freshthrowaway1138
2586
65
5
Oh boy, here we go, ignoring science some more!
https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2023/11/14/americans-trust-in-scientists-positive-views-of-science-continue-to-decline/?
Nov 14, 2023 8:17 PM
freshthrowaway1138
2586
65
5
Oh boy, here we go, ignoring science some more!
https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2023/11/14/americans-trust-in-scientists-positive-views-of-science-continue-to-decline/?
Adester
Science is not equal to studies, but many people don't distinguish between these 2. This is a problem, because almost every major study in the last decades was bought to influence people. Many people lost trust in anything that comes from a "white coat".
CypherMarz
Let’s hope they pray for a better future
twoamartist
People who believe in science are going to make it.
RummageSaleBubbler
Next up: The dark ages, now with the internet.
SciFiGuy2018
Where's the graph bar that shows the rise of FoxNews viewers.
quade
0xBADA55
While they do and present the results using tools, technology, infrastructure that Science has provided 😑
TangoTouche
Oh dear
HtNrN
time to take their electricity as well as plastics away
Tengenstein
Fuck that. Take their western medicines and fertilizers. i want to see them starve whilst trying to treat rickets with powdered dragon cock
gtotherizzle
We Americans can suck it
crankyoldgeezer
Morons gonna moron. I have faith in younger generations
cambriago13
Underfunding education for decades and tainting factual studies with the horseshit dogmas of contemporary cults is having exactly the desired effect.
epicurusaquinas
I'm an engineer and I think science is mostly good - of course! But I get where some (depending on their social status) have varied opinions. They see social media as negative on teens, AI bad on jobs, energy consumption (due to more tech) bad on environment. Science can also solve (or will solve) these but some people don't share my optimism bcoz many things in their lives are negative. I read the related articles. People's diverse living experiences make for different views of science.
epicurusaquinas
For example, during COVID many of my fellow African Americans didn't see the new RNA virus like I did. I thought it was new awesomely cool science. They thought "here we go like the Tuskegee experiments all over again, now 'they' are experimenting with the whole population". Tuskegee happened. And I couldn't convince them science has moved on. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2022/04/07/black-americans-views-of-and-engagement-with-science/
epicurusaquinas
Thank for posting this @OP. It's Mind Blowing good stuff.
absoluttalent
Counterpoint: people who agree science is good and important, HATE doing surveys and avoid it
HeHeHebieJeebies
as they ham hand their device connected to global knowledge to vote on the stoopid thinking stuff.
Randomice
Clearly we need the Mythbusters back. They had a definite positive effect on science and technology.
Kjasi
If you deny science, then you are not allowed to benefit from it. Turn over your smartphone, your car, and any cloths you did not personally weave from raw sheep's wool.
epicurusaquinas
I'm an engineer (an expert at applying science) .. so I'm just asking you to be careful not to confuse science with resulting tools only. Personally weaving something is still science if you study it, make theories, perform experiments and confirm if predictable results are statistically consistent. Science is the result of the scientific method at work which can be applied to almost anything. I think equating science to be technology or (more broadly) the tools which result is a lil limiting.
Kjasi
I was giving them the benefit of the doubt and letting them have tech older than 1000 years or so...
epicurusaquinas
Lol. Sorry. I get preachy sometimes. Now I see what you mean. "If you hate science, then ...."
Raoul97533
Science made computers, computers made the Internet, the Internet made Social media... So yeah, science has a big negative to make up for until it has a net positive on society after that blunder...
Sebastopol140
epicurusaquinas
Good quote fellow Imgurian. +1 Well said by one of my fave all-time authors. I think you got downvotes bcoz what Asimov said is something people feel and don't like. But I upvoted bcoz it's true and better to know and face the reality VS bury your head and downvote truths we don't like.
goodbyeitwasfunwhileitlasted
Science isn't the problem. It's people who misuse what scientists create/discover that are the problem.
Atomic2
Yea even talking points like this will get distilled by loons into "scientists misuse their platform" or something.
pleaseconsiderthatImightbejoking
It's also the way we do science, which has become riddled with fraud and grifting, as well as the way we teach science, or rather don't, as 30 minutes of nature trivia. Kids graduate having done 12 years of science class work but never heard of a p value.
epicurusaquinas
People who misuse the science are also part of society. So whether it's the nuclear bomb or AI cheating artists. You have to look at all of society to judge whether or not science is good or bad. Because it's also the application of science. Of course the big question is what does good or bad mean?
goodbyeitwasfunwhileitlasted
By judging the science based on how some asshat decides to abuse it's potential, you're condemning all science to be seen as bad, forever. No matter how good something is, there will always be someone who finds a way to use it maliciously. Take the Internet for example. It's a truly wonderful thing. All of human knowledge accessible to anyone at any given moment. However, it's also full of people who use it for truly terrible things. The technology is great. People are the problem.
epicurusaquinas
Wow. Calm down. Why are you trying to put words in my mouth and make it sound like I was defending some people who see science as bad? I'm just trying to explain the results. Holy shit.
pleaseconsiderthatImightbejoking
Science is funded by specific organizations with explicit goals. You don't take grants from Orphangrinder.inc and then act shocked, SHOCKED, that your research was used to make more efficient orphan grinders.
kendrickmeadows1
"The kids who slept through basic science and math courses in grade school because 'I'll never need to know that' now believe that people who do understand basic science and math are fools for telling them what basic science and math means." "Why are you trying to read that word?!? What are you some kind of nerd?!?"
pleaseconsiderthatImightbejoking
The way we teach it is part of the problem. Without a foundation in episiotomy and probability, science class is essentially just 30 minutes of nature trivia, which, while fun, isn't science
gtotherizzle
Even the ones who didn't sleep through it still hated and bullied those of us who enjoyed it, or at least understood it.
epicurusaquinas
It's also true that science has delivered DDT, leaded gasoline (it's still in the air & water btw) and nuclear fission bombs. For me, I think the good outweighs the bad. The VERY cool RNA science of the COVID vaccine saved millions. But how does one even define good & bad? Science's advances can be negative or positive for an educated person. Social impact is emotional & subjective for anyone. To me it seems they're measuring primarily optimism .. not necessarily understanding of science.
StackMySwitchUp
Take your logic and sound reasoning and peddle it elsewhere, you heathen!
epicurusaquinas
+1 (I feel you're jk)
gtotherizzle
Dude....you're thinking too hard
epicurusaquinas
This is the way I think. It's taken me a long time to just accept it and not worry about it. I like me. I hope you like you. So far I do!
gtotherizzle
I don't. But I'm sure I'd like you