Equal rights march for... ?

Jan 22, 2017 7:35 PM

LoveEngineFive

Views

391433

Likes

12550

Dislikes

2037

The concern is that the GOP tends to be very anti-abortion, anti-contraceptive...

9 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 19

I appreciate the adult discussion that took place. +1 to each thing

9 years ago | Likes 135 Dislikes 3

Thank you for rewarding good behavior.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Thank you for rewarding rewarding good behavior

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Mmm. How is this comment second best?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

and

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Roe v Wade, birth control coverage, pregnancy not being considered a "pre-existing" condition are the big ones.

9 years ago | Likes 483 Dislikes 33

I've a friend who wont quit cause she got pregnant while working under their insurance. If she got a new job, she'd be paying out of pocket>

9 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 1

which is roughly $20k in the US if not more. She's basically trapped in a job she doesn't want and could do better than because insurance.

9 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 0

Yep. B4 the ACA, if you got preggo & needed ins you were F'd unless you had work/spouse cov.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

And that's just the start!

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

Wtf does roe v wade have to do with any of that? No one is going to repeal that.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 11

Expect that repealing Roe Vs Wade is a goal of the Republican party, so it's understandable that women might worry about it.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The issue of health insurance and 'preexisting conditions' is a bigger societal problem. In fact all of that is related.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

lolwit, pregnancy isn't a pre-existing condition. Asthma, Cancer, MS, Cystic fibrosis, those are. But Pregnancy? No.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 13

Google is your friend.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

before the ACA it was considered a PEC so that companies wouldn't have to pay for it.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

so what you need, is for non-PEC to just fall under insurance as it should be

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If birth control is covered, condoms should be covered.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait, so women are always pregnant?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 15

No, prior to the ACA ins co's had escape clauses (loop hole) so they wouldn't have to cover it. Applies mostly to individual coverage.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Those aren't "rights" though. They're commodities. Not sure what you mean by the pregnancy thing though.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 25

Depends if you think access to affordable healthcare is a right or not, in my country it is.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

Here in Canada it is. But it's socialized so it better be. However, in America it's a commodity, thus the market decides. /1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Which is arguably a better system, if you allow and incentivize competition. /2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I'd argue it's not better to have competitive. Brands differentiate & at macro level always fall into 2 categories: cheap but crap, 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or just google "is pregnancy a pre-existing condition." TMYK

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

In a first world country that controls most of the world's wealth, it should be a right to be covered

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

But why does everyone else have to fund a woman's choice to kill a baby? We're confused.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 13

The "right" to have an abortion doesn't mean others pay. Just like your "right" to own a gun doesn't mean peeps are buying it for you. Gj

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Except PP, which helps women have abortions, is federally funded. Guns are not paid for with tax dollars.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually there's a fee for abortion and health services at PP. They use a sliding scale but then again, so do other regular doctors.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Short answer: They don't. I'm betting you already know that though and are attempting to troll

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Ask Ron, he was there

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 2

Research and become educated on the subject - do not be ashamed. We must stand together https://www.womensmarch.com/mission/

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

The Women's March happened everywhere... In the west. I haven't seen footage from Women's marches in Bangladesh or Kenya. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Why do you think that is the case? 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

It could be that there isn't support for them or it's unsafe. Or it could be they just didn't make the news.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or could it be that the Women's March don't care about the issues affecting women in the developing world?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Thank you so much, Smart And Benevolent Man, for explaining to us foolish women what our priorities should be.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The main one is legislated 100% control of your own body. Otherwise it's the lack of enforcement of guaranteed rights relative to context.

9 years ago | Likes 90 Dislikes 14

"The main one is legislated 100% control of your own body" selective service. it's tied to a host of federal benefits

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Is this ignorance suppose to make you look cool?

9 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 28

Easy FP

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Wouldn't Andy learn that in his women's studies class?

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

One of the only good comments here, +1

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Reproductive justice, ya silly ding dong.

9 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 13

Abortion, many rape cases being ignored, and the fact that Donald "grab em by the pussy" Trump is the president now

9 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 8

Then educate yourself.

9 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 14

Chris pratt is a beautiful woman

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I'm a man, but I volunteer with Planned Parenthood and I'd be happy to give you a list.

9 years ago | Likes 340 Dislikes 32

Please, give us all that list so we can all beat republitards over the head with it whenever the post fake questions like this one.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

Thank you for what you do. It means a lot.

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 3

I imagine T.R.A.P. laws, which are legislated and imposed in bad and dishonest faith, are high on that list.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 5

Those are vicious and awful, but really discriminatory against doctors rather than women specifically.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Thank you for doing what you do!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are laws being passed at the state level that would severely limit your choices if you get pregnant. It's just the start.

9 years ago | Likes 121 Dislikes 11

The fight needs to be fought at the state level, where the problem may exist. People forget that the president has little say in this stuff

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

The protections we have though were given at a federal level by the supreme court. Trump is going to appoint at minimum one SC Justice.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If our protests can help influence the selection of a Supreme Court justice, it will all have been worthwhile.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Trump and (especially) Pence are pro-life and if the fight came up on a federal level they would jump at a chance to repeal or change law

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I have a problem with the term "pro-life." They are pro-birth, they have no plan on how help the parent (s) or child after birth.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I agree

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You defend something you have. It's OK to be proactive about it when someone threatens that.

9 years ago | Likes 121 Dislikes 10

Why are some people against MRAs then?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 17

So why don't we see pro-democracy marches happening in democratic nations.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Check yesterday's news.... The woman's march was about much more than "women"

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Reproductive rights. Defunding of Planned Parenthood. Criminalizing abortion.

9 years ago | Likes 718 Dislikes 56

We shouldn't criminalize a person killing another person? I'm confused.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

PP isn't a government agency so it shouldn't receive government funding.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

See, I thought reproductive rights included a right to choose abortion or not...

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Murica... Greatest country in the world, right? I live in small European country and woman are paid equally, abortions are not illegal

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't forget about income inequality, over sexualizing of women

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*Democrat talking points.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

And that's just the start!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Those are practically the same thing.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 50

Soooo it was a pro-abortion march? We're all pretty confused about the whole thing...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

It was just a general outing of frustration. Sure, abortion rights might have played a role but mostly women were just fed up with things

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Isn't parental leave also super absent (or thin when present) all over the US as well? "Squeeze out a kid, back to work!"

9 years ago | Likes 172 Dislikes 1

there's no inequality here, you're being shafted as a parent, not a woman. we have paternal leave here too, but it's shorter

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I don't 100% disagree, but you also have to take into account the physical healing that women have to go through, so there's some inequality

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

it's not inequality, but it should be given to mothers. if neither of us gets a car even if I don't need it but you do it's not inequality

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Yes it is. Very few are offered parental leave. Most go unpaid.

9 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 0

I understand that there are people that defend that as being fair somehow...I just don't understand why they exist in the first place.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

This is a weird thing to see for me, we have both maternal and paternal leave in Slovenia and most of Europe

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Ontario here, my friends that are now spawning in their early 30's tend to split the leave between them. Dads gotta' get dadding and all.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In my experience most jobs that don't generally don't offer paid leave of any sort. I've seen it mostly with lower wage jobs. Makes it tough

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I can imagine. Even here, with a decent leave system in place, the struggle begins anew when the topic shifts to daycare. Or so I hear.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a mom i was going to say this! I felt equal to men utill i got knocked up.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Can't show their tits in public when guys can

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

You can in new york.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Men stand behind women 200% on this one

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Men were technically the ones that made being topless in public as a woman illegal.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Only 54% of women are actually for de-criminalising abortion though. Thoughts? (I'm pro-choice fwiw)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

That's quite off from stats I've seen. Source?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Your source doesn't support your conclusion. A valid conclusion would be: "of all people who identify as pro-choice, 54% of them are women."

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not just "only 54% of (all) women are pro-choice". Also, abortion was decriminalized back in the 70s and has stayed legal since then.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm not sure about criminalisation, but probably not tax-payer funded

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 25

It already isn't tax payer funded. These laws just create more barriers.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

"By law, federal funding cannot be allocated for abortions (except in rare cases)" literally from that section you linked.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Right, PP is federally funded. As in, some services like mammograms are federally funded. Abortion is not.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Did you actually read what you posted? No federal funding is allocated for abortions. I'm sorry you're bugged about birth control/mammograms

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It's not like men have these and women don't

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

It would be easier to secure those rights for men if people stopped blocking them for women...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not just abortion. Men can get condoms free. Women would have to pay if PP is defunded or insurance is taken away.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also under reproductive rights I've know 2 women who were denied surgical sterilization (one in her 30s with 3 kids) on the grounds 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

Yes! I actually discussed this with my dr. She said I would have a hard time finding a dr that would do it. I'm 28.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that a future husband might want additional children. That's not illegal but it's definitely a problem if a hypothetical partner gets a say.

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

Whoa what?! Where is this? I've never heard of such a thing.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

One lived in Tx (eventually got it based on her health issues), the other IN and talked someone into an IUD with the hope of snip later.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Why do they need to talk someone into an IUD? Want another baby, take it out. It's not fucking rocket science.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, holy shit I've never heard of that but that's totally fucked

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Didn't realize murder was a right? Am I missing something?

9 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 159

Yeah...half your brain

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

what do you mean?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

No one, esp govt should have the right to tell a woman what to do with her body.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

how does that relate to what you said about murder being a right?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Meaning they have no right to tell me I can't have an abortion.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

They are implying abortion is murder. Abortion should be a right.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

I didn't know telling me what I can and can't do with my body was a right. Am I missing something?

9 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 25

Do whatever you want with your body. Just don't expect everyone else to finance it.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 13

Unless you live in a state with Medicaid abortion coverage (and even that is medically neccessary only, not elective), you aren't. *c*

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If you doing something with your body impacts a life you had a part in creating, darn straight you don't have that right.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 61

You're wrong. They do have that right.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It's not the governments place. Period.

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 12

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 8, 2024 8:39 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Should be missing a period this far down.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

If you believe that life begins at conception, the kid's life should be protected. You don't have the right to murder a life you created

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 29

So rob women of their ability to control their own body? Seems like losing rights to me.

9 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 9

I think the idea is to make it illegal for them to kill babies.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 27

Until suicide and all drugs are legal, no one controls their own body.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 24

Sure, but that wasn't Zane's point I think. But what you are saying is fair.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

No actually. Make them pay for correction of their mistakes. If you can't afford it - don't make those mistakes in the first place./

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

Many times people have to abort a wanted pregnancy due to danger to the mother or some sort of fetal lethality problem.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

/Pregnancy doesn't happen by chance. You can't just randomly catch it on a bus trip. You have to make a conscious decision first.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

Also, in terms of abortion, if someone isn't smart or prepared enough to have safe sex you think they'd be prepared enough to raise a child?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Doesn't matter. If you're adult you have to take responsibility for ALL of your actions no matter how prepared you are.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Rape never happens, right? If she WAS raped, body has ways of shutting down if I remember correctly...

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yeah, and there are ways to interrupt a pregnancy within the first couple of weeks without actual surgery. And in that case it will fall/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Birth control access is part of the problem. If you can't afford health care you can't get prescribed bc, and the only place I've seen give-

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

- out free condoms is planned parenthood, which is on the edge of getting shut down. So basically if you're poor and can't afford condoms-

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Devils advocate: they have plenty rights over another body if they choose abortion, as that is a separate life. If a pregnant woman is (1)

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 24

No the woman has the right to remove the other, parasitic lifeform from her body. It's inability to survive on it's own kills it.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

(2) murdered is it not double homicide? Is it right to destroy another life just to avoid pain and stretch marks?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 13

A fetus is not considered a living human being until it has been born alive. Therefore, if a defendant kills a (1)

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

So something which moves, feeds, excretes, responds to stimulus et al isn't considered alive? Who passed that law?!

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 9

(2) pregnant lady he can only be charged with one count of murder for killing the mother

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

There have been cases where mom is basically carrying a still born baby and have died as a result of not having an abortion.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

And I have no problem with that. I have no problem with 99% of abortions that are medically necessary. What I dislike is the casual (1)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

(2) attitude with which people regard this new human life. Yes it's sacrifice must sometime be necessary but we should never be blasé .

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I think what flies over most people's head is the average women doesn't want an abortion, it's a distressing thing to go through.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

They want the right to have it availability to them as an option. It's not like women are out there intentionally harming babies.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

More devil's advocate because internet points have no real value and the what if the baby is still born already is a dumb argument. 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

According to CNN in 2011 0.018% of babies r still born, and most of those are probably unexpected. Saying we should base policy on less 2/3

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

They can control their body to not do the things that get them in the situation in the first place, so no, make better decisions 1/

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 46

That prevent them from getting into that particular predicament in the first place before getting into that situation and then saying 2/

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 34

"whoops I made a mistake and did this thing knowing full well it could lead to this and now I need someone to take care of it for me" but 3/

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 35

It's still my decision and my body age my rights even though I threw them out the window to do this thing in the first place

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 30

I'm so glad that rape no longer exists. That's great! Wasn't it proven that if it was a legitimate, the body would shut it all down right?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

You're welcome to remain a virgin. The rest of us will acknowledge that sexuality is an important part of being human.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

As is pregnancy from said sex. It is the natural order. One leads to the other.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 13

if you wanna deal with never having sex fine. you dont get to tell others they cant. thats the point. its not your business.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh fuck off, natural order my ass. Our natural order is to die at 20 from disease, but we don't really do that anymore do we?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Reproductive rights aren't equal rights. Men have no reproductive rights in the US. You get a chick preggers, you pay her for 18 years.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 15

The whole way child support is arranged right now is stupid, but I doubt it'd be easy to push through a 'commy law' like state child support

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Bc you have the choice to leave at anytime and you can. She will be stuck prego and will have to take care of a human by herself.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Which happens ALOT!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or y'all share custody and no body pays

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

That's entirely up to the mother to decide. Courts rule in their favor usually and your rights aren't as valuable as theirs.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

No, it's up to both parents. Most men just choose to give up custody for money rather than fight for it. The bias in the courts is a myth.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Although they should be, equality never means real equality if women don't get the better side of it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I don't really care about why it is like that, I just want people to shut up about wanting things "equal" when they really don't.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Dude. That's a kid that's already born, so it has child rights. It's not still in your ballsack, which would be your reproductive rights. K?

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Yeah, but it is the woman who decides if the child will be born or not. Man has no say. Even if he was against it from the start. If she/

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

This whole mess would be irrelevant if we just got rid of the stupid rule that the parrents pay child support (1)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

/poked a hole in the condom with a pin and lied about being on a pill the man still has to pay child support, no chance of escape at all.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

(1)Well didn't he know she could've gotten pregnant? Why not pay for the kid he made, the one who had no choice? That kids deserves money.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(5) responsibility. Women should too. I don't care if women have an abortion or not. It's none of my concern. I'm not their doctor.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(4) say in whether or not they provide for the kid. If they want nothing to do with it, fine. Sign off all rights to the kid and sure. No

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(3) Pro-choice is not asking for everyone to have an abortion. But the OPTION to have one is AVAILABLE for all. I 100% support men having a

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(2) That's the logic used for women with abortion- you should've known you'd get pregnant. What do you think happens? Not the kid's fault.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This whole mess would be irrelevant if we just got rid of the stupid rule that the parrents pay child support (1)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's a regressive tax that punishes poor people for having kids, supports the prison industry, robs fathers of their freedom (2)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's a good thing when it is applied equally across the board and is based on current income. Right now it sucks because it's skewered.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would assume its mostly to do with threats to defund planned parenthood and the POTUS admitting to sexual assault.

9 years ago | Likes 252 Dislikes 38

also declaring an intent to "revisit Roe vs Wade" might have something to do with it

9 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 1

"...they let you do it..."

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 10

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 8, 2024 8:39 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

"letting you do it" is not consent....

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Wait. When did Clinton admit he was a rapist?

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 103

You're clueless aren't you

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 10

Must be cause I don't watch "fake news" sites like CNN or MSNBC.Missed my daily dose of lies n propaganda.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 35

I too need an old white guy to be screaming into my ears to understand the information, its the only way really

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

Homeboy here loves him some Breitbart and Drudge Report so he can get "alternative facts"

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

This something that Trump said!! Wow you people are brainwashed.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

People like you make me genuinely scared about the future of humanity.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

Ppl who can't tell the difference between hyperbole (look it up) n assault frighten me

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

What do you watch? And the video is quite clear. He said he likes to grab woman by the pussy. Even joking around, how can you condone that?

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

It's all in good fun. What's the problem?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 18

Don't condone it. It's tacky n nothing more. Not assault, not rape, nothing like what y'all tried to pretend it was.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So when u say, "I blew it up," or "I'll kill him" you should be jailed destruction or conspiracy to murder w no actual damage?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nothing's happened yet. It was mostly about awareness and unity. Standing together and fighting against legislation that would make us less.

9 years ago | Likes 392 Dislikes 47

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Feb 11, 2017 3:30 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

That's like saying "I haven't gotten in a car accident yet so there's no need to ever service my brakes."

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

No, its more like saying "my boyfriend may cheat it on me, so ill do his best friend first so i dont get hurt"

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

what legislation are you talking about?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Are you familiar with Mike Pence and his stance with women's reproductive rights in Indiana while governer? Hes now our Vice President.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Not everyone is from the US :). That's kind of fucked up unless there is an economic argument for it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This seems to be the easy way to get to FP recently

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Which is why Madonna kept saying revolution

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

"Nothings happened" Okay thank you. Thats all I need know regarding this Woman's march. Makes complete sense now.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 20

So we should just sit around until it's too late to do anything? Senate already voted insurance companies don't have to cover birth control

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

What is all this talk? If a guy wants to have sex, he will buy condoms as birth control. Some women.... provide birth control!!!! Uhhh why?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Birth control is not just used to prevent pregnancy. I use it to treat a hormone condition. If I'm paying for insurance it should be covered

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Thats the problem... its the healthcare insurance thats the issue. Women arent singled out. Healthcare is a joke nowadays, all im saying.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

What legislation? Were there any specifics to this stupid protest?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Proposed legislation, not passed, that restricts sexual autonomy of women specifically. This wasn't a protest so much as an awareness thing.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Still confused. We're calling abortion "sexual autonomy" now? Is that just more PC than "taking care of it"?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No. Autonomy = ability to have sex when you want, with who you want. Proposed legislation targets this ability.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What legislation is that, specifically? Sounds too crazy to be true.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

these things are going to get done fast. obama was the only roadblock left

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

Haha

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

What do you mean 'us'? Sounds a bit like segregation to me. Typical woman to trip BEFORE something happens. Protest just in case right?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 16

There are hundreds of laws limiting access to abortion, family planning, medical care, prenatal care, etc.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It is us, not just women. They've already removed any mention of civil rights and lgbtq etc from the official whitehouse.gov site. Cabinet 1

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

picks are anti-environment, anti-public education, anti-any type of regulation, pro-cutting taxes to top earning folks, etc. Not Just Women.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I mean, which is better? Getting rights taken away and having to fight to get them back, or fighting to keep them?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Fighting who? Fighting why? Or is it just a trendy all female protest?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 9

Well, for one, fighting the people who want to take them, in this case Republicans.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Also, the protest wasn't all female, I know a bunch of guys who participated. And what on earth do you mean by "trendy?"

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

For me, it's the right to live in a sexual harrassment/assault free country. Also, reproductive rights.

9 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 5

We can't promise you the first one, but we can promise persecution to the guilty.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

I think the thing is, when the country elects a man who has been recorded basically admitting to sexual assault, treating women as objects,

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

etc... It's understandable to assume that the rest of the country DOESN'T have your back when it comes to sexual assault.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Rather him than a woman who has repeatedly covered up the numerous sexual assaults committed by her husband.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Get your facts straight.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're obviously not from Indiana. You'll see. Mike Pence is a dick.

9 years ago | Likes 182 Dislikes 19

Pence is powerless. A dick indeed, but powerless.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The only thing scary about Trump not carrying out his full term, is Mike Pence stepping in.

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 1

Not the only scary thing. But perhaps the worst thing.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You weren't kidding! I just read up on a bunch of his voting patterns.. fuck that dude

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also in Indiana - can confirm. Saturday was not the first time I went to the capitol here to protest this schmuck.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Can confirm, Mike Pence is disgusting. If not for the possibility HE takes presidency, I'd wait for someone to off Trump or he steps down.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

Wtf is wrong with you? Trump is a DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED official not a dictator, quit wishing for the overthrow of our government just cuz

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 26

Your candidate didn't win, absolutely fucking disgraceful

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 26

Hey man sorry you're getting downvoted. Some people just don't like being reminded they didnt vote.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 13

Tbh I don't care either way, the constant barrage of ppl wishing Trump's assassination is fucking terrifying

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Because of how the electoral college works, even nonvoters in blue states wouldn't have made a difference. Clinton already got more votes.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

From Indiana, can confirm.

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 6

I can second. I moved from Indy to DC about 3 months before Pence...this isn't what I meant by "Pence Must Go" :(

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How's the pizza in Indiana? I hear it's a little homophobic.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

I have noticed a decrease in the varieties of sausage available

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In Indiana, you always go corn dog to mouth, never mouth to corn dog.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

its a pretty long list, you could look it up if you actually wanted to.

9 years ago | Likes 87 Dislikes 18

quick pull one out of the air...

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 16

No, I don't think this turd wants to actually pull up an up to date article.

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 14

Ugh, this meme should die. "Too afraid to ask" is an odd way to brag about ignorance. We've got the web *and libraries.* Try harder. Engage.

9 years ago | Likes 174 Dislikes 45

This.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 11

Technically they are engaging since they know people will comment with the right answer or their opinions on the matter if there is none

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 6

"ugh" should die too.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

They're like the old people who think they need to literally ask Google a question. No one is judging your search history besides the NSA

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

im not exactly sure what point you are trying to make... and at this point, im too afraid to ask

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

Also a lot of states have a "luxury" tax on feminine hygiene products I.e tampons, pads, etc but no corresponding tax for male products.

9 years ago | Likes 181 Dislikes 23

Also noteworthy is that women on average cost the government more money than men.. so maybe women's products are more taxed on purpose?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 10

what exactly are "male" products? shaving cream and razors? golf clubs?

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 13

what exactly are "male" products? shaving cream and razors? golf clubs?

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 25

Hygiene products count as a luxury pretty much across the board, be it toilet paper, soap, or tampons. This isn't a problem like you think.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 20

I feel like you wouldn't say it was a luxury item if all women stopped using pads and tampons and just bled all over everything.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 6

Of course its a problem when women are being taxed more for hygiene products than men, while they still only make 75 cents to the dollar!1/2

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 22

Too bad the wage gap is a myth.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Are you specificallyasking men to subsidizewomen's hygienebecause it's women's hygiene? That's the ask for dropping that tax, but not others

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Also, women make 95 cents to the dollar when you control for the variables. If you want more money, get a better job.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

No. Don't try to sugarcoat it honey. There ain't no women making 95 cents. get a better job, where? why? Why not treat me like an equal?1/2

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

Only US have this tax, in EU deodorants cost the same no matter gender. Just cuz its not a problem for u dont mean its not a problem for me

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

This is just a blatant feminist lie often referred to as the "pink tax". Even if it was true, just buy the "male" hygiene product.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 10

Ah yes, the male tampons!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Yep lemme just buy the male tampons

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Why aren't you defending that there is a tax only on female products? Oh yes, because that's a lie you can't defend.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

The saddest thing is people who don't understand that ALL the rights they have were won by a fight and can be taken away...all of them

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 6

Freedom is a fragile thing and is never more than one generation away from extinction

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jun 13, 2017 11:15 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Yes, just like all the other rights. These are merely laws and can be rewritten.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All of them

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Just.... take a look at Ohio and Indiana, and Texas. That'll be the whole country VERY soon.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 6

Respectfully, I just don't see that happening.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

:(

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I'm an independent, but seems like most women/supporters of women, don't agree with treating women like objects "she was married, I didn't 1

9 years ago | Likes 477 Dislikes 51

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 23, 2017 2:28 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

To be honest.. i'm not sure if you're agreeing w/me, or upset w/me, but either way, hurray for education! (also another reason women marched

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think you should educate yourself. Read.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

2)care" "grabbed her by the pussy, you can do what you want", is really insulting to women, & shows the man in charge of the US, views half

9 years ago | Likes 355 Dislikes 42

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 23, 2017 10:24 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Context: A recently married man bragged about trying to fuck a married woman. And then bragged about touching/kissing women without asking.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 23, 2017 10:21 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

He specifically says he doesn't even ask or wait.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

3)the population as lesser- this is fact. Also, women fight shit like that all the time- Supervisors asking about "home" time, when she's

9 years ago | Likes 283 Dislikes 36

I'm also independent and relatively agree with what you've commented here. But that's not fact, that's your opinion of the man and his 1/

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

intention with those statements. Unless you can verify your mind-reading powers, his motivation and overall opinion of women is your opinion

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

I don't see how that's relevant? Even if his intent was different he should've owed up to what he said and either apologized

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

4)going to go have kids &give work back to the males, if she's on PMS if she expresses an opinion. Issues with representation in our legal

9 years ago | Likes 248 Dislikes 35

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 23, 2017 10:23 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't think business owners should have to pay for someone elses children simply because it can be made as a reason to not hire women

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 18

Doesnt seem to cause issues in the rest of the developed world

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

5)system. right to BC, rights to abortion (choice), right to protest, and the right to fight back to an election that was sabotaged.

9 years ago | Likes 233 Dislikes 39

You have the right to abort a child in the US, no? I think trump only wants to make it so everyone doesn't have to pay for it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 17

6)oh, and because of posts like this, w/women who don't know history, saying "what rights don't we have"&half the comments say "silly women"

9 years ago | Likes 223 Dislikes 37

You also have the right to protest (look at the womens march) but that doesn't give you the right to get violent (inauguration protests)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 14

As a man, I've heard that women get shafted when it comes to having pockets.

9 years ago | Likes 6674 Dislikes 38

If we all'd paid attention to a woman's job in HOME EC CLASS that wouldn't be a problem. No pocket? Sew one in. Whiners.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

"Get shafted"

9 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 1

"Women only have 73 pockets for every man's 100!"

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 2

This statistic feels inflated. I'd say we only have about 45. Some pockets aren't even pockets. Just sewn on for show!

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

This is true. Source: I'm a woman. Who wears pants. Specifically denim. Pockets are scarce.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Levi's 515 bootcut have pockets. Thats the only jeans I've bought/worn for almost 10 years

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Went to your profile to see if there was some sort of technicolor cheese wedge post. Ended up following you because I love your cat.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I let him know he has a fan, but he didnt seem to care much. Username is from one of the Mystery Science Theaters.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a man, I've heard women get shafted.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

As a man, I've heard that women get shafted when having sex. But then again so do some guys.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It's true. I buy men's Roots brand track pants because they have pockets that are deep enough to be useful. Plus, they are comfy af.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I would have marched for that! #notmypants

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I've worn women's trousers. Couldn't even fit my man-hands in the pockets, let alone anything else.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a woman, I can't fit my woman hands, let alone my phone

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or they could pick clothes that aren't designed without pockets. Hell, I heard some women even make clothes.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I Googled "women getting shafted via pockets" and now I have a new fetish.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

YES. I NEED. REAL. PANTS POCKETS. I DON'T CARE ABOUT FAKE POCKETS FOR FASHION, WHAT IS THIS, THE 20'S?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The solution to this is both easy and impossible. "Stop buying dresses without pocket". Men wouldn't buy pants without pockets.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The dress with pockets is so rare; we are lucky to find one or two in a life time.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What has the world come to when more dresses have pockets than women's jeans?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My 2 year old daughter is already disappointed that all of her "pockets" are only for decoration.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why did yah hafta go an bring that up...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Something something "get shafted" sex joke

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah same

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a woman, this is the only additional right I see necessary at this point...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is not lie!!!!! Lol

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and Shampoo....

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Solution:HOODIES ALL DAY EVERY DAY

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a man the women's pockets thing makes me livid. It's so unnecessarily asinine.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

As a man, I've heard that women get shafted when having sex. But then again so do some guys.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's just a myth like the clitoris and global warming

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

OMG YES. Fucking what I wouldn't give to have pockets.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's, In My Opinion, The Worst Of The Bunch.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I recently had a conversation to my guy friend about this. He could fit his entire Samsung Galaxy S7, portable battery, headphones, 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Couple pens, and a small book in one of his pockets and all I could fit in mine was a small iPhone SE.... 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So if we made pants with pockets and still fashionable we'd be rich!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I agree thats shit. However pockets are not a right.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So your saying, have a shaft have pockets. Don't have shaft, get shafter

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I logged in just to reply to this. I could scream for hours about how fucking much I hate buying pants, Jesus Christ!!!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a woman who used to be a man, it fucking sucks, dude.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Truthfully I want my girl to wear a dress with pockets for the pure symbolism.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They have purses, its called a vagina

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

My son asked me why I carry a bag (purse) and that is the exact reason. NO POCKETS, DAMMIT.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

28th Amendment: All genders shall have equal access to pockets.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Shouldn't be a problem, they are naturals at sowing. Pockets in no time. See, the patriarchy isn't that bad, gave them skills to overcome.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They get socially accepted bags they call purses. Fuck em

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Are you sure they weren't just talking about their shaft pockets?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

just buy unisex/MANLY clothing. cargo shorts (the longer kind) have all the space you could want, and they look better on women. comfy too

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

As a man, this makes my pants look like a chipmunk..

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's what I was thinking

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This comment wins imgur

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and as a good friend of mine points of .. soft and cozy clothing

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh God you're right, I have to get out there!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then again, our pockets got nothing on their handbags.. Fuck me those are practical

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They are way too easy to forget and more vulnerable to being snatched.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're misinformed good sir! Dresses now have pockets. What a glorious world we live in!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Umm... How about that they get to carry the ultimate pocket that holds all their shit and not be judged for it?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is why I always hated Hermione. She has a fucking tardis purse that can store an entire fucking library in it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You get jeans that make you're ass and legs get good or pockets. Not both

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

OH MY GOD! So glad someone noticed! It's ridiculous!!!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tis a sad truth...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I concur

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now this is a movement I can get behind

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My 5-month old twin daughters are more likely to have pockets in their clothes than my wife.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Socially acceptable purse, though

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

OMG Yes. It wouldn't bother me so much if they didn't make fake pockets too.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 147 Dislikes 0

I'm a dude and I always find this cool too

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I have heard this so many times irl and it makes me so happy for them. *high five* Ya, pockets are awesome! Carryin stuff wif outcha hands!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Too true friend. And shafted when paying for tampons

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Very good point! Women's pockets are useless!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes seriously that is annoying. But why? Why the fake pockets on everything!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Today I complained that my 1 year old's pants have pockets and my pajamas don't. Definitely shafted.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As an Apache helicopter, I wish I could have pants

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes damnit #freethepockets I have too many damn pants with pockets that are sewn shut. WTFF

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah but they get socially acceptable mini bags to carry; purses.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Daddy, who sewed up my pockets? Nobody. Why can't I put my hands in? Looks like you don't have pockets. Who would make a dress like that?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I call them fockets (fake-pockets).

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would definitely march for pockets. That's just some bullshit.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's true. I buy men's Roots brand track pants because they have pockets that are deep enough to be useful. Plus, they are comfy af.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a man whos pretty good at sewing, I want to suggest that they tailor their own pockets in, but I'm worried it will be considered sexist

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

A lot of jeans don't usually have much in the way of space, so we'd pretty much have to straight up make our own jeans or have cargos.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's not sexist, it's just easier said than done. As a woman who's pretty good at sewing, not all pants are made to accommodate pockets.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

they make up for it in purses

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it was a huge revelation when I found out. gf was like "can you hold these?" and I was like "don't you have pockets" and she was all "no".

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

OH MY GOD DO NOT GET ME STARTED

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

this is true.....no wonder we have trust issues, they put fake pockets on all our clothes!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've told my gf that she should get men's pants, for the pockets and for the fairly uniform size no matter what company or brand she chooses

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Ya but girls have different shaped thighs that usually don't fit well in guys pants. Otherwise I would wear nothing but guys pants!

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

I always buy guy pants and they fit me fine. (I am a female).

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I wish i could,but i have way to much hip:(

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Get larger size, then hem them/get them tailored.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tell me about it! once accidentally bought women's jeans from a clearance place. There was so much hip space, like what is this

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Lmao! You coulda cut slits in the sides and made some bodacious pockets. :)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a man ive seen women getting shafted, often in hd

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

THIS. I have TWO pairs of jeansI ordered online without front pockets.... TWO.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There was a sign at the march that said "More pockets!" They knew what it was about.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was thinking of getting into a business to add pockets to outfits with no pockets.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm a woman, and I'm ok with it because I like tight jeans and bulky pockets look bad. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 9

Which is also why men should ditch cargo shorts! ;D Unite!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You leave my Cargo shorts out of this! Its for utility....

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought that was what the tactile turtleneck was for.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also yes.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just have your boyfriend wear cargo pants.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You mean you like getting shafted?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Cuz that's why we have purses to hold all our stuff anyway!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So far every girl I've talked to about this absolutely hates that their pants have none or very shallow pockets. You are a rare exception.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Do those girls like tight jeans? Also, I take a purse with me pretty much everywhere so I can have gum, ibuprofen, tissues etc. all the time

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Some of them do. Most of them likely would take purse or sth even if their pockets were bottomless, but it's the lack of options that sucks

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

My theory is that they don't put pockets in women's jeans only to force them spend more money on purses etc. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Because having any pants without pockets just doesn't make any damned sense

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's probably my least favorite part about being a woman.

9 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 1

What's your most favorite?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a man who cares about equality, shafting women's pockets is important to me.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

I was so excited to find yoga-type pants with pockets the other day...it made me sad for myself. But also happy. Cause pockets!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a guy, I bought a jacket that once had a fake pocket. I really felt your pain. It was terrible. But luckily it was just one fake pocket.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Just one? That's nothing compared to being fooled by both the front AND back pockets...

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Are you sure? Men's clothing frequently has pockets sewed shut for looking sharp after shipping but are fully usable if cut open.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It wasn't a blazer. Just a light denim jacket. Has a zipper but it opens to nothingness.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

...a fake zipper? Well, in effect, since it's a useless zipper. What a concept!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What a sad realization. Sounds like a neat jacket though so you've got that going for you which is nice

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

....yet are gifted breasts, that generally see the use of a bra, which is utilised as a more convenient pair of pockets

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Yeah that's actually super unhealthy and gross. That's how you get a lot of bacteria and stuff all over your lady bits.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Which we wouldn't have to resort to if they just gave us pockets... if you don't want boob money, give us pockets :D

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I cringe seeing cell phones. Cash and phones are the dirtiest things you own, I feel bad for your significant other

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd much rather boob money that the prison equivalent, arse money!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah but woman have handbags aimed at them so I guess it balances

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

It's hard to keep track of a bag though.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, so we can spend even more money on a form of storage we should have on our clothing >_>

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Because....we don't have pockets.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

If someone aims a handbag at me, I would take evasive maneuvers.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

No. It really doesn't. Carrying around a bag is annoying and I'm always afraid I'm going to lose it. I live having pockets on my cargo pant

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

No we have to find something else because we have no pockets!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What came first no pockets or the bag?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The age old question

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a woman, I hate wearing a purse. Give me pockets so I don't have to lug around and keep track of a freaking bag.

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

Thank you! My mom can't understand why I refuse to wear a purse. They're bulky and awkward. My boobs are all the purse I need.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

I wish I had boobs

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes!! Too bad my cell phone doesn't fit anymore. That is one draw back of not having a flip phone!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Your smart phone won't lay in your bra? I mean, mine does slip a bit sometimes but it's safe 99% of the time.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's the Damn truth, I got so excited when I found out a dress I bought had pockets. What a time to be alive!!!

9 years ago | Likes 189 Dislikes 1

I find most of the time those pockets are useless because they pull on the dress too much and the fabric gets pinned to my side.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's a feeling like no other.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I knew this but it was repeated three times this weekend anywsyd

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"That's a cute dre.." THANKS IT HAS POCKETS

9 years ago | Likes 88 Dislikes 1

Damn straight!

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

EVERYTIME!!!!!!!

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Wow - I have never owned a dress with actual pockets!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's an amazing thing

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's an amazing thing

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait, are you serious? Women don't get pockets in their clothes? What the fuck?

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

I was told it's because women like to have a smooth, slim form. But, I'm a women and I want my shit on me and my hands free!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's time for women to rise up. Create gorgeous outfits with pockets! POCKETS FOR ALL!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes! It's so sad. Sometimes they are tiny pockets, just big enough for a chapstick.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Jesus. I couldn't handle that. My phone, keys, wallet and such has to be in there. I now realize the purse but why are some so damn big?!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Some clothing doesn't have pockets, or they have fake pockets that are stitched closed, or really small pockets that are practically useless

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

That's.. fucking retarded. I am so sorry.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

This is to basically force women to buy purses to carry what most guys can carry in their pockets.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

No, it's because the pockets would add bulk, especially if actually used.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I almost agree, but I've seen those duffel bags some of you call purses. That's a bit of an overreaction for a few pockets you're missing.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Well there is a few things I wouldn't put in my pocket. Unless I was running to the bathroom.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You know the one's stitched closed are just to help maintain ship til bought? Seam ripper to the rescue!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

For some yes

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didn't know a lot of my nice clothes had usable pockets for decades.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've got clothes with legit fake pockets-they feel like disappointment and lies

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

As a woman, can confirm

9 years ago | Likes 1015 Dislikes 4

How else are you gonna get duped into buying hundreds of dollars worth of handbags?

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Someone once asked me, "why do all women have purses?" And I replied, "because we don't get to have any goddamn pockets"

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

I've seen more women switch to backpacks. If it feels anything like my laptop bag on my shoulders, I can see why.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Pockets on dresses, that's all we ask for!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

As a married man, I can confirm as well.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a pocket on women's jeans, can confi.. wait *disappears*

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But you get to have fancy purses.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

If it's not attached, I'm losing it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a man who has had to wear women's jeans, can confirm. How do you fit phones in there??

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

True dat!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can confirm too, all I have are faux pockets.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a man with size 24 waist, can confirm

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a human, can confirm

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's so that they can sell more purses.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How else are you gonna get duped into buying hundreds of dollars worth of handbags?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I HATE using purses and bags.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

WHY ARE ALL MY COMMENTS DUPING

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

although your clothes are a lot more comfortable

9 years ago | Likes 119 Dislikes 7

As a man who wore yoga pants once, can confirm. Weird night.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

TBH I love their pants and the likes, very comfy

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ehh. Yoga pants, yes. Bras? Nah. Fuzzy socks? Yes. Structured shirts? Nah.

9 years ago | Likes 138 Dislikes 1

Fuck yes, thigh high fuzzy socks sound bloody amazing to wear.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hell ye, fuzzy socks are great

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

what do you mean by structured shirts? all i know is every piece of womens clothing ive touched is softer than the male counterpart

9 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 3

Thank you for asking. I too did not know those words could go together to make sense.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Shirts that have bones in them, it's like a hard plastic used to create a body shape. Or shirts that have cups built in. Dresses similar too

9 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 0

But I agree fabric is usually soft as fuck

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

I feel like you've been shopping in the shitty men's section, bc shitty fabric is still shitty regardless of gendered clothes.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Not sweatshirts! Why do you think we always steal them?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

When you make a comment like this it makes me think you must have absolutely no clue how to be empathetic towards others.

9 years ago | Likes 131 Dislikes 27

Comments like this are the problem. Ever thought of explaining instead of condemning? Maybe this is her way of asking.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 22

It's a pretty darn sarcastic way of asking that makes it seem more like she wants a pat on the back for being special rather than an answer.

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 3

I'm not really feeling the teachable moment here. You're more than welcome to have at it.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Maybe stop being so bitchy when someone's literally asking a question?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 19

Explain? How is pointing out a person's lack of empathy being bitch?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your first comment was a complaint, but not actually addressing what the OP wanted to know. Seemed like an opportunity to explain to her.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If there wasn't real issues that even modern women face, they wouldn't rally in such numbers, globally.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 8, 2024 8:39 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Reproductive rights, lack of political representation, lack of funding and pay for sports, being told tampons are a luxury...

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 8, 2024 8:39 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

There's a £10,000 fee in the U.K. to run for parliament. Lots of people don't have that kind of choice

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 8, 2024 8:39 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Also access to abortions?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 8, 2024 8:39 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Nope, check my comments about women's tennis. Complete denial of opportunity to make more money simply because the men's game came first

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 26, 2017 4:09 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Not necessarily, female tennis players' pay is justified by saying they only play 3 sets. But they won't let them play 5 sets or it'd 1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You asked how are women unequal, not what laws limit women being equal. There's a cultural problem here

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

https://www.womensmarch.com/mission/ that's their reasoning. As far as rights being denied there's a few dozen bills that restrict 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1176 Dislikes 62

Principle 1 (Nonviolence) is rich considering they've attacked several people. Yeah, I know, it's supposedly the facists at AntiFa doing it.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

But they're not exactly demanding AntiFa stop, or demanding the black hooded thugs leave, either.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 23, 2017 5:56 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 23, 2017 12:44 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

They did....They marched for the people mentioned in the article.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hmm, from the article it didn't seem that way, I suppose I may have misread

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Hey thanks for the link, good to read from the source!

9 years ago | Likes 124 Dislikes 3

Did you find it as unhelpful as I did? It doesn't really say anything definitive other than nonviolent, which was a fail apparently.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

"LGBTQIA" wtf?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Thank you I will read this later

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

but do the women marching know that or are they just hopping on the bandwagon

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 15

All I got out of that was "LGBTQIA." What in the harold magarold is that. ??

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 22

Let me Google that for you...

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

As Abraham Lincoln said: "No law can give me the right to do what is wrong."

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They didn't answer the who, what, when, where, and why.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 14

I don't understand why this is called a women's march based on this link. O_o

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jul 8, 2022 9:47 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Pardon, what is now under intersectionality? The term women or the march itself? I'm confused by the name if it's representing all.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jul 8, 2022 9:47 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

That's just... bleh... whatever.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sounds more cultish than an agenda.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 100

Thank you for the link.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Don't forget this page, too: https://www.womensmarch.com/principles/

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Sounds more cultish than an agenda.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 103

Regrettable time to accidentally double post.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

No offense but tl:dr

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 11

To;Dr: in some states, if you get raped and conceive, you don't get an abortion; gotta give birth and care of the little shit all your life.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Thanks for the sauce.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hurray source!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

So they are protesting for an amorphous reason and have no clearly defined goals other than exposure of... stuff. Yeah that sounds right

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 86

When you do exactly no research you reach ignorant conclusions. https://www.womensmarch.com/mission/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The guy didnt link to the right page. Click the link at the bottom

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Women's rights aren't human rights, human rights are human rights. That webpage feels like a bitchfest, downvote me.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 49

Maybe if you stopped bitching it wouldn't feel like a bitchfest?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Ok, but ill be gentle.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"downvote me"... I don't care what came before this, any variation of that I will downvote regardless.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Sounds like they think things are gonna be A-OK for all straight white guys though.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 19

Well when you've never had your right to marry who you want threatened and don't have to worry about your bodily autonomy being taken 1/

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

At the turn of each election, not being denied service bc you're straight or have had an abortion, things may seem pretty fuckin peachy 2/

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And what rights are being taken away from Blacks and Muslims? They need to pick a clear goal, not just list opppressed" minorities to pander

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So basically they want us to hand over the keys to Putin?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 23

...what?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

From what i understand from the mission statement is were to forgo the military and adapt a peaceful life. Im all for being corrected I may

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i don't know where you got "get rid of the military" from but... no? secondly, Russia is not and has not been since the days of (1)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

'Russia' being called the USSR. and while im not saying they wouldnt invade if we did get rid of the military, we are not cause no one is (2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Think we should make it any easier.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not being understanding correctly but won't that just be asking a communist country to take over? Russia is already in the running i dont

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Nonviolence is a way of life for courageous people."

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 2

It doesn't take courage to leave other people alone. Am I missing something?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

It takes courage to not strike back when you feel threatened.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Does it not also take courage to strike back when it's necessary, though?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I felt that one aswell

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Username checks out

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Tell the black gangs when killing other black gang members to stop non violently. Tell the drug cartels to stop. Non violently.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah but as a man I can't get an abortion, so take that.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 12

Not with that attitude!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This is either the best or the worst reasoning on this issue.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Serious question. So, the march was not against Trump? I mean, all this existed before he was inaugurated, right?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

No Trump specifically said he intended to attack women on all of these issues so he's certainly the main motivation for this showing.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was not officially an anti-Trump protest, but since Trump actively opposes many of these issues, there is clearly overlapping ground

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

Obama never admitted to sexual assault on camera or campaigned to close women's health clinics.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 8

Officially a women's rights march, but most of the people at them (or at least at the one I attended) were very much against Trump.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I've wondered this too. They could have marched during Obama's term, but didn't. Hmmm...

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 11

Of course Obama represented their views. Trump does not, nor does any branch of govt currently, hence, the march

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Probably because Obama isn't an admitted sexual assaulter of women, running on an incredibly regressive platform?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

LGBTQIA? What has been added now?

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 12

Omg this is the comment I was looking for. Everytime is see the acronym LGBT, a new letter is always added.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why not just add the entire alphabet at this point, shit..Numbers too. Gotta include everybody, right?

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 10

I use QUILTBAG, personally.

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 4

All you need is U.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

LOL it's less of a mouthful. Are asexual people really a marginalized group though?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Ignored or told they don't exist, yes.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

But are they denied rights...? I'm not trying to be contentious. This stuff just confuses me.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Tomorrow it will be LGBTQIAZXGHTRBMNW

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 19

Haha! They're different!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

And so what if it is?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 9

The fact that you don't find that rediculous is in itself, rediculous.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

Meh, I disagree

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

Intersex and Asexual

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

But those are covered under the Q...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Asexual bit being part of it is so retarded. What the shit does a asexual person have to be upset about? Putting them in the crowd of...

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

...homosexuals, etc, has no logic attached to it. A heterosexual can go asexual and NOTHING would change in how they are treated by others.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Because the progressives decided 'asexual' is a gender.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

What's intersex

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

If you have to ask, you can't afford it.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

That's the first time I've seen LGTBQIA... It gets longer every time... What's the last few mean?

9 years ago | Likes 204 Dislikes 18

I don't know why anyone would want to label themselves. People seriously confuse me.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The longest related Initialism i have seen is LGBTTQQIAAP. At that point I assumed they were taking the piss. They were not.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Not sure why you were downvoted--I was wondering the same thing.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

They're just trying to be inclusive to every letter in the Alphabet. Progressive!

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 7

A queer friend of mine said to use the acronym QuILTBAGS to make it easier to remember

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Quiltbags?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Queer, Intersex, Lexbian, Trans, Bisexual, Asexual, Gay and....uh..Sexy?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Darn sexy people! They shouldn't be allowed to marry! IT'S NOT RIGHT!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The varied answers I'm seeing here are exactly the problem I have with these stupid labels.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

At this point I think I am fine with more letters being added. But they gotta use the whole alphabet once. No repeats.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

"Questions In Advance"

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I'm gay, can't we just say "people" instead of making ridiculously longer sequences of letters?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Sure, and we can get rid of all groups and categories and just call everything "stuff" :)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What gets me is why do they keep wanting special labels for everything? Why can't they just be a person, not a letter of the alphabet?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

Because we have subgroups we all belong too and it's helpful to classify things in many situations.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Q is Queer, I is Intersex, A is... either Ally or Asexual depending on how much Tumblr you've smoked. It's all snowflake bullshit.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Dont feel bad. I'm a social worker and thats the first Ive seen it like that as well.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

I'm gay and I have no idea what those mean.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

you're a bad gay then :D

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'm gay and I didn't even know it went past LGBT. Should just call it "everything other than straight" at this point.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Itll keep getting longer as long as people continue to think gender identity and sexuality are the same thing too

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It would be shorter if we just used "other"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't like how the "LGB" is included in it all. At least they know what they are and don't need special labels.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We could add U for unisex, and rearrange them to QUILTBAG. Much easier to say.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Weren't the non-vaginal members of the march triggered by the (insert plural pronoun) wearing vaginas on their faces? How rude.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The 2 new letters really screwed up the GQBLT acronym I was using

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why don't they just make it "to infinity and beyond" as they continues to identify more stuff

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Politically correct term for 'mental illness'

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 30

I hate to admit it, but once you get far enough its either you are doing it for attention, or have serious issues. I draw that line at (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

The titles that are so specific that only you belong in it, and the "other-kin" bullshit. No, you are not part wolf, you are a furry.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I was thinking the same thing... what the shit..

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 13

Queer, Insane, and Agonizing

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

Am I the only one who thinks this is getting a little out of hand? At this rate it will be the entire alphabet.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That alphabet soup just keeps getting longer. I am confused, does lesbian and gay not cover queer?

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 6

Queer also connotes a more radical and political ideology.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Queer is becoming common as a catch-all for anything not fitting into straight or the other letters. Tho the q sometimes means questioning.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Gay covers lesbian, so there's one letter we can get rid of

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But there needs to be distinction as both groups have their own needs/issues they face.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"gay" covers men and women issues.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not necessarily. Queer in this sense is more about having a fluid gender identity that bounces between masculine and feminine or neither

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Though I have to say a gender queer person will likely have some trouble making one of the other labels fit.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There is a difference between queer and genderqueer, is there not?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes. Queer is a much older term and usually refers to sexual orientation rather than gender identity/expression, although expression does...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In what part of the spectrum do the face-vaginas fall?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ah, ok. I did not know that.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Intersex and asexual and/or ally. The last A is laughable.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 11

I think the A may just be asexual.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

It is

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Ally can go F itself. Being ok with different genders/sexualities doesn't make you not straight or cisgender.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 6

Agreed, I think some people just want to feel special or included, no matter if they deserve to be.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Oh, that's for sure. Transgender has issues in that regard too, since it's based entirely on internal belief and so impossible to verify.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

To be fair, the word feminist describes both female and male feminists, and white people participated in the black civil rights movement

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In fact, a woman can't be a feminist in Germany :) Only a man can be a Feminist. Women are Feministinnen. The idiocy of gendered language

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sure, I have no issue with that, I'm just saying they don't need their own special term just because they're nice to one group of people.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

At what point does it change to "The Sexual Identification Spectrum"?

9 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 2

According to my scrabble tiles, we're not even halfway there.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or "gender and sexual minorities" (GSM). 3 letters that cover everything. Works in German too (geschlechtliche und sexuelle Minderheiten).

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That would be a significantly better name.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No it wouldn't. Let them keep adding letters. It lets me call them the Drunk Alphabet Group.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There all on the spectrum, no doubt.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I've heard propositions for Sexuality And Gender Acceptance - SAGA

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I would hear that every time in my head like the old SEGA jingle...which would be awesome.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Saahhh-gaaa..."

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Welcome to the next level...? Or... SEGA!!!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've heard adding in "Uncertain", and just rearranging it to QUILTBAG.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Yes that too! Haha.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nah when they're uncertain they make a new acronym.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Queer, intersex, asexual.

9 years ago | Likes 87 Dislikes 7

This is why QUILTBAG is a better way of writing it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Intersex?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

People whose biological/physical sex (phenotypic or sometimes even genotypic) is indeterminate or ambiguous. It's rare, but it happens.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

Seems more like a disorder, but OK, sure.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 15

This is legitimately getting out of hand

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Is the Q stand for questioning?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Depends on who you ask. I wish I had a better answer.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I mean this is the right answer ^

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It depends. I always heard questioning. Some say the A is for Allies and not Asexuals

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Thought the A was allies

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

It was when I was in college in the early oughts. I've started referring to it as 'alphabet soup' because they're always adding letters.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Idk why you were downvoted for that but pretty sure it used to. Cant keep up with everything I guess

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ironic how in trying so hard to be "inclusive", they turn people against each other.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Isn't queer the same as gay? Then again, aren't lesbian and gay essentially the same thing as well?

9 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

It's a large umbrella that essentially means not straight and/or not gender-conforming. Could describe pansexuality, crossdressing, anything

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lesbian and gay have very different cultural connotations and histories. Queer is a catchall for people whose sexuality might be misleading>

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

if given a more common name. Lesbians who like certain men, people exclusively interested in androgynous partners, things like that.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yes and no. Queer is a bit more like....bi with a heavy leaning on way or another. At least thats how it was explained to me. Gay-Lite.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Queer was explained to me as not heterosexual and I don't have to tell you who I sleep with. Because really, it's not your business.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's heteroflexible.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Queer is more of an overarching term that people can use when they feel that none of the other labels describe them well. For example, (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 5

so in other words it's bullshit

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

my queer friends say that some days they are more attracted to men and others they're more into women (2/2)

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

Shhhhhh, have to be extra special

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 16

yeah or just not feel like "gay" or "straight" describes you

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Seriously... at least take solice in knowing those kids at the high school level are not taken seriously in the least.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Yeah, because queer people made this term up, right? It's not like it was hurled at them as a slur by people who refused to accept them...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

All for the right to have an abortion but also give the male to not be financially burdened for nearly a quarter of their life if they 1

9 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 46

Correct me if I'm wrong but if you don't want the kid, can't you sign away your rights as the father and then you don't have to pay support?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Decide to not want said child.

9 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 23

You have the option to wear a condom...

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 10

Really? I point out that men are also culpable and you downvote me?!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

She has the option to be on the pill. What's your point?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

That men also have a protection available to them. Some women lie (gasp!) about birth control.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

There's a sort of entitlement here that bothers me. "I fathered a kid but it's my right to not be burdened by it."

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

And the father having no right to have their child live?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then shouldnt women be held to the same boundaries when half of that kid is part of the father? Equality is about equality

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I didn't say anything about abortion, because I don't have any answers. Abortion is a really tough subject and there are no easy solutions.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The statement "I was stupid and got knocked up but it's my right to not be burdened by a healthy non dangerous pregnancy."

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thanks, that's what I was trying to say... It's a two-person job!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

After I posted this my SO told me that guys can give up rights.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 6

As I understand it: parental rights, yes, financial obligations, no. But I'll readily admit to just being a random guy on the interwebs.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

As I understand it: parental rights, yes, financial obligations, no. But I'll readily admit to just being a random guy on the interwebs.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

In the US, Canada, and UK legal paternal surrende/financial abortion is rare, convoluted, and usually only if the mother agrees to it.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

That's not the case generally, as a rule even if a man is raped he will be responsible for child support if named the father.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Are you saying that you should be able to force a woman to have an abortion? Or just not pay for your own kid?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

So the man should have to just live with the woman's choice regardless?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If women want the power to keep/abort the child all to themselves, men shouldn't have to pay for their decision.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Being able to walk away without having to pay child support, ect. If the woman should have the right to have the child or not and the man 1

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

2should be able to walk away or be a part of the childs life. You shouldn't be allowd to trap the man in the situation.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Men walk away all the fuckin time, what are you talking about?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

An option where men can legally sign over all rights to the child and have no obligations, financial or otherwise, to the mother or child.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Legally speaking, a man is always financially responsible as the father. When a father walks away, he can always be forced to pay even if he

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well, as they say to women, maybe shoulda kept your legs shut, right? As for men, maybe shoulda kept it in your pants. Fair play, no?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If you read my first comments, I think women should be able to make whatever choice they want. I dont think they should force their choice

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

On men. Equality all the way around. O think the "keep your legs shut" is a silly response to being against abortions.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

abortion rights of women (particularly among the lower class) being drafted and presented at state congress's

9 years ago | Likes 1766 Dislikes 100

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 25, 2017 3:59 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 13, 2025 3:26 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Yes he did, he's in favor of repealing roe v wade and letting each state decide whether or not abortion should be allowed.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

That is how a federated republic works.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Actually, the draft thing is less a women's rights issue and more a men's rights issue, as men can be drafted and women can't.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

One thing I haven't seen clarified is that these people aren't just advocating directly for women's rights. They're also speaking up for 1/

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

the rights of ALL minorities. In this case, it feels like calling it "Women's Rights." would be more of a means to get people to support 2/

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

specifically women's rights over any other group's rights. As much as I understand that there's definitely good reason to want change for 3/

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

all of the groups involved in the description of women's rights, it's still unfair to only call it that. 4/4

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Much as I may be politically aligned differently I appreciate a well wrote TL:DR of the opposite side's views instead of "educate yourself"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What does @op say?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So we're pedaling pacifism against people who want to hurt us. All of their points talk about non-violence.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I'm a man, and I'm not allowed to have an abortion. Some equality....

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

That makes a little more sense why they kicked out a feminist group just because they believe fetuses have rights too.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

But can we trust a bloated plutocrat?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I never understood the reasoning behind separating human and women's rights. They're the same thing. Else you're already starting divided.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Abortions kill women, too.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

So let's all protest against trump! Who has nothing to do with the issues we dislike a the state level!!!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 31

Trumps admin has a #2 who orchestrated this state level stuff. Trump himself wants to appoint an anti RVW USSC judge. Point missing is easy!

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Who is this #2 orchestrating state level stuff? Specifics would help your point. You know RVW is not the prevailing law on abortion, right?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 12

Inept, aren't we? #2, 2IC, XO, aka his vice president Mike Pence. As Gov. signed into law a bill criminalizing abortion for mental illness.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You're really doing great work here, thanks for having more patience with them than I ever could.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

There's an attempt in Texas right now to turn abortion into a felony, thus preventing women from being allowed to vote if they've had one.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

Adultery is a felony in Michigan. MI Statutes Section 750.30 My point is lots of shit is felony, and non enforced

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Not all states deny you your constitutional rights, though. In Texas specifically, the disenfranchisement only lasts as long as the sentence

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Can I march so men can't be drafted? Im not a fan of it in general.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 7

You'd probably have the support of feminists on that. They've fought to be included in the draft before, so visa versa seems appropriate.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Someone stopping you?

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

So none, but somebody said something. So everybody marches.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 105

USSC declared abortion a constitutional right in '73 and that right is being threatened. Slow on the uptake?

9 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 7

Been hearing this for 45 years. Clearly im not the slow one.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 42

Y'know, these things are alot more fun if you put some effort into it. Your generation is terrible at pointless internet arguments.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

They ruled it legal and protected under the 14th Amendment. Supreme Court cant declare something a constituional right.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

I'm all for fully restricting abortions. Period. Entirely. Like have none of them.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 32

So pregnancies that'll end up killing both mother and fetus should go untreated? Some abortions are to save lives.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

What should we do about the teenagers that can barely support themselves? (Genuine question)

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Genuine response.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

Let them put the kid up for adoption. I'm not for murdering a child for the convenience of society.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 16

You do realize that the adoption/homeless children system is already massively overtaxed, and many of these kids grow up completely >>

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

If a woman chooses to do the deed, it should be she who bears the responsibility and cost of birth control or abortion-- 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 27

not her neighbors. If anything the money used for govt care, directly related to this, should be put towards edu on the subject. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 25

Abortions are already prevented from being federally funded. These bills prevent people from paying for the operation.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

You have $10 for food & someone gives you $5, but not for tacos. You still have $5 more that can be applied to tacos. It's just earmarking.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Oh man...as a middle school teacher, please world, allow abortions.

9 years ago | Likes 129 Dislikes 7

Why allow abortions?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are 2 wars to fight here. 12 year olds with babies or the totally incapable parents reproducing in the first place.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

12 year olds having to deal with pregnancies (presumably rape or other nonconsentual ways) is, obviously, not good for them, but I don't 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Seriously..just getting worse and worse

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Jesus, as a high schooler even the thought of children scares me. But middle school? Yeesh.

9 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

When I was student teaching, I was placed in a middle school. 1 pregnancy in 5th grade, 3 in 6th, 2 in 7th, and a whopping 9 in 8th grade.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh I graduated in the class of 2012 and I remember kids getting pregnant as early as the 6th grade

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

I'm not against abortion, but I can understand why certain people may be. It's definitely a tough issue.

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 15

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 23, 2017 6:50 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Ok. That's just unhealthy.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No it's not. "Stay the fuck out of other people's lives."

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 21

You realize there are things society deems morally wrong and therefore illegal, right?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

It can be. It's also a personal issue. I will never say you should or must get an abortion. That is your choice. Right? Pro-CHOICE.

9 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 9

i'm pro abortion, but if you're pro life, it's not your choice, its about taking away a child's right to life.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I feel the same way, but I can understand why certain people would be against it.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

Which is fine. But they want to make it illegal to chose anything else. There is a huge difference between the two.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Its as personal of an issue as my desire to murder someone.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 20

Oh. Cool, so you support compulsory organ donation?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

Can't we just have a happy median? One abortion per person (man or woman); no questions asked.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 15

That's not really a happy median for either side.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is it too late for your mum to have one?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Well, she's 4 months pregnant with my little sister, and late term abortions are legal here...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tbf, those deny men abortion rights, too

9 years ago | Likes 510 Dislikes 71

Big if true.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You're not wrong

9 years ago | Likes 115 Dislikes 2

Tbf, men were out there marching too

9 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 5

Still being labelled as solely a women's right march. In a biological vacuum, sure. In real life, people utilize abortions, not just women.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Yeah, but those men don't have to carry a baby for 9months & give birth.

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 15

Some inequalities are brought on by nature, and some by man.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

That is more profound than I was expecting to find. Did you come up with that?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then why aren't you in the street protesting?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Bitch I might be

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but so you want to have a transvaginal ultrasound?

9 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 6

Sounds kinky

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

More like unpleasant. Women are forced to look at the sonogram and listen to the heartbeat before an abortion.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm so sorry i thought that said "How would you have..."

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Why would they be opposed to being drafted?

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 13

Because equality only counts when it's beneficial

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 28

I don't see why anyone would want to be drafted. "/

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

Nobody wants a draft.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I know, nobody likes to get cold.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The bills are being drafted, as in the early process of writing.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

No my question is, why would women fighting for equality be against the draft?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Modern day "Feminists" aren't about equality, they're about female superiority.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

A lot of them are against the draft for both men and women

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

They aren't.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

As a European I never got why is abortion such a central issue in US politics. Aren't there more pressing matters that need attention

9 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 2

Because people get mad at the idea that it is constitutionally protected. I don't care if my state allows it, but Roe should be overturned

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We like to pretend that we're still a "moral" nation even though literally everybody knows that's a giant pile of steaming bullshit.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

We have little actual separation of church and state in a country founded on separating church from state. It is confusing and frustrating.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

The guy who said that phrase first advocated federal funds be used to create churches for the Indians you know

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the phase is about keeping government out of religion, not religion out of government :-)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yep

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

It's the influence of Christianity, which demonises abortion

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 3

it comes down to if you pro life, you believe its murder, if you're pro abortion, you don't.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

*Pro-Choice, madam president. You can be for a woman's right to choose, and dislike abortion. It's about giving them control over their body

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No. It comes down to Roe v Wade argument of whether the government can force you into bodily servitude of the state.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

like i said, whether its murder or not.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

nobody (in the rational discussion) is "pro-abortion" and encouraging it.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sounds like a state issue, not a rights issue. That's Governmental

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 46

If I'm wrong, tell me how. States can't write the Constitution

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

Constitution req the fed govt will protect living citizens' bodily autonomy. It's not for the govt at any level to disallow abortions.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

If that were true we wouldn't have vaccine reqs for public schools. Roe v. Wade was about privacy & gov not accessing your records.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Roe was about privacy to make decisions about your person - I.e. Bodily autonomy. Also yes re vaccines hopefully that happens soon!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm confused, sorry

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you can ask your questions with kindness and respect feel free to message me, yo! I'll do my best to splain how I see it :)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Their description of their mission doesn't help me understand what rights they are missing

9 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 36

The first line says "We stand together in solidarity with our partners and children for the protection of our rights..." Not clear enough?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Rights and access aren't equivalent.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 7

true, but when you intentionally restrict access enough, you have effectively restrcted the right. hence jim crow laws being illegal

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yes, exactly!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is what vexed me as well you think the mission would include their goals in any tangible sense.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

The new presidential regime is threatening to women and minorities. The march was about not losing rights we currently have.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 11

Like?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Abortion, for one. There's also the threatened Muslim registry. Then there's the fact that we elected a man that glorified sexual assault.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 7

Its not always what is missing, but that protections have been threatened to be taken or new restrictions placed on everyone, not just women

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

But it's all extremely vague nothing is defined it just reads like the election conspiracies once again. Big bad Donnie gonna take your

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 10

Rights, sounds exactly like four and eight years ago big bad Obama is gonna take your guns and your rights.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

heres the difference: the right spun up obama gonna take the guns. trump and congress have openly campaigned on removal of womens rights

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you actually watched the march speakers youd have specific issues being tackled by the march. But hey, bitches aint shit.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Trump wants to drop or reduce funding on planned parenthood. This not only takes away abortion rights, but cancer screens, STD tests, BC etc

9 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 6

um, dropping title X funding would only mean that you can't get an abortion at PP. Doesn't block screens/tests/bc or other clinics' abortns

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Would to know what your sources are but Title X funding does not go to abortions. PP abortion funding comes from other donors.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

no you're right, I misspoke. Title IX is what I was referring to. PM'ed

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Basically we would like to keep control over our own bodies and not have our choices ran by a guy who thinks abortions should be punishable

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 6

Reducing federal funding for planned parenthood isn't an attack on anyone's rights. There's no other scenario that logic makes sense.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 15

As well as other issues, like the VP's dislike for gay and diverse rights, which would hurt everyone if rights were no longer protected

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

The biggest one is the right to have an abortion and health insurance cover feminine products such as birth control

9 years ago | Likes 1225 Dislikes 112

birth control isnt a right, and shouldnt be one. And certainly it has nothing to do with equality. Men buy condoms and razors. Why cant wome

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 13

Because birth control costs the same as condoms, right? ps: women buy razors too. Why do you think only men need razors??

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I'm so confused by all this razor talk. Am I missing the point of comparing birth control and feminine products to razors??

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Best thing about being a man is free abortions and free pills.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Health insurance thing is a commodity, not a right. The abortion thing has strong proper arguments on either side of the debate.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

and why do you think you deserve that?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Isn't abortion more of a religion topic than being sexist?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

That could be argued i guess, but it's not like people getting abortions are different religions than those against them.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Very few people are pro abortion. The pro choice movement is about women who don't want to be told what to do with their bodies.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Why can't you buy your birth control out of the money your employer pays you? But really: why should I pay for yours?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 23, 2017 11:15 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Well if this makes them pay for a boob job then I need to go March!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 16

I've been on birth control since I was 15 because after I got my period I bled and passed huge blood clots every day for six months. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

By the time they put me on the pills, I was anemic AF. The hormones keep me from bleeding to death, slowly. Not exactly elective. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

And if you've never tried to get something covered that isn't explicitly in your insurance plan, let me tell you: it's nearly impossible.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

But it's not denied. Which bears the question: are they protesting for rights or celebrating the rights they have? All news says protesting

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It is more effective to protest before its actually taken away, than to protest to get it back. Bills are set in place to take rights away.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Men aren't allowed to have abortions

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Well its controversial cause abortions cost a lot of time for doctors. Over half a million every year since 1792. Majority of these.. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Are from unwanted pregnancies, but some are medical emergencies. So why use abundant resources on something that can be prevented with 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Proper sex education in school or better goverment support of expectant mothers? Obviously there will be exceptions.. but half a million??

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Lol you you guys really suck

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And that's just the start!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is feminine products considered a right though?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My BC is normally $94 a month. My insurance pays all but $11.24 of it. Why do people keep saying insurance doesn't cover it? IT DOES.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You have every insurance under the sun? Wow! How'd you do that?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You ignorant fool, if your insurance doesn't cover it then you have shitty insurance. I've had several different types (even cheap) and...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Aetna. Granted not the best in the world, but decent.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My best friend has Aetna and her BC is fully covered.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It has ALWAYS been covered. Go march or something...jesus....

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Abortion Is legal..and how is the law preventing insurance covering birth control

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

If you want birth control pay for it yourself. Why should I have to pay for something you want? We should have the choice if we want this

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 23

Many woman NEED birth control. It's not all about sex

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Ok. So as far as actual medication, I grew sure cover but not for morning after pills or abortions and stuff like that.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I think you had a stroke half way through, can you reiterate?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I agree with actual medications but not abortions.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

my car insurance should cover oil changes too. i think were missing the point and purpose of "insurance" . Definition changes at some point

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 16

The maintenance on your car doesn't result in another human being. If it does, might wanna get that checked out.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Don't forget all the medical conditions that BC helps to control and alleviate.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Ok let me clarify, I am ok with actual medication. I misspoke when I said birth control. I am against abortions. That's it. Yes there are

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Time when I feel it is ok. Like after a rape, or when the mother finds out she has cancer and to do treatment it will kill the baby anyway.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I donor feel that is very often though. I don't feel I should be forced to pay for something against my beliefs. And saying that it's either

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Pay for abortions or welfare is stupid. Sounds like you need a job. There are all kinds of jobs that people can do from home.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

No ones protesting to have free abortions??? And to touch on your "get a job" comment, I'm working 3 as well as in school and I couldn't

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

... 2/2 my taxes.Your personal beliefs shouldn't restrict others' rights or privileges.That would be selfish and narrow-minded

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm pretty sure viagra isn't paid for with your tax money. I think it would be insurance. Which is who would fund the abortions.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't believe doctors should prescribe viagra to men when they could exercise and eat healthy instead. I pay for those pills with... 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Get yourself a job that offers health insurance to cover said feminine products. Don't make everyone else pay for your needs.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 22

I don't know if you misread it or something but that is exactly what they said

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Yeah, because poor women who are unemployed or working shit jobs are exactly the people we want having unintentional babies.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Then have safe sex.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 12

Go do the research on contraceptive failure rates and get back to me.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

How? They have trouble affording birth control. Are you advocating celibacy within marriage?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Wear a condom or don't take the risk

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 15

Correct me if I'm wrong, but abortion has been legal since 1973?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

You were right, but unfortunately now you are wrong :(

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It has been legal, but that doesn't stop states from creating legislation that makes it nearly impossible for them to be administered

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Ya but those states you are referring to are usually random flyover states where a bunch of pro life people live who don't want abortions

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If you want birth control pay for it yourself. Why should I have to pay for something you want? We should have the choice if we want this

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 16

Pay for condoms or pay for an entire child's needs. Do you you need to go back to remedial math?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's a medication. When I can pick it up from the pharmacy like allergy meds, sure. Until then, it should be covered like all other scrips.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Birth control being covered? That doesn't even happen the the eu

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

It falls under preventative care, which also includes things like cancer screenings, vaccination, etc.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

That sounds reasonable.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, it does.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That happens right now in America.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They why are they protesting for it

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They're protesting new proposed bills that are trying to repeal the access.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They're protesting new proposed bills that are trying to repeal the access.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I have birth control and can get an abortion 30 minutes from my house. Guess I'm missing something.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

Because women in your past protested for that right lol that's the point. To preserve and not backlash

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That's what the march was to preserve. There are bills in the house that are trying to repeal the current laws that permit it.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

I've read through this thread for quite a while to get this far, and I keep seeing your comments. Thank you for spreading truth and facts.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Why should insurance be required to cover an abortion and birth control? How is that a right?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

It's a right because SCOTUS has granted the right. That's their job, yo.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Concerning birth contr, not everyone uses it to not get pregnant. Some women use it as a medication to keep their hormones in check

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I have several friends that need it for PCOS, ovarian cysts, debilitating period cramps. Don't know if insurance covers it or not.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It does not. PCOS here. Insurance counts anything towards getting pregnant as "getting sick" and won't pay for you to "get sick".

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Aug 16, 2017 4:07 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Women want the choice to be able to get an abortion. They want to keep it legal. It's not a matter of voting, it's a matter of rights.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 4

Healthcare is an elected choice? Thats a sad state of affairs then

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

It is everywhere. Do you not understand how laws affect people's lives?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I do but where I live we have universal health care you don't decide if you treated or not based on whether you can afford to

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There are other uses for BC pills than as a contraceptive, for many they are simply medicine.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

I know, my girlfriend uses it for ovarian cysts. And her this is covered by health insurance.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If it's covered, it's not an issue :) the problem is when it's not anymore, while Viagra still is.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This. I use BC to keep my cysts at bay and also because without them I'd be bleeding constantly. I went 3 months without stopping before BC.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yup! Not getting pregnant everytime one chooses to have sex is good and everything, but for many people this is te reason why they take them

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I would've stopped taking them and rather use condoms if it didn't mean I had to call in sick every month because of cramps.They can be bad.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And it's not that difficult to obtain free condoms.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

This. This is what I want politicians to keep in mind. I have PMDD and ovarian cysts, and I need BC to keep me from being in pain 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Preach. I bled for 3 months straight and almost fucking died until I was put on BC as a medication to regulate my body.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And while I would love to see all forms of contraception to still be available and/or covered by insurance, this is the one I'm worried 2/?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

about the most. 3/3

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

spending 10-20 dollars every month on 'luxury items' ...aka tampons and pads. isnt fun.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

My hearing aids are luxury items, and I spend more a month on batteries then a woman spends on tampons - private insurance people.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

At that point, it's better to bulk buy. I was excited to find out emp benefits had a HSA that would pay for tampons/pads/contact lens ... 1/

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

yeah i normally wait for the sells and stuff. "buy 2 get 1 free." Ect. then buy a shit ton.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I have to buy food or I'll die. You guys really should be picking up the tab.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Food isn't taxed as a luxury item though. Tampons are. (Most) women aren't saying they should be free, just not taxed that way

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Food and tampons are taxed exactly the same way where I live (and everywhere I've ever lived). WTH is a "luxury" tax? That may be the issue.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hm, didn't realized it varied. A luxury tax is a tax on something that isn't a necessity. So it's basically saying that women don't need 1

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

tampons or pads. For reference- food and medication are not taxed this way. Most, but not all, states have this 2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

solutions, but then the insurance company immediately backtracked and said those don't apply. Hate the system so much. 2/2.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I bought bulk. Bought enough for 5 years, figured "welp I'll use them." Diagnosed with PCOS and didn't have a period for 18 months. lol

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So, when a pregnant woman is murdered, it's a double homicide. But when a woman has an abortion, it's ok. It's somehow "human rights".

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

You can't have it both ways.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Agreed- it should only be homicide. Not double.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm horrified by how many people are casually talking about destruction of a human life, just to avoid pain. I didn't know that was [1]

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

[2] a valid excuse for ending a life. It isn't part of the woman like a leg, it's is a separate life that needs her support.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

What about if an abortion is needed for a medical reason? Eg the baby or mother has a health condition that could harm one or both of them?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh I'm absolutely in favour of abortions being legal, and available, without constraint. Especially in terms of saving the life of the

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you want birth control pay for it yourself. Why should I have to pay for something you want? We should have the choice if we want this

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 22

Covered. If you want it you pay for it. If not you don't have to pay for it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Well nobody wants abortions or to pay for welfare, which do you think is cheaper?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Because it's used as medication for pain and hormone issues and still isn't covered in those cases.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Why should we pay if you break your leg? Or if you get cancer from smoking? That's how insurance works

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

But let's say I am against regular abortions. I feel they are against my beliefs. Why should I be forded to pay for this? I think if you

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

Want it covered you pay for it. If you don't want it covered you don't pay for it. It should be sold a la-cart style.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

Insurance doesn't work like that. You don't pick and choose what your company covers, only what coverage you get.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

(1)I'm against paying for cancer treatments. So can I opt out? They shouldn't have smoked if they didn't want cancer. We gave them plenty of

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not every one who has cancer smokes. Let's try to be competent, and adult.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

(2) Free air to breathe. They should've known smoking leads to all cancers. Why should I have to pay? I believe smoking is wrong. Same logic

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's a religious issue. I am referring to abortions only not all birth controls. Just to be clear.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Because it benefits society as a whole. That is why ppl pay for roads (even if you don't drive), defense (even if you are against war), etc

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Well with that argument did you know churches provide about 85% of soup kitchens, shelters for homeless, so everyone should be forced to

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well with that argument did you know churches provide about 85% of soup kitchens, shelters for homeless, so everyone should be forced to

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

free birth control isnt a right, and shouldnt be one. And certainly it has nothing to do with equality. Men buy condoms and razors.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 18

Why are you buying condoms? They're available for free...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Condoms are readily available for free. Many places hand them out. Tampons, pads, and birth control are not.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

The idea was to help prevent unwanted pregnancies, condoms are given out free at health clinics too. Razors should be cheaper for all.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Would you rather help a woman prevent pregnancy, or assist her in raising a child she didn't want or couldnt afford?

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

Neither. Not my problem what a woman does. You are treating women as if they are retarded children. want sex, buy birth control or condoms.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Can't afford birth control? Don't have sex. Simple.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Why do I have to do either? Why am I responsible for them?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

cause feminism. fuck logic and fuck men.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

cause feminism treats women as if they are babies. This is everything true feminism fought againts.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Women shouldn't be punished for having sex. Birth control should be free, it would decrease abortion rates and medical cost, look at Sweden

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

how is it equality when one gender gets free stuff and the other pays for themselves plus for women. Get a job.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Um, but right now, men are getting free stuff!! FREE CONDOMS are being shared at every abortion and medical center for youths.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

like I said men buy condoms. why cant women buy birth control. they arent being punished, not my job to pay for you to have sex.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They buy condoms, but condoms are given out free, as I said. Not your job to pay me for having sex, well then don't complain when u have 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

condoms are a multi-billion dollar industry they arent given free to adults, only to kids. as for child support your comment is retarded.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

to pay child support cause you wanted to hit it raw. Don't whine and don't sympathise with men who complain about paying child support 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Since when do women have a right to have an abortion? Like where is it deemed a right under the law? Serious question.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 20

Right to life. Literally the first fucking right listed.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

No one is killing the woman.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Actually happened in Ireland. http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-20321741

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Right to life. Literally the first fucking right listed.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Google Roe v Wade

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Do you believe in the Dred Scott case?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

I don't. He asked when it was deemed a right under law. That is where is was.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Owning a person was once a law, and I thought we were past calling other people not human because of factors they can't control.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What the hell ? I am from EU aka free healthcare and we def. dont cover birth control in insurance. So this is quite a shock coming from US

9 years ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 16

feminism is about proving to not need a mans help meanwhile forcing them to buy stuff... its better not to try and think about it

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 75

Where in the definition of feminism did you get the idea that women want to single out men to pay for goods?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Covered in Norway until you're over 22, I believe. It prevents a lot of unwanted pregnancies

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That's really cool. Most people can afford it themselves by 22. Does this system work well?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah. I'd say so. We have very few teen pregnancies. We also have health clinics that hand out free condoms :)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm in Canada and my birth control isn't covered by the government either

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it is in canada

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

well Québec anyway, we are distinct after all ;)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The piece that hasn't been mentioned here is that Viagra or E.D. RX's are covered under insurance. Why Viagra but not birth control?

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Worked in a pharmacy, never filled one ED script that was covered by insurance.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Viagra is more "cosmetic." Birth control prevents unwanted pregnancies, babies, and ultimately taxpayers' $$. Viagra doesn't "help prevent"

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Erectile dysfunction is a medical problem, viagra is not a cosmetic.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I paid $30/month with insurance pre- ACA for my birth control, for example..

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

My insurance completely covers my BC. Different programs I guess.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pre-ACA? mine was $15 when started and kept going up

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ah no, I lost track of the conversation. Currently covered 100%. Now I'm wondering what the pill prices are in Europe though...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In my country it costs like 15-30€ for 3 month package ... Without any insurance.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Here it would cost $30+ (there are some that cost $280). Per *month*. So for 3 months you're looking at $90-$840 without insurance.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Depends in which country you live, EU is not one unified bloc. It's covered in France, it's not in Poland for exemple.

9 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 1

exemple

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Are you defining my comment, asking for another example, or pointing out my spelling mistake ("exemple" instead of "example") ?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Basically, the less Catholic a country is, the better their healthcare is likely to be.

9 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 3

As an Irish person, this.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Also the less Orthodox.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I'm taking a shit and I lol'd and my gf is concerned

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

From the UK, and birth control is free.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Long live the NHS, and hope the conservatives don't screw it over

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Whoop! Whoop!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The problem in the US is that whatever is not covered, is exorbitantly priced.

9 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 2

Yes, that I would imagine might be a serious problem in US.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Condoms are like 50 cents each, cheaper if you buy 'em used.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 5

Lol why get them used when Planned Parenthood gives out condoms for free.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because they won't be free if PP is defunded. See? This is why women are marching.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They're talking about medications, often for ovarian cysts, etc.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Ah ok. Makes sense. Still, I know a good used condom guy if you ever need a hookup. Some of them don't even have holes in 'em.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Do they want health insurance to start covering the cost of condoms too? There are multiple methods of birth control

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 10

birth control helps everything from acne to hormone regulation to blood thinning. A side effect is preventing pregnancy.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Birth control isn't used only as a contraceptive, it can also help regulate hormonal imbalances that cause periods that are so painful (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

That they induce vomiting. It's also a fairly effective acne treatment that drs will recommend before trying more intense medicines (2/2)

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Source: I was put on BC by my Dr when I was 15 because of debilitating periods - it helped immensely (3/3).

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

B/c before Obamacare, health insurance was 40% more than male. Same exact insurance coverage. Must of been my fault for being a female.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Plus a lot of insurances cover viagra and not birth control... so how about them equality apples?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Really i just wish BC was called Female hormonal control kit, or something similar.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Specifically ones that a woman would use long term, such as the pill or the ring.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Condoms get forgotten, broken, not put on right (because sex-ed isn't a thing anymore, GG). Even if you forget BC pill it's still all good.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What I dont understand is under ACA tubal ligations have to be covered, but not vasectomies

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Even though ligations typically cost more and can be riskier procedures

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

- "can be" + "definitely are" + "require a long recovery period including hospital stay"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a woman, that's bullshit!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No. As well as man shouldn't pay alimony for the unwanted child.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 12

I think this is particularly a hard issue. Having an abortion is a difficult choice as is raising a child with no support. But for the man,

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

he gets to walk away from it with no burden either way. I'm not saying you are wrong, but I am not completely on board with it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

What's so hard about it? Woman wants abortion, man doesn't. Woman gets abortion. Man wants abortion, woman doesn't. Man gets saddled w/ 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

18-24 years of child support.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I agree with this opinion and get yelled at for it.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Of course he should! He put it to the world. If he don't want to pay alimony, then don't hit it raw! :) Wear condom!

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 15

You realize the condom can break or the female tricking the guy into thinking she's on the pill etc etc right?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

So why are you fucking her if you think she's going to do that?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

Yes because that's always super obvious and easy to spot huh? Can come out of the blue for all you know

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Can men get condoms covered by health insurance?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Birth control isn't just for that. It's often used to treat irregular menstrual cycles and other reproductive health problems.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

You didn't answer the question

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Since obamacare I've had no copayment for BC so... I thought thar shit was taken care of.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 5

selfless!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Trump and the GOP want to repeal Obamacare so that would go away. They especially don't like that portion so it's unlikely to be in (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

I'd like it repealed and replaced with something supporting free markets, tort reform, etc.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

That's the problem. They want to repeal it, then put it on a 3 year timer by which they PROMISE to have a replacement. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The government is a lot of things, but timely isn't one of them. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

whatever they replace Obamacare with.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Like they've got a plan. Honestly, they are replacing with air and fluff and "alternative facts". It's outrageous and shameful.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Since Obamacare, my co pay went from $0.00 a doctors visit to $25.00. My $200.00 hospital deductible went up to $500.00.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 11

You can thank the GOP for that. Obamacare was SUPPOSED to be government single payer insurance, but GOP fought tooth and nail against that.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I feel your pain. My deductible for myself and my son on my plan is $5000. It's ridiculous. I didn't have an issue paying for BC.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Playing devil's advocate here - shouldn't the father of the child should get a say in whether or not an abortion is performed?

9 years ago | Likes 96 Dislikes 98

I think so, except for in special circumstances (rape/incest/abuse/etc).

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The father? That's debatable. Random old white dudes who think pregnancies from "legitimate rapes" abort themselves? Hell no.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 4

Non sequitur. Dads can have a say without making the entire medical procedure illegal and/or costing thousands.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

Sure, if he wants to take over gestation for the remainder of the pregnancy.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

If you are not responsible enough to have a discussion about what the woman would decide ahead of time, you have forfeited your right imo.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

If you don't want potential offspring aborted, don't stick your dick in a pro-choice woman.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Male sea horses can carry a child, why the hell cant human men? Unfair!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No. It's not his body. It is the woman who will have to endure the pain and body deformations if the husband wants to keep it.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I got pregnant a couple of years ago after switching medications to something that interefered with my BC and not realising. I had a 1/

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Relatively new boyfriend, and so was very nervous about bringing it up. I was NOT going to have the baby, and all my friends told me to 2/

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just get rid of it without telling him. I found that really fucked up, so I told him anyway and made it clear that I didn't want it. If 3/

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He had a problem with that, I'd be fine with him leaving or I'd let hin grieve or whatever. But financially, emotionally and practically 4/

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Absolutely not whatsoever.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

he can have an opinion, but no say. If I ever need an abortion, I'm getting one even if my husband doesn't want it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If there was a way to painlessly and without repercussions transfer the foetus to a mechanical uterus then absolutely. Until then, no.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No! The man should only have a part if the woman decides to carry to full term then the only say he has is to pay child support! SMH!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've always leaned towards giving the man the right to a "legal abortion". Mother gets to decide whether to have the abortion, father (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

has the right to "legally" give up rights to any interactions with child in exchange for not being held responsible for child support. (2/2)

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

That isn't a thing? :( Damn. That's bullshit.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

100% agree.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So, the dad will pay for the time off work needed? All the time and money needed for doc appts? That would be an issue if both parents...

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Pre-child support lol.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

agreed to him raising the child alone. It's a pretty long and expensive process to birth a child.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Fair enough, however, in this case its either a yes or no. What's the ruling if the woman is pro abortion and the father is anti abortion?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

1. He shouldn't be fucking outside of marriage. 2. He can pay for her time being pregnant in exchange for not aborting.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's the million dollar question, I guess.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 15

I think that's something you should discuss with a potential partner before sex. It might make for an awkward moment but worth it long-term

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Theres always abstinence. i know they'll do it anyway. but the same people want paperwork before sex in college.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

That was fortunately already answered by the USSC in 1973.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

It doesn't morally answer it.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 15

You can't force women to carry a baby for 9 months. Pregnancy is all on the woman, she should have the final and only say.

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 5

only if he ALSO gets a right to say the choice is hers and hers alone to keep the child and not have to support a child that could not exist

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It's not that easy. It's half his, and it's all the baby's. So getting an abortion is possibly alienating the rights of the father, and the

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 11

rights of the baby, as well. It's a really shitty issue that's unfair to all, but in cases of consensual sex, women are adults. She can

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

FYI. It's an embryo, then a fetus. It only becomes a baby and qualifies for rights when it can exist on its own.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Absolve herself of the responsibility of creating a life if she wants, even against the father's wishes, but a man gets stuck with

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Nope. The woman has to deal with the physical repercussions of the pregnancy and birth. You can get maimed, acquire lifelong medical conditi

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 4

Your argument is fair but then should a man be forced to pay child support if he (prior to birth) says he does not want the child at 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

An embryo is not a child. If a woman doesn't want to carry an embryo to term, it's her right. A baby is not an embryo. It has its own rights

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All? If a woman doesn't want the child she can have an abortion, but if a man doesn't want it he's legally and financially responsible.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

In general, I think most women who truly don't want kids take precautions, the same cannot be said for most men and the law reflects that.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

ns and even die in the process. You cannot force someone to do something that endangers them, especially when it's for a scientifically unve

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 4

Rifiable belief. Furthermore motherhood can ruin your career prospects and cost you hundreds of thousands in lost opportunity costs. This is

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

You. I like you.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Not true for fathers and those facts are scientifically verifiable.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

As a man I'd like to have a say, but I can understand how it is significantly more the woman's choice, seeing as its her body.

9 years ago | Likes 133 Dislikes 12

the baby shares half of its DNA with the father, the baby is the product of both. it isnt her body,or her property!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 32

If she keeps it against his wishes, then she can pay for it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

We aren't talking about the baby's body, we're talking about the mother's.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 4

we were talking about abortion.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 12

Yes, he should get a say also. But what if the women was raped?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Pretty obvious would be a unique situation. Not sure why you needed to ask.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

It happens a lot more than I'm guessing you think it does. Sad, but true.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because, that's how rhetorical questions work.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I can see that she carries the child, but why does she -alone- get to decide? The father literally has no option to carry the child.

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 76

I think you just answered your own question.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So what you're telling me is, if a man wants to keep the child, a woman will be legally forced to carry to term and give birth?

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Because he can't decide that she has to carry the child to term, or undergo the trauma of an abortion. It's unfair, but biology isn't fair.

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 3

Isn't it unequal that one person gets to choose the fate of something two people created?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 33

Because people kinda poop out on their words. Some father can make the verbal commitment to stay, and then leave after birth.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

Can't woman do that? Adoption.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 46

Well sure. But that would be like saying one parent should be able to legally force the other to donate an organ to a dying child.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Or just die for it to live.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's an actual life-or-death scenario for the woman. Complications happen, and it's a big risk pushing a human out of a lemon sized hole

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So its kinda like slavery. She wants to do one thing. but someone else has the ability to tell her that she can't do things with her body.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's a tough topic, I guess the argument could be made that a man could impregnate another lady if one doesn't want kids with him?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It just doesn't seem fair to the men. They have NO OPTION of carrying a child.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 21

The other thing to consider is that in many states, if a woman is raped and impregnated, the father still has rights to the kid.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0