Honestly, if you don't understand the science behind it, this is some witchcraft bullshit and I would probably have been part of the medieval mob going: "It fucking slaps, but it's surely the work of the devil!"
40ish years later, when technology started concentrating on quality of audio, was coined the term "high Fidelity", or "hi-fi". Another 40ish years later was internet; it was nicknamed "Wi-Fi"
I was initially surprised at how good it sounded, but when you think about it, it's basically just a man talking and some simple instrumentation (and it's being recorded from a single source of sound anyway). Might not sound as good if you have to have an actual band perform the piece live.
That bass comes through much better than I would have thought. Now I want to see that cylinder played the same but with the output sent to a modern sound system.
So when does the edited Rick Roll version come? You know someone is gonna do it when he puts the cylinder on to hear the recording (if they haven’t already done so)
you laugh, but unlike a CD's cold, soulless 44,100 samples per second — an arbitrary number chosen by engineers who demonstrably hate music — the wax cylinder captures a continuous, unbroken analog waveform, meaning every infinitesimal nuance of the performance is preserved in the groove, including the rich harmonic complexity of the recording horn's natural resonant chamber. 1/2
The gentle warble introduced by the hand-cranked motor and the delicate organic hiss of the cylinder surface are not distortions but textures that digital simply cannot reproduce, lending the music a warmth and presence that audiophiles call "being in the room." Most importantly, since the signal travels directly from air to diaphragm to stylus to wax and back again with zero electronic mediation, the path is essentially a straight line to your soul. 2/2
Simply said analog just records the continuous curved wave, digital mostly if not all is always rendered sawtooth quality wave. Any traveling wave sound is a continuous smooth lined wave, no matter the frequency. Well that is what i say, to keep it simple.
Seems so but this is also why so called audiophile's get laughed at. Much of what is strived for can't be heard by most, the loss from recording mediums and transferring between tech exists, and analog vs digital giving different life is subjective. It's like saying CRT beats current OLED because of x factors.
I mean yeah I get liking vinyls or tapes for their unique sound.
(Also: CRTs are actually better for niche applications like retro gaming because they handle low-res content vastly differently than modern screens)
But saying that they are objectively better is just idiotic. Ok, so if. 44.1Khz 16-bit, 1,411kbps audio isn’t enough for you, you can get .flac with 192khz 24-bit and 4,600kbps. If you tell me anything other than the raw studio recording file is objectively better you’re just wrong.
Sailboatt
So does it start to sound terrible if it's a really hot summer day ?
azazyel
And on the cool check-in Centerstage on the mic And we puttin' it on wax It's the new style 4 & 3 & 2 & 1
GrenithTheSkald
Honestly, if you don't understand the science behind it, this is some witchcraft bullshit and I would probably have been part of the medieval mob going: "It fucking slaps, but it's surely the work of the devil!"
Sebastopol140
That's cool, very cool!
waybackintime
Now all you need is a cute dog listening to have the whole picture.
duktayp
40ish years later, when technology started concentrating on quality of audio, was coined the term "high Fidelity", or "hi-fi". Another 40ish years later was internet; it was nicknamed "Wi-Fi"
tombeithemist
That's pretty wack.
witheredspoon
was totally expecting a rick roll.
someguy7734206
I was initially surprised at how good it sounded, but when you think about it, it's basically just a man talking and some simple instrumentation (and it's being recorded from a single source of sound anyway). Might not sound as good if you have to have an actual band perform the piece live.
pinkmansaidthebest
https://media4.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWE1NzM3M2U1eDYwdnF3Z3hvNmhzZ2Q1MHl2cXkzYnk0NmZvNjY5bmtxZGd0MjZoZCZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/Q2LRWdJDq9xy8/200w.webp
toolzgalore2
Biggie would be proud... Hopefully
AdrianDunne
Waxing lyrical
TicoMachi
A really funny gag would have been if when he went to play it you also hear his narration recorded along with the track as well.
Ebo352
That bass comes through much better than I would have thought.
Now I want to see that cylinder played the same but with the output sent to a modern sound system.
Roune
So when does the edited Rick Roll version come? You know someone is gonna do it when he puts the cylinder on to hear the recording (if they haven’t already done so)
Gnakenheimer
I was surprised this wasn't the one
preparanoid
Honestly what i was expecting
steelundecided
A New Style Beastie Boys https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbGnU96ByYQ
vigilante397
*uses pure mechanical means to make pure analog recording*
*uses AI generated voiceover to talk about it*
Icheckalltheusernames
https://media0.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWE1NzM3M2U1dHpjM2NrcjYxYnZrcTN0ZWs0N2xmMmRteTYyN2Fpc29lY3YydDliayZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/THf4SfOn2szSrNl8r1/200w.webp
jridley
***content match*** :)
FeloniousMonk13
That's fuckin dope as hell. Biggie would be fuckin proud.
HandoB4Javert
It's not quite as cool, but the sound is amazing
FeloniousMonk13
here is my reply to you sir
brownribbon
And Edison would probably be horrified. And I love that for him.
purplehayze87
Whats the name of this remix!
kaijuuGold
long live physical media
0570
jeke212
I gotta ask this dude where to get a recording head for my Edison. Anyone have the contact deets?
PupShadowDMcTaggart
Your best bet nowadays is probably eBay. t
ratfvcker95
you laugh, but unlike a CD's cold, soulless 44,100 samples per second — an arbitrary number chosen by engineers who demonstrably hate music — the wax cylinder captures a continuous, unbroken analog waveform, meaning every infinitesimal nuance of the performance is preserved in the groove, including the rich harmonic complexity of the recording horn's natural resonant chamber. 1/2
StarscreamAndHutch
Nyquist
ratfvcker95
The gentle warble introduced by the hand-cranked motor and the delicate organic hiss of the cylinder surface are not distortions but textures that digital simply cannot reproduce, lending the music a warmth and presence that audiophiles call "being in the room." Most importantly, since the signal travels directly from air to diaphragm to stylus to wax and back again with zero electronic mediation, the path is essentially a straight line to your soul. 2/2
Verbodentoegang
Simply said analog just records the continuous curved wave, digital mostly if not all is always rendered sawtooth quality wave. Any traveling wave sound is a continuous smooth lined wave, no matter the frequency.
Well that is what i say, to keep it simple.
jargonmon
That's amazing, seeing as it couldn't have possibly been recorded in a live studio, but from a playback in digital format. So uhhhh. Yeah.
ThingsThatDontJustifyGenocide
They're satirizing audiophiles.
GargleTheseNutz360
"And if you don't know, now you know, N***a" - Biggie
Yasashii93
I gotta know: are you actually serious?
universeHacker
Is "ratfvcker95" serious? hmmm... I'm going to guess no, that it's satire of audiophiles.
impotence
Seems so but this is also why so called audiophile's get laughed at. Much of what is strived for can't be heard by most, the loss from recording mediums and transferring between tech exists, and analog vs digital giving different life is subjective. It's like saying CRT beats current OLED because of x factors.
Yasashii93
I mean yeah I get liking vinyls or tapes for their unique sound.
(Also: CRTs are actually better for niche applications like retro gaming because they handle low-res content vastly differently than modern screens)
But saying that they are objectively better is just idiotic. Ok, so if. 44.1Khz 16-bit, 1,411kbps audio isn’t enough for you, you can get .flac with 192khz 24-bit and 4,600kbps. If you tell me anything other than the raw studio recording file is objectively better you’re just wrong.