More DNC mouthpieces coming out with a call to arms against Zohran an AOC, who could’ve guessed

Jun 28, 2026 3:55 PM

Mgxr44

Views

26832

Likes

642

Dislikes

25

What I hope people take from this and all the other moderate Dems sounding the alarm about the DSA is what doesn’t freak them out. The democrats getting slaughtered in 2024 doesn’t freak them out. Trump destroying huge parts of the government? Not that either. Imperialism and genocide? Barely a peep. BUT some young and exciting candidates that promise to actually make things better for YOU and not in some “incrementalism is the only way” BS, but REAL, immediate, and impactful change, THAT is what scares them. THAT is what will get them off the couch and force them to question their way of doing things. You can tell a lot about people by what does and doesn’t motivate them.

Literally fight harder against the actual left than they do against the republicans…

1 month ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

1 month ago | Likes 80 Dislikes 2

"our opponent is other Democrats!"
What about the gop
"What ABOUT them?"

This is even dumber when your remember is the motherfucker that accused people of being paid to be pro-Palestine, only to be outed as a paid pro-Israel asshole a few days later.

1 month ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

So they're admitting that Donating and Complaining is all they do?

1 month ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

This is why people (including myself) think the Democratic establishment is bought and paid for by the GOP to be a token opposition.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not by the GOP though, by the same people that own them too, the capitalist class

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

1 month ago | Likes 356 Dislikes 1

1 month ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 2

"Get in looser we are taking the rich!"

1 month ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Looser? Sounds unsafe. I'll get in tighter.

1 month ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Fucking auto correct.

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

So you are only a "reasonable democrat" if you love rich people, cops, end stage capitalism, and Israel... Is this the same Van Jones that got $100M from Bezos and called dead Gaza babies a disinformation campaign?

1 month ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Our new chapter here in Florida isn't even official yet and we are already doing all that. Hopefully we can get the Zionazi Randy Fine out of office - we are trying.

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I find it hilarious that the DEMOCRATIC party is suddenly surprised at how DEMOCRACY works.

1 month ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

I thought it was satire about how useless mainstream Dems are. "OMG these DSA candidates are beating us via... grassroots campaigning and appealing to voters!"

1 month ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

To be fair, when voters are apathetic then winning elections becomes a matter of name recognition. You get name recognition by spending lots of money on advertisements, just like the corporations you are getting that money from.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Not when the voters are so apathetic that they wait to see who you're attacking, look to see if their platform is progressive in any way, and vote for the people you attack out of spite. That's happening quite a bit and I'm loving it.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Voters are apathetic because the democrats consistently fail to follow through on anything and routinely take their base for granted, to the extent of becoming actively hostile to voter demands. Who gets enthusiastic about 'voting for the lesser evil' over and over?

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Kind of amazing line of work to be framing coalition building as some kind of boogeyman...

1 month ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

The mainstream Democrats have rested their laurels on "we may be crap, but at least we're not Republicans" for so long they've forgotten what actual campaigning and running on values and ideas looks like.

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I'm lovin' how the liberals are freaking the fuck out that their slow fascist slide isn't good enough anymire. What happened to blue no matter who? What happened to straight party ticket voting? Suddenly those are old news, because the party has been infiltrated... by people who've been there the entire time and are sick of the status quo. This is a hellaciously good thing to see, that these assclowns are realizing their pro-genocide,big-money shit is no longer being accepted.

1 month ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

Establishment Dems never really meant "blue no matter who". They've been fucking over progressive candidates for awhile now to ensure that "blue" is only ever another establishment candidate. Now that progressives are getting through the primaries in droves despite it all, they're probably gonna want a new mantra. Fuck 'em.

1 month ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

These chuds and their "The West"

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's because they know destroying the two-party system will destroy the democratic party, since it will just be seen as another franchise of the republicans, which it it.

1 month ago | Likes 266 Dislikes 4

That's not a bad thing though, you need multiple parties to make people work together. That's how all these parliamentary systems work. You have to put together a functional majority for voting blocks. I don't love the current democratic party but if another party starts we can force the current to push more to the left in some ways.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I love how they're whole deal is "the people are wrong for voting for the candidate they like". Very Republican sounding of them. "We know who you should elect better than you do."

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I’m still trying to figure out what they see is wrong with democratic socialism. Let’s take care of each other, there ya go, that’s all that matters

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is...bring on the destruction

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is not the two-part system per se, but that for too long campaign donations from the ultra wealthy has been what determines who gets elected. In both parties the politicians who actually listened to voters mostly got replaced with ones who listen to big business. Eventually you got a political establishment more loyal to each other and big business than their actual constituents. The two-party system makes it slightly worse, but it is a separate issue.

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Yeah, destroying the 2 party system will destroy the 2 parties as they exist today.

Isn't that the whole point?

1 month ago | Likes 86 Dislikes 2

Yes. It needs to happen. I hate the fact no one thought to sell Trump the idea of making his own independent Golden Trump party.

1 month ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 0

It’s been exhausting, but it really has taken specifically Trump to finally damage the hull of the ship enough for us to finally see it sink, which it is, slowly, and violently.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Kinda did but he has already held the MAGA core in the R branch and they weren't letting go of that boat wake

1 month ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Good the fake democrats who think socialism is bad can get out so that we can get the freedoms our founding fathers back like socialism promises.

We should have our lives protected not sold to a third party who chooses to delay deny and defend the decision to put profits over life.

We should have the freedom to speak out against our government not worry about being locked up for decades for question wether ice is like the SS or for simply touching water.
1/2

1 month ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

We should be able to pursue happiness with an education system that requires masters degrees in education and salaries that will motivate the best minds to teach rather than sell out to survive. For our police force and elected officials to be educated and not bough positions.

Our government has been failing for long enough we could certainly write a declaration for reformation that starts with a list of our grievances as to why the current government fails to protect our unalienable rights.

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Mentioning the genocidal invaders at the end there as a requirement... And this is a democrat?

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Next up: Van Jones to teach the Democratic Party how to protect itself from trans activists, the LGBT movement, Black Lives Matter, feminists, civil rights activists, and the labor movement.

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They glazed the DSA so hard I almost liked a hate post. They couldn't have tried to make the DSA sound any more based even if they tried.

1 month ago | Likes 105 Dislikes 1

I legit thought it was saying Dems need to go help DSA and follow their lead until the stinger.

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Don't you, as an American, just LOVE Israel, The Police, and Rich People??? If not, WHY DO YOU HATE AMERICA?!?! /s

1 month ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 1

Stop, I can only fit so many boots in my mouth at once.

1 month ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

They openly are admitting that they're out of touch dinosaurs and don't know how to connect with people, with telling us the DSA is a grassroots campaign organizing people by... going out there and actually talking to the voters and building a base organically through support. What a concept!

1 month ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

It's ironically the Democrat equivalent of "The Right Can't Meme". They think they're talking to people in an appealing way, and they are so off horribly off that it comes back around to funny again.

1 month ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Right? Like, to them it's "how dare they actually go and be part of the community instead of manipulating them from on high for the benefit of private interests! Don't they understand how the system is supposed to work?"

Draconic, wannabe nobility.

1 month ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

The old guard dems suddenly being faced with the idea that simply being "not the GOP" is no longer enough to be electable and they actually have to try, and deciding instead that party self-immolation to prevent new idealistic talent taking over is a better idea.

1 month ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

You know what they say, scratch a liberal and a fascist bleeds. Liberalism will always side with fascism to protect the interests of capital as that is the root of its systemic power.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

You can't want dignity and democracy for all, then simp for rich people. You're literally supporting the cause of the fall of democracy by doing that.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That last part was all I needed to go and register with my Local DSA chapter.

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Hell yeah!

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I used to like Van Jones. Fuuuuuuck that guy. How can you not hate isreal?

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

also dumb as a box of rocks apparently.. how many people read that and up until that single toxic fucking word (and place, and people) thought this was a reasonable argument and might have actually considered helping the cause he's espousing up until then... seriously amazing how fucking little these people can't read a fucking room.. like it's good that he's that dumb so we don't have to wonder if he's a genocide supporter... but.. just... wow.. read the fucking room

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Seriously? Yes, you fucking dipshit clown. Here's another thing to try: delivering on campaign promises. Here's another: don't assist an openly fascist regime with passing fucked up legislation

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This is a really simple concept, it's called controlled opposition.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Tell the Democrats this, and they say you're screwy. They prefer to put neo libs in office than winning candidates. Hillary had the popular vote in 2016, butvdidcnot get elected. Instead, Democrats blame people who supported Bernie

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

...kinda disgusting to see that they ARE actually aware that their plan of doing nothing but advertising where no one sees and getting celebrity endorsements has hardly worked for them for the past decade. Any time since Hilary flopped, they could have woken up and said "oh, we're being lazy about this and need to do something."
And this is what it took? A wave of competence threatens to step up and they finally decide they need to change?
They all deserve to be replaced.

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

imagine hating the side who actually listens to voters and ACT on those wants instead of only weak verbal agreements and then never act on it....majority of dems have failed to do what the voting base voted for em for and its been decades...if your vote gets nothing done why not risk it with the one that does show actions being done?

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So if you don't hate... *checks notes* all the /literally/ bad things..."

1 month ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We need ranked choice voting + jungle primaries across the country. That would break up the two-party system and force people to vote for candidates and not just parties.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If certain people could only learn what certain terms mean, like socialism and communist.
Who am I kidding? They would just find other terms to improperly use.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I mean, I only vote Democrat because I hate rich people. Honestly? My primary concern come election time is "How do I get welfare granted to poor people and taxes applied to rich people".

Everything else is a secondary concern at best.

1 month ago | Likes 155 Dislikes 1

Honestly, a lot of those secondary concerns will be greatly diminished as knock-on effects from taxing the rich and supporting the poor. Without the superwealthy you won't have a bunch of superwealthy fucks sitting around bored trying to figure out how to start WWIII because it's the only thing they haven't done yet.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is the Establishment saying they'll hate you WAY BEFORE they'll hate their betters

1 month ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

I vote in the Democratic Primaries for whomever proposes the best system of welfare, and then in the actual election I vote blue, like any sane person. More and more of the Democratic Primaries are being won by people who propose better welfare systems and higher taxes on the rich, so this works out well for me.

1 month ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Sure. And incremental change sure is better than nothing. But this is them outright saying they don't want Incremental Change either. This is a CNN correspondent outright saying "you'll either like this boot, or you'll get nothing from me"

1 month ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Yes, and I was replying that "But the DSA is offering something I want! Hatred of rich people! What do you have to offer to compete with that in the Primaries?"

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"we'll offer you more police and you're gonna LIKE IT GODDAMMIT"

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Which is half the problem. It doesn't affect you, so why care? You'll sit on your ass and vote on single issue shit, when we're trying to push now for better than a single issue candidate. Mamdani is a prefect example of someone that can run on multiple issues and then gets in and fixes multiple things at once. You're just gonna vote for anyone not Trump, even it were Newsom with his shit stances on lgbtq, Israel and immigration enforcement.

1 month ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Don't throw away a small step in the right direction because you wanted to move farther. Newsom sucks ass. I want someone GOOD in the seat... but I am also not in control of everyone else and if he gets the fucking ticket I will vote for him. Begrudgingly and mourning that we could have REAL CHANGE with a better candidate... but I will do it.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'd vote for Newsom if he took home the ring, of course I would. Do you know what the alternative would be?

But I'm voting against him to take home the ring in the Primaries.

1 month ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

(And to be clear: I don't like Newsom's policy on taxing billionaires 'wait, wait, why are we voting on this, wait wait stop don't do it'. It turns out that shit people are shit at taxing the rich)

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Clowns sitting home got us Bush, which got us Citizens United, which I am pretty sure got us Donald, which got us Dobbs and all these other fucked up rulings. Yes I will vote for Newsom if the other option is an openly corrupt white supremacist

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Why wait until election time? As VJ describes here, the DSA is working year-round. Educating themselves and each other, organizing mutual aid, developing internal democracy, etc. are all things the DSA does in the off season. Simple analogy: If you don't exercise in the spring, don't expect your beach body to be ready in the summer.

1 month ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

A lot of people don't have money or time. I do, and I spend a certain amount of it on political activism, but a lot of people don't.

Also, it really wasn't that long ago that I didn't have either money nor time. This is actually a fairly recent development for me, largely caused by Biden's economic policies.

1 month ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

That’s fine when it comes time for the general election, but during primary season you should push for the most progressive person as possible.

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yes, which is usually whomever is most willing to tax the rich.

1 month ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

So you vote for the rich Democrats because you hate rich people?

1 month ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 20

So you help the rich Republicans win because you hate rich people?

1 month ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 5

Exactly. Thank you for pointing out exactly how stupid the comment I replied to is.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 11

If you're discouraging people from voting in the Democratic Primaries, and then further discouraging them for voting Democrat in the general election, you are therefore encouraging people to permit Republicans to win.

Vote for who you love in the Primary. Vote against who you want to lose in the general.

1 month ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Who says I'm discouraging anyone? I'm pointing out the flaws in YOUR comment, that you clearly didn't think through. I love that you're trying to move the goalposts everywhere but where they started.

"I vote for rich people because I hate rich people" is one hell of a silly statement that you made.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

Democrats want a diverse ruling class. Republicans want a white god fearing ruling class. Socialists don't want a ruling class.

1 month ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

Depends on the Democrat. Corpo dems want businesses to rule things, as long as they get paid.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

If we're playing the pithy abstraction game, here's one for you.

Democrats want whatever their voters want. Republicans want whatever their donors want. Third-Parties want whatever Republican donors want.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

So Democrats got rid of the filibuster and forced through populist agendas under Obama when he had both houses of Congress, right? Democrats got rid of the filibuster and forced through populist agendas under Biden when he had both houses of Congress? Right? They couldn't even figure out a minimum wage increase.

Dems don't give a fuck about their voters any more than the Republicans do. They just pander to the voters slightly more because if they don't they lose.

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Only some do, which is the entire point of DSA. You're proving this post right, by sitting here and pretending dems want what voters want. Moderate dems support Israel and the genocide in Gaza. Moderate dems did a piss poor job, letting the DoJ under Garland take 4 years to half prosecute a terrorist traitor, that stole an election and wiped out evidence of his crimes.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

1 month ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Uh, what?

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Stop worrying about 'reasonable' vs. 'socialist' Democrats, the party needs to unify, put on the gloves, and knock the crap out the RepubIican N@zi's that have hijacked the country.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

The reasonable ones and the socialist ones are the same.

Idk if you read my little
Blurb at the bottom, but your “reasonable” ones are more worried about the ones that actually want to change things than they are about the republicans. And their policies are how got trump in the first place… 😬

1 month ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Because ultimately the time for "reasonable" has passed. We live in extraordinary times whether we like it or not and extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures and extraordinary people.

The last time this happened the right wing noticed and seized the opportunity precisely because the rich, the elite, the powerful were more concerned about holding onto their positions in the face of progressive leftist demands.

And they cant claim ignorance to the alternative, they knew full well 1/

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That not only would millions of "peasants" would pay the ultimate price for their greed and self obsession, but that many of their own class would aswell. 2

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1