I thought dinosaurs were already extinct by the time World War II took place

Dec 9, 2016 10:14 AM

Akilex

Views

402018

Likes

9843

Dislikes

653

You forgot Canada :(

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ghosts of the Osfront- dan carlin

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

was scrolling through the comments to see if anyone had mentioned it. Just finished the series, chilling stuff

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is wrong on so many levels...

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Everyone forgets Australia

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

untill they see our fauna

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

*How the USA thinks WWII went. As a Dutch person, I didn't learn shit about what the USA did in WWII.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Killbots have a preset kill limit. Knowing their weakness, I sent wave after wave of my own men at them until they reached their limit.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This would be a little better if the Russians were declawed and only a few of them had teeth and Italy was giving Germany a blower.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 4

*blowie

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

no. Russians were armed with the most effecient weaponry on the battlefield...Don't get your history from Enemy At The Gates please.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I was referring to the fact that they didn't have enough weapons for the amount of soldiers. Don't be a cunt.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What about Canada?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I've never seen winter represented as a T-Rex before.

9 years ago | Likes 123 Dislikes 18

The heads are too small, most likely Allosaurus's

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

30 million dead Russians will haunt your rotten capitalist dreams.

9 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 1

Enigma was broken in July of 1941. The siege of Leningrad and Stalingrad started 3 months later.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yes, yes, Operation Bagration, the circling of the Army Group Centre and the brilliant tactical moves from Zhukov are all "The winter". Sure

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Winter helped a lot breaking the German war machine, but it's still not the T-Rex nor any other dinosaurs on this picture.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And yet still Napoleon was faster in Moscow than the germans. And strangly half of his army was dead when they arrived there before winter.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Lol. Who thinks that? People who get their history lessons from CoD maybe

9 years ago | Likes 409 Dislikes 20

Murican education at its best mind you, France is the Capital city of Europe

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The people who need dinosaurs to represent war for them because reading is hard.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I remember playing as a Russian soldier in CoD Finest Hour.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

On the contrary. World at War actually put it into better perspective. At least for me.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Probably. The guy who did this was definitely getting his ideas from ARK.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

World at War's campaign was a lot of Russian missions.

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

That last mission were you go to plant the Soviet flag and get shot. And your commander butchers the dude with a meat cleaver.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Haven't played in a while. That game was hard as nails. lol

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Yeah it was https://youtu.be/GJo5lnWva8U

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It was Call of Grenades: Thrown at Dimitry.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I beat the fucker on Veteran. Do you have any idea what the sound of grenades landing behind you in a line sounds like? It's hell on Earth.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I tried to play World at War on Veteran. So many 2-shot kills and a thousand grenades. I never made it to the end.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Funny thing is even cod showed the Russian and British perspective. This is purely a European misconception about Americans.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Do you remember when the Russians invaded the US?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

You just revived a dead soundtrack in my head

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're welcome. That's the extent of my COD knowledge.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ooh I 'member

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah, somehow one fucking nuke EMP the entire fucking nation. But what had that fucking bullet from brazil to do with anything?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Russian death count in WW2 was enormous something like 20 million to the US 1/2 a million. I don't think many people in the US know that

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

35 million dead russians all told

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And 30,000,000 Chinese.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Really? I watched 3 documentaries that said D-Day was "The Single Most Important Day in Human History." You tell me it's just CoD...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

You can make a case for it. If D-day failed, either Hitler or Stalin destroys European civilization. That is pretty bleak.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, Stalin sure. Hitler would've lost either way, but the war was always US vs USSR. The bombs were to show off to Stalin. Not Hirohito.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Per the Japanese, the bombs impressed a number of them. They said the bombs and the Soviets between them made them give up. I believe them.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm sure the bombs had more of an impact than a fruit fly. But they weren't essential to win the war. We didn't need to nuke them to win.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Oh, and Also Truman was kind of a racist and an asshole. But history has a way of white washing our sins.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

We did nuke them to show the Soviets that we meant business, and they weren't going to just take whatever they wanted in negotiations.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Neither are accurate.

9 years ago | Likes 460 Dislikes 22

Japan should be just as large as Nazi Germany it's amazing how much ass they were kicking in the early years of the war.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

Yet still couldn't fully take China.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

China is like, almost the size of europe

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"So." - Germany

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The most glaring problem is the portrayal of France's involvement.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean, you can only get so accurate with depictions of historical events via dinos with flags on them..

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Lots of good points here regarding everyone contributing to the victory, but the bigger point is regarding Russian Westward expansion...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The US and her allies were the only thing keeping Russia from marching to English channel, trading one nightmare scenario for another.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Russia had no desire to "free" Europe, but rather dreamed of conquering it for themselves.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're right, I'm pretty sure there weren't any dinosaurs in World War II at all. Although I'm not a historian.

9 years ago | Likes 190 Dislikes 3

I think we got ourselves a kickass story.. dinosaurs in World War II.. dinosaurs in World War II

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The evidence is mounting against your case, though: http://store.steampowered.com/app/70000/

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Actually the presence of dinosaurs during WWII is the only accurate part of this picture.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There were a shit ton of mech suits apperently.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ha! That's what the media WANTS you to believe!

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

Comment was decent but mostly had to upvote for username

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah wake up people!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

America donated literally thousands of trucks and jeeps to the Soviets, giving them a decisive advantage in mechanization over the Nazis.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Sure, the Soviets aren't given anywhere near enough credit as they should, but it's not as though The United States didn't contribute at all

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You want them to put little American jeeps under all the velociraptors?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well yeah. I mean, I'd surrender if I had to fight an army of raptors on Jeeps.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The image of the Nazi military as being ultra-advanced and mechanized is largely a facade they themselves maintained. It was really a... 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The only two countries with fully motorized artillery at the start of the war were UK and USSR. Even USA had horse-drawn artillery in 1941.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Small core of advanced tanks that were a logistical nightmare to maintain, along with some armored cars and alot of horse-drawn carriages.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Actually the most important stuff US gave USSR was train engines and some vital chemicals.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I wish everyone puts things in T-Rex's to teach me things

9 years ago | Likes 1782 Dislikes 7

I think America might be the only T-rex there. I see a lot of allosaurus.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

And all I wanted was alotosaurus. :(

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The axis powers are all T-Rex too. I think the image is a bit off though, as the US did most of the pushback in the Pacific arena.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You're going to love Dinosaur Comics.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:33 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

wtf

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I... like this.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That was great. This is what I love about Japan. They aren't afraid to try something no one has done before!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think it comes from the fact that their comic industry is based on independent artists instead of a big corporation making rehashes

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This comic for example was originally posted online for free, caught the attention of the industry and was published. The author never

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

published anything before.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Dec 12, 2016 3:15 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

No, that would be Scalie Schoolie.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My Biology class would be soooo much Better!

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Birds and bees replaced with t rex and t rex

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Literally anything would improve the current topic of molecular biology

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I don't know what that means

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Neither does half our class

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

P-rex = ∆m-rex ∆v-rex

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sex Ed would get weird.

9 years ago | Likes 379 Dislikes 2

Rex-Ed

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You spelled "awesome" wrong.

9 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 0

Here you go friend, this is how babies are born. http://imgur.com/BROO4x8

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Pull my hair. IN TRYING!!!!

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Hey man check your messages again

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

T-sex

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Far less hair pulling and zero reach arounds

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

T rex would be a great anti wank mascot

9 years ago | Likes 139 Dislikes 0

Anti-masterbaition t'rex says "rraaaaaaaaaggggghhhhhhgggggjhhhrrrrrr"

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

☆Have the urge to spank the monkey? Do The T-Rex Arm! Thinking about ringing the Devils doorbell? Do The T-Rex Arms! Do The T-Rex Arms!☆

9 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 0

*flails tiny t rex arms*

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Russians have a terrible kill death but god damn do they play the objective.

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 2

early on yes, later in the war? they were just as skilled and professional as their opponents

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

but yes that is why I am fascinated with Russian military history, they will ALL fight to the bitter death for the homeland

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

There's no options, its get shot by the guys invading your home, or get shot by the commissar telling you to charge an MG nest with no gun

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Way to ignore the entire Pacific theater

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 5

The US spent 75% of its war effort on Germany, 25% on the Pacific. With only 25%, the US beat Japan by themselves. They weren't important.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm sure you have a source for that

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I do! Thanks for checking. :)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yup, probably just as violent as the eastern front. Those japs wouldn't give up.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

It was close, but the level of brutality was not on par. Leningrad alone was a kind of massacre completely unseen in the Pacific.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Does Manchuria and the Rape of Nanking count as the pacific?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nope, that was the Chinese theater. The Pacific theater was a war on the ocean, whereas the Chinese theater was a land war.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was war. Brutality was the same. Just the scale of land fighting was far less in the Pacific

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

There is a very stark difference between island hopping and open siege warfare, the comparison simply doesn't hold up.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Ever hear of the Rape of Nanking? Or any of the Sino-Japanese War? The japs were just as brutal as the Nazi's.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Two words: "Lend-Lease"

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 5

Was paid for in gold.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Yup, eventually. Paid off August 2006.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

which is tiny in comparison to the soviet industrial workhorse output...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hey fucker canada was a big part of that war. Why does everyone leave out canada. Sorry for lashing out btw.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

The USSR caused 90% of the german's casualties by themselves - the other 10% is US + UK + everyone else. They're just not that important.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Stop being sorry, Canada! Have some respect for yourself. Jesus!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Sorry

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Don't worry about it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There is really good visualization: http://www.fallen.io/ww2/

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Nice

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

nice but still leaves out Australia and New Zealand deaths Over 993,000 Australians served in the armed forces during World War II. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Of those on active service, 27,073 were killed in action or died, 23,477 were wounded, and 30,560 were taken as POW

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My grandfather fought his way from Northern African into Italy. I don't think either picture is accurate.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

My great uncle fought at Huertgen forest. I think he'd have told you to stop acting like this is some history lesson and appreciate the joke

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

and what does that mean?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

My grandfather fought in the french resistance. So yeah i think both pictures are wrong :/

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

My grandfather fought in Yugoslav partisans. We're not even "drawn" here.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I can't imagine how tough that must have been.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I think it was tough for evryone in this time. The biggest thing he told us was that half of his unite died because someone betrayed them

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

but yeah my grandfather was still thanksfull to the brtis & americans for saving us (just don't call us cowards ^^ )

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

In the army you only have to care about the ennemy in the the resitance you also have to worry about people who will denounce you to the SS

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

And again, the US backed the soviets and U.K. economically and with basic demanded resources for years, without which the U.K. would have

9 years ago | Likes 133 Dislikes 32

It's the reason some Russians still like Spam.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Trading mostly with HUGE interest that wasn't paid off until the 80's. Not that it wasn't a huge boon, but it came at an outrageous cost.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It cost an incredible amount to keep the U.K. operating as well as operating our own force. It cost a lot to fund the Russians too while we

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

also spent an incredible amount defeating the Japanese in the pacific. Your society was about to come to an end. You're welcome.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And USSR paid for all those resources with gold and money for many many year. It wasn't a freebie. Well, some of it was, but not for USSR.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nor should it have been. We kept the USSR functioning during wartime. We gave them the ability to fight. It wasn't cheap.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was a great boon. But not the lifeline you make it sound to be.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We gave the Russians food and trucks, we gave them tanks and planes too but they used them as target practice because they were shit.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The Shermans were alright, but by that point the USSR was producing far more of its own tanks. Lees were death-traps, M3s weren't fantastic.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Soviets depended far more on equipment like boots than it did on LL tanks.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Barbarossa, Case Blue, Uranus and Little Saturn happened without Lend-Lease. LL sped up the soviet victory after winter 42/43.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Than again, UK had no other option really.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Agreed. It was that or surrender.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not that I think it was a bad thing overall, kinda like my free Czech Republic.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They helped for free and didn't make a penny/cent? How gentlemanly...

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Everything has a price. Whether given for free or as a loan, you can't deny the affect.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It also was not a gift, it was a loan, which made US biggest profit out of all countries who took part in WWII

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

And?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Russians paid with 8.7 million military casualties. (28 million dead total). Without them, we'd have lost.

9 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 9

Agreed. And?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Never get used to seeing that staggering number

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And without us, they probably would have lost.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

"WWII was won with British intelligence, American steel and Russian blood" -attributed to Stalin

9 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 1

In Europe. The Pacific was a mostly the US Navy and Marine Corps.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

I agree that the US funding did help Britain, but it was given as a loan (which made the US lots of money), rather than just support.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

The "loan" bit was a cover story. Little of it was ever paid back. Isolationists at the time denounced it as a scam. They knew.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It got Britain what it needed while it needed it. It was done on a promise of repaying and that was it. UK fulfilled its obligation and we

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

trusted them to do so. As for support with no expectation of repayment, which is a stupid expectation, how about US airmen traveling to the

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

UK to take part in the Battle of Britain. We saved the U.K. What's wrong with repaying the costs incurred to keep the country functioning?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

collapsed and the soviet advance would never have happened as the bombing of Germany would have never occurred and the full might of Germany

9 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 19

would have been directed on the eastern front along with the resources they were harvesting from n. Africa (oil). Japan would not have

9 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 13

fallen as their navy would have been fully prepped for war instead of being annihilated. We didn't win it alone but without us, Germany

9 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 14

would have won the war in Europe and at LEAST held the soviets off. Deal with it.

9 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 15

This is just as selective as what you're complaining about.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Found the yank...

9 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 25

Yeah thanks for the loans.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

I mean let's not forget Stalingrad was in 1942 and Kursk started before the invasion of Sicily. Peak production in Germany was in 1944 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

well i'm glad your contribution to events that took place over 60 years ago make you feel better about yourself and your country. cock.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 59

What would have happened if US, and now the EU banks , didn't fund Hitler to begin with?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 21

Without America, the war would have been lost. Without the soviets, the war would also have been lost. Teamwork!

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

U.S. helped both sides of the war for a while. You can debate how much so for each side, but there it is.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 11

The soviets invaded Poland with Germany. Forgot about that? Or are you blowing things out of proportion?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 12

Did you intend to reply to my comment with that? Or the post? If the former, then I am perplexed. You are correct, though.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Your comment. I didn't downvote you either. Considering we supplied the U.K. with oil and food, without which the U.K. would have become

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 11

combat ineffective and would have collapsed, long before we officially joined, I wouldn't say we assisted Germany in any real way.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 10

Don't worry, I didn't downvote. I just didn't quite understand if that was a rebuttal or not, and if it was what was it rebutting.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But the US also sold weapons to Germany, or did you forget about that?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

It's often best to forget about lies. What I find more perplexing is the worship of Russia who raped and murdered thousands of Poles.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is a misleading half-truth. Please read up on the topic. Plus, at the time, we didn't have any weapons worth selling.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Oh please. Normal economic trading does NOT equal supplying the German war machine en-mass.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They didnt back anyone. They didnt enter the war so they can sell weapons and resources to both sides

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The USA didnt enter a war before 1941, before that they didnt want to intervene because they was selling resources to both sides of war

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even though Allied has requested US for the military intervene and it could resolve a war quickly.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The USA charged the UK for the help. We only finished paying off the debt a decade or so ago. You get no points for mercenary work.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 12

...wow. Your nation was done. Your society was coming to an end. We step in and SAVE your asses before we had even joined the war and you

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

somehow manage to turn that into a negative thing for the U.S.? Up yours. Paying us back was the least you could do. Jesus...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No, the UK borrowed money and equipment from her colonies and the US. They never hired the US to fight in the war as "mercenaries."

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The US supplied the UK with a lot of money and materials. The US lent a lot to the UK in the lend-lease program and didn't require payback.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The US did get bonuses like bases from the UK but the only requirement in the lend lease program was that the materials be returned after.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Anglo-American loan you are talking about was a loan of money and materials, not mercenary work.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What, do you expect a country of isolationists to simply give you stuff for free in a war we had nothing to do with?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Apparently. This guy's a dick who would try to find the downside of a sunrise.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

A lie. The only bit that got paid back was the bit after the war was over. And that was ten cents n the dollar.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This needs more points

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Why?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Because it's accurate

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We get repaid for keeping a nation afloat during wartime, saving their society, and that makes us mercenaries? Up yours.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure you got a deal. Can you put a price on no speaky de Deutsche? Mercenaries my ass.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Yeah, because Hitler would totally have left you guys alone and not helped out the japanese at all.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Hey! We're the only reason you don't speak Dutch, you can thank us for the tea and taxes later.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Poor Poland

9 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

polasaurolophus!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is Naxi-Rex using Poland as a dino-shield?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yeah, we suffered from it quite a lot, fucking russians were worse than germany for us

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

?1

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

except we always took 3 countries at once, more than once too! we get used to it you can say

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm laughing my pierogi off

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm concerned.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Polandball is really good at showing history

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Watched the Pianist last night. Damn.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Let's not forget that Britain held their shit up while the US was twitching thumbs. Europe would have fell if not for GB...

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 6

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Everyone in America knows this. It is in all the history books and documentaries. More of us know about thus then know their own history.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

More of a case of Americans saying "not my monkeys. not my circus." than twiddling our thumbs

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

It wasn't our war, at first. It was Germans and Brits and French killing each other. Just like they'd been doing for a thousand years.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Russian here, I always wounder if you guys celebrate victory as we do every year? May 9th is the 2nd biggest holiday in Russia after NewYear

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In Germany, we celebrate May 8th as "Day of Liberation", but it only used to be a national holiday in East Germany.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not as much of a big national parade day thing over here, and we celebrate in August since that was when we finally finished with Japan.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why is the US one larger than the UK one? This was made by an American wasn't it?

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 10

It's compairing the size of the US vs Japan. Besides the Brit-Rex is hunched over.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Brit rex is an allosaurus, which are 4 tons. t-rex are 6-10 tons

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

By the time America entered the war, Britain had lost a few tons.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Britain actually had less casualties despite being in the war for a longer period.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The US only shortened the war, Russia already had it won. Even the Japs only surrendered because Russia was 3 weeks away from invading.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 10

I hate displaying accurate information only to get hit with down-votes. The US didn't become a strong till after ww2, get over yourselves.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Without the US pouring in supplies, bombing Germany, and generally keeping Hitler distracted, the USSR never would have pulled it off.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

And without the USSR pouring in millions of troops and battering the eastern front the Allied invasion of Normandy would have failed.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Not really, The supplies we gave USSR Yes, But the USSR was already cleaning up the eastern front by the time the US got there.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

The US had about 405,000 casualties, Soviet Union 27 MILLION. So yeah we need a bunch more hammer and sickle dinos. Great post

9 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 16

Why all the countries except the Soviet Union presented the only dinosaur?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That figure includes Soviet civilian casualties which were huge.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Also a good number of the soviet dinos need to be eating each other, or dying in tar pits.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You're comparing US military casualties to Soviet total casualties

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

If America had shared a border with Axis territories, the counts would be substantially different.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

what does this even mean, it's a ridiculous counter factual

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

Casualties *suffered* aren't how wars are won. China lost 15 million + and no one is claiming they were the unsung heroes of WW2?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So wars are won by the largest number of casualties?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the rendering time would take years

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And how many US civilian casualties were there?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There has never been a major war on U.S. soil after USA became independent. There was a minor scuffle with Mexico IMHO.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

War of 1812 much?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Japanese killed six in Oregon with a crazy lamp/balloon/bomb thing

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

To be fair, the soviets had that many casualties because their military was lead by Zapp Brannigan.

9 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 6

*Zab Branniganski

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was not. At least, not all the war. Stalin early purge deprived the soviet from many competent general (indeed) but others came after

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Zhukov, for instance, was really fucking good at his job, definitely not Brannigan. Underestimating Soviets was also a mistake Hitler made.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but the bulk of the losses came from before Zhukov took over, so my point still stands.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

your point is irrelevant, The losses came from a crippled military without many officers, thanks to the purges.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You see, killbots have a preset kill limit. Knowing their weakness, I sent wave after wave of my own men...

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's always worth remembering that the UK was vastly larger than the US at the time. The UK was a superpower around the globe.

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 6

The US helped in Europe but forgets that the Empire was fighting with them in the Pacific and alone in China against the main Japanese force

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

That is in all the history books. It was not forgotten.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Who reads books when there are films, games and dinosaur memes? :D

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sigh. Very true.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The British are seen as a sideline in films and games and only in France. We had land on every continent, fought against every enemy

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

And at one point most of the allies as well. Now the UK would rely on US military might but back then the UK WAS the military might.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Absolutely, US deserves plenty of credit but they were the closer. Brittain, Russia, France pitched first 8 innings USA came in and closed.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's a pretty good analogy, actually. I don't suppose Canada, ANZAC, Norway, Belgium, the Netherlands and company were manning the bases?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Canada was the water/batboy

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Canada, being in the British Commonwealth did quite a lot more, along with Australia and NZ. Don't forget India and other UK colonies too.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

False, although this is what Russia thinks. Millions died on the Soviet side, but many as a result of Stalin's "use unarmed dissidents (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 10

The USSR inflicted 90% of Germany's casualties. The rest of the allies share the 10%.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

you're an idiot if you think Russia didn't contribute over 90% of the war in both casualties inflicted and lost

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You are not right. Of the 26 million dead, half of them were civilians who were killed by the Nazis. Because they were not considered people

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Dude, at least google things before posting

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Convicted for counter-revolutionary activities in the army are not recruited.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

1921 - 1954 in this article, the convicted 3 777 380 people. On January 1, 1941, in conclusion, is 1.500.524.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

(2/2) as bullet sponges" policy. Cruelty from their own national policy makers accounts for a large number of their dead.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 6

what are you talking about? You watch "enemy at the gates" a few too many times? The fact you think the majority of people where forced

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

to fight is laudible. Don't underestimate the will of the Russian people

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They don't even call it a "World War," even though something like 160 nations were involved. They call it "the Great Patriotic War," because

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

"They don't even call it a "World War"" - excuse me, what? Care to provide your source?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm a professional interpreter. The word for "WWII" in Russian is "Velikaya otechestvennaya voina." Translation: Great Patriotic War.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

doesn't affect the actual meaning of these terms. (6/6)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I just found out I can't write Cyrillic on here?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

up to this day, and while some people may lack the understanding of the difference between them and use them interchangeably, that (5/?)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the term doesn't even cover the entirety of USSR's own involvement in the WWII. Both "WWII" and "GPW" terms are widely used in Russia (4/?)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the WWII. GPW started after WWII already began (when Germany attacked USSR) and ended before WWII ended (when Germany capitulated), so (3/?)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

War" refers specifically to the events on the Eastern Front involving USSR, and is known to be a part of a greater conflict, which was (2/?)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm sorry, but you're wrong. The word for "WWII" in Russian is "Vtoraya Mirovaya Voyna", meaning "Second World War". "Great Patriotic (1/?)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it was packaged as a call to defend the homeland from invaders (carefully erasing the fact that Nazi Germany and USSR were allies til '40

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

...before which, they had an agreement to split up Poland. Nazis surprise attack nullified the "Molotov-Ribbentrop" pact between the two.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

Yeah, no. M-R pact was "bad", but was not an alliance. By same logic Poland and Germany were allies because of Czechoslovakia. (1)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Since USSR saw a war coming miles away and was building alliances since Spanish civil war. But they were told to fuck off (4)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

In the end, everyone fucked up, but Germany started it. (5)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Making these statements requires understanding what happened in Europe in the 30s, with Soviet union isolation. Spanish civil war and (2)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

British policy of "Appeasing the aggressor", that backfired when USSR was left with no choice but to go cordial with an ideologic enemy (3)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well that was a rant. Sorry fellow imgurians. Pet peeve: when Russia rewrites history to glorify herself. /r

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Where's Canada?

9 years ago | Likes 1206 Dislikes 47

It's off screen, busy not being important.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 14

*Upvotes all of the Canadian supporters*

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 3

Tyrannosorryus

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

No doubt brother where is canada?

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

For those that don't know Canada was in WWII before usa

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 3

Yeah. Considerable Canadian soldiers were lost in Normandy. Where are they?

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 6

While this is true, Canada overall was relatively insignificant. There are countries more important than Canada not shown here.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 24

Are you that cunt I ran into before? I think you're that cunt I ran into before. Perfect, I can tell you to go fuck yourself again.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

Am I? I attempt to introduce reason and logic to plenty of people on this site who refuse to accept it, so it is possible that you were one.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

We're at the front of the line, choo choo mother fuckers

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

And the rest?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

my thoughts too.. Where is Canada?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

In the right place, so in British Empire.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

No

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Don't forget that Mexico gave companies to the US to fight in Europe as well.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's, it's uhhh somewhere around there

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

always love when canada gets left out.one of the first countries to join the war.americans did everything they possible could not to fight

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This is a 'murican post. As long as America is the biggest on there, they don't care :c

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

seriously. wtf right?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Who?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Star Lord, man

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a proud Canadian, we're the teeth of Britain and the US.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Canada is represented by the Union Jack - it's the same queen anyway.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No love for the Polish Army-in-Exile either.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Getting drunk on maple syrup

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That movie allied was legit

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Apologizing for missing the picture.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In the board game Axis and Allies, Canada is considered part of UK's force.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Watching everything going according to plan

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

canada is probably a rabbit

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Off to the side luring France over with some chicken feed

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Exactly....

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I kind of assumed the French and UK flags were like... Ikea components for for the bookshelf that is Canada.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Canada is sorry

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

So theres actually a logical reason why Canada is normally not remember well by history.if you guys are interested i'll make a post about it

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Tell me more!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just as in WW1, they usually group Commonwealth countries together with England.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

No they don't, and learn what "England" means

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

The United Kingdom? Calm down bud.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Nope, they're not interchangeable. But hey, you used "calm down" so that was better than you making a point

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

then why isnt the Common Wealth a T-rex? America was way smaller

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Except for the fact that we joined WWII of our own accord and had command over our own troops, huge moment in our history.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thats snow in the background, you can't see Canadians in their natural habitat unless they want to be seen.

9 years ago | Likes 282 Dislikes 3

Am Canadian, can confirm. PS look behind you.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Clever canadian, didn't know you could fit in toilet tanks!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We can fit into anything with enough maple syrup as lube.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Legit.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

So is Canada Chuck Norris, or is Chuck Norris Canada.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Yes.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

It's the egg laid by the Rooster after being impregnated by the English T-Rex. And coated in gravy and cheese curds. Wait, no, that's dinner

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People always post this... Canada lost 0.25% of the amount of people China lost and you don't see people asking where's china...

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 16

You don't measure success by how many people you lost, bud.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You are comparing a country that was defending itself vs a country that was never at risk of invasion but sent people to die to help allies?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And trying to call that equal? And as far as soldiers, Canada lost 0.37% of it pop vs China's 0.6%. Most of China's were civillian

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No. I'm saying it's childish to ask for a pretty little dinosaur on a shitty joke.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

China's casualties are so often forgotten, it's ridiculous. But this post is more about "boots on the ground" than civilian casualties

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes but how many people did we kill Canadians were pretty danm powerfull in that war. Again Canada has very little money invested (1/3)

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

in their military but our soldiers are rugged as fuck have you ever met a northern Canadian because they (2/3)

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

are super nice but could kill bears with there bare hands while riding a moose topless on the way to their watering holes. Not ones (3/4)

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

to be Trifled with!. Sincerely a beaver loving maple leaf tree huggen super patriotic Caknuckle fuck! Sorry for being prideful.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Considered part of the UK

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 17

Not in WWII

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

It's a country since 1867

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

1931*

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Yeah but that American educational system though

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I guess Dieppe, Juno Beach, Normandy, Vimy Ridge, Passchendale and nearly every other allied battle means nothing.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Vimy Ridge, Passchendale

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think theyd technically be combined with the british, same with the australians, scots, and irish

9 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 22

No. We joined on our own, independent from Britain. This is basic shit.....

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

ANZACS

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not sure what's worse - your post or how many people upvoted it

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure Ireland was neutral

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ireland played neutral.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And kuwis, indians etc

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I thought Ireland was neutral

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We were but Irish men joined the British and even American army to fight, I'm pretty the US and Britain also used our ports and airfields

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But I'm not 100% certain about ports and airfields part

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Typical.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But why, Canada had been a Dominion for close to 100 years by that point.

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 5

The Commonwealth

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

We didnt even write our own constitution at that point.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Ps. fuck the Clergy Endowments Act of 1791. Dont think we forgot that shit.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That was WWI. In WWII Canada joined the war on its own and had command of its own troops

9 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 4

Canada was still a dominion until the 80's, actually.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Statute of Westminster and we did fight in WWII under our own flag (red ensign at the time)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Flag is irrelevant, and Canada Act 1982.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Canada was a major part in WWII. We took care of a large part of Italy and were one of the deciding factors in the Battle of Normandy.

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 4

Lol. *pats head* That's right. You're a big boy too.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

That's what the Canadians told the americans after Normandy. Look at the comparisons of how much land each party took.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Don't forget we were the ones that liberated the Belgians, Dutch and Danes. Those countries still love us.

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 5

That's not accurate, they played a part but the British under Montgomery are largely credited with liberating Denmark and Belgium was...

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I'm a Canadian. Why the hell do you even care, though?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 15

It's a part of our history & we lost a lot of brothers. They deserve recognition for their sacrifice you fuck

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

That's true- but this is just some fucking meme. Calm down.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Well if that's the case then where are the flags of the 50+ other participants during the war?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

It's a shame they're not there either but that doesn't invalidate our role

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

I mean let's be real here a lot of the omitted countries played a larger role than Canada did. I don't understand why you guys have to 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

2/2 make such a big deal out of being left out.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Wrong, Canada was the major force, unlike what the U.S. would like to think.

9 years ago | Likes 158 Dislikes 42

Lol, no it wasn't.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 11

There were about as many US casualties (including wounded) as there were Canadian soldiers. 1.1M Canucks & 1.08M Joes

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

27 million ruskies though

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

British intelligence, American steel, Russian blood

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Canada is just that good.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Dec 10, 2016 1:37 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Canada supplied syrup to Great Britain.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Millions of ours died while fighting for freedom. Don't be an arse by minimizing our role during WW2. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Also don't confuse our contribution during WW1. We aren't the bitches you might think we are! Read about Vimy and come back with excuses...

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Fuck yes. France was so grateful they gave us a chunk of their land. americans can't say that.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Wrong. Russia was the major force. GB, the intelligence. America, the steel. Russia could do what they did because of US manufacturing.

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 8

In cahoots i say!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Lets over simplify the largest war in history a million times in the comments.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Look at the numbers and each countries role, it's not an over simplification. Should probably mention the Poles, though. Cracking code.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Hey my country gave steel to the enemy instead!:D

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Which Americans would like to think this I ask? Show me proof that we all think we saved the day single handedly.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Most of them.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

My own roommate is Canadian and I had to explain to him that Canadians fought in the war too.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Slap him for me!!!! (sorry)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pretty much every American cartoon, movie and fox news anchor

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

American Hollywood writers.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

So uh, we're using hollywood now? Since when was hollywood ever a good source to base any sort of opinion on?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

but muh mel gibson

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The movies a country produces are an excellent representation of what it thinks of itself.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Since...hold for it...ok NOW!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wrong, us Americans know we joined late and other countries did their fair share of fighting, not just Canada.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 11

that's not the point he was trying to make, not sure how yours is an argument against his :-/

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

We didn't join late. We joined about midway and that war started swinging in both theaters.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Whatever, you know what I meant. Later* Is that better?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(I know we supplied the allies too, before we joined)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Dec 10, 2016 1:38 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Yah the Uk declared war on September 3rd 1940 and Canada declared war on September 7th 1940. Canada waited to show our independence.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Think we need to go back to the history books on this one man. Sorry.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

First world war we fought because GB fought, WW2 we made a point to independantly declare war and fight as Canada not a commonwealth nation

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

But yet all your troops were supplies to GB, not independent forces with their own objectives

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Unless I am remembering my history wrong, its been several years

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You mean 'a' major force

9 years ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 10

'Eh' major force?

9 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 2

Pretty much. Canada did a LOT more than anyone seems to give credit for, but WWII was a joint venture in suffering for every party involved.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No. The major force. Think of the Soviets numbers and triple that. Canada fought on the northern front.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 27

For those who missed it: \s

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

There were about as many US casualties (including wounded) as there were Canadian soldiers. 1.1M Canucks & 1.08M Joes

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

It was a joke. There weren't 3 times as many Canadians as the soviets.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 15

No we mean THE. The US joined very late in the war, and barely had time to help with the invasion of Normandy cause of the Japs.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 39

I'm Canadian and... no. Just, no. We contributed all we could and won some serious respect, but we were VERY short of "THE"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Canada was the major force?...you helped but were not even a fraction of resources or troops

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 19

If we werent a fraction, that means we were all of it. You should have said a small fraction.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

Canadas resources were absolutely a huge support of the UK.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

OHHHHH CAAAAANADAAAAAA!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There were about as many US casualties (including wounded) as there were Canadian soldiers. 1.1M Canucks & 1.08M Joes

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

That's not right. http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0004619.html Canada only had about 1.08 M total soldiers.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(kind of unrelated) but thats crazy comparing the population densities

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yeah, I don't know what t rex text book this graphic came from but the Canadian dinosaurs we were pretty significant in WW2.

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 5

true, says everyone in Europe, but obviously America thinks that we did nothing, except send just as many troops with .10 their population

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 27, 2018 7:13 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Dead soldiers do not represent the number of soldiers that participated in the war. Also your just flat out wrong.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Honestly

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

WWII was won with American steel and Russian blood.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 10

The uk fought the Germans alone for a year without them the war would have been over with a convincing German victory.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Yes but without anyone it would of been a German Victory. America mattered the UK mattered and soviet union mattered

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I know, it's just most of the comments are saying it was the Soviet union and the us who were the only reason the allies won

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

sigh...the lend lease was tiny in comparison with the soviet industrial workhorse.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

...and Japanese negligence, they could of attacked the Soviets in the east and destroyed their industrial sector; Japan not a team player

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

what? they tried.. and got absolutely stomped.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

seriously where are you getting this from?! The Soviet Union and Imperial Japan didn't got to war till after Germany surrendered.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

no they didn't, the reason why is that they never trusted the Nazi's; even if they had invaded their military would've been stretched thin

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and couldn't count on the Nazi's to share resources after takeing control of middle eastern oilfields, instead they opted to attack the U.S.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

France is a rooster. lmao

9 years ago | Likes 3460 Dislikes 59

going the wrong way too

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Chicken

9 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 3

Hen

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Fowl

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Le chicken

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Le coq c'est notre emblême.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Allez vous faire foutre .

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I like how it's walking away

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

But I thought France is bacon.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

*Sir

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A bit inaccurate, considering that the fall of France was more a product of political circumstance than it was a military defeat.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This meme is also a slur on the French. They fought bravely and lost in 1940. They got back in the war in 1943 and fought bravely for 2 yrs

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

and heading the other way

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

To be honest , france not was cowardly , they just were not as organised and were thinking about "how ww1 was" not how ww2 was

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That assessment was shared by most of the military experts around the globe. The impact of change in tactics and tech wasn't known.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yeah pretty much , but myth of cowardly france persist , despite most of soldiers were quite brave , a bit sad

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Roosters are dinosaurs too.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ummm, sort of. But that's like saying humans are tiktaaliks.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The French are a bunch of chickens? What?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mate, the French made a big difference in the war tbf

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Chicken, actually.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Technically...that's a chicken

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I fucking love this.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Roosters will fuck you up. xD

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Chicken, going the other way. Not historically correct but verrrrry amusing.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It would be more accurate cock, bald eagle, lion and bear against black eagle, raccoon dog and wolf.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

chickens or other birds are technicslly still dinosaurs sooo...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Buy French army surplus rifles. Dropped once and never fired.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

I think it's a chicken. But "cock" is pretty funny, too.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

CHICKEN!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

Remembers me of the time when they decided 449 vs 448 against the new flag: White star on white ground.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Cheese eating surrender monkey.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 16

A chicken quite fitting!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Also, it's walking in the opposite direction

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Roosters aren't a fucking joke. I had one and it would try to attack me anytime I went outside because I was in his yard.

9 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

Roosters are the most vile bastards in animal kingdom, they just want to fuck you up and they don't need no reason.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

We had a troublesome rooster one time. So we got another one so they could be cocks to eachother (did you get it?)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well then got the fuck out of his yard.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

We found the French person.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'm actually 100% Murican.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can you set the pecking order? Is that something you can do with roosters? Like how dogs thinking they're the house alpha is fixable.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No. They are way too violent or territorial. All you can do is relocate it. Eventually it attacked my brother so he ate it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Definition of chicken for English Language Learners: a person who is afraid.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Chicken. The French are chickens

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 19

And running away

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Should've been a cat

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Le coq

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This legit made me lol

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Us French are not chikens. May I remind you who fought alongside americans for your independence ?

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

Seriously, this is a BS argument. *Your* despot, Louis, decided on that to screw the Brits. The UK was a far freer country than France.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

We remember Gen. Lafayette. Well, some of us do. I don't know about everyone.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

American here, I get in so many arguments defending the French it's ridiculous.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

You didn't just fight with them. You footed the bill and bankrupted your own country for the ungrateful sods.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Oh no, that wasn't the goal. The only reason the french did so, was to piss off the brits.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We know. Ours relationship with France is always listed as "It's Complicated". Still, the Yanks should give you less stick. They owe you.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh, a brit. Enjoying the rain much ? Kidding, love you. well, no. but you got it. Btw, how did you saw me as a french ? my written english ?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh, cock.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

"They are coming from Belgium"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Chicken. They are saying France is chicken, hence facing backwards to the rest.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Because they're chicken...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Can Rooster's walk backwards?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I thought that was a chicken?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

A white one. Running away.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Evolutionnary speaking, the rooster is more advanced than the dinausaurs

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

doe's things become more advanced as time goes on i mean it's better suited for todays environment but dinosaurs were pretty well suited in

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

their time

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Evolution doesn't necessarily mean improvment.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

exactly so the rooster isn't necessarrily more advanced than the dinosaurs just more adapted too the current circumstances

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Chicken, cause surrendering.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 18

I agree, if it was because of its mascot why isn't anyone else represented by their animals? France have always been known for being pussies

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

If it weren't for France we might all be speaking Arabic or German right now. I'd never have the cheek to question their valour.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Lol, wtf? Saying that about America is considered a bad joke, but you're seriously saying it about France? Get outta here you rascal you!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Poitiers 732. Verdun 1916. Both as monumental as Marathon or Plataia. Only thing on the US resume even close is Midway.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Oh boy! Attributing the battle of *Tours* to France is like giving them Alesia as well. And if they'd lost Verdun, the worst long term...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Isn't the joke that France is a chicken?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

I thought they were cheese eating surrender monkeys?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

And that the US are a Tyrannosaurus ?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Original name for France was Gall, meaning cock or roster.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

... so the asterix and obelix were french?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No. Gaulois. France came after.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Gaule, and actually you can translate it with "boner" no joke ....

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

*Gaul

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

the only surviving dinosaur

9 years ago | Likes 128 Dislikes 3

Crocodiles, caiman, and tautara are reptiles that lived alongside dinosaurs, and they were bigger.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Also, though not reptilian, the echidna, the platypus, and bees were all alive alongside dinosaurs. Lampreys, too.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

TIL roosters are dinosaurs

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Kind of, yeah. Avian dinosaurs.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Iguanas

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The rooster is actually the national bird of France

9 years ago | Likes 229 Dislikes 0

*the Coq

9 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 0

And also a dinosaur descendant

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

A proof that evolution can work backwards

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ben Franklin wanted the turkey as usa`s

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I like this.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

and white the national flag

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 31

The French had literally the most bad ass special forces of the war, definitely motivated. Fuck with the French and you'll bleed...profusely

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

If you say so, frenchie.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 14

American, fuckwit

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Be careful.... the SAS are listening....

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Once, when a group a French soldiers were asked why they weren't shooting the Germans they replied "if we shoot them, they'll shoot back"

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

And that was the day the French almost taught us how to stop all wars. Stupid French :(

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Cause it sings proudly with both feet in manure. Source: am French

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Eh, we have a wood eating rodent with a flat tail here lol

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Pal, we have an eagle that rarely even visits our country every winter

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Source: Coluche in "le Belge" source : I'm Belgian

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

tmtc maggle

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

No, that was bad. Really bad,hood french.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

tmtc = toi même tu sait == you know it aswell and maggle is "ma geule" witch can be translated as dawg

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*gueule ????

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Je suis français, au passage.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cock sir. The French are cocks*

9 years ago | Likes 740 Dislikes 17

Or possibly they are chicken...?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Found the Brit.

9 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 5

They actually are. It's not a Brit insult. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gallic_rooster

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Chickens* just run away...

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

Should have been a cat.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It's hard to tell what they are from the back of their heads HA!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

The French were a people who got steamrolled unprepared then many aided the Brits. No the French were ok. DeGaulle was a cock.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I wouldn't fuck with a cock

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

That's the only way I know how to fuck.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Coq*

9 years ago | Likes 171 Dislikes 4

Coq sportife

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Coq Sportif* cher ami

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Çôq

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Coque Monsieur

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Coque

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ne pas confondre coque, coq, et coquille !

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

No it's not, chez nous we say "bite". Exemple: "ma grosse bite à défoncé OP hier soir"

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

That's a paddlin'

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*le coq

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

*Le coq au vin

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Winer

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sportif

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

hon hon hon

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It is quite insulting considering France surrendered to avoid more casualties on their side because the war was losed from the beginning

9 years ago | Likes 109 Dislikes 23

But the govt actively went after it's own ppl.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The French are a hard bunch of cunts tbh. Fought along side them in certain situation's and by no means are they pussies.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I sure love me some freedom fries

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"Never give up! Never surrender!" - Jason Nesmith (Galaxy Quest)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

*Lost

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Well they kind of brought that on themselves. They had a large, better equipped military and sent most of their forces into Belgium.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Especially considering the incredible burden they shouldered in WW1

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I think everyone losed after reading that comment

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 17

It's just another form of racism. They don't even understand they're still acting like colonials with that tripe.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

What race are we talking about?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You were able to enrapture me for about 2 minutes before I realized you're a troll. Gj.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What kind of raptor are we talking about?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The fascist government was the one who surrendered, not the people. The government had no issue with giving up the Jews by doing so btw.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Name a country that had issue with giving up their Jews....... is that cricket noises I hear?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 9

Nordic countries.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Oh yeah! The Danish king wearing a 'Juden' armband that one day. That jerk Frog king didn't even wear one on the chopping block in 1792!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm guessing English isn't your 1st language?

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 14

Yep, but the best way to learn is practicing and being corrected

9 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

agreed. and it's always impressive when someone is bilingual.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Perhaps as an american or the like, but many countries teach mandatory English and their own language, and then a third language of choice

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Only word you got wrong was that you said "losed" instead of "lost". Otherwise excellent.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

What @radas86 said. You have even mastered the They're/there/their usage, placing you far and away ahead of some native English speakers.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Oh I'm not trying to be rude, I was just wondering

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Sorry if I was, really I just meant to say that you were right and that I'm happy you're pointing my mistakes so I can improve

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The rooster is an actual symbol of France.

9 years ago | Likes 98 Dislikes 1

self-hating french

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 12

...this was sarcasm, guys

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was going to say that. +1

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Because the French are chicken?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 12

And the tyrannosaurus is the symbol of the USA. Got it.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Not until January 20th.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I think you are thinking of Tyrannical Sore-Ass

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The original us flag was a T-Rex holding an M16.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

It sure as hell is now.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nevermind, they'll never leave us with that, French are labelled as cowards since then, but we keep 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

2/2 ...the fries and the kiss, and THAT is true power my friend :)

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

I know its a big joke but I prefer to think about how the french had the most powerful land army in like.. all of modern history til then.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

French soldiers on early WWII gave all they could but were sent with 1 gun for 2 and 1 box of bullets per truck...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

The French were also, admittedly, pivotal to the success of the US revolution. So they aren't all bad.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Well in hindsight, seeing what the US has become, maybe not so great of them to help that.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

France was the opposite of the "coward" stereotype up until then. In the Napoleonic era they were fighting worldwide.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And the braid.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

And the Bread.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And the toast

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0