Human Trials for Male Birth Control. Thought?

Mar 29, 2022 3:42 PM

BittersweetOM

Views

140415

Likes

1619

Dislikes

41

https://gizmodo.com/a-birth-control-pill-for-men-could-start-human-trials-t-1848685598

Happy baby snapper tax!

I wouldn't trust this to keep me from getting pregnant

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The one where they put a temporary gelatin plug in the vas deferens seems promising.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I would have taken it when I was younger and more 'active'. Can never be too safe.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

I have no issue with it, would be happy to take it. I saw the negative effects birth-control had on my ex.

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Who needs a pill? I just make sure she pulls out so there are no eggs injected in my bootie-hole.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Wonder how many anti vaxers will be willing to take this but still not trust the vaccine?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I sometimes forget to take my brain pills

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sign me THA FUUUUUUUCK up

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You put the pill in your shoe. It makes you limp. I'll get my coat.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

I mean as a dude I'm kinda happy about this. But it's anti hormonal, why can't this be created for women too? Being married, they have itbad

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I’m going to be popping them like m&ms

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People think men don’t want this, but all of the young single men like me I know are excited. Gives me assurance birth control is used 1/

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

And is a second or third layer of protection against unwanted pregnancy. I don’t know any men that don’t want this to be real

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

A lot of men do. It would make life easier. The problem has always been human biology. As we've found out the hard way, we don't know 1/

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

nearly as much about men's reproductive organs as we thought we did... and those are still far more studied than women's. 2/2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Without reading any of this I'm just here to say I think it's appalling that 1% of the trials ended with men-mice hybrid monsters.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Sign me right the fuck up to be a tester

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

About time!

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

WHY ARE MEN TRYING TO GET MICE PREGNANT?!?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Have you seen those whiskers?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Because they want more mousey women in the world? I'unno.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

TLDR, but as a man, im on board and will take them until i get the balls to get my balls un-gotten.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I’m happy that family planning can be more equal, rather than women taking the brunt of responsibility.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

You Mean that it can be more equal and men have an equal say on if they want kids or not.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Uh…yeah? Just because I listed one reason I was happy about it doesn’t discount another

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How I'm supposed fit that pill in my pee hole

4 years ago | Likes 421 Dislikes 5

Very carefully. If House can self-catheterize, you can surely stick a 10mm diameter pill up your urethra and rotate it in place like (1/

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

an IUD. In fact, Knoxville and Steve-O will demonstrate that as a PSA in May

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 162 Dislikes 1

It was made for mice so it should be about the right size

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Sir, it’s pronounced ANul jee zik. The pills go in your mouth.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Get a bigger hammer.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

While making this face

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If it wasn't a snug fit it wouldn't block the baby juice

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Training, perseverance!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Same way that you fit the rods sheesh

4 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 1

You know they are called sounds because if inserted incorrectly you will make all kinds of sounds.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You’re not wrong

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Like loading a musket

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Yours fires off smoke like that too?! Thank god I've found someone to talk to this about. Some women find it impressive, others, though...

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I think it's more just semen steam as I am so God damn hot.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Texas has already made it illegal

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I can't tell if your screwing around.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Every sperm is sacred, y’all.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Had a girlfriend lie about birth control to try and get pregnant so I would not dump her. This is protection from that kind of thing.

4 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 8

A female comedian said it needs to be in a form that will ensure men will take it. Contraceptive beer!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

I'm a man, and I don't drink beer. I'd prefer it in a red wine.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Same happened to me, horrible way to start a family.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It's also protection against people in healthy relationships that also just don't want to get pregnant. Not everything is a chess match.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Fine w/me, but I've seen stories that this is 'coming any day' and 'in trials now!' since I was about 13 or so. I'm 40 now. Wouldn't wait.

4 years ago | Likes 181 Dislikes 3

They are still saying 5-10 years.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Right after cold fusion.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, it's a lot easier to deal with 1 egg than a few billion swimmers so rubbing into issues wouldn't surprise me.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 18

Sure, if the solution were purely mechanical and not chemically or anatomically based

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

This seems like an entirely baseless statement...

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

I think it was a thing for about 2.5 seconds. But dudes were crying about side effects. So they pulled it.

4 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 23

They pulled it ?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

... so scientists? The scientists running the study?

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

You mean when nearly 100% of the people in the study had debilitating side effects that didnt go away so they took it back to formula?

4 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 3

Was that the one with bad/violent reaction to alcohol, which is why many would like a pill? Because alcohol makes you forget condoms often.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Missed opportunity to say pulled out.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

At least one promising candidate had feminist groups opposing it because it gave control to men. It was weird af.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I believe that was a different medicine altogether, this one has far more promise.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Piss off

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well if by crying about side effects you mean suicidal depression then yeah.

4 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

many female birth control pills has that too. and cancer risks etc.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

In addition to the % that someone else mentioned, it's suspected by some that if female birth control was made today it wouldn't pass either

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

It wouldn't. Neither would aspirin, for that matter.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yeah but its not 70% of the patients using it.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

I'm all for this. Watch now as churches and their right wing supporters try to block it. They need to fuel mindsets.

4 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 3

Pretty much all churches besides the Catholic Church support contraception. That generally goes for abortions in the case of rape or danger

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That’s not to saythe catholic church doesn’t have a very loud voice in the us, but I think it’s important to use actual statistics about

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Religion and social issues instead of creating straw man arguments. That way we can actually target the groups that really espouse these

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ideas and seek to change them. Misrepresenting groups just makes them get defensive and less likely to join your cause in my experience

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nah, I’m betting they’ll let their hypocrisy run rampant if it ever becomes an option.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

“Abortion is a grave sin, even in the case of rape, if god did not want that child born the rapist would have been on the pill” i’m sure :/

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Since men do not have to suffer the consequences of pregnancy, the threshold for side effects from birth control pills is rather low" 1/

4 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 12

This is infuriating. We can get abortions. It’s not like we’re stuck with a baby. No excuse for women’s hbc to have bad side effects.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

18 years of financial and moral servitude is a consequence.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Yes, but 1) Those consequences apply to both parties and 2) I suspect they're talking about physical consequences.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No they don't, one party gets to choose for both for a choice that was made with both, and if the man doesn't agree too bad.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Nah. Go spread your MRA bullshit elsewhere.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Proove me wrong, in what country can a man OPT out of a pregnancy and face no financial responsibility if he doesn't agree in having a child

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

JFC this line... Heaven forbid that men should have to go through a fraction of what women have had to endure for the same result....2/2

4 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 14

I think he was saying people won't put up with it, not that the research weighed it more heavily.

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Yeah I think so too, it’s depressing but true

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Oh, I get that. I was more referring to men who don't bat an eye at what BC does to women, but demand that it doesn't happen to them.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

One could argue that's because BC has been around for a while, and while it has side effects it also is used for more than just BC. Should

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

probably ask pharma companies why they seemingly haven't managed to cut down the side effects already despite many years.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Now to find a woman willing to have unprotected sex with me.

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Hello there.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hello there

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

GENERAL KENOBI

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Your move.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, your move!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

i just went the vasectomy route, an insurance co-pay and 30 minutes later i was done, 2 months later i was shooting blanks

4 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 6

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Mar 29, 2022 4:05 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

did your tests back up the 10 loads theory?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Mar 29, 2022 4:05 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

since ive had one i know, and you still needs tests to verify there are no swimmers, i had a test after 1 month and then at 2 months

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yup. Mine was 4-6 weeks and 10 rounds later. Apparently a fair number of people never go back to confirm and later find out the hard way

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I went that route too, but it turns out it just changes the color of the baby.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm not even having sex...

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

He beat the system.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I mean, he didn't say where he was shooting the blanks at.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Didn't we already have male BC but it had the same sort of side effects as female BC and people went all "oh well we can't have THAT"? [1/2]

4 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 14

We sure did. ?

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 12

No, this is a common myth. Side effects were drastically more serious. Please stop spreading the myth.

4 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

Happy to oblige. Happy another poster gave me a better source. NOT happy that NPR (my prior source) completely undersold the severity.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It happens, I remember reading the original trial results forever ago and was like "holy fuck" before that I use to be the exact same way

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, the side effects were much worse.

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 4

The above image literally says "The threshold for side effects is low because men don't suffer the consequences of pregnancy." yet people

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

in these replies are desperate for some answer that would sound...less flakey, I guess? But reality is reality.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

the image is taking about what you can get past a medical ethics board, not about what men would put up with for more options

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am rather excited. Female birth control has some fairly awful side effects, so something much less impactful can be a win for couples

4 years ago | Likes 446 Dislikes 2

Im fine with the good ole condom. No side effects for anyone. If it dosnt feel good enough get some drugs or something

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I have to have hormonal BC to control cysts, but haven't really noticed any major effects. Period is as wild and unpredictable as before too

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah I take “birth control” for hormonal treatment purposes far more than contraceptive purposes too, but not everyone does.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it also has some benefits - like period and acne control

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

They do - which is why having options as a couple is still a good thing, though I fully acknowledge that while female birth control 1)

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

can have some gnarly effects, it can also reduce the severity of some periods or things like acne. It's just nice to have more options on 2)

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

the table as a couple.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If it would end up being just as bad as female birth control, at least couples can decide who will cop it and suffer the side effects.

4 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 2

Shit, both, just both. That's how bad I don't want kids. The gf us already on it. I'd just go on it too.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Definitely true, and especially so if either of them have health issues already. It's all around super great we may have the option soon.

4 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Exactly! The more options, the better

4 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

Though with any side effects it won't get approved - the criteria is biased. It is approved if taking the pill has less risk than not 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

taking the pill. For women, that is measured against pregnancy. For men... it's measured against... normal. 2/2

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

Which is what has held it back so long. Something must have changed.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Don’t get too excited. There is an article on this about every year it seems… I remember reading about this as a freshman in college (2005)

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Im sure the side effects will be something similar. But for ppl who want an alternative to either pill, look up the “Testicle Bath”.. neat-o

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Awful side effects like children?

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Jul 25, 2023 1:39 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If you're strongly against having kids, for whatever reason, & actively taking steps to avoid it then yes, falling pregnant may be awful.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hahaha! Yes.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I don’t understand why vasectomies aren’t more common, especially among those who don’t want kids.

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 5

I told my hubs to cancel his appt when I read the potential side effects. And I personally know 3 guys who've suffered long-term discomfort

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I have 0 negative side effects from the pill so why take the risk?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Is it uncommon? I know a lot of people with vasectomies. Virtually every male in a committed relationship where they are done having kids.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because it's invasive surgery on your genitalia which could permanently make you infertile, not even remotely comparable to the pill

4 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 6

Well I don’t want kids so I don’t care how reversible it is or isn’t.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

So you’re saying you don’t understand why they’re not more common because you don’t care? Maybe with empathy you’d understand

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Fantastic failure at reading comprehension.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yup. Vasectomy reversal is expensive and only has ~50% success. Many times couples opt for IVF because it’s cheaper and more straightforward

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

My hubbys procedure took 20 min. & recovery took 3 days. I tried nearly every birth control on the market & always had bad side effects.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"Invasive" is a strong word. It's an extremely quick, minimal procedure, doesn't go inside, and they often use electric current instead.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Probably the same reason women choose birth control instead of surgery.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

A vasectomy is a lot less invasive and has less recovery time than getting your tubes tied. They aren’t equally comparable

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Didn't say they were. But the reasons people don't get them, are comparable and often the same.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It’s incredibly difficult for women to get sterilized. Tons of pushback from doctors. Much easier for men.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Theres gonna be awful male side effects as well there's no going around that. A vasectomy is probably the best solution and freezing sperm.

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 16

Why do you think so?

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Because he’s never priced IVF.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've been following the development of this for a while and it seems like the side effects may be far less severe, though we won't know 1)

4 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

more until it's been in use for quite a while, though I remain optimistic and hopeful. If it does end up being worse or just as bad, I'd 2)

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Even if it turns out to be just as bad, I am still all for it! Until we get these pills, we can't have true gender equality IMHO..

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

This has been the issue as to why all prior attempts failed; the side-effects were worse than women's birth control and often did 1/

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

agree though.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

That was true of the last *checks* four attempts up until they hit human trials. The problem seems to be that results from animal 1/

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The "non-hormonal" part gives hope the side effects will not be as bad

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Here's hoping.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

DIDJA READ IT?

4 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

Did you? They literally said they are hopeful but sceptical as human trials are the real deciding factor.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It's been true of every attempt thus far. Male genitalia are apparently a LOT more fragile than female in this area? I need to see if 1/

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

there is some study that gives an explanation for this. 2/2

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or if you want to go around slinging that dick.

4 years ago | Likes 110 Dislikes 5

That 99% success rate is for one year for the average male activity. If you are impressively slinging that dick being above average [1/?]

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

activity could drag that 99% right down, then roll the few % change per year up and soon you are in risky territory. Better to snip. [2/2]

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Birth control doesn’t prevent std’s so please continue to wrap it on your dick slinging journeys!

4 years ago | Likes 86 Dislikes 1

Or don’t, they’re a imgurian not a cop.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is my only concern with the male pill. Will there be an std explosion in the wake of this?

4 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Yes, due to the lack of sex education in a lot of the USA/World.

4 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

73.9% certainty of it.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Skin to skin or don’t go in that’s what I always say.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Your should say something else.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Stds*

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

STI*

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

But… is warm

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Butt is warm

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Then I’m sure you’ll love the burning sensation of stds.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0