The guy who owned the farm stole the labor of his underpaid worker, the food manufacturer stole the labor of his underpaid assembly line food workers, etc. whether the food product gets stolen by a hungry person at the end of the chain of exploitation is the least of our worries
Both sides of this argument are valid. Stealing the food from one person because you are struggling, can mean that now that store owner might end up struggling. And the Farmers who grew is very much are struggling right now, so they need the flow of goods to keep generating money. Or else they will not be able to afford to grow anything, then everyone is going to find themselves going hungry.
Everyone has to eat. And most stores pass lost goods costs onto their workers. So stealing to survive helps the one starving, but it can result in the people working trying to make enough to not starve end up having to steal as well to get by. Which is why I said both sides are valid, because everyone is just trying to make sure they have food.
seenunseen
Taking something from others is most definitely wrong. Taking things from faceless corporations that rob from us isn't.
Nanntuckett
Societal competition should only start once everyone has the basics to live comfortably.
Kyzyl
Javert did not care about the right to an attorney.
pocsaclypse
https://imgur.com/qVe44a6
yoloswag360noscope420blazeit
doesn't matter what you're trying to do, it matters what you did
miserycones
The guy who owned the farm stole the labor of his underpaid worker, the food manufacturer stole the labor of his underpaid assembly line food workers, etc. whether the food product gets stolen by a hungry person at the end of the chain of exploitation is the least of our worries
mondeca
iidky
I hated that show. It should have been called "Two Assholes Build Crappy Bikes".
Targe0
Both sides of this argument are valid.
Stealing the food from one person because you are struggling, can mean that now that store owner might end up struggling.
And the Farmers who grew is very much are struggling right now, so they need the flow of goods to keep generating money.
Or else they will not be able to afford to grow anything, then everyone is going to find themselves going hungry.
bekkayya
did you time travel here from the 1600's? learn about scale my dude
TheSecondPiewackit
I didn't give them the right to an attorney, I just evicted them for excessive obtuseness.
TheSecondPiewackit
Wooosh
Targe0
Everyone has to eat.
And most stores pass lost goods costs onto their workers.
So stealing to survive helps the one starving, but it can result in the people working trying to make enough to not starve end up having to steal as well to get by. Which is why I said both sides are valid, because everyone is just trying to make sure they have food.
TheSecondPiewackit
"Woosh" means the point sailed right over your head, guy.
TheSecondPiewackit
Wooooooooosh
Targe0
I get the joke it is trying to make.
I'm talking about the issues at the core of what the jokes trying to be about.
TheSecondPiewackit
No, you clearly don't.