We have a bottle of champagne

Jul 30, 2026 12:32 PM

moecurlylarry

Views

25924

Likes

773

Dislikes

40

Brewery stripped of alcohol permit after promising free beer when Trump dies https://www.the-independent.com/life-style/wisconsin-brewery-alcohol-permit-trump-free-beer-b3024000.html

they could probably switch completely over to THC infused beverages, and make up the difference selling tee shirts.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Owner has a history: https://www.wpr.org/justice/law/minocqua-brewing-company-owner-arrested-on-criminal-defamation-charges

Then, dealing with the same newspaper publisher mor
e recently: https://www.wpr.org/news/minocqua-brewing-company-owner-charged-harassment-northwoods-newspaper-publisher

1 month ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

#JustDieAlready

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Click baitey title. From what I read the own is just and outright douche and there were a lot of other things that contributed to this out come

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ok so now they just need to go into business selling home brewing kits.
Fairly sure you don't need a license to sell those.
Just like they did back in the prohibition days.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

They're gonna win sooo big in court

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Strange. I had a video called "Trumpenfuhrer" from 6-7 years ago on my barely used Youtube page that got axed from the page today. It was a video of drumpf in front of one of his crowds of cult dipshits giving one of his idiotic rants with audio of Adolf Hitler giving one of his crazed speeches dubbed over it. It was flagged for "Hate speech" Something is going on.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

An attack on their 1st amendment rights?

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Soon to be most popular speakeasy in the USA

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do they need a permit to give away beer? Or only to sell it for money?

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The owner violated a no contact order against his neighbor. It's all on police cam. Donut operator just did a react video on it

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Flew a little too close to the sun

1 month ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 8

many states dont allow establishments to give away alcohol. In my state anyway when they give "free samples" you have to give them a penny or any kind of change you have in you.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He goes over their complaints in his substack post. https://minocquabrewingcompanytimes.substack.com/p/in-and-absurd-act-of-heavy-handedness
Looks like the state is shutting them down over nitpicking, already corrected issues and circumstantial evidence to me.

1 month ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

Technically it's a permit violation to give away beer as a promotion in Wisconsin, but they'll likely win on appeal.

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

What's the likelihood the state's going to argue that the brewery is promoting the assassination of Trump with the offer of beer? I hope I'm being absurd with this but frankly who knows at this point.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

How about that Freedom America?!

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

THIS is a freedom of speech issue.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait, after reading more about this, this shop is run by a colossal 1,000 Couric tower of shit. Fuck this shithat.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When that grotesque orange blob kicks, there's gonna be people and pubs worldwide buying rounds!

1 month ago | Likes 88 Dislikes 5

I made a promise to myself. When he dies im gonna take a shit on his grave.

1 month ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Better turnout than the 250th State Fair, and better planning for the event!

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There will probably be quite the line.

1 month ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I have a $400 bottle of Irish Whiskey I am saving for just such an occasion.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I've got a 20 year old Lagavulin I'm saving for the day.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

May you crack it very soon. Ill toast to you with my Midleton irish and you to me with your scotch.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Behold, the land of freedom.

1 month ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Wow, misleading journalism at its finest.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This would seem to be a First Amendment issue since Citizens United decided that corporations are people.

1 month ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Given the context thats an *insanely* clickbaity headline and seems to, at the very best, really wrestle with facts to arive at that.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You don't need a permit for selling alcohol if you're going to give it away. No sale, no problem.

1 month ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 10

That's true in a social hosting situation (such as a private party in one's home). Whether they're legally allowed to give it away free if they're a licensed alcohol vendor is another issue.

1 month ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Does it really work that way?

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Idk if it is legal, but I've been to swap meets where there are guys that sell toothpicks that come with a beer.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The exact opposite, actually. This brewery is in Wisconsin. Like most states, they cannot give alcohol away to customers for free as a business promotion. The Wisconsin DoR specifically notes that businesses may not give away alcohol beverages to customers without the appropriate authority/license, and Wisconsin regulates these types of giveaways. There are cases where a brewery CAN, but this would not qualify. It is technically grounds for revocation of your permit, but they'll win on appeal.

1 month ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Reddit thread yesterday had a bunch of locals chiming in that this owner is a real piece of shit person and the shutdown has nothing to do with the offer of free beer.

1 month ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 1

Yeah this guy is a MASSIVE piece of shit. He likely publicized the Trump stuff because he knew the hammer was about to drop on him, to manufacture outrage in his defense. He's exactly the kind of person that would lie about this type of shit.

1 month ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

One of many cases of why this guy doesn't deserve defending. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_QFcacHMVc

1 month ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

I don’t like EITHER side of this dispute.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Bangstad also fabricated edited versions of newspaper articles with racial and sexual slurs in them, to try and get Walker harassed.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Among many different reasons why Walker got the restraining order in the first place, is because Bangstad was making posts accusing him of *murdering his brother* and posting photoshopped images of Walker sexually assaulting his employees. Bangstad is objectively the person in the wrong here.

1 month ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The "other" side of this particular dispute Greg Walker, the guy that called the cops, did so because his business is across the street and Bangstad had been constantly harassing him, to the point where a judge issues a no-contact order barring Bangstad from communicating with him. Bangstad proceeded to round up a bunch of drunk people and stand on his side of the road yelling obscenities at Walker. Walker is in the right here, he didn't do anything wrong, just reported a parole violation.

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I’m not saying he’s in the wrong in this instance. But he comes across as someone doing selectively right leaning journalism- kind of a Wish.com version of R. Murdoch.

(I will note that most of what I can see in that regard comes from the brewing company’s feed, so it’s NOT an unbiased source.🤷🏾)

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'd point out that Walker being conservative doesn't mean he doesn't deserve the same legal protections the rest of us have. But you shouldn't even bother LOOKING at Bangstad's company's media feed, they've been repeatedly caught doctoring photos and evidence to smear Walker. You can't trust anything he says.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

However:

https://captimes.com/opinion/dave-zweifel/opinion-liberal-brewer-runs-afoul-of-oneida-county-wing-nuts/article_f31d920c-7f08-5e24-8fc5-48d4950814a5.html

Walker appears to be a climate science & COVID denier, etc.

So while Bangstead is clearly in the wrong, the person he’s victimizng isn’t exactly a nice person either.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is there a justification for them doing that or is it just a blatant attack on their freedom of speech

1 month ago | Likes 528 Dislikes 9

@drousnavat there is a justification, in their eyes: this is a dictatorship, and you can't insult the god king or you'll wind up in a shallow grave, either physically, mentally, or financially.

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Same result, what's the difference?

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Brewery said they never said Trumps name,nor any ones name.. was apparently violations so that why.. but the violations may not be enough to shut Brewery down.. plus I wonder how this may or may not be 1st amendment issue..

1 month ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 6

Same justification that ICE have for detaining and shooting innocent ppl i guess

4 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He's a scammer and an asshat according to Reddit locals.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not sure about all states, but where I live, it is illegal for a bar to offer alcohol at no charge

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The place and owner have been ringing up a string of complaints beyond this too.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If it’s not restricted in the rules of selling alcohol when they got their license I would say case to sue the state.

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

attack on free spech. they want it so you can be arrested for saying ill of dear leader

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

which is more likely? sensitive republicans or an actual violation?

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

both at this point. but im leaning towards actual violations and a FAFO moment

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I think it's a free speech violation. they aren't saying kill, they're just sating death

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Would the government admit that even if it was?

1 month ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 6

Would anything of consequence happen if they did?

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes, cause apparently American constitution doesn't matter that much recently...

1 month ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

In the history of the late Roman republic each faction would often said that the constitution was in jeopardy from their opponents. Historians said they was because the constitution was unwritten. seeing the present day though I disagree…. It’s because the constitution was unread.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Someone could take it literally and think that if they kill said person that they will get free beer.

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 32

No one of sound mind will take that as a command to kill the President. Free beer is the least part of that problem.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Read your own comment and try not to laugh.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That might be their excuse for retaliation, but the proper legal response to somebody putting out a hit isn't "shut down their brewery".

1 month ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

To be fair, they probably would even without promisies. Odds are whoever finishes the great orange anus is gonna be considered a hero.

1 month ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

Anti-Orange

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Incitement needs to be specific. "Free beer when Trump dies" does not qualify as incitement at all but "Free beer to anyone who kills Trump" would.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

That's not how they worded it. Besides it's a mute point. They were closed down for not paying taxes. As usual, the headline is deceiving.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

*moot point and their statement was “Free beer, all day long the day he dies" and “Show us this post when it happens in a few months and we’ll make good on that promise.” which isn't incitement. We'll see what happens now but I'm fairly sure they specifically went after the brewery over their statement.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I did speak to text and I thought it was wrong...lol. I personally don't wish anyone dead. I like to wish things like "wicked toothache" or "loosing all their hair" Wishing for someone to die is bad karma

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Also, I didn't research any further than OPs link. Here is the first sentence. It can be taken a few different ways.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

True, but that is a stretch and freedom of speech is a thing. You would basically have to make the argument that "free beer for 1 day" is a reasonable incentive and payment for an assassination of the president of USA.

1 month ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Well, for that specific president....

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

According to the article, numerous violations of regulations for how breweries and taphouses are supposed to be run, though it doesn't go into detail. The owner characterizes them as "minor" and undeserving of closure. The details are, well, more detailed. You can read about them in the Substack post linked in the article, but here's a summary:

1 month ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 1

Bootlegging isn't minor and can lead to being bared from a state for decades. Always pay the tax man when it comes to alcohol. Glen Creek (a favorite distillery near Buffalo Trace) still can't sell in Ohio because owner caught a bootlegging charge in his 20s.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

running a taproom without producing a sufficient quantity of beer within the state; importing beer that they had made in Illinois directly to a brewery, not a distributor; didn't pay taxes; didn't have a permit to store beer; sold a case of beer to an unlicensed business; something about reporting barrels for tax that I am too dumb to understand; imported wine and cider without a license; having numerous, public complaints filed that the owner characterizes as coming from right-wing trolls

1 month ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

I don't have the domain experience to know whether any of that is typically worthy of a license being revoked, but the owner does admit to screwing up in many ways, so the govt has a case, strong or weak as it may be.

1 month ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Failing to pay taxes is enough to suspend or revoke a liquor license everywhere I know of. I have one in PA, and every annual renewal requires a clearance from the PA Dept of Revenue to demonstrate no outstanding tax debt.

1 month ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

That's like the entire point of liquor licenses. I mean they'll say it's public safety or some BS but no, it's taxes. And remember, even the Joker is afraid of the IRS.

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Basically used the event as an excuse to go looking

Most cities can shut down many businesses by simple issues like this, they don't want to though. Unless that company is doing something they don't like, then they "reserve the right"

1 month ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

plausible, but I lack the capacity to verify that characterization

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Or, exactly the opposite, which is fairly common, coming from someone with 30 years in the industry. Often, failing service industry businesses will claim or cause controversy as they’re just about over the cliff. It’s much easier to start a new business if your last one was closed for political reasons than tax & liquor license fraud.

I have no specific info on either, though.

1 month ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Apparently they were shipping beer from Illinois into Wisconsin and not paying taxes on it.

https://www.wpr.org/news/state-revokes-brewing-license-kirk-bangstad

1 month ago | Likes 255 Dislikes 0

Not paying tax? Who would do such a thing

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Burt Reynolds could have done it and not got caught

1 month ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Contract brewing is common. IIRC, it was about $500 in missed taxes. That state also has conflicting laws regarding alcohol.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Wisconsin? I thought the only law was "yes, I'll have another".

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

For production, the laws are geared more for large companies being able to push around smaller ones.

4 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Eastbound and down
loaded up and truckin
we gonna do what they day can't be done

1 month ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Are you telling me the theres no causation between the two events in the headline and the actual reason for losing the licence is a legitimate violation?

1 month ago | Likes 169 Dislikes 3

Yes

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There’s at least 50% chance. If you want to piss off people you better make sure you’re squeaky clean .

1 month ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Or rich enough to avoid the consequences.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not from what's available here. It is possible that they were given extra attention due to their speaking out against Trump and that this violation would have otherwise have gone unnoticed.

1 month ago | Likes 110 Dislikes 2

I mean that’s not a defense in court. And quite frankly idiotic. If you’re gonna be breaking the law maybe don’t draw attention to yourself like that.

1 month ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

It's possible that mole-people, as revenge for being forced to sweep the floors and scrub the toilets of this establishment for sub-minimum wage, turned the owner in for revenge. But why don't we look at the most reasonable offenses like tax evasion instead and maybe then we won't look like idiots desperately grasping for any sign of foul play?

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 31

Oh I think vindictive conservatives are considerably more likely than mole people.

1 month ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Are we sure theyre not Trumped up charges?

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Extra attention doesn't negate the illegality of their actions. I applaud their thinking and the free beers, but they can pay taxes like the rest of us.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The question is; how many other bars do this and haven't had their license pulled.

From my experience, every bar I've seen behind the curtain at is doing everything thing like this they can get away with to save a few pennies.

1 month ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 2

You stroke apologise God to

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ok, I know these fellas who got beer across Texarkana, Tx in under 48 hours. He’s a bit of a bandit tho.

1 month ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 2

To be fair, the boys were thirsty in Atlanta...

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

They had a long way to go, and a short time to get there….

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I’m happy to see I wasn’t the only one coming here to say that.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0