it at everything, seeing what sticks. But even what sticks... is flawed. It's useful at digging up data, but composing it into a smart document that is logically cohesive and accurate... rarely happens.
TheHolyFatman
Yeah, they're making huge bets..and I think this is going to go the way of some of the Internet companies of yore: only a small number will rise from the ashes of the crash, and they'd have to have something exceptionally accurate.
There are practical applications of AI algorithms, but not everything has to be an LLM.
OriginalAndWitty
It's called 'money' that's what AI is all about. Fire people, let AI do all the things, and make more money. It's always about more money. Why does a company do anything? Money. Make...more...money.
kaoticgirl
AI is the new U2 album
iwishidpickedabetterusername
My phone decided that I no longer wanted to use my power button to turn my phone off, and that it should instead be used to summon Gemini AI.
Well, that can fuck right off.
Finally sorted it yesterday, my joy is unbounded!
ThatLoserTheFourth
Please, how do I get it to leave me the fuck alone?
iwishidpickedabetterusername
Search the settings for "Side button". It comes up with the options of what it does.
ThatLoserTheFourth
You are a saint. Hallowed be your name
iwishidpickedabetterusername
Peace from AI be upon you.
LovepieCreampuff1031
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THIS COMMENT YOU JUST HELPED ME SOLVE THE SAME PROBLEM!!!
jbrightmans
Everyone: Oh no, AI!
Me in county regional construction company: So we just got Windows 98
TheDoctorCrankenstein
Vast majority of our public infrastructure runs on antiquated software on some old ass Commodore acting as a lynchpin.
No one knows how it works but we know if we change it the whole fucking thing crashes. It's like the hidden coconut in TF2.
LehmanParty
I have a couple years of job security by being the only guy that knows Excel
somethingsomethingwittyhere
If you Excel at it, it might even give you Access to a promotion. You have my Word.
cytherians
I think I may have to go back and relearn COBOL... 🤔🤪
DrLOAC
Copilot: Hey do you want me to save a pic every 3 seconds of everything you do on your laptop and then AI will make it searchable!
Fuck No!
Copilot: What if we saved it to One Drive!
Then I’d have to pay a monthly fee and I just turned that shit off. Besides someone could steal my data.
Copilot: What if we pinky swear it’s super safe and we wouldn’t share it with anyone - except the govt if they had a warrant or they just asked us or somebody paid us for it or..
Fuuuuucckck Windows 11
ballsoutflyer
*breathes*
*collects thoughts and goes into Scottish mode*
I'M SAVING IT ON MY OWN BLOODY HARD DRIVE YOU GREAT GANGLY OVERDONE OVERPRICED POWER HOARDING PLANET KILLING PILE OF TRUMP LEVEL USELESS SHITE!
Fuck windows 11 indeed.
Ihug
I should really finish migrating to linux.
lollersson
https://media0.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTY1YjkxZmJlZTYxZXducDRsdWgxaTR3ZXU4OXpnZ3Jja2VydzcxZG0zcjd0ZTFmeCZlcD12MV9naWZzX3RyZW5kaW5nJmN0PWc/uwlDAujt3w9mU/200w.mp4
NoTalentTech
Toqom
These comments always bother me as it is still, on your computer but also backed up. Screw AI and recall but I love using OneDrive to backup my documents folder and desktop, no pictures or movies. You only get 5gb but you can invite temp emails and get yourself 500mb per. I got mine to 8gb and more than I need. Nice thing is if you have folks who save everything to their documents folder, most their shit is backed up. Also shutup10 works on windows11
AllMyOpinionSuck
Linux is easier and more accessible than ever, just saying. Outside the initial growing pains of a new OS most people wouldn't have an issue
youreathing
It's pretty simple to disable/not sign-in to Copilot. I rarely see it.
ballsoutflyer
Soon, they will force it on you as a condition to use your own PC. And idiots will love them for it.
HandsomePenguin
Thats not the point. Anything like this should be Opt-IN, not Opt-OUT. Its blatant data collection, pure and simple.
barbarian818
Tech bros and investors have a big raging hard on for AI because it promises to produce wealth without any of that pesky involvement with the miscreants who have been the ones to create that wealth in the past. It promises to make the money machine go brrr, that's all.
PuzzledCompletely
cytherians
This video is brilliant. She's just... 𝒃𝒓𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒕.
While AI has some useful purposes, there's a lot it's lousy or mediocre at that a human can do better. But companies are betting way too much on AI doing everything. There's gonna be a TON of mediocrity surrounding us by the end of 2027.
GrumpyOldMan55
Could I get AI with Craig's attitude? I'd go for that.
TinaEveFox
I want Craig to be my gps.
fybdfybd
"Just fucking turn!!! It smells like sluts over there!!"
DeadeicPrints
Who?
GrumpyOldMan55
IYKYK
Wikipedo
WIYDK?
victell
TYDK, IDK
CrisprCAS
OBWIYDKBYWTK?
Crambodian
I got you fam:
https://youtu.be/1HDBSm2s18s?si=Rv5sPVpICeDg6jnU
DeadeicPrints
Ahhhh thanks dude.
DonjuanV
I feel ya Craig
McPuffinStuff
hufflesnuff
The problem is we accepted the branding of a statistical model as "intelligence." It can't "do" anything. It's just a series of equations.
bebechat
I want AI to lighten my workload and free up my time — but all it really does is clear space for even more work to fill that time.
VastMajorityRule
https://media4.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWE1NzM3M2U1N2s3OXZqcXBhbWpvYzNpOWVsZWhwMTB5MHh1Mm5zbXA5cTZhdGJkayZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/lptwTtIUnnOGDL7zLn/200w.webp
Murdertron5000
Kind of like adding more traffic lanes. All it does is add more traffic.
Murdertron5000
Cue all the imgur tech bros to come in and explain how prompting a computer is the same as making legitimate artwork. Never mind the entire creative process, that's for suckers!
Madara1389
AI artists are not artists, but the quote in the picture is still nonsense. We already automated both of those jobs; the dishwasher & washing machine. The only human interaction left in them is to load/unload the machines that do the rest of the job for us, and that's not something that AI, especially generative AI, can resolve. That's an issue for generalized robotics, which is a whole different field of tech.
Murdertron5000
Too true. Doing laundry before the washing machine was a chore that would take people days. I'm not sure there's anything in my personal life I need "AI" for, anyway.
Madara1389
Right, and then add in the invention of the dryer; beforehand you could only dry your clothes on days where the weather was good because the standard practice was to hang them on a line between two poles outside. It could take hours to dry that way. If it was raining all week, you weren't getting laundry done. Then the dryer was invented and suddenly you could dry any load in around an hour no matter the weather.
youjettisonme
I get it, but I have never heard it expressed that way. I don’t hear people saying that AI is the same as making art. I think most people realize that it’s entirely different much like taking a picture with a camera is different than painting that same scene. That said, 99% of what is called AI art is pure garbage, a kin to someone’s lazy photographs on a crappy camera.
Murdertron5000
I agree, most people know the difference, but there are definitely some who can't comprehend putting AI art into a different category. They don't even understand the argument and automatically assume any criticism of AI art is coming from a failed, resentful artist. Trust me, I've talked to more than one on here before. Pretty recently, too
youjettisonme
Absolutely agree
captainfakeypants
LLMs just *aren't* AI. They're an evolution of a google search, that's it. We'll look back at this AI gold rush and laugh at how many people blindly trusted their future to AI because it seemed like magic at the time.
The thing is, if you're ignorant enough, everything seems like magic.
emberfish
Except searching on any website sucks now
TheDoctorCrankenstein
What we now know as basic chemistry was at one point considered magic and ancient chemists were called wizards or alchemists.
PuzzledCompletely
Fair, but AI considers the good (wizard) chemist and the bad (incompetent) chemist the same. So maybe you get good advice, but maybe not. You get it fast though.
msfeatherbottom
https://media4.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTY1YjkxZmJldnNmb3BjOW81eGo0MmF0Zm9tNXkyd3B0MWs2eTJvNHB5OWp3cjJwciZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/DFu7j1d1AQbaE/200w.mp4
KillingTlme
This is Copilot
d3ltabrav00
We have meetings and training almost daily, this video is way too close to home
ThingsThatDontJustifyGenocide
I can't wait for this bubble to explode and tank the economy.
Like, yeah, a lot of rich people will lose a lot of money, and the people who matter will lose some jobs.
But holy shit it's fucking exhausting, and the waste and bullshit... And the run-up of energy-prices and brownouts it's gonna cause as datacenters steal all the power... Fuck off.
Gliocas
can i still use it to make custom porn?
TheDoctorCrankenstein
Hopefully not, so you actually have to commission real artists who need the money
Gliocas
twas a joke good sir, i dont have money for ai anyways and porn is already free everywhere. shame i got so many downvotes
euphoricopportunity
My company has gone all in and my job has become about 75% more depressing since that happened. Not entirely for that reason, I have a lot of other complaints too. Basically, our corporate culture has dramatically transformed over the last few years and... I am waiting to see the results of some projects before I make any rash decisions. Might want to change industries, but I don't have any wonderful alternatives in mind either. I paid my dues already, as it were. Ugh.
CrisprCAS
Have you explained that AI sucks and everyone hates it?
PuzzledCompletely
I remember when companies were scrambling to find people that remembered COBOL, so they could fix the y2k bug. I suspect they are going to be looking for people that know how to un-AI things at some point.
DecapodianSaysWoopWoopWoopWoop
LLM, not ai.
Jamerperson
Autocomplete, not ai
CardeasIV
Yep. Glorified T9 is what it is
throwaway12345432
T9 when Tegic were actually innovating.
youreathing
99% of the public don't understand the difference and that's the issue.
igglebotato
Yes, but I think it's too late by far, it's been kleenexed all to hell
a2s2020
Not even a bandaid solution?
OwlXiozee
This is the old man hill I am choosing to die on. Never give in.
igglebotato
godspeed and good luck
ToSisPoS
“OK, hear me out what if we combine iPhone autocomplete, Geocities search engine, Spotify’s ‘shuffle,’ and Facebook algorithms but we make it exponentially more terrible?”
Gliocas
i get that shuffle i based off rng but computers don't really do random, but windows shuffle is soooo bad. i have30,000 songs and it literally plays the same 50-100 songs over and over again.
they should just connect a pc to document like a cesium atom decaying and base their algorithms off that, kinda like how they did with the lottery numbers, and then use that like the world time zones thing where pcs dial into that server to grab their baseline and make calculations.. like OTP based onclock
HandsomePenguin
Shuffle song list. Song plays, designate song as "Do Not play" until every song has played, Re-shuffle list, go again. That's what I want.
ToSisPoS
I especially like their year-end round up “because we kept choosing this song at random, we have determined that this is your favourite song of the year!“
Gliocas
lmfao, yep!
Gliocas
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/30/mastermind-of-lottery-fraud-admits-he-rigged-jackpots.html
JoshAndBurn
In the tech-bro world, all you have to do is say that your thing has AI and everyone gets excited and throws money around.
Companies are so confused why consumers aren't dumping money on them just because they said the magic word.
iquestionthepinappleeveryday
I think, like literally that was the post. That’s what that person spent the time making the video to say exactly that.
welluhwhatdoyouwantmetosay
125 years ago, the magic word was electric. They sold electric toothbrushes and electric combs, which were not powered by electricity, but instead exposed to an electric current at one point.
algoritham
100 years ago, the word 'radioactive' was all the rage. People literally drank radioactive water because it was so new and cool.
FoolishMortal
Reminds me of the late 90's when you said your thing was On The Internet and everyone got excited and money was thrown around.... plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
Carrera26
'E-commerce' wad the magic money word
Ginoawesomesauce
My dad lost a bunch of money when the dot com bubble burst. A bunch of investors are going to be doing so soon. I don't usually do stocks, but I kinda want to short some companies.
TheHolyFatman
I told my financial advisor to move my retirement acct funds out of big tech funds, I just see it coming crashing soon, and with good authority.
One thing tech bros didn't do is factor in power resource adequacy. We literally don't have enough power to deliver to data centers. And we lost renewable energy as a way supplement power generation. Without power, there are no data centers. Without data centers, no AI.
ToSisPoS
Internet, eh?
JoshAndBurn
You see, there's this series of tubes...
Iaddnothing
Yep. I work for Big Bank. One of the teams sold management a big AI solution. Our team took it for improvement. It was all IFs and ELSEs
ShinksAvoHazaar
I have a layman’s understand of ifs and else’s, can you explain it like I’m an idiot or if you have a good link that will, share it?
Iaddnothing
https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/linux-for-bioinformatics/0/steps/202967
ShinksAvoHazaar
Above and beyond stranger. Thank you.
Iaddnothing
You deserve that and more, my faceless fellow social media user
Kbantar
Buzz words control those with money who make the decisions. Experts are made to do the work not make the decisions.
morphis
3d TV... You'll never want to watch it any other way.
DarthAndy
It's because we've all had to interact with 'AI' help bots in the past few years and know that they're all utter shit
DarthAndy
Turns out if you type "FUCK OFF YOU USELESS AI TWAT AND PUT ME THROUGH TO AN ACTUAL HUMAN" and it will (if that's an option). TBH, just typing HUMAN will do but it's not as satisfying.
dashers
Yep, and I'm five years it'll be something else. We've previously slapped onto products: 365, cloud, virtual, xp, .com, 95, turbo
PackratMagpie
JoshAndBurn
Ha! I remember when they wanted us to be all excited about 3D TVs and we collectively just went "nah."
iquestionthepinappleeveryday
IMHO we did that with 3D movies too, but they kept fucking doing it.
Infinias
I am still fascinated by the 3d emulation on my parents tv. Did I use it out of novelty maybe 3 times? Yes. Did my parents ever use it? No. So money spent for a feature not used and unknown to the user, and consequently not wanted by the user.
dashers
I have a 3D TV, because I bought it in the year when that's all you could get. And for animates films like the Lego Movie, it's fantastic. So while it doesn't get much use, it's going to be a shame when it gets replaced.
ImHereToExplainTheJoke
I wouldn't go that far. It's not a tech fad. The tech is here and its sticking around. It's improving fast, and the only thing that will change is the acceptance of its limitations.
dashers
It's both. It is a fad and people are throwing everything AI (even other ML that has been around for ages) at the wall and seeing what sticks. But some of that will stick well and hang about and become a refined useful toolset. I love it for the simple case of giving me the right combination of commands from Linux man pages for things I rarely use.
maxximii
It's "here" in the same since as VR. Both are only capable of performed 1% of their claimed function and make every process they are used in slower compared to the "old" way.
iquestionthepinappleeveryday
Depends on what you use it for. I use ChatGPT regularly as a better search engine. It functions really well for finding information and summarizing it. In contrast, I’ve never used VR, because it doesn’t seem to add anything to me life, so I’m not sure where the comparison is.
TheDoctorCrankenstein
I hate how over hyped VR was.
It should have just stayed as a fucking entertainment accessory and niche educational tool (which were areas it actually excelled at) but nope, corporates tried to sell it as this panacea for "office productivity" as if they could become fucking Tony Stark with one so now everyone thinks it's snake oil for not meeting inflated expectations.
When Meta bought-out Oculus that was the beginning of the end for it.
maxximii
sense*