Privacidad y originalidad -LumiSpace-

Jul 26, 2026 8:54 AM

Translator: Privacy and Originality -LumiSpace-

Epilepsy intensifies

4 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I want to see this in a way it blacks out the view entirely.

4 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Pretty fucking neat

5 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

First the Bobiverse predicts Trump and the total downfall of America into a theocratic hell scape, and now it predicts blinds "printed" on the glass.

4 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would love a black version of this as blackout blinds for my bedroom.

4 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 days ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

i thought it's a quantum state thing. when someone tries to look through the window from outside, it goes opaque

5 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

These are usually some kind of LCD base. In an unpowered state the liquid crystals are chaotic, scattering light into all direction, creating an opaque layer. With voltage applied the crystals align (along the elctric field I guess?) and will leave substantially more unscattered light through both directions.

4 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

i worked on these windows!

4 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

šŸ‘

4 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A couple more years and you will be able to watch tv on your windows shades

5 days ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

But honey, we need to get the 4th wall screen so I can enjoy my shows.

The Firemans wife said

F451

4 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You can use a projector on these, works pretty well.

4 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That will be weird when you're on a porn site...

4 days ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

But can you play doom on it

5 days ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

I'm like 89% sure it can run doom

4 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Is it not see-through BOTH ways?

5 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

what?

5 days ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

See through, But both ways. Up and Down.

5 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I meant opaque. 'Not see-through' = opaque. Not the best way to describe it...

5 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I think when it is set to opaque, then it’s opaque both ways.

4 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not everything needs to be electronic idk. Blinds work fine and don’t cost copper

4 days ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

these appear to be feline and child resistant. they win

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd quite like those, nice to have privacy at the flip of a switch from my chair and blinds with motors aren't as good.

4 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Blinds with horizontal slats work fine. The ones with vertical slats fucking suck.

4 days ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

True!

4 days ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

it's a good thing the default state is opaque

5 days ago | Likes 105 Dislikes 0

True, but it means that your windows now consume electricity to be transparent.

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Around .3 to .6 watts per square foot, comparable to an LED lightbulb which uses 10watts. A 1 story house with ~200 square feet of windows would be ~60 to ~120 watts or the equivalent of 6 to 12 light bulbs. If you connected the windows to a switch, each rooms windows would take less electricity than the light bulbs.

3 minutes ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Start worrying about power outages

4 days ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Depends on the application if default being opaque is preferable.

4 days ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Shower doors, yes... windshields, no

4 days ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

I don't think this technology on windshields will be a best seller, but why not

4 days ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Probably not, but I guess it could act as a built-in shade screen...thing. To keep the sun out while it's parked. Do people still use those? I feel like they were pretty popular 20+ years ago.

4 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Still popular, but I think the biggest issue is that they take up so much space. I would love one that rolls up like a projector and is attached to the ceiling of the car. Just pull it down whenever you get out, rather than needing to keep it in the backseat or trunk or whatever.

4 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I just did my first install of an office with these privacy shades. The first installer to install this film did a shit job and flecks of dust were everywhere. These specs show up 100x their size. We turned off the hvac, washed everything around it including the walls and carpet, and took our time and it went well. Our cost for 2 office window walls about 7 feet tall was $1500. But doing it twice cost $3000 and looking bad to the client.

5 days ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 1

šŸ˜®šŸ‘

4 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is it a polyethylene type material like window tinting is? If so I can totally understand the ā€œ100x magnifiedā€ effect. Can’t tell you how many times I’ve been asked to put something like that on office windows while building construction was still taking place, and had to explain to a number of people that ā€œwe cannot make this look the way you want it if there’s dust everywhereā€.

4 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You charged the client for a mistake done by the subcontractor or your employee?

4 days ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Our company took the hit.

4 days ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Ah. I was expecting that but thought otherwise from the way it was worded. So the client just didn't like the extra time needed?

4 days ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The wording was clear, I think maybe both of us just thought the cost (to the installer) was unexpectedly high.

4 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except the grammar of the last sentence.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0