If i didn't hate chic-fil-a, I would go to that restaurant to support them, it's only about 45 minutes away, I could make that drive. But i fucking hate that company so I'm just gonna continue to never eat there and judge anybody who does.
This fucking REEKS of PR. chickfila probably had a shit quarter and decided to buckle. They're coporate scum like the rest of them, begging for your dollar. Fuck 'em.
I do wonder to that Sleeperkid (if its not just a Russian account) does he work on sunday? and whit that does anyone in his family cook food, do they travel and only by foot to the church every sunday. is chickfile open on sunday if so... well then that chick file celebrated a gay marriage is like there least of there problems.
The one near me flew their flag at half mast the week the Supreme Court legalized gay marriage. I wish I was fucking joking. This post is not surprising to me
I really don't understand why people think because Dan Cathy is a homophobe that means every single person involved with Chick Fil A is a homophobe. When I worked there, about 30% of the employees, including two red shirts AND the Director of Operations, were openly gay.
Jesus was overall a pretty violent guy. Matthew 10:34–36 Luke 12:51–53 and of course, the whole thing about making his own flail and hitting people with it. Flails aren't just whips, they're designed to rip chunks of flesh off the bone.
Imgur post: "LOL, Repugs don't support Chick-fil-A because they support these gay guys. Morons, they're still on your team regardless."
Imgur comments: "I do not support these two gay guys because they support Chick-fil-A......."
Don't mind me, just wading through the usual slop here at Imgur, where people unironically chide others for the very thing they're doing as they do it.
Either shows support for the company. I for one, as a gay man, would never show support for a company in any form that contributed, and still does, to conversion camps utilizing electro therapy.
Taking a picture in front of a business does not equal supporting hating gays especially as a gay person. Like I said, nuance is nuance. Y'all have no clue what that word means I guess.
The local chik-fil-a here has more LGBT+ employees than any other fast food place in the city. According to the one I talked to after a college class, they basically said they've never once been discriminated against there by the other employees and managers and so it gained a reputation as being a decent job to get while in college. Shocking as it may be to hear, just because there is a shit owner, doesn't mean the entire business follows them down the toilet.
The owner of Chick-fil-A literally shovels money to republican politicians and anti LGBT+ orgs. It doesn't matter if one franchise owner doesn't harass their employees, every sale still goes to discrimination, and your local Chick-fil-A staff are complicit in the further marginalization and persecution of themselves and those like them.
I got news for you, sport. If you leave your house and spend money, you are supporting some damn thing or other you don't fucking like. When GlAAD starts offering benefits granting jobs at $5 dollars above what anyone else in my town is paying, I'll feel bad for having taken a job at Chick Fil A. Until then, unless you're gonna pay my bills you can shut the fuck up about it.
Well that's lovely, meanwhile the money funneling up through the business is partially responsible for funding shit in other countries like the capital punishment of LGBT people in Uganda. Glad you have a cool server though! :thumbsup:
That would be really bad, if it were accurate, too bad taking 5 sec to find the snopes article shows that was just misinformation spread on social media. Yay misinformation! If it fits your own bias you just believe it without fact checking. To be clear, not defending chick fil a or any other company, they are all pieces of shit and everything sucks, but I will defend the actual facts and misinformation is always bad. No need to argue, it never changes anyone's mind, this comments for bystanders
So back in the twenty teens Chick-fil-A got lots of hate for openly funding anti-lgbtq movments and Evangelical groups, then it started affecting business and they said sorry. Now instead of the money being donated on behalf of Chick-fil-A, it instead goes to the ceo who donates it using his name. Also while Chick-fil-A directly is hunting down and murdering gay people in africa, the evangelicals they fund are. Watch the god loves Uganda documentary
Yeah that’s a positive in my experience. Not simping on Chikfila. I have a bunch of problems about their food and separately their politics but I don’t see anyone making a valid problem with their food, which is actually pretty easy to do.
I've had it twice in my life so far. And both times, my reaction was "Yeah, this is fine". Like...the ingredients are reasonable quality...and that's it. It has no identity beyond that. Fuckin' *Subway* has more soul than Chick-fil-A.
Their nuggets are the best in the business. I don’t shop with them because of their policy decisions, but that doesn’t mean they don’t have the best nuggets on Earth.
I didn't say it was better, I said it had more soul. More personality. More of an identity to latch onto. We make memes about Subway. We complain about the quality, but hate that we lost the $5 footlong. They had a huge PR campaign that ended in disaster when that fucker who shares my name turned out to be evil. Subway has something *identifiable*. A *story*. Chick-fil-A is just...passive evil, mediocre chicken, and...nothing else.
Well, it has an identity, the identity was "bigoted anti-LGBT fast food chain" that's all I know about them. Is the food good, havent heard much about that, but I've heard a lot about the owners donating tons of money to anti-LGBT groups. I wouldn't eat there.
The food is acceptably good if it's the flavour profile you're looking for. Decent quality ingredients, not slop, but you really better like pickle and vinegar flavours fried in peanut oil or you're going to have a bad time.
The open bigotry is like 95% of the hate, the weird cult following shit is just that, weird. Fukin churches putting a run on mid tier chicken sandwiches cause the owners are 'christian'. Just wish they'd be open on Sundays so the no-tip crowd went there instead.
I understand the broad strokes, but there are an innumerable number of Christians that live more true to the teachings, at least in terms of acceptance and embrace of what particular sects determine to be undesirable or sinful; they just don’t feel the need to take to social media in defense. It’s not even evangelicals or “conservatives”. It’s just the bad ones. The people who think they are “good Christians” because of the church they attend, rather than the way they live their lives.
"Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. And a person's enemies will be those of his own household." He wasn't the god of hippie liberals anymore than of right-wing nutjobs.
That faith is supposed to be about: loving other humans, accepting their flaws, and taking it face on when the occasional nasty person takes advantage. It’s supposed to be about supporting the orphan, the widow and the prisoner. It’s supposed to be about doing good for a fellow human.
And contrary to your comment, they do exist. Just not in the US that worships at an altar made of money and power.
The Christian authority is the bible. The bible is vague esoteric and inconsistent. SO MUCH SO that Christians can't even agree on what it is "suppose to" mean.
And they don't even know Paul was rejected as an apostle by Peter and James (bio-half-brother of Christ) and that Paul was a closeted homosexual (his thorn in the side.)
Huh? Catholics do to and while I know little about the orthodox I do not believe they just threw the apostolic letters and other stuff away, but if they did good on them.
To me knowledge all Christian churches do include Paul’s many letters as part of their worship. But while the Gospels are the focus in the Catholic Church and other older denominations like the Episcopal and Lutheran, the evangelicals love to quote Paul.
While this is true, they need to be louder. I mean, we all need to up our volume, but progressive Christians especially need to be louder or they will lose their brand to hate.
That is almost uniquely US perspective. Elsewhere in the world, evangelicals exist, but they have little to no voice because they are vastly outnumbered by the progressives.
The organizations claiming they're 'Christian churches' have completely lost what Jesus actually wrote. They've fallen down a path of dogma taught by clergy forming their own ideas and trying to take a few things in the Bible, and plenty that isn't (most of the story of Satan is actually from Dante's Inferno), way out of context, and claim that's "what God/Jesus said".
Read for yourself. Note who is narrating. Bible literalism is ignorance.
A lot of Christianity comes directly from Paul and his beliefs and those after him; not those of Jesus. Paul seems to have been a bit of a nut. Now, personally, I like the sermon on the mount.
I really should've written 'said'. It's what I was thinking. Otherwise the sentiment is still the same.
A big problem with US 'Christians' is they take things out of context and conflate it all as coming from God/Jesus. They don't seem to know what a parable is anymore, as just one example.
I think you typo'd "liberalism" in place of literalism.
The Creation Museum and Ark Experience are ridiculously popular with Christians, which declare that evolution isn't real, and there were dinosaurs on the Ark.
Like I said in another comment, that is almost uniquely a US problem. Elsewhere in the world, the literalists are present, but they are a very silent fringe. In fact, the creator of the Creation Museum is an Australian who had to go to the US to be taken seriously.
Thank you. Not religious myself, but my family is full of the non-dickhead Christians. The differentiation is meaningful. My dad worked with his United church here in the Toronto area and the congregation to become an trans-affirming space with the support of those who attend. I've also met some folks who were ostracized from their evangelical or orthodox church. For those with whom religion is important, these refuges are life savers!
I am also not religious, but was brought up as a Catholic and even went to Catholic schools. I don't like the bigotry on both sides of the argument, hence my post.
"The religion-builders have so distorted and deformed the doctrines of Jesus, so muffled them in mysticisms, fancies and falsehoods, have caricatured them into forms so monstrous and inconceivable, as to shock reasonable thinkers, to revolt them against the whole, and drive them rashly to pronounce its Founder an impostor." Thomas Jefferson's letter to Timothy Pickering, Esquire. Feb 27th 1821 Holds just as much, if not more, true today than it did then.
TrancedJoe
There's a reason it's called hate chicken
nation543
If i didn't hate chic-fil-a, I would go to that restaurant to support them, it's only about 45 minutes away, I could make that drive. But i fucking hate that company so I'm just gonna continue to never eat there and judge anybody who does.
DameDePiques
Oh no, people being happy! And other people saying they are happy for them... what has the world come to? *swoons in conservative*
levyathyn
They don't worship Jesus, they worship the thing he died on and the people who killed him.
TheConnArtist
Doesn't chickfila lobby against gay rights?
Greer8
AnonsAndMinions
This fucking REEKS of PR. chickfila probably had a shit quarter and decided to buckle. They're coporate scum like the rest of them, begging for your dollar. Fuck 'em.
ZackWester
I do wonder to that Sleeperkid (if its not just a Russian account) does he work on sunday? and whit that does anyone in his family cook food, do they travel and only by foot to the church every sunday. is chickfile open on sunday if so... well then that chick file celebrated a gay marriage is like there least of there problems.
akambe
This is in my town. Props to the franchise owner.
Iaimtomisbehave
The one near me flew their flag at half mast for thirty days for Kirk. I've never eaten there.
derrymerbles
The one near me flew their flag at half mast the week the Supreme Court legalized gay marriage. I wish I was fucking joking. This post is not surprising to me
Goronhead
Imagine being such a piece of shit that you mourn other people being treated like people
HEXtheDark
Chick-fil-a has finally found the consumer group "non-hetero-people".
ThM1ck
I really don't understand why people think because Dan Cathy is a homophobe that means every single person involved with Chick Fil A is a homophobe. When I worked there, about 30% of the employees, including two red shirts AND the Director of Operations, were openly gay.
dynamojoe
In Utah, no less.
zeacorzeppelin10
Chick-fil-A sucks and nothing they do will change my mind.
SpaceGiraffeVoter
I got a gift card from a secret Santa to Chick Fil A and wasn't sure how I'd use it. Guess I'm going to that location
Ivalicenyan
I practice my religion of not having the effort to care about things that don't concern me
bourbonandbaddecisions
There is a chick fil a 15 min from my house but I never eat there. Instead I drive 40 min to a spot that has superior chicken and no homophobia.
friendsofsandwiches
Remove the branding, keep selling the chicken.
rubypilgrim
Jesus was overall a pretty violent guy. Matthew 10:34–36 Luke 12:51–53 and of course, the whole thing about making his own flail and hitting people with it. Flails aren't just whips, they're designed to rip chunks of flesh off the bone.
MrsHowVeryDareYou
Imagine thinking about other people’s genitals more than they do
ThatRaccoonGuy
Shame on a gay couple for having a Chick-Fil-A wedding through. You know the hate chicken money has actually gotten real queer people killed.
Necrothean
Imgur post: "LOL, Repugs don't support Chick-fil-A because they support these gay guys. Morons, they're still on your team regardless."
Imgur comments: "I do not support these two gay guys because they support Chick-fil-A......."
Don't mind me, just wading through the usual slop here at Imgur, where people unironically chide others for the very thing they're doing as they do it.
sleeperkid
I’m not sure taking a photo in front of a restaurant is the same as having a wedding there.
Fuckimgurcunts
Yeah I thought it was a middle finger
wingweaver415
Either shows support for the company. I for one, as a gay man, would never show support for a company in any form that contributed, and still does, to conversion camps utilizing electro therapy.
drunkcat
Whitewashing is whitewashing.
Shewy92
Nuance is nuance. Y'all are crazy.
drunkcat
Okay sure, give me the nuance of a company who's entire thing is funding conversion camps.
Shewy92
Taking a picture in front of a business does not equal supporting hating gays especially as a gay person. Like I said, nuance is nuance. Y'all have no clue what that word means I guess.
ZantetsukenX
The local chik-fil-a here has more LGBT+ employees than any other fast food place in the city. According to the one I talked to after a college class, they basically said they've never once been discriminated against there by the other employees and managers and so it gained a reputation as being a decent job to get while in college. Shocking as it may be to hear, just because there is a shit owner, doesn't mean the entire business follows them down the toilet.
Lutki
The owner of Chick-fil-A literally shovels money to republican politicians and anti LGBT+ orgs. It doesn't matter if one franchise owner doesn't harass their employees, every sale still goes to discrimination, and your local Chick-fil-A staff are complicit in the further marginalization and persecution of themselves and those like them.
ThM1ck
I got news for you, sport. If you leave your house and spend money, you are supporting some damn thing or other you don't fucking like. When GlAAD starts offering benefits granting jobs at $5 dollars above what anyone else in my town is paying, I'll feel bad for having taken a job at Chick Fil A. Until then, unless you're gonna pay my bills you can shut the fuck up about it.
ThatRaccoonGuy
Well that's lovely, meanwhile the money funneling up through the business is partially responsible for funding shit in other countries like the capital punishment of LGBT people in Uganda. Glad you have a cool server though! :thumbsup:
ArmyOfMantisMen
That would be really bad, if it were accurate, too bad taking 5 sec to find the snopes article shows that was just misinformation spread on social media. Yay misinformation! If it fits your own bias you just believe it without fact checking. To be clear, not defending chick fil a or any other company, they are all pieces of shit and everything sucks, but I will defend the actual facts and misinformation is always bad. No need to argue, it never changes anyone's mind, this comments for bystanders
Lutki
So back in the twenty teens Chick-fil-A got lots of hate for openly funding anti-lgbtq movments and Evangelical groups, then it started affecting business and they said sorry. Now instead of the money being donated on behalf of Chick-fil-A, it instead goes to the ceo who donates it using his name. Also while Chick-fil-A directly is hunting down and murdering gay people in africa, the evangelicals they fund are. Watch the god loves Uganda documentary
Lutki
Isn't hunting down******
MattScifiBandit
Chick-fil-a is not a chicken restaurant. Its a pickle restaurant that happens to have chicken.
SploogeMcDuck316
Yeah i 100 percent do not get the hype. Its pretty bland and nothing special imo. Waffle fries and sauce is good tho.
Xenarion
Go on...
IloveHockey
its owned by hateful Christians
Xenarion
I meant about the pickles thing.
smashpro1
The chicken is marinated in pickle brine.
IIikethecutofyourjib
Olive Garden is an olive oil restaurant that happens to sell pasta. Fuck CFA for their views but cmon dude
cytherians
Extra sodium for that blood pressure boost?
smax410
Yeah that’s a positive in my experience. Not simping on Chikfila. I have a bunch of problems about their food and separately their politics but I don’t see anyone making a valid problem with their food, which is actually pretty easy to do.
Who the fuck complains about pickles?
Xenarion
Oh, not as interesting.
Lovecards
Annnnnndddddddddd???
justfillingthespace
I've had it twice in my life so far. And both times, my reaction was "Yeah, this is fine". Like...the ingredients are reasonable quality...and that's it. It has no identity beyond that. Fuckin' *Subway* has more soul than Chick-fil-A.
Eyeetsass
Their nuggets are the best in the business. I don’t shop with them because of their policy decisions, but that doesn’t mean they don’t have the best nuggets on Earth.
smax410
Yeah, I hate Chikfila but fucking hard disagree if you think subway is better.
justfillingthespace
I didn't say it was better, I said it had more soul. More personality. More of an identity to latch onto. We make memes about Subway. We complain about the quality, but hate that we lost the $5 footlong. They had a huge PR campaign that ended in disaster when that fucker who shares my name turned out to be evil. Subway has something *identifiable*. A *story*. Chick-fil-A is just...passive evil, mediocre chicken, and...nothing else.
cytherians
It's a really stupid homophone for "Chick fillet."
PimpinKen
I've always read it as "chick-filluh" rather than "fill eh." But I also call another famous chain "Pantera bread"
Rhythmaster
Well, it has an identity, the identity was "bigoted anti-LGBT fast food chain" that's all I know about them. Is the food good, havent heard much about that, but I've heard a lot about the owners donating tons of money to anti-LGBT groups. I wouldn't eat there.
IHaveGreatKittenRecipes
The food is acceptably good if it's the flavour profile you're looking for. Decent quality ingredients, not slop, but you really better like pickle and vinegar flavours fried in peanut oil or you're going to have a bad time.
The open bigotry is like 95% of the hate, the weird cult following shit is just that, weird. Fukin churches putting a run on mid tier chicken sandwiches cause the owners are 'christian'. Just wish they'd be open on Sundays so the no-tip crowd went there instead.
dogboybastard
Christian's do NOT follow the teachings of Jesus Christ. That's not what that religion is about.
Xenarion
Why the apostrophe?
goodguyC
I don't know, my Methodist church is super liberal....I think there are definitely some good, feed the poor, cloth the stranger type Christians.
Corin
We probably don't even know what Jesus taught is the funny thing, everything we think we know about him is basically fanfiction written decades later
luckiestnut419
I understand the broad strokes, but there are an innumerable number of Christians that live more true to the teachings, at least in terms of acceptance and embrace of what particular sects determine to be undesirable or sinful; they just don’t feel the need to take to social media in defense. It’s not even evangelicals or “conservatives”. It’s just the bad ones. The people who think they are “good Christians” because of the church they attend, rather than the way they live their lives.
SocoFox
They aren't Christians. They are blasphemous heretics.
GrandAdmlStrife
Yes, imagine celebrating the murder of someone who said 'just be kind to everyone' as the basis of a religion
pgdave
"Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. And a person's enemies will be those of his own household." He wasn't the god of hippie liberals anymore than of right-wing nutjobs.
DaveSamsonite
MosquitoHawker
That faith is supposed to be about: loving other humans, accepting their flaws, and taking it face on when the occasional nasty person takes advantage. It’s supposed to be about supporting the orphan, the widow and the prisoner. It’s supposed to be about doing good for a fellow human.
And contrary to your comment, they do exist. Just not in the US that worships at an altar made of money and power.
Mahabazu
The Christian authority is the bible. The bible is vague esoteric and inconsistent. SO MUCH SO that Christians can't even agree on what it is "suppose to" mean.
secretdpp
Gotta turn to fiction to find good ones.
CallMeCourierSix
*American Christians
Christians in other countries seem to be doing the right thing (mostly). It's only American Christians that have turned into fascist pigs.
Ircy
Christians follow the teachings of Paul. Not even kidding.
mariusvandeventer
Even Paul (who had many faults ngl, even he admitted it), said "you should live in harmony with all people.
Bowtie8bit
And they don't even know Paul was rejected as an apostle by Peter and James (bio-half-brother of Christ) and that Paul was a closeted homosexual (his thorn in the side.)
Pikkupanda
No. Evangelicals do.
Ircy
Huh? Catholics do to and while I know little about the orthodox I do not believe they just threw the apostolic letters and other stuff away, but if they did good on them.
Pikkupanda
To me knowledge all Christian churches do include Paul’s many letters as part of their worship. But while the Gospels are the focus in the Catholic Church and other older denominations like the Episcopal and Lutheran, the evangelicals love to quote Paul.
That was my point.
boredatworkthatsall
The OG Christians, yes. 👍
Today’s religions hanging on to the name of Jesus follow the teachings of people who lived centuries later, Thomas Aquinas being one notable example.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schism_in_Christianity
Pikkupanda
And King James had the Bible rewritten in a misogynistic tone.
3006mv
https://www.avidreaderbooks.com/item/gQpiPqSJBXhKnOgkDu5ELA/lists/LfhPtYP811xk/
IamIntoleranceIntolerant
Correction, Evangelicals and conservative Christians do not. There are plenty of progressive Christains out there.
CurbYourClassWar
So what are you “ReAL ChRiStiAnS” doing about the fake ones?? You still all vote the same damn way…
IamIntoleranceIntolerant
I am not a Christian, nor am I an American.
apneax3n0n
Roman christian here (the ones in Rome with the pope, the old originale basic ones) . Fuck muricans christians evangelicals
wejustdontknow
We don't hear enough from the Christian left. There are plenty of them out there.
SquashDemon
While this is true, they need to be louder. I mean, we all need to up our volume, but progressive Christians especially need to be louder or they will lose their brand to hate.
IamIntoleranceIntolerant
That is almost uniquely US perspective. Elsewhere in the world, evangelicals exist, but they have little to no voice because they are vastly outnumbered by the progressives.
SquashDemon
That's a small spot of hope.
Pikkupanda
Friend, that’s why I became ordained. To separate the faith from the business of religion.
IamIntoleranceIntolerant
You. I like you.
Pikkupanda
Likewise I’m sure. :)
Euchre
The organizations claiming they're 'Christian churches' have completely lost what Jesus actually wrote. They've fallen down a path of dogma taught by clergy forming their own ideas and trying to take a few things in the Bible, and plenty that isn't (most of the story of Satan is actually from Dante's Inferno), way out of context, and claim that's "what God/Jesus said".
Read for yourself. Note who is narrating. Bible literalism is ignorance.
Selfinflictedwounds
A lot of Christianity comes directly from Paul and his beliefs and those after him; not those of Jesus. Paul seems to have been a bit of a nut. Now, personally, I like the sermon on the mount.
magikmarker
To be fair I don't think Jesus is actually credited for writing anything in the Bible. The new testament is things written about Jesus.
Euchre
I really should've written 'said'. It's what I was thinking. Otherwise the sentiment is still the same.
A big problem with US 'Christians' is they take things out of context and conflate it all as coming from God/Jesus. They don't seem to know what a parable is anymore, as just one example.
IamIntoleranceIntolerant
Most Christians don't believe in biblical liberalism. Most believe in evolution, for example.
IamIntoleranceIntolerant
*LITERALISM. I hate autocorrect.
Euchre
I think you typo'd "liberalism" in place of literalism.
The Creation Museum and Ark Experience are ridiculously popular with Christians, which declare that evolution isn't real, and there were dinosaurs on the Ark.
IamIntoleranceIntolerant
I did, indeed. Stupid autocorrect.
Like I said in another comment, that is almost uniquely a US problem. Elsewhere in the world, the literalists are present, but they are a very silent fringe. In fact, the creator of the Creation Museum is an Australian who had to go to the US to be taken seriously.
wearsPantsOften
Thank you. Not religious myself, but my family is full of the non-dickhead Christians. The differentiation is meaningful. My dad worked with his United church here in the Toronto area and the congregation to become an trans-affirming space with the support of those who attend. I've also met some folks who were ostracized from their evangelical or orthodox church. For those with whom religion is important, these refuges are life savers!
IamIntoleranceIntolerant
I am also not religious, but was brought up as a Catholic and even went to Catholic schools. I don't like the bigotry on both sides of the argument, hence my post.
Selfinflictedwounds
There are many Christians who are not worthl asshats, but there a LOT who are..
Not really religious but have read Jesus's Sermon on the Mount. I agree with it applaud those who follow that view.
There are a majority who endorse or turn a blind eye to the other side, who have far more in common with the pharisee Jesus was opposed to
Zange0
"The religion-builders have so distorted and deformed the doctrines of Jesus, so muffled them in mysticisms, fancies and falsehoods, have caricatured them into forms so monstrous and inconceivable, as to shock reasonable thinkers, to revolt them against the whole, and drive them rashly to pronounce its Founder an impostor."
Thomas Jefferson's letter to Timothy Pickering, Esquire. Feb 27th 1821
Holds just as much, if not more, true today than it did then.