Yo, put that track on wax.

May 31, 2026 9:33 PM

Source: Casey Bell

awesome

keanu_reeves_whoa

owen_wilson_wow

So does it start to sound terrible if it's a really hot summer day ?

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And on the cool check-in Centerstage on the mic And we puttin' it on wax It's the new style 4 & 3 & 2 & 1

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honestly, if you don't understand the science behind it, this is some witchcraft bullshit and I would probably have been part of the medieval mob going: "It fucking slaps, but it's surely the work of the devil!"

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That's cool, very cool!

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Now all you need is a cute dog listening to have the whole picture.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

40ish years later, when technology started concentrating on quality of audio, was coined the term "high Fidelity", or "hi-fi". Another 40ish years later was internet; it was nicknamed "Wi-Fi"

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That's pretty wack.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

was totally expecting a rick roll.

3 months ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I was initially surprised at how good it sounded, but when you think about it, it's basically just a man talking and some simple instrumentation (and it's being recorded from a single source of sound anyway). Might not sound as good if you have to have an actual band perform the piece live.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Biggie would be proud... Hopefully

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Waxing lyrical

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A really funny gag would have been if when he went to play it you also hear his narration recorded along with the track as well.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That bass comes through much better than I would have thought.
Now I want to see that cylinder played the same but with the output sent to a modern sound system.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So when does the edited Rick Roll version come? You know someone is gonna do it when he puts the cylinder on to hear the recording (if they haven’t already done so)

3 months ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 1

I was surprised this wasn't the one

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Honestly what i was expecting

3 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

A New Style Beastie Boys https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbGnU96ByYQ

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*uses pure mechanical means to make pure analog recording*

*uses AI generated voiceover to talk about it*

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

***content match*** :)

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's fuckin dope as hell. Biggie would be fuckin proud.

3 months ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 0

It's not quite as cool, but the sound is amazing

3 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

here is my reply to you sir

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And Edison would probably be horrified. And I love that for him.

3 months ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

Whats the name of this remix!

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

long live physical media

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I gotta ask this dude where to get a recording head for my Edison. Anyone have the contact deets?

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Your best bet nowadays is probably eBay. t

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you laugh, but unlike a CD's cold, soulless 44,100 samples per second — an arbitrary number chosen by engineers who demonstrably hate music — the wax cylinder captures a continuous, unbroken analog waveform, meaning every infinitesimal nuance of the performance is preserved in the groove, including the rich harmonic complexity of the recording horn's natural resonant chamber. 1/2

3 months ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 8

Nyquist

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The gentle warble introduced by the hand-cranked motor and the delicate organic hiss of the cylinder surface are not distortions but textures that digital simply cannot reproduce, lending the music a warmth and presence that audiophiles call "being in the room." Most importantly, since the signal travels directly from air to diaphragm to stylus to wax and back again with zero electronic mediation, the path is essentially a straight line to your soul. 2/2

3 months ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 7

Simply said analog just records the continuous curved wave, digital mostly if not all is always rendered sawtooth quality wave. Any traveling wave sound is a continuous smooth lined wave, no matter the frequency.
Well that is what i say, to keep it simple.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's amazing, seeing as it couldn't have possibly been recorded in a live studio, but from a playback in digital format. So uhhhh. Yeah.

3 months ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

They're satirizing audiophiles.

3 months ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

"And if you don't know, now you know, N***a" - Biggie

3 months ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

I gotta know: are you actually serious?

3 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Is "ratfvcker95" serious? hmmm... I'm going to guess no, that it's satire of audiophiles.

3 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Seems so but this is also why so called audiophile's get laughed at. Much of what is strived for can't be heard by most, the loss from recording mediums and transferring between tech exists, and analog vs digital giving different life is subjective. It's like saying CRT beats current OLED because of x factors.

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I mean yeah I get liking vinyls or tapes for their unique sound.

(Also: CRTs are actually better for niche applications like retro gaming because they handle low-res content vastly differently than modern screens)

But saying that they are objectively better is just idiotic. Ok, so if. 44.1Khz 16-bit, 1,411kbps audio isn’t enough for you, you can get .flac with 192khz 24-bit and 4,600kbps. If you tell me anything other than the raw studio recording file is objectively better you’re just wrong.

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0