Just another day.

Jul 30, 2020 1:45 PM

Perkunas687

Views

4180

Likes

36

Dislikes

13

Setting aside that he can't delay the election, the issue is more that he publicly contemplates it and his followers will do the same. Anti-American.

Also, how Trump could remain President even if he lost the election: https://www.newsweek.com/how-trump-could-lose-election-still-remain-president-opinion-1513975

The only way through this is overwhelming votes. Which means they'll try to make it hard as hell to vote. But vote, you must.

trump

wtf

He knows he cant delay the election. He just wants to be able to say it was rigged when he loses.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

v

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

he also cant send in federal troops or make protestors sign a pledge to not protest anymore,yet here we are. ppl need to take this seriously

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

IOW, he's pulling a Hillary, expecting a loss, so planning for the blame early.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

Except this is typical Trump-- he claimed the election was "rigged" before the 2016 election, then changed his mind after he won.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's fine. The US Constitution is very clear. On January 21, 2021, Nancy Pelosi becomes president.

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

It'll actually be the senior Democratic senator in class 1/3 (33 Dem (+2 ind) to 30 Rep)

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You think he is going to comply that easily? And if he doesn’t, who removes him?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Pelosi is also up for reelection tho...

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You are correct. My mistake. It would be a disaster.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't forget to participate in the BATTLE OF THE GAFFES this November...'cause the other side might win....? They're both criminals

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 10

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's like saying a rapist and a shoplifter are both criminals

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

That argument lowers the moral standard for all. And, it fallaciously assumes there is no better choice than these 2 anywhere.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

A vote for a 3rd party at this point is a vote for trump. And yes, your statement does lower the moral standard for all.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

There is no other choice possible. If the third parties wanted to win they needed to have picked up far more momentum 12 months ago.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I'm not talking "3rd parties". I'm saying - like Jack Nicholson - is this the best there is? B/c, political idolatry aside, its embarrassing

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I mean sure I agree, but the primaries were done and decided with months ago and both parties picked terrible candidates.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0