Wild piece of history

May 1, 2026 8:07 AM

Rules for thee...

3 months ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

How many of them are alive and not in prison? - Unrelated where are their mansions?

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Every fucking one of them should have been arrested and given the death penalty.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Nah, thats too quick.

You need to make it long and drawn out as a lesson to others.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Burn it all down

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Probably all in Congress now.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

just last week, one was given a high position at the CDC

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I bet not one of them was shot in the back of the head and dumped in the nearest ditch. Shame.

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

ah yeas an oath that means f nothing since most of them got what a small penalty fee to pay if anything at all

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It’s almost as if placing your hand on a rando book and pinky swearing to be honest doesn’t really mean anything…

3 months ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

They lied to Congress and weren't punished for it.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That aged well and thanks for smoking.

3 months ago | Likes 137 Dislikes 0

"Ignore history and vape now, it's perfectly safe as long as we don't do research on it!"

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ah, tangential but Thank You For Smoking is a fantastic bit of cinema and everyone should watch it.

3 months ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

I love that movie

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Companies have been lying for decades (a century) about tobacco, oil, asbestos, teflon and other forever chemicals... When a company swears that something is safe, you should assume the exact opposite. You may even assume that they *know* it is harmful, but they want to sell it anyway.

3 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

None of them were prosecuted because the people who care abut laws are idiots who cannot comprehend bad faith across.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Many of them are not idiots, they just don't care about anyone else and are working in a system that functions differently than most people have been told.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Quitting is easy I've done it hundreds of times

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_ZDQKq2F08&feature=youtu.be wow the video
and you can see they carve the definition out

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What capitalism looks like.

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

They ded?

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And they were all punished, right?

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They obviously knew, but in principle this is a question to some actual researchers, CEO doesn't need to have a competence for judging their products, that's only a resposibility projection. A lot of terrible stuff has been done with good intentions, that's why third-party oversight & regulations are crucial.

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Watch “The Insider” about Jeffrey Wigand if you haven’t already.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Great movie from the 90s about this called 'The Insider' starring Russel Crowe and Al Pacino

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I saw Wigand on the lecture series after the movie came out. He said everything depicted in the movie actually happened, but some things were just shifted around in time for better story telling. One of my favorite movies. And great soundtrack too.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What is the god damn point of purjury if no real penalty is applied??

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They were punished for lying under oath, right? Right?

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just to be clear, it isn’t nicotine that kills you. It is all the other stuff

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And i'd bet not a one of them were ever given anything more than a mild scolding from a politician just looking to get their name mentioned in the news cycle.

3 months ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 0

It was a severe scolding, actually, but yeah. All seven were sacked over the next few years, and the industry agreed to a $200 billion settlement to defray healthcare costs incurred by the states. Sadly, none of them were charged criminally. In their testimony they put forward their own definition of “addictive” which was different than the commonly accepted definition. This weasel tactic likely saved them, as the DoJ determined the bar for conviction probably couldn’t be cleared.

3 months ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 1

So golden parachutes and no personal legal penalties?

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Did they actually pay the settlement?

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Just looked it up, so your welcome for being your personal google bot. Payments are based partially on sales volume, which has dropped way off. So far they’ve paid $138 billion. They have to keep paying forever.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Would it please you to know you're better than the gooSlop?

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

v

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If all of them had been arrested and died behind bars for their murders, maybe America would have sent a fucking message.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What's the punishment for lying under oath?

3 months ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 0

Depends on whether you're rich or not.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A cabinet position

3 months ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 0

Massive profit. Don't listen to the haters, crime not only pays, it pays well.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

$100M golden parachute

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Depends on whether or not you actually believed it. I don't know what they actually testified to, but if they believed it wasn't addictive (despite the evidence they had) then it wouldn't be lying. If they testified that they didn't have evidence that it was addictive then *that* would be lying. As for how they could honestly believe something in the face of actual evidence? People do that all the time, everywhere - it's not unique, especially when someone's paycheck depends on it.

3 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

or worse their image

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They weren’t lying because they explicitly laid out a definition of “addictive” that is different from everyone else’s. Essentially the sworn testimony version of having your fingers crossed. Saved them from prosecution, but was a watershed moment in fighting corporate tomfoolery.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Are you rich?

3 months ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

No

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Im rich in amino acids, does that count?

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Depends on how rich you are.

3 months ago | Likes 107 Dislikes 0

You don't really have to be that rich if you're white.

3 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

Poor white is not the same as rich white.

3 months ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

And rich brown/black is not the same as poor white.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No it's not, but I meant that a rich black man won't get the same treatment as a rich white man. And a poor white man won't be shot for a traffic stop like a black man would.

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

That's a really roundabout way of saying racist still exists, but money matters more.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The fossil fuel companies are playing from the same playbook. Of course, tobacco kills the users (and people around them) while fossil fuels kill everyone, so maybe it should be taken just a little bit more seriously?

3 months ago | Likes 347 Dislikes 1

They're also, frustratingly, two major industries where "burn it all down" works in their favor/hurts the people more.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We aren’t a serious society.

3 months ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 1

We truly deserve to be hit by a meteor of our own making.

3 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

No. We don't. Stop doom scrolling. Not everything is shit. The algorithm is designed to make you feel this way. Take a break from the internet.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

3 months ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Friendly reminder that the "experts" who said smoking doesn't cause cancer are the same ones who said climate change isn't real. Not just the same company. Literally the exact same people.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"clean coal"

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This bri* I, ah, mean, cam, Campaign contribution says it's fine and we don't have to worry at all....

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Where I live (above 50°North latitude) it's expected to be over 30°c next week, and about half the local population doesn't believe in climate change. They've funded so much propaganda is ridiculous

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No the playbook is that oil companies blame the consumers.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's the gas industry's playbook in the first place, the unleaded gas thing was before '94

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So, are the meat and dairy industries, more or less for increased sales. there has been a lot of money spent on convincing people what to eat more of.

3 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

But a balanced breakfast needs at least 32 grams of pork or else the 9 eggs recommended would unleash their full protein power.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Like shit-fil-a

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Capitalism kinda depends on this bullshit. If you can,t keep them consuming “more” and “bigger”. the system grinds to a halt.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Back when business knew the borders of the village and how many people were likely to buy from them they could be responsible about it or it would hurt their bottom line. Now they have the entire world as a market so they see infinite expansion as a strategy when in reality they are eroding the foundations of the market itself. Eventually they're either gonna run out of resources or people will be too poor to afford the product.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If I recall correctly, the tobacco industry first wrote the playbook, pouring heavily into marketing and PR companies. These companies essentially wrote the rules that are copied by the most horrible industries today, to carry on selling, business as usual, a product everyone knows is harmful at every level.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That should be the death penalty

If you are engaged in business that you know harms other humans, you should kys and I don't say that about anyone ever as a survivor of SI. But war profiteers etc don't belong on this planet

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They don't deserve an easy way out, imo. I just hate the fact that some faceless executives in some US city destroyed the world for a fat bonus. The chain of decisions that caused all this, from the horrible company that hired the mercenary PR firm to the person who came up with the plan, all responsible.

Same playbook with the oil and plastic industry: carbon footprint. Shift the responsibility to the consumer. We don't have to produce sustainable packaging, YOU have to recycle! Diabolical.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1 in 3 users of tobacco die. If any other product had that kind of death toll, it'd be so insanely illegal that you'd get arrested just for being in the same room.

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

So 2 out of 3 become immortal?! Sign me up

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

What I suppose I should have said was "1 out of 3 users of tobacco are directly killed by the product". Kind of figured that was implied, but didn't count on the Internet's ability to creatively misunderstand.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

also some 1/10 of the secondary smokers die directly to it. Kids etc. that have to inhale the smoke without consent.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

1/3 of direct users and 1/10 of people just nearby. That's an incredible level of death directly associated with this product.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

100 years from now we’ll look back at social media this way.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Social media is no less lethal than tobacco, but its consequences are more indirect. With tobacco, only the one using it dies. With social media, the one using it is completely fine but people thousands of miles away die because of something that person said.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It, like tobacco, leaded gas and paint, asbestos, and x-rays, got entrenched before any study of its repercussions got its shovel out.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To be fair, before widespread use, social media was at least relatively harmless.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nah, their playbook is much better, and has largely worked.

Big oil learned from the repercussions to the tobacco industry. They all acknowledge climate change, invest enough in green energy to put forward a solid marketing campaign, throw money into campaigns that make the average consumer blame themselves rather than the oil companies, etc. And all the while, drill baby drill.

3 months ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 0

They also fund any and all movements that restrain green energy

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yeah in the EU the "pump it underground and it will cost trillions with no security at all for any long term"

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0