Firenthehole
1444
67
10
https://www.google.com/amp/uproxx.com/news/ajit-pai-freak-out-response-net-neutrality/amp/#ampshare=http://uproxx.com/news/ajit-pai-freak-out-response-net-neutrality/
Nov 29, 2017 2:08 AM
Firenthehole
1444
67
10
https://www.google.com/amp/uproxx.com/news/ajit-pai-freak-out-response-net-neutrality/amp/#ampshare=http://uproxx.com/news/ajit-pai-freak-out-response-net-neutrality/
twelfthdr
Good ... stupid big mug big teeth piece of shit
kantaloupe
We should find out where he lives.
LaAguaChocha
Unless he has a solution he is replacing our current net neutrality with, he should sit his retarded ass down
[deleted]
[deleted]
RyanMcFlyin
Namely the first thing and the last thing
AddictiveTendancies
His name is Ajit, and he likes to eat shit!
00ImBatman00
I'll get a spoon, he can eat my ass..
Firenthehole
That's fucking hilarious
UpVoteMonster
My name is Jeff.
Potus45
Keeping net neutrality in place puts an unfair burden and unnecessary regulatory overreach on ISPs. It is anti-consumer and stifles growth!
cleopatches
I... are you being sarcastic?
SgtThunderfistMD
Xsiah
Basically it's a choice between whether you want to restrict ISP businesses, or all businesses on the web. I think in the grand scheme of
Xsiah
things, more people benefit from an unrestricted internet, because anyone can start a website, but far from anyone can open an ISP company.
username12345678
imNotChrisPratt
How is it an unfair burden? You might need to back that up a little.
Potus45
imNotChrisPratt
Yeah, sorry you can’t throttle speeds of your competition when you have a monopoly. So unfair...
ChickenVegetas
ImNotCreativeEnoughForAGoodUsername
Uh can I get a not-broken link
Xsiah
It's not broken
ImNotCreativeEnoughForAGoodUsername
It looks pretty broken to me, all over the place and with #ampshare and = signs in it
Xsiah
works on mobile. but the last part of the link is sufficient http://uproxx.com/news/ajit-pai-freak-out-response-net-neutrality/
ImNotCreativeEnoughForAGoodUsername
Oh hey, thanks. That's much easier to work with
snowman520182
Ok, will someone please explain to me the "absurdity" of anything he said? Jesus Christ, never change, imgur.
imNotChrisPratt
DrJDX
New metaphor! The government contacts Comcast to build an amazing new highway to connect everyone, everywhere, using highway building 1/?
DrJDX
Techniques perfected by public interests and made available for everyone. In exchange, Comcast may charge reasonable tolls to drivers on 2/?
snowman520182
Yes, yes, I know all the fucking retarded net neutrality arguments(which we don't have under the current legislation btw) but rather-
snowman520182
Than demand that, you people would rather preserve bad regulations. I'm impressed.
DrJDX
What’s bad about the regulation?
DrJDX
This new highway, to pay for construction, maintenance, and give them a little profit. For a while, this is fine, and everyone can get 3/?
DrJDX
Everywhere. Comcast realizes they can cut deals with large companies, including themselves, to give priority lane access to vehicles 4/?
DrJDX
Going to or from “preferred destinations”, and relegate others to crowded, poorly maintained lanes with arbitrarily lower speed limits 5/?
DrJDX
Imagine if your package carrier (and you only have one choice) could decide what you were allowed to receive, and how fast? 1/?
DrJDX
After the rate was paid, they decide, “you ordered from Amazon? We prefer Sears. 6 months for this to arrive, and damaged.” 2/?
DrJDX
Essentially, your choice goes into their hands, because they can modify your experience based on their business dealings. 3:?
DrJDX
Once the rate is paid, the carrier (your ISP) should not get to decide to prefer or slow traffic based on origin any more than a shipper.
DrJDX
Without net neutrality, your ISP can block or modify content based on origin or destination. This has literally no upside for the consumer.
snowman520182
That has fuck all to do with what he said in this article