Very interesting

Aug 26, 2023 12:54 AM

I call this piece “Beijing to Los Angeles”

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It turns out unpadded cardboard boxes aren't a good way to ship hollow glass cubes. Who knew!

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Yeah. The courier service were set up to fail if those are the actual shipping boxes.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As someone that's been cut a bunch of times because of improperly packaged parcels, Walead Beshty is a thoughtless jerk.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Use some fragile tape to get some nice extra fracture lines

3 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 0

The boxes are laminate

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

As a person that works for a “shipper”, it goes like this- we throw box, say “that sounds broken” then we go about our workday

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I collect glass and once purchased a vase off ebayUK. They shipped it to the US in a plastic shopping bag wrapped once with tape. Literally no box, no packing. It arrived as a bag full of shards. I asked the person what they were thinking and she basically blamed the USPS, going into this long explanation of how the mail is superior in the UK, and that Royal Mail would never have broken it. It would have been handled gently, delivered by a tweedy old lady on a bicycle, other nonsense.

3 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 0

What an idiot.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I have no idea what they were smoking. Royal Mail are great, but they're still putting shit in a van and bringing it to you. I've never had anything arrive with the box damaged, but badly packaged stuff will be fucked up.

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I don't care what anyone says, "art" like this is just stupid.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Did he mark them fragile

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Why, he's not Italian.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Frah-jill-ay

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And risk them getting even more broken?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I feel like the title is a bit misleading

3 years ago | Likes 86 Dislikes 10

As an artist, I find it interesting. .?… . ..

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

An interesting titbit is that when someone tells you something is interesting it often is not interesting.

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

*tidbit

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Either is a correct spelling, but 'titbit' is more British and more titillating. https://grammarist.com/spelling/tidbit-titbit/#:~:text=In%20American%20and%20Canadian%20English,spelling%20is%20right%20or%20wrong.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

TIL cheers

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Interesting

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Darn, I could have done this with a tempered glass plate for my 3D printer. Thing is mine would have just looked like a pile of shattered glass.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Now put a guitar in a roadcase on a plane and show us that on arrival. Too many instruments look like they were run over by airlines who don't give a fuck.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

When I moved I sold all kinds of fancy breakable stuff that I couldn't take with me. I got disgustingly good at reinforcing boxes, down to making tiny cardboard triangles that couldn't compress. My crowning glory was a vacuum sealed 25kg filigree in an homemade cardboard armour airmailed to Australia. This is glass in a box.

3 years ago | Likes 396 Dislikes 5

I have to ship pottery. I have to make magic happen.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

These are laminate glass intentionally designed to break

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I used to run a shipping room, and with my own skillz, I pack things *well* for shipping. You can't blame the shippers if all you're doing is putting a glass box in a box. This is just …. it's not the flex - isn't that what kids say now?

3 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

That’s not even the right character for that quote.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

exactly. I got 12 bottles of wine back from Argentina in luggage because the packaging was made to not break them. This person did the minimum for "art" and proved nothing in my view because of it.

3 years ago | Likes 139 Dislikes 11

Mendoza Malbec?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"the box was marked fragile." "you filled a cardboard with glass in a manner undeserving of fragile care."

3 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 3

Now I'm thinking, what's the odds the artist scuffs the boxes before/after receiving them? or sends dozens of undisplayed ones for each display piece?

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

The collection was originally conceived as a representation of the absurdity of shipping corporations owning a copyright on both the shape and volume of their boxes, but was later expanded to focus on how the journey that a being or object goes through is manifested through its physical form. The goal was never to see how badly the shipping companies would break the boxes, but rather to see how the boxes were transformed by their journey. He's not groundbreaking, but his stuff is kinda neat!

3 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 2

Well no, he's glassbreaking.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

not to mention these are clearly shipped via standard shipping and not the dedicated process where you pay more for better treatment and it gets treated no differently!

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

It’s funny that there’s no UPS one. (Because they lost it or it was stolen en route).

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Neat :)

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

fascinating, and cruel.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They are my new Beshty

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What I really want to know is what the ones from UPS and DHL look like.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They haven't arrived yet.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

UPS because they ran over the box and got a flat, DHL because it's still at a warehouse in Yellowknife for some reason

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pile of glass.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Whole lotta people in the comments proving that people on the internet are lazy morons who take everything at face value.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Someone has a grudge...

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 184 Dislikes 37

Eh, I'll allow it.

3 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 6

Agree, the art is the mailing of it, but he's not creating the patterns so why would that be his art, if anything he has to credit the delivery people as the creators and he's just a curator.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

I'm gonna go out on a limb, and guess that you have some *very* granular opinions on the subject of AI art.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If you don't create the art then you aren't the creator, seems pretty cut and dry to me. If I pay you to throw paint at a wall who's the artist? Even if I give you the paint and the room I'm nothing more than a provider and not an artist. I'm sorry but if you type in endor bob Ross into an AI thing you didn't do shit, George Lucas and Bob Ross did and you pretended you were an artist.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Backlash here from lazy mfers who think when they did color by numbers in elementary school they became an artist.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

I can see artistic interpretation, but that's own personal perspective, not necessarily the artist's.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This is art.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What is considered art?

3 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

There is a long tradition/discussion of this in the art community. The current answer is "Art is what Artists" create. The edge cases here are then about objects that are pre-made and how much the artist should change to make it art. - Is this art? I would say no, the act of glass and modifying is both outside the hands of the artist. But you could argue the intent and sending is the art making act. As I am not an artist, I would lose that argument to an artist.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The job of art is to make people talk about it, so this is art

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

A sideways urinal.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not this.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 10

Why not?

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I have yet to ever hear someone who declares a piece of art "not art" able to explain their reasoning in anything even close to coherence. Maybe today is the day? Patiently waiting.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Like, there are a few examples, like that banana taped to a wall,that you think could be called not art.it didn't really have any effort put into it. This, while not needing that much effort, is very creative.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Uh.... artist. I try very hard not to be judgemental, but this is pushing it.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

I mean....what's the message? What is this an interpretation of? What could possibly be the thought process? What effort was put in to shape the material? I don't get it.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It can be an indictment to the shoddy practices of delivery services but that also can produce unintended interesting visual effects. A glass box is not interesting, but the damaged ones are visually more interesting.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Art doesn't need to be overexplained, art must also remain a mystery. That's what makes it intrigueing.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Legend has it that he's still waiting for the OnTrac package to arrive, 7 years later.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And that package is called "Godot".

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Low effort.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 10

I'm wondering if he calls them things like "Promises" and "Hopes and Dreams". Probably would get top dollar

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

I approve.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So a guy puts stuff in a box, expects someone else to break it, and then calls it art? Is that how art works?

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 9

Modern art

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Anything can be art I suppose, but what this definitely isn't is a creative work with sufficient originality to qualify for copyright protections. Same thing as a monkey selfie, only the monkeys are working for FedEx in this case.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes. Art is intent, not method.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Meh. I intend for this comment to be art. Is it?

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

If you put this comment in the context of a surrounding where art usually is displayed and if you can convince knowledgeable people to agree with you, then your comment will have become art. See Marcel Duchamp

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah sure, it's ok to not like it. Art is subjective.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Possibly. But keep in mind that they said "art is intent", not "art is the CLAIM of intent". But if you truly feel that your comment is art, then it's at least art to YOU. No one else is required to agree with your view that it's art. In the case of the artist in this post, many people agree that his creations are art, which is why he is now a reasonably well known and respected artist.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm assuming he packs them himself cause that definitely does not align with packing standards. The dick.

3 years ago | Likes 672 Dislikes 22

Awesome concept.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

So?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a employee in parcel sorting centre it is incredibly how many glass packages and go and then come for return. Private sent packages however do very well but those partners have really sucky packages. That said, nobody around here give a shit. Heavy boxes are stacked on lightweight half empty boxes, oh you clearly tagged the box with fragile stickers?? I guess I'll throw it anyway! - People don't give a fuck 🤷

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

When I was buying and selling old video game systems on eBay, I learned quickly not to mark packages as "Fragile." It's almost like BEGGING someone at USPS or UPS to see HOW fragile it is.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

At this point it's an insult if you put fragile on your packages. What you should do is the basic stuff like no shift in gravity and empty space. So stuff your packaging with paper or something and make sure the item doesn't move around. A nice package (nice wrapping, clean new box) goes a long way (without any damage literally). They tend to handle those nicely (idk something psychological).

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also put that fragile sticker anyway when it's truly fragile ofc. You never know.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We found someone who works at fedex, Amazon, ups, or usps

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 9

FedEx??? Is that you.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

The intent is for the glass to break, I doubt the intent was to shame underpaid overworked delivery workers.

3 years ago | Likes 257 Dislikes 18

they arn't underpaid, generally just set into a well crafted "go faster or else" situation: I.E. there is nothing stopping the boxes from falling off the conveyor and slowly building a mound between you and the way out of the truck......

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We're really not that overworked...

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I do pottery. Potters must ship stuff. The insane packing we gotta do for shit to maybe survive is magic. I wish we could pay our postal workers a bit more to not destroy everything

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

More pay to work more slowly? What sort of companies are you familiar with?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 11

We're campaigning for the new 4/20/69 work week. 4 day work week/20 hour work week/$69 minimum wage

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Yeah. I need to look it up because I can respect the creativity. I hope he's not doing this to be a jerk.

3 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 4

He's kinda calling out FedEx by showing their name.

3 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 1

Good point.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Displaying the broken glass boxes on the FedEx shipping boxes kinda implies that the intent was to shame FedEx.

3 years ago | Likes 212 Dislikes 4

I mean FedEx is poo poo.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

FedEx, yes. Any particular FedEx employee, no.

3 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 10

Then he should pack the boxes according to instructions. He can't blame them for breaking his glass when he's improperly packet it.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

Nobody blamed anyone for anything. It's art goddammit.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I mean fed ex drove a forklift through a TV I ordered, then customer service told us to pound sand. Properly packed doesn't mean good shipping practices.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

The artist statements mostly focus on the fact that FedEx has copyrighted the standard shipping boxes they use and seems to suggest that the dystopia late-stage capitalist idea that corps can own shapes and sue others for using them is the target of the shaming.

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

What does any of that have to do with the glass?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Seems to me that the artist also focuses on a corporate culture that encourages employees to be careless with their packages.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I can think of better ways to make "art".

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Fantastic. Now, if you actually feel driven to make art, you should start using these better ways and get to making some art. If your ways truly are better, then perhaps someday you will be as successful as Walead Beshty.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Why do you think that's art?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"Art" isn't some magical elevated status. If you create something with artistic intent, as this was, then it is art. The term "art" does not imply any specific value of any type. Art then becomes SUCCESSFUL art if it elicits emotional response, or is purchased by an entity, or gains popularity, or has historical significance. It cannot be argued that this art has accomplished the first three.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No. You really can't.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Seriously? There are no other ways to make art? Do you think that's art?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'm saying that you specifically can't make art. Because if you could, you would. All the people who say things like "my ... can make better art" never follow through with it. And yes, this is art, because an artist decided it is and presented it in an art context. That's all it takes to make art. People like you (not specifically you now) can't understand that craft is not the only deciding factor what makes art.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

That's bold of you to say I can't make art. I can, and I do. I just don't think that something like that is art. An experiment, maybe. Not art.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And yet it is art because of the reasons I stated, which are the accepted criteria in the art world.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Craft being skill, i.e. knowing how to paint, sculpt...

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0