Good thing nobody cares about the Great Lakes

Mar 22, 2021 6:23 AM

Bountyhunterfromhell

Views

109202

Likes

2438

Dislikes

99

https://returntonow.net/2020/12/11/maps-show-how-dramatically-fertilizer-is-choking-the-great-lakes/

And yet Vegans are still a laughing stock for many people on Imgur.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Most individual farmers aren’t the problem. The meat packers keep prices so fucked up, good farmers can’t survive, only industrial farmers

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Fucks sake, are we really going to be around for humanity to kill itself.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That's ok. Give it some time and Canada's conservatives will vote to deny the Great Lakes are even real.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

„bAt rEgUlAtIoNs bAd fOr bUsnEs!“ - magats and bananapublicans

5 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 4

Of course they don't realize regulations can create new businesses, but they benefit from dirty energy so they dgaf

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This is the reason I'm a vegetarian. Not the whole animal cruelty thing.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

I went full vegan 2 weeks ago for this exact reason as well. The reduction in animal cruelty is a big bonus though.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Oh no, the problem is in the Amazon! Don't you dare look to the USA, China, Russia... Only look at poor countries with no nuclear power.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Have ya also accounted in the dstrctn of the water table & hat the meat industry is the main breeding ground for multi resistant bacteria?

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

WoW first time I see a post supporting « veganism » on the front page. That’s refreshing

5 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 4

Not just the CAFO meat industry, those are subsidized crops (corn and soy) and are primary ingredients for nearly all manufactured foods

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

@op fucking thank you! for reasons to hate the last administration, so many regulations were gutted that helped kill the progress thru EPA

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

My pleasure

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You can hardly blame them; we're paying them to do it. We don't have to go vegan to make a difference, just eating 30% less meat would help.

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

We watched The Gamechangers and stopped making meat the "star" of each meal and now only eat meat maybe 2x a week.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As someone who lives about MAYBE 10 minutes from Lake Michigan. Peoples homes are sinking into the dunes too. They are coming far more inlan

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

But I sure do love trading corn and soybean for food. /s

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They’re using azolla fern now that can neutralize fertilizer in water and in turn used as fodder itself

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

No one will give a shit until it's too late.

5 years ago | Likes 144 Dislikes 5

I live next to Lake Erie, we have cared about it for a long time but positive change happens far too slow.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

that was the point of the lorax

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

It’s already too late.

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 3

And we STILL can't get people to care.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Not enough people anyway, most advocates for the environment are ‘annoying’.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

And costs 100X as much to restore as it would have to prevent.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Then they'll blame Hillary Clinton.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Thanks, Obama.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And a lot of people still won’t care then

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

a lot of us do care, but not enough. We are fighting a losing battle and its tough to keep going some days.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is the ass end of the Fuck Around age. We’re gonna get a front row seat to the Find Out age.

5 years ago | Likes 1552 Dislikes 10

Chu talking about the find out age is starting you just dont know it yet

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Poetry

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

im grateful my balls of steel gave me the courage to get a vasectomy. made the hardest sacrifice and protected my kids from this hell.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well said.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Can't wait! (jk, it's terrifying. I just use humor to deal with shit)

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The problem is no one doing the Fuck Around will be party to Find Out since they have plenty of $ to weather the storm or be dead by then

5 years ago | Likes 222 Dislikes 2

Wait, you need money to die now? Damn, I knew our generation wouldn't be able to retire but I didn't realize it was that bad.

5 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 1

They zap you back to life just to sew up another pair of nikes bro

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If you die poor, your body just gets used for food or fuel. No funerals now unless you’re rich. Soylent Green is people.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Funerals are expensive man, in the UK it's something like 3 to 5k easily and that's nothing fancy either

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

Yea we had to do a bare minimum for my dad cause my family isnt well off. Just cremation and burial was about 2k, and he went into plot with

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My mother, so it wasn't even a new hole or nothing.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My wife's funeral was 11k, and that was on the cheap. Her grave marker was another grand. That industry is a vulture culture.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

In sorry for your loss ?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Just throw me in a ditch and let nature reclaim me.

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

Find your own ditch, I've claimed this one

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

I wanted a thrown of a cliff into the sea funeral. Full yeet. Wife won’t even do me a Viking funeral. Now trying for a dropped into ocean

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Cement shoes, and a couple of miles out in to the ocean for me please.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It cost around US$2k just to cremate my dad (COVID, no services) & get his ashes back in a box.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And it's not even a nice box.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

A lot of what agent Smith said is true.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

As a species we're failing the Great Filter of greed. We could solve these issues, we simply don't.

5 years ago | Likes 545 Dislikes 4

This. We're so far removed from the people and land exploited we stop caring.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Good, humans deserve to die out as a species. (Sorry, I’m a little bitter)

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I am solving this issue by building up my seaweed cultivation business.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Speak for yourself

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 10

Do you think greed is good?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Pay attention to grammar and you'll be able to work out what I'm referring to. Then you won't have to ask stupid questions.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

Wow, what a fucked up, ignorant response. Help a brother out oh great quiz master. What the fuck did you mean by your quizzical statement?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's straightforward. If you don't understand it then you have more fundamental problems I'm not qualified to solve for you.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Actually, we can’t fix it at this point. Now it’s just about handling the consequences of past generations actions.

5 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 2

Yes we can. We just have to move the motivation. We subsidize death all day everyday.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Almost. We still can fix the things we do now that will fuck us up later. Yes, mitigation is necessary, but some prevention still possible.

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

True, but we're not doing it. Every scientist speaking out is ignored, all we do are tokenistic, insignificant gestures.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It's up to us today to decide whether the consequence is millions dead, tens off millions dead or hundreds of millions dead.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

We can still do damage control. We can't instantly fix it anymore, but if we start being a net positive we can help the planet heal

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We're a fat bastard eating ourselves to death

5 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 0

This whole collective guilt thing is keeping people from overthrowing those that design these policies of unbridled greed.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I feel guilt and take my own steps to alleviate it. I also want much more radically green politicians and I want immediate action by them.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Mint sir?" "Can't i'm full" "tis but one wafer thin sir...."

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It kinda irks me that when we say 'we', it's easy to forget that it's really a minority of the population that is using resources in ..

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

.. an unsustainable way. If the richest, and most heavily consuming, 20% of population stopped excess consumption, we'd be OK.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

As a European I believe that per capita we are the worst of the worst for consumption and greenhouse gas liberation. I read it somewhere

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

And everyone gives vegans a hard time.

5 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 3

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 9

It’s the cognitive dissonance

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

it isn't vegans or not-vegans that will change the world. how much change does 1 vegan more or less make compared to what each company does?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

that would be because vegans seem to enjoy being self-righteous twats

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

As a practicing vegan, I wish I could disagree but I can't even stand a lot of them and avoid the vegan reddit...

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah I know:( I think socks congregate on the internet though. My in person vegan friends are very lovely though

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Netherlands are in the same place, fertilization is killing the surrounding area. It's really hard to walk back once the farms are there.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Parts of Germany are having contaminated groundwater now so the treatment to turn it into drinking water becomes more expensive.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Only 4% of mammals are wild animals. The rest are humans (36%) and livestock (60%). Only 30% of birds are wild. 70% are livestock.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When I first learned this it was the most shocking thing about the whole ordeal.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Do you have a link for that ? I would like to make a meme about it. Thank you

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Extra bonus: it's all "roundup ready" crop so you'll never be able to plant anything but corn and soybean from Beyer aka Monsanto

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Not sure if it's paid research with conflict of interest, but glyphosate supposedly has a environmental half life of about 2 months average.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, farmers routinely use it to kill crops like wheat before harvest to aid drying. So you can probably still grow other stuff next season

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Google the long-term effects of routine roundup usage. There are multiple studies

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or roundup-resistant gigant mutant weed. there is that too. they are needing more and more poison/surface

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People should start eating insects. High in protein and low environmental impact

5 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 8

Or cultivated seaweed!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Crunchy on the outside, creamy in the middle.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Slimy, yet satisfying

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Pffftt, they're probably already doing it by grinding up insects and including them in processed foods.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or start lab growing meat. If we really got that going large-scale, it would be incredible. We would eventually have a steakhouse on mars.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

They are doing this already.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There is not as much demand as you think people would have. People want the "natural" artificial bred antiobiotic stuff

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

or just eat beans. no animal food source will be more efficient than just directly eating the plants that would otherwise be used as feed

5 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 4

Except for certain nutrients that are created by said animals. There's a reason we evolved to be able to eat meat...

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 11

B12 is deficient in modern plant diets because of water purification and such.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Source?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't have anything credible to hand, but this site discusses the prevalence of b12 creating bacteria in the wild. Bacteria...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why youse downvoting him? He's right, you basically can't get b12 without animal products.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The animals don't have b12 in them either anymore due to crappy soil.. Everyone should be taking a b12 supp. Go vegan.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Luckily we can biosynthesize whatever B12 we need on an industrial scale. Bad news for the organic advocates, good news for the rest of us.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Truth doesn't agree with their feelings I guess. I'm not saying veganism is impossible, I take issue with the efficiency claim.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

What nutrients are only available in animals? Vegan almost five years with perfect bloodwork here?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

*evolved to NEED animal sourced foods. There's no primitive society of vegans, guess why

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

Veganism is an answer to the unsustainable and unethical mass production of livestock, it's not in conflict with indigenous ways of life.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Because they didn't have a choice, but we do.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 8

We're arguing efficiency of a plant based diet here, not possibility.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

"But why don't you want to have kids?" Me: [vigorously points to a shitload of maps related to climate change and human destruction]

5 years ago | Likes 339 Dislikes 15

*gestures at everything

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Vigorously, I might add.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Counterpoint: the kind of people who deny climate change are the same who have 10 kids. In a generation we could be living in idiocracy

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

We are a fucking cancer

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

We can also be the cure, but the amount of "I choose not to" is fucking astounding.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I’m always tempted to reply “Why would I carry wood into a burning house?”

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Haven't heard that one in a long while. Yoink.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

no kids DEFINITELY means no more humans!? Like, I get the problem but not having kids is NOT the answer. Have them, raise them properly.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

No. You can have them and raise them for me instead.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why the "!?" at the end? Are you asking or telling? And no. Having no kids is a great solution. More people should try it.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

?! out of utter surprise, now, at both of you for thinking not having kids is the answer, when raising kids properly is the solution.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

If you signed a bill into law and it wasn't enforced, would you create a new law or put more resources into enforcing the old one? Same shit

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

raising kids properly IS the "new law" in your example. What - you just wanna watch the world end and the human race become extinct?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

In the other hand: Soylent Green

5 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

It’s people

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

*on

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

In Soylent Green, the other hand

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

...and the ones who don't care at all will keep on eating and breeding, because Entropy would love people who can't define it, if it felt.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

its fucked to think that a lot of rednecks will eventually be saying "we got to breed, otherwise the world will be nothing but brown people"

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And they don't even get that since "European" is mixed with every ethnicity on the planet and "white" is recessive, "brown" is immortality.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The upvote was for the perspective, not the statement itself.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People deciding to not have kids is the slower yet more morally acceptable way to be team Thanos

5 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 3

Just having 1 kid will do that. 2 people in one generation becomes just 1 in the next.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Unless some people have 7.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That usually balances it out

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Im 28 years old and I'm the oldest of 14 kids...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Its also the plot to Idiocracy and how they got so stupid. Forward thinking ppl didn't have kids = more dumb dumbs

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

Nothing I can do about that, except have children to expend as ammunition in class warfare over a dying planet. Or... not.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Wait...no, you might be on to something. I'll start up some blueprints for a child cannon

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But...it's got electrolytes

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

It’s what plants crave

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Because I believe that the death of humans will be a net positive towards the existence of snow leopards.

5 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 5

It's mandatory for Snow Leopards to have their tail in their mouth

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

We all would if we had a tail like that

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thank you for this.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

It’s far worse:

5 years ago | Likes 299 Dislikes 5

I think it's brave to say Glaciers 10%. PERMANENT Snow and Ice. Humans be like, Hold my beer!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would love to see this map animated for changes over time.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Although it should be noted that not all land that feeds livestock could be used productively as cropland.

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

but that land could easily be habitat, that both sequesters carbon and keeps the delicate ecosystems in balance

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Sure. Though that's also often the kind of low-quality land that's used by low-tech animal herders with few other options.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Can't get over Libya, one of the least developed nations on earth, being used to represent development. lol.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean, I know intellectually that meat consumption at that scale is a Bad Thing and I want to not do Bad Things. (1)

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But goddammit, steaks and bacon and sausage are so tasty :(. (1)

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm dumb. I kept looking for what represented the oceans.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hey, look! They remembered New Zealand!

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Who?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well fortunately we're going to get a lot of glacier land back soon! Good news!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why is "glaciers" listed twice?

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

It’s two different land masses, both with the majority of space used by glaciers

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Someone didn't read the legend

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It shouldn't be, if you only add glaciers once the percentages come to 99%.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because neither of those areas make up 10% on their own, and are too far apart to share a label. Like Australia & Indonesia both being Shrub

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Oh I didn’t see the second glacier label, thanks. Was wondering how Greenland alone was 10% of the Earth’s surface

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Greenland and Antarctica together make up the percentage for glaciers, I would say.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

WHOLY FUCK. 27% versus 7%, I had no idea THAT it is that bad.

5 years ago | Likes 108 Dislikes 1

What others have said, but also groups like TNC work with ranchers and allow grazing on protected lands to replace missing wild herds.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Emphasis on the second "that"

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, got the false one in my indignation.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, to be fair, the animal feed land includes grazing land, which is usually a land that cannot be used for other crops. I wish they had >

5 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 3

Yep, my region can not be used to grow cereals or pulses as our season is too short. But we grow fantastic hay.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Plus, fertilizer is rarely used and land is tilled at most once every ten years.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sure, but still almost 4:1 ratio.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yes, there is definitely a huge disbalance there.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

shown the grazing land and the land that is used to grow animal food other than grass differentiated from each other. But there is a huge >

5 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

problem with rainforest being burned down to grow soy to feed cows.

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

The end result is the same.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And cows aren't supposed to eat neither doy, not corn - they get sick from this diet

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I have read this before but as a gardener, this land not being suitable for conventional farming doesn't mean you can't produce food there

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

That's true! I'm also a gardener and our plot is on top of old house cellars. Dig 20-30cm and you have stones. But we still make it work -

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

it just means you need to take more time to build up humus.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

By conventional, you mean commercial?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

no. I meant things like monocultures, heavy machinery, unsuitable fertilizers, pesticides etc.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

you can still do sustainable gardening on a large scale -> conventional is almost always commercial but not the other way around

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It gets worse. More than 80% of farmland is used for livestock but it produces just 18% of food calories and 37% of protein

5 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 2

Looks like crop land for animal feed is in the livesto k portion. This is not the clearest info graph.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yes it is, and yes it is. "Grazing and feed crops" and grazing _is_ the minority, don't kid yourself.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah man the meat industry is pretty goddamn fucky.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

But bacon...

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Steak mostly, pigs don’t really require the land that cows do

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I know it's heresy but most of the bacon flavor comes from the curing. You could use whatever and it tastes about the same.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Eh, you also need a really high fat cut for it to actually be like bacon.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Sadly we have two options: not have bacon in the future and be dead,.or not have bacon in the future and not be dead. Were going with #1 atm

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

One theory behind the ban on eating pigs in Judaism/Islam is that they are very poor investments compared to goats/sheep but delicious, so >

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

kinda prefer the second one though

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So what's the solution, apart from drastically reducing the human population?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Not being an ecofascist cunt

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Reducing factory-farmed meat consumption (fast food is a big one, good place to start). Also look for sustainability labels on meat packagin

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Vat grown meat is a thing now. Ram rodding it in to reduce land use would be a great thing to do

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There is a fair amount of glacier and forests left. (Sarcasm)

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Reduce meat to twice a week, eat more chicken, stuff that obnoxious vegan at the whole foods tells you, ect

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

Since you brought up the subject, check out the trailer for the upcoming documentary ‘8 billion angels’: https://youtu.be/q-zMlAAg3XA

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Eating less meat. You need less cropland if you eat crops directly.

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 3

But crops don't taste as good as cows, pigs and lamb.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 14

Hey I doubt anyone will change so I suppose enjoy them, maybe you’ll die before drastic change occurs

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That's actually been disproven. The amount of cross needed to sustain you versus meat and the cross needed for the cow ends up better off

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 14

That's just physically impossible. As in it would violate thermodynamics

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Depends on relative efficiency; if you only get 10% of the energy from the plant, but the cow gets 80%, and then you get 50% from the meat?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Eating cows

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

Don't worry, it's totally fine - the USA absolutely learned an important lesson from the dust bowl...

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Dust bowl was due to bad tillage practice and lack of tree cover. This time around, it's overusage and runoff of artificial fertilizers.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah as I implied, they didn't learn the first time.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Was up in fargo yesterday. Gusts of 40. Fields were just blowing away. Dont understand how you can watch that as a farmer and not want to

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Change tillage practices.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

What do I do with this information

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

Grow seaweed

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We put 20 acres of our 80 acre farm in the region back into wetland to help filter (but we're a park district, so not $ driven)

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

If you live near the Great Lakes, you could look into the issue and do activism. If not, nothing at all. Regions differ.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 9

vote for the political parties that have environmental protection on their agenda.

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

yeah. my job used to be working with farmers and finding them grant money to help mitigate the runoff from their fields, it was great.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Eat fewer meat and dairy products.

5 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 2

This, try eating vegetarian half the week, try one vegan day a week. That would help tremendously. Then have a steak on Sunday.

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

Two steaks! Because I've been virtuous, I deserve a reward

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

If you eat meat only 3/7 days and 2 of those days have a steak? Be my guest, that's a solid improvement on the average consumer.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

One steak and one predator fish once a month. Poultry and prey fish 2 or 3 times a week. Rest is legumes and eggs. Preferably local and

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

seasonal but we can't reasonably eat pumpkins and potatoes for 4 months a year.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep, came to the same conclusion. I used to eat meat almost every day, but am happy I got it down to like 30 to 50% by now. WorkInProgress:)

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

And the best way to help is to stop consuming animals and go straight for the source but people aren't ready to talk about that.

5 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 7

Are you interested in finding a real solution or do you wanna pretend people are going to stop eating meat? They're mutually exclusive.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

I do not expect everyone to stop eating meat, lower consumption? Sure. But I know it's not realistic to expect everyone to do that.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People are already stopping to eat meat....plant based is the fastest growing food sector the last few years. It's about drawing down.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So you really expect every man, woman, and child to comply? Like I said, let's try to find real solutions and not rely on wishful thinking

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Who is taking about comply? Individuals are making choice. In a market economy, when demand dries up, prices will rise and supply will...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...decrease, and a cycle will start where eventually meat will be v. expensive and hard to find. Supply pressures caused by climate change..

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"BuT I NeEd MeAt" heard it too many times

5 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 9

To be fair I was like that until I became vegetarian. I honestly thought I would not be able to be a vegetarian, but turns out it was easy.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Ye I thought it'd be hard but eased myself into it and havent looked back. Gone vegan this last year, and that wasn't bad with gentle change

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I just took the plunge one day with my father. He stayed vegetarian for like a week and I am still vegetarian 4 or so years later.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Especially around here. Imgur has a real problem with vegans and vegetarians that occludes any meaningful conversation about the topic.

5 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 2

Yeah, suddenly everybody becomes a bodybuilder who needs 300g protein per day.

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 4

Tons of plant based body builders getting plenty of protein out there.

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 5

I love that people don't believe me hahah. I done said people aren't ready to talk about it. Cognitive dissonance is real.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Can you give me ideas of plant based proteins for bulking up? :)

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It’s such a huge issue. Pathetic. Literally so many vegan athletes, it is proven to be a healthy lifestyle

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

As if people who give up animal products hated them. We all liked them, it wasn’t easy.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Shit I was addicted to cheese and yoghurt before I went vegan cold turkey. I also used to eat steaks blue.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Mac and cheese still haunts me

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, we may not like it, but vegans are on the right side of History. If we get to have a History.

5 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 11

Soy is affordable for vegan food because the soy-leftovers humans can't digest is sold as pig feed. Would be burned otherwise..

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

You don't need soy to survive though

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

True! But demand feeds production

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

People know this, bUt BaCoN, and when facts are presented the get really angry about the whole thing.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

They are nit necessarily on the only right side, but an improvement. Meat should be a delicacy only enjoyed on rare occasions

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 7

I prefer medium rare myself but whatever grills your goat I guess.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Badum tssss

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

not a mass product hurting and killing the environment and inflicting pain on the poor livestock

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

I agree with you, but also wouldn't be able to kill an animal under normal circumstances so I would still feel bad eating them, as I do now

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Meta-analysis suggest that reducing meat and animal by product industry to sustainable levels will have the same impact of going strictly

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 18

Vegan. The big issue is that a lot of land that is used for the omnivore industry is just not usable for the vegetables needed for an all

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 16

Vegan diet and would require just as much resources to grow the plants as it would to grow meat and byproducts in a sustainable way.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 14

This is false. Have you seen the stats on how much food is produced just to feed the livestock?? Humans could live off a fraction of that.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Not all land is suitable for growing food. Grassland used to feed cattle for example, and this skews the stats a bit.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Like others I'd like to see links to these studies because I'm more sure how the maths work out here

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't forget about seaweed aquaculture!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Vegans might be right, but their self rightous "in your face" attitude destroys any hope of arguing about it. Regulations have to hit 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 13

the meat industry hard, makes meat more expensive, will change food behaviour in the population. Not "MEAT IS MURDER" and a bucket of paint.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

You know what fuck the 2/2 I'm on a rant here, that behaviour is so fucking common, pedal to the fucking metal instead of compromising

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

like the fucking idiots that tried to get us to eat bugs, bugs are AMAZING! You can make flour-meat out of them and the steak tastes good!

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

but how do those people try to convince others? BY SHOWING THEM FULLY FORMED BUGS TO EAT, fucking idiots, show people the end-product-

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Maybe you are upset because some people are making a more radical change? So it comes across to you as annoying?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No why would that be annoying? It's annoying when they incessently talk about it. "Do you want meat?" "no I'm vegan" that should be the end.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Uh...you do realize the same destructive farming practices uses to grow crops for livestock are identical for vegan food...right?

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 19

If we ate all the crops directly instead of feeding livestock first, much less would be needed to provide everyone with enough food.

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

That's why I grow seaweed in the ocean....

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In fact, the overwhelming drive for palm oil commonly used in vegan foods is catastrophically destructive to the environment.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 18

Palm oil isn't only used in vegan foods. It's a valid problem, but not connected to veganism. It's used in everything because it's cheap.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

"Real" vegans dont eat anything with palm oil (cause of environmental destruction) or honey in oit

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Hell I'm not even vegan and I'm actively avoiding it

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Veganism is no more the answer than anything else. What is an answer is smarter, sustainable agro-tech.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 14

Seaweed aquaculture my dude

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bugs also

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Amazing I had to scroll this far to see reasonable discourse. Every comment from here up is vegans congratulating themselves for being vegan

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Omnis getting so triggered lol. Sorry science supports it and you don’t wanna change. It’s fine, but idk about refuting facts.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

We could have both. Go vegan until we can do better.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1