A good lesson in perspective

Jun 21, 2021 5:16 PM

ladymihaelatargaryen

Views

111946

Likes

4656

Dislikes

52

In Brazil, people take spectacular pictures tempting fate by hanging from this famous rock.  
No photo-shops. These are real pictures:  
You Can check on Snopes.

Incredibly brave people…?
The truth is, the rock is only a few feet above the ground.

All that is required is the proper perspective and angle!
Remember this lesson when you read/view material on the internet or media.
Sometimes, the truth is a lot different than what it appears.

perspective

brazil

photography

I can still roll my ankle 2” above the ground though…

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

but sad truth is some people do this for real, looking at you russians and americans

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You could already tell from the first picture

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

#3 is impressive, regardless of the height of the rock. That pose looks challenging!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I knew there was going to be picture with the punchline like this but still my stomach dropped with every picture.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They're doing way worse: agglomerations, not wearing masks and taking chloroquine to prevent covid-19.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It would still suck to fall onto rock and then into the sisal.

5 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 2

And it’s “Aaaaaaas yoooooooooou wiiiiiiiiiish” the whole way down that hill

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

Inconceivable

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Still impressive upper body strength

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Unless they are going to post pictures of group members falling to their death.....

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

“I’m so over this shit.” - Rock probably

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

One day.... One day

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or the source could just be an idiot

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

120% ? ?

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Hahaha got me for sure

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 87 Dislikes 1

Damn millennials, killing the "falling to your death" industry

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

Right. Let's get this 'Children of Men' plotline going already.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's why many children and teenagers die. They must be at least as cool as this

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ahh death by misadventure pics... so far fewer of those this last year and a half

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There must be at least one dad who dangled a baby and sent the picture to his wife. May that dad rest in peace.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I can't believe you dun fooled me like this! I was gonna hand out "no fear" t-shirts and everything.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Potato Chip in San Diego. Always a stupid long line to get *that* picture.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

But that has a pretty serious drop. And its thin =0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just looked at all the photos on google of that and they all are pretty bad at getting the perspective right.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

@claraclara8

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How do I create the illusion of having a dozen friends?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#5 and #8 are a completely different rock

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

I am pretty sure that is the other side of the rock...

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Beach below looks different and I don't see any skyscrapers in the other photos at all

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Yup, offshore islets are different as well.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean, that would be because it is literally facing the other way?

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I looked into a bit, illusion rock is located at Pedra Do Telégrafo cliff. #5 and #8 are from the cliff Pedra de Gavea.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I see! Well, they do look similar enough that they had me fooled!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was so confused. Was like 5&8 are literally the same rock. But now I realize you mean different from the rest. I’m slow

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That rock will break one day

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Fingers crossed

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah during the next Ice Age, so if you're planning a trip to Brazil in 3521 - you may want to get your refund.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 229 Dislikes 1

Fly, you fools!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10yr old me did this 30+ yrs ago.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

OK boomer... :p Just kidding!

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I have a picture of my sister doing this exact same thing on that exact rock. Good times

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Great, now she's got Durin's Bane to worry about.

5 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I went to the Grand Canyon and stood on a rock with about a mile drop on 3 sides. Had to tell my mom it was a perspective thing or she’d die

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

Ah Safety Last.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Does anyone know the name of these short clips? I love watching them. They show how old movie tricks were done. They’re so creative and fun

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I can't answer your question, but this specific clip is Harold Lloyd in "Safety Last" if that helps your googling any.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It did, you added to the google rabbit hole i’m currently in. Thank you

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm terribly sorry. (-:

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

not sure what you call them other than special effects. got it from here /a/wUAcl some more in there maybe help u find more

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

thank you

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That actually makes me feel so much better, those pics freak me the fuck out

5 years ago | Likes 858 Dislikes 1

Me, too.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My hands got sweaty from seeing those photos. Thank heavens for the last picture!

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I felts so relieved when I got to the end then saw your comment! There are dozens of us!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You and me both. My nut chakra always acts up with heights.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The guy holding his kid over the edge, and I'm thinking "yeah, my dad would've tried that with us."

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

my dad used to pick me up by my belt loops. he did it so often, they broke. i fell face first onto some rocks. thanks dad!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Saaame!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Plot twist: last pic is the actual photoshop, to ease viewer anxiety

5 years ago | Likes 98 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why would you do this to us!?

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

That line of people waiting to all take the same picture! It's like when you see a long-shot of all the people "holding up the tower in Piza

5 years ago | Likes 371 Dislikes 2

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Or, Pisa, I guess.

5 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 0

Apparently, influencers line up to take pictures inside a private jet that isn't going anywhere so they look good.

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

It’s a sad empty world for some.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

I feel like its a lot sadder and emptier getting hung up on what other people are doing.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Influencers are called influencers because of their massive reach - it's good to call out what they're doing so people aren't fooled

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Or wings painted on the side of a building.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Here’s mine.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

There was one set of guys who turned that on it's end by having one pretend to shove it in another guy's ass...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I live in Vegas. Hundreds of people line up every day to take a picture with “the sign”. It’s 115 degrees. Of all the tourist stuff..

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I understand wanting to get a fun picture of your own, but at the same time it would make me feel like a tool.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Eh, if that's their idea of fun, they're not hurting anyone. Let em have it. I'm gonna do it too someday. Dorky tourism is part of tourism!

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

Or on the top of Everest...

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I always found those pictures so depressing. Tenzing Norgay must be spinning in his grave.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I experienced that. It's dumb. Skip Pisa, visit nearby Lucca instead. It's mind blasting.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Just like deceiving charts.

5 years ago | Likes 1722 Dislikes 12

Neither of those charts are deceiving without further context. It's entirely a matter of relevant fluctuation.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

Always remember - 70% of all statistics quoted online are false.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And 58% are made up on the spot

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

and 6/4th of people don't understand fractions

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Restaurant tried to sell 1/3 pounder burger. Why would I do that when I can get a 1/4 pounder for the same price? What am I, a sucker?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Check out the book "How to Lie with Statistics"

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Govt here went an extra step in some recent propaganda and instead of doing #2, did #1 with reversed time axis

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"The data will confess to anything if you torture it enough"

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And that is why bar graphs should always start from 0, if you want to show small variations there are other excellent graphs for that.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Don't trust any statistics you did not fake yourself. You can make any statistic say anything you want if you know how.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If anyone is interested in this there is an amazing book called the Visual Representation of Quantative Information

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That book rules. My PhD advisor made me read it and it gave me such a better appreciation of good data presentation

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The Tuftean Lie Factor from The Visual Display of Qualitative Information, 1983

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yup... Truncated charts are the worst.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is why I always say if you do not include 0 (or 1 for log graphs) then you are lying with pictures.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I can’t stand charts that don’t start at zero.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Actually amazing

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

figures don't lie, liars can figure

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

THANK YOU! I hate when they obfuscate with the scale.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I only trust statistics that I doctored myself

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

always check for graph starting at zero, always

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Broken axes definitely have their purposes, but you need to know what you're doing, and they really need to be obvious

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Didn't even check the second chart because the first one scared the crap outta me!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The chain I work for was successfully sued for misleading advertisement using a chart like the one on the left.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I do this at work all the time.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's almost as dangerous as deceiving farts

5 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 4

v

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*deceptively charts farts*

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Do you deceive the fart, or does the fart deceive you?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A smart fart starts in the heart, blows apart as it darts to depart. Oops restart, it was a shart.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

they just like to leave out the numbers on the left or make them so small you don't look at it.

5 years ago | Likes 221 Dislikes 1

Or make up there own numbering because that's totally okay... https://i.redd.it/gkrwduy9zuq41.jpg

5 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 0

Blogarithmic scale?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A lot of the Covid case graphs had a logarithmic Y axis scale which can easily through people off. Fuck knows what this was supposed to be

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

their* and the corrected graph looks almost the same. No clue why they even bothered.

5 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Sometimes it's to weed out anyone who is smart/observant as they want a dummed down audience that don't question what they're told

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

what in the goddamn

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What is 30 plus 90? Ahh fuck it just put 100 and add 30 from there.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

What 190 -> 240 -> 250?

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Yep, my stats professor always said if you can’t see zero (baseline) on the graph, you should immediately be skeptical.

5 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 1

That’s why all of my Y axis are logarithmic or exponential, muahahahaha

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

There are plenty of legitimate reasons to have the XY intercept not be 0 on the Y axis... though not really with a bar chart

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Sometimes applicable, not always

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

hence the skepticism

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They said be skeptical, not dismiss it automatically. There might be good reasons for sure, but take a closer look at least.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

As long as the y-axis is defined probably, I as a mathematician have no problem with this, in some functions small changes have big conseque

5 years ago | Likes 151 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

5 years ago (deleted Jun 22, 2021 3:33 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

...I'd say it depends on the amount you're being charged interest on, yes?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah but as a mathematician you're likely to always check the y-axis, most other people won't

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

As a business analyst this would be deception. It's all about understanding what the audience wants to know, and presenting it in a fair way

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Line charts this is ok, and even recommended, but not bars. People compare bars geometrically and lines arithmetically.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Don't agree. In histograms it not okay cuz in most cases the area of each bar there is the most important, in barcharts it is fine.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Plus barcharts are often used in the same way as line charts but diff is relatively in discrete data vs continuous data in respect to x-axis

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, like any geometric process, such as uhhhh interest rates

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Like how a rise from 286.8K to 287.9K is actually cause for alarm (no /s, it really is)

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Or 13.65 to 14.75 C, to save people a conversion.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

But in °C it can look a lot bigger, proportionally. The point is that Δx/x isn't always a good indicator.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Consequences, (**** the 140 character limit).

5 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

Such as with interest rates

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"I'm a mathematician. As long as the y-axis is well defined I have no issues. Small changes *can* have big consequences in some functions."

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Greetings fellow mathematician, glad you are agreeing.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

But seriously I'm not English, drunk and a beta student. So thank you for trying to teach English but it ain't gonna do much.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I∈Mathematicians;¬(∃Issue∈I:Well defined labels→Issue);∃f(x):|Δf(x)|≫|Δx|

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Perfection

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0