"Baby, It's Cold Outside" is not about date rape

Dec 7, 2018 7:36 PM

rookiebatman

Views

92927

Likes

2162

Dislikes

126

It's one of the few Christmas songs I like. people need to quit searching for drama and hate to start

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm curious about the songs in their regular rotation. There are many top40 out now that are blatantly raunchy.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

There’s raunchy and there’s a song that sounds like genuine rape.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

This is why I exclusively play Butcher Pete for the holidays.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They've pulled Rudolph as well because of bullying. If you're fake offended enough context is just an illusion

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Instead of (again) taking the whole context that shows that even misfits have a place!

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Private radio stations can play whatever they want. Be mad at the station for caving to idiots.

7 years ago | Likes 857 Dislikes 22

Or just be glad that they're not playing it, because rapey or not, it's an INCREDIBLY irritating song.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But if they want to cave to idiots, then it's not up to them. Right? Then it's your decision.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I mean, as long as they can afford to keep the station running, and if they're running near the red they might play it safe

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Be mad at society for making radio stations feel like it has to cave to idiots to avoid a boycott based on complete nonsense.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

For all the complaints I hear about Christmas music, taking away one song seemed to put sandpaper in everyone's knickers.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Or maybe don't bother getting mad about shit that doesn't actually affect you. (Or stay mad. I'm sure it'll do wonders for your health.)

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Clear Channel owns a large portion.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They aren't caving to idiots, they're caving to clickbait articles written by "journalists" who create fake outrage to generate ad revenue.

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

It's business. If they think they're going to lose listeners, they'll pull the song.

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

And radios stations aren't exactly rolling in cash these days.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I'm mad at everyone and I'm not even from your country

7 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

I’m mad at everyone all the time.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

is this your reaction to life?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

“Hey what’s in this drink?” “Baby, that joke is 11 years old...”

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

I’ve heard 1 christmas song on the radio and then it changed back to Crappy modern music. Got to love radio stations.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Unpopular Opinion: Social progressives efforts to eradicate problematic things entirely paves the way for regressive thinking to take root.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Just as the original context should be taken into consideration, current day context is also relevant. It's why laws get edited and reviewed

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Neither should be the sole factor taken into consideration. Perception can be a very important element to be aware of.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's an annoying, outdated song. Literally out of date, it's not relevant to people who listen to it now. Why are people fighting for it?

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They don’t give a shit about the “cause”. They care about the advertising revenue.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Ah so now suddenly it's censorship when a private radio station decides not to play a song for reasons *you* don't like?

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 8

“Muh free speech” types love to bitch about it when people express speech they dislike. They almost universally hate “academia,” for example

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

They are also obsessed with capitalism, unless it works against them like in this example

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

There are rap songs on the radio, about objectifying, raping, murdering, stealing, drug use, vandalism, etc. But this song sure is the worst

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

This is the third time some variant of this has been posted in the last week.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People listen to radio?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

A 20 says this station will pull 'Baby it's cold out' but I bet they will keep "Hey Joe" in rotation.

7 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 6

What's the relation between the two songs? And I assume you mean the Hendrix song? Unless I've not heard of the song you're talking about.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"Hey Pete" is the clearly superior version https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_rbl4CYZXk

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, what's wrong with "Hey, Joe"? It's a man who's going to murder his woman for cheating on him. Crimes of passion, not uncommon.

7 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 2

Well it's not a lyrical interpretation of date rape, so it's all good I imagine. Also I think the lyrics talk of the murder in past tense.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It does eventually get to the point that it was clearly in the past, yep. I just wonder if he based the song on any particular actual event.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Right, no one was trying to coerce a woman into unwanted sexual contact

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Did you not even read the post, which clearly explained it was not about coercion?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But I could be wrong.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 362 Dislikes 24

its a Christmas song, ofcourse it is

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I like it. It’s always been on my christmas playlists and will stay right the fuck where it is.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

It *is* just kind of a crappy song

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Last one should read: it's just a nice duet that can actually sound quite amazing when sung by the right 2 people (Will Farrell and Joey De

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

**zoe** Dechanell

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*Zooey Deschanel*

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

*Leon Redbone

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No. It's a fantastic song. The arguments are still quite valid.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I agree

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You just don’t like love songs, do you?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not the way bublé sings it. I’m a definitely straight white male and I’d let him bend me over the couch if he wanted. Maybe I’m mostly str8.

7 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 0

Bubles voice is like smooth silky caramel dripped in your ears.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Herero-flexible

7 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Agreed and I’m between bi and straight same with Ryan Reynolds but I would also fuck Cher or Stevie nicks as long as the don’t stop singing

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I have never liked this meme until now

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's not at all hard to understand the context of you actually listen to the tone. Jokes like that *are* still relevant today, because not /

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Yeah, people thinking that every single word is now literal are the kind of brainlets that other brainlets get worked up over then the third

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

set of brainlets come in and complain about the second complaining about the first, and here we all are on imgur

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

2 every situation is actually that ambiguous. We should not cave to an ever present state of fear and mistrust. Play the song or not, I

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

3 don't give a crap, but don't tell me how I should feel about it and I won't tell you how you should feel about it.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Have people told you how you should feel about it? I've only ever heard people's personal opinions.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's literally in the comment I'm responding to, talking about how *we* understand the song differently today than *they* used to.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Were you waiting all year for this?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

C’mon, it was just about a lil p in the ol’ v, as it were

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Tab A into Slot B (◍◠ლ◠◍) /snicker

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Who you callin lil’

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

A bit of the ol' in out in out

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This shit again? It wasn’t about rape when it was recorded, but it’s certainly the wrong message now.

7 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 13

How is it the wrong message now? It still isn't about rape.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

The message being that “no” means “keep trying” with an intoxicated partner.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

but IN THE CONTEXT its not "really" intoxicated, and the "no" is SPECIFICALLY a message TO keep trying. context matters.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

As I said, back in the day, it had a different meaning. If they don’t provide context before each play, your context is meaningless.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

The context is pretty clear contained in the song though...

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Or how about ban it because its overplayed

7 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 7

I heard it eight times yesterday, each by a different pairing

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I feel the same way about all Christmas music! Love the holiday but the music is...ugh :/

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Same. Im sick of all of them, but im also a grinch and dont really like christmas time all that much.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

My opinion, throw MORE Christmas songs into the mix, use more of the old classics and new ones, don't just replay a half-dozen.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The real insight here is to see the anti-sex nature of contemporary feminist critiques of culture... it’s roots are in a Puritan ethic

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

kinda like the irony of the radical far left being very much more racist than average.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I can't believe it took until 2018 for people to complain about this song. In a modern context, it's sounded rapey for a while.

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 10

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Dec 11, 2018 8:55 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Dec 11, 2018 8:56 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I think thats probably why this is SO much of an argument, really. its not as obsolete as people want to make out.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1) its been argued about every damned year for the last several. 2) no, it doesn't sound rapey if you pay attention.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've read an analysis on it in some post here, so I know it wasn't when it was new.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Before #MeToo, concerns about this type of this were mostly brushed off because lots of people (mostly men) didn't realize how rampant it is

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

by "it" I take it you mean women being socially treated badly if they are honest about wanting sex...

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I said what I mean by “it”. Well before you responded

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah but that doesn't have anything to do with the song.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It = harassment, coerced sex, assault, rape, etc.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Why is no one complaining about Every Breath You Take?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It’s coming.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If that song is about date rape then Elvis' "Teddy Bear" is about a roleplaying furry.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

"I don't want to be a tiger, 'Cause tigers play too rough. I don't want to be a lion, 'Cause lions ain't the kind you love enough."

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Did you overlook Elvis' song "Don't" ? ....... "Don't, don't, that's what you say Each time that I hold you this way"

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Baby let me be your lovin' Teddy Bear. Put a chain around my neck and lead me anywhere."

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As long as it's consensual furry roleplay, great! Who cares?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Didn't say there was anything wrong with it, just that in a world where furries exist, this song carries new meaning, at least to me.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you have to explain the context every time for it not to sound rapey it's probably better to not bother. Free market and all

7 years ago | Likes 153 Dislikes 26

honestly you have to be braindead for it to sound rapey

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

If you aren't stupid, the entirety of the rest of the song should tell you that one line wasnt about rape.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I've always thought it was pretty obvious.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Should only have to explain once to any intelligent person. Also fuck the free market.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

An explanation that doesn't come with every time you play it on the radio, and one most people don't know 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

And yeah, fuck the free market, but you can't blame a station for not playing a song people don't want them to play 2/2

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Yeah, trying educate stupid people never gets us anywhere, better to just let them do what they will and get out of their way.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Not knowing the exact context of a specific song you heard on your morning commute makes you stupid? Or should they describe it every time

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

If it makes you outraged enough to complain (despite not learning/researching/confirming) then yes.. 100% fucking stupid.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

You seem to have a rather loose definition for stupid.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Nope, it's actually the textbook definition. "Having or showing a great lack of intelligence."

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This may be just me, but even knowing the context doesn't really help. I still find the song uncomfortable despite it all.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

However, I'm not arguing that it should be removed from the repertoire of any radio. I'd just change the channel.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also the fact that is is originally - historically - not intended that way doesn't change the fact that it's hella rapey today. Because, ->

7 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 27

But it ISN'T "rapey". That just isn't what it means. People just fail to understand it.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

even in modern context it's not rapey.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

....how?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

<- as we've been told by OP, context matters. And that includes the modern context.

7 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 21

I stand by that original context is what's important. If modern context obscures that, the people should want to understand the origins.

7 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 5

Your radio Christmas Playlist isn't the place to figure out the origins and culture of whatever song you hear

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I agree with you. Language evolves...saying someone is "a gay fellow" means something totally different than Dickens or Twain intended !

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

"Let's all go to a minstrel show, they used to be fine in the past." This is what I hear when people defend "Baby, It's Cold Outside."

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 8

That's... Just stupid. Can you not see the difference? One thing actually is what we see it as, racist, but was accepted because that >

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Was the thought process at the time. Why it exists the way it does, is because of its original context. Much like this exists the way it

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Oh and ban the bible, there is rape, murder and all kinds of things that don't fix todays context.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I could get behind that, for entirely different reasons

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It doesn't even sound rapey tho. It's at best mildly coercive, "oh shit, it is cold outside, guess I have no choice but to sleep with him"

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Exactly, it’s pretty easy to tell just from the tone.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I mean, trying to stop someone from leaving followed by asking what's in their drink, I can see how you can get confused

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

well, I can see why Drax would get confused anyway. I always thought the meaning was pretty clear.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's not great either. Not because he necessarily does anything. But because of the implication

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

what implication? that she would be socially judged harshly if she said what she wanted in a straightforward way?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is joke. From it's always sunny if I'm not mistaken

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

People these days look for just about anything to get offended about. Apparently VeggieTales is evil now

7 years ago | Likes 305 Dislikes 32

I always fucking knew it!

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I can’t believe you just said that

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I'm not religious, but I fucking love Veggie Tales. Don't you step on my Veggie Tales you easily offended pricks. Btw, what are ppl saying?

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

How dare you accuse me of being easily offended.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I've been looking for the whole cucumber for my salad... Last time I saw it was on Mom's nightstand. :O

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Misery loves company. We'll get the attention we're "entitled" to if we bitch and moan about everything.

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Lord of the Beans was hilarious. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLCIPHkTQuQ

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Go to 47 minutes and 58 second in

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Seriously why do some vegetables have eyes and some do not? I must know!

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

all the potatoes in my cupboard have eyes

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

You do not have a cupboard, you have an enchanted dark jungle hidden behind a common door.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

People that have to much time and comfort need to find ridiculous things to get mad about unfortunately.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's definitely not these days. People have thought X was bad for society and should be banned since fucking Martin Luther

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No it just sucks.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

7 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 9

Bob the Cucumber shot everyone!

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Bob the Tomato, uncouth swine. Larry is the cucumber.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

And you would be fucking WRONG because I'm referencing the Drawn Together parody.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Legit Answer: Some Christian groups have been attacking VT for years because it wasn't Christian "enough". Even the creator noted (1/2)

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

that he was "wrong" to teach "morality without Christianity". It's considered fluff that says "being good without god is ok"

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Wow, that’s messed up

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

OK, this I need to know more about. How on earth are veggietales evil?

7 years ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 2

Just watch it. Evil brainwashing in a healthy disguise, irreverent to a literary classic. /s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b21_lqLET0s

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Barbaraaahh...Manatee, Manatee, Manatee, you are the One for me, one for me, one for me... Clearly stalking poor Ms.Manatee.. BAN IT lol

7 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Considering they have a lot of biblical tales I can understand why an anti-theist might say something like that, but idk if that's the case.

7 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 3

I mean, I hold a fairly anti-theistic view but I don't really see it as evil. Misguided maybe, but evil?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

i wanna know too

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

TALKING vegetables?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Basically it isn't evil, but it left the "God" message behind, and just became a Generic CG children's show

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

But God made us special and he loves us very much :(

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

God made us dumb assholes and constantly punishes us for existing.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 17

Fundamentalist propaganda.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Because of the cucumber

7 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

He needs a clum baby.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Larry did nothing wrong.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

This I want to know too!

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Because it's moralistic proganda I guess (probably not why people are calling bad though)

7 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 6

True. Thankfully it's not shite

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Oh damn don’t teach people to be morally right. What the hell.

7 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 5

Apparently all the villans have accents, and the main characters sound white...so someone interpreted this to racism

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Pretty sure they fight pirates with accents...must be racist against pirates too

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I like that you had to state the absolutely absurd claim of sounding like a color to try and explain this

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Sounding like a color?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"the main characters sound white"

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You should probably rephrase this.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Probably, but that'd take like a whopping 10 seconds of effort and my brain is tired. Somebody massage it

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Regardless of the original intent ... 99% of the people listening to that song have never seen the movie for the context. Deal with it.

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 9

This. No need to crucify it, but the last thing we need is a “no means keep asking your intoxicated partner” message.

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 6

The buzz created about this issue is likely more beneficial than if the song was never scrutinized.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Again, context- There isn't anything in the drink, that's the joke.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Alcohol is in the drink. It was a common thing to say, back in the day. Again, no means no. It’s that simple

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

and it's cold means it's cold. The phrase "No means no" is a modifier to the fact changing a yes to a no is almost impossible vs no to yes.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So it is in fact not that simple. And she is IMPLYING there may be alcohol in the drink as a justification for her behavior.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Again, 99% of listeners never saw the movie. That’s not the context in which they’re listening to it.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So, "context matters" except when a modern context makes the statement indisputably daterape-related, huh? Historical context isn't the ->

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 9

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Jun 28, 2024 8:11 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

there are people who dispute the shape of the earth. some people think Gif is pronounced like peanut butter.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

<- only context that exists, you know. That's kind if the WHOLE THING about context, there are SEVERAL. Something that somebody bleating ->

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

<- out truisms like "CONTEXT MATTERS" ought to know lest they sound like a total idiot. Little experiment: go ahead and publicly exclaim ->

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

The context of the song is historical context. Reading it in modern context is an objective misread. This has been explained at length.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

There's nothing inherently wrong with people being a little weirded out about it. The song is dated, but that's why explanations are posted.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This is what you think it means vs. this is what it actually meant. Same thing can be found in other language/culture barriers.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As has been explained (ah, reading comprehension) there is not ONE context (otherwise it'd be text). Historical context: not rapey. Modern->

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

<- context: rapey. It's surprisingly simply unless you're one of those clods hell-bent on being offended about people being offended.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

That's why I said that there's nothing wrong with people being confused about it. Explaining the culture of when this was written helps.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Context does indeed matter. Art is not just what was intended, but how it’s interpreted.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

Listened to in the context of today, the song is no longer innocent. I support those with empathy for others.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 7

Something something libtard cuck feminazi

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

except yes, it still is. people being dumb doesn't change what it means.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sadly sometimes that empathy is hyper focused on a specific cause and manifests as screaming demands and accusations at everyone else.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You don't get to tell the content creator what their message or intent was. That's not empathy

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Too true. You don’t get to tell the content creator what their intent was. Mostly because the songwriter, Frank Loesser, died in 1969

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

But as I mentioned, art is in part how something is intended by the artist and in part how it’s interpreted by the audience

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

You may find nothing wrong with it. The station chose to have empathy for those who no longer appreciated it in its current context

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4