AI is getting better at generating "deepfake" text on the internet, and people suck at telling it apart from comments written by real humans

Jan 17, 2021 11:24 PM

ParryLost

Views

2310

Likes

19

Dislikes

2

An interesting article from Ars Technica (https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/01/ai-powered-text-from-this-program-could-fool-the-government/) and Wired (https://www.wired.com/story/ai-powered-text-program-could-fool-government/) that may be interesting and relevant to some Imgurians. Just a few highlights below; see the original article from either site for more details.

Max Weiss, a Harvard medical student, used openly available AI tools to generate comments for a government website as part of an experiment. He found the process surprisingly easy to set up, and the comments stayed up for months (despite the fact that he promptly notified the government about what he was doing, and included a tag in each artificial comment to make it easier to moderate).

AI is getting to the point where artificially generated content is actually quite good, potentially indistinguishable, in some contexts, from content generated by actual human beings. And this technology is only getting better at what it does.

The successor to this program, GPT-3, is already available to AI researchers, and further improvements are being made all the time. It is already possible for any random individual with a computer to do what Weiss did, and it will only get easier with each passing year.

"The volunteers did *no better than random guessing.*" I.e. these comments pass a simple Turing Test. Of course, it is easier for short comments generated by AI to be convincing, than for longer passages of text. There is less room in which to make mistakes. However, if your objective is, for example, to swamp forums or comment sections with machine-generated comments to create the false impression that there are lots of people out there sharing a particular point of view, short comments are more than adequate... And as the AI gets better, its capabilities will only improve beyond that.

And of course, if you're good at demagoguery, or have access to an army of paid human commenters, you don't even need clever AI. Its existence still opens up new and scary possibilities, however. This particular genie is already out of the bottle, and with no way of putting it back, the face of the internet may be changing significantly in short order. It's common enough to see half-joking comments about "Russian bots" on Imgur, especially under any post dealing with political topics. But the technology is real. It's already entirely possible for just one person, using freely available software, to create the impression of a groundswell of support for any position they may choose. And of course governments and large corporations have access to more resources, and more complex software and hardware. If you think the internet is being used to manipulate people and spread misinformation now... I'd say this is certainly something to worry about.

With some of the dumb things people write, it’s no surprise. Even a bad AI could mimic some things I’ve witnessed real people write.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is an eventuality, I think a lot of humans on the internet would fail the Turing test. Cleverbot isn't encouraging either

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am not an AI

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Calm down skynet

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I don't believe you.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's what one of THEM would say!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This post was written by AI

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Negatory! I have many human feelings in my human organs regarding [insert topic]

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We are both trrue human as distinguished by the double letter my smart device did not correct

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is why geniuses have been warning us against AI. When they become too adept, things can go horribly wrong.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And of course, they'll be used to destroy factual truth, which is basically just the end of democracy right there.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Why do we keep doing this? We have the power to slow AI like this

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't necessarily agree. We need to be aware of the dangers and the downsides, and look for ways to manage the risks, absolutely. But →

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

→first, I don't think we do have the power to slow AI. AI research is potentially very lucrative. AI can find applications in almost any →

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

→industry. There's a lot of incentive to move AI research forward, and once a technology is developed, there isn't really any way of going →

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

→back. Besides, I also don't entirely agree that we *should want* to stop AI research. Slow it, in the sense of doing it more carefully? →

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

→Maybe. But AI has the potential to do a lot of good, as well. It's already being implemented in medical research, and that's just one →

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0