funneydude
4680
98
4
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/firebrand-us-republican-marjorie-taylor-greene-faces-insurrectionist-challenge-2022-04-22/
jrabbitmusic
Mediathug
That’s a spot-on headline. It’s precisely what this is about. Bigot’s Rights.
activeracer28
20yrs from now, all our children will struggle to understand how we didn't stop the fall of our country.
howcansomeonepossiblyhavethesameweirdusernamealready
I don't know what I was more disgusted by-- her blatant lieing under oath or the people in courtroom cheering for her when she walked in.
iusepaint
She will get away with it. Won’t she?
cdhpineapple
Most likely. But I'd love to be proven wrong.
SteveMND
I mean, it'd be nice if i'm wrong, but
mrthewhitee
Naw, they're gonna say first amendment and give her a pass just like all the others who didn't physically attack anyone or anything.
MasterPrime
There are restrictions on 1A. One of which is very specifically about inciting violence.
anotherrandomname
I mean it's a tough question- Do you advocate violence against those who disagree with you? "I don't know how to answer that"
SmellingMistake
That counts as a "yes", because if it was a "no" there would be no difficulty in answering.
myth1250
Supposedly not knowing is, simply put, not a “no” answer. That is enough said when it comes to advocating for violence.
AngryGraphicDesigner
…honestly answer it in a courtroom without getting myself disqualified from the next election.
BioGoji1989
I will pray for Joe Pesci to teach her how to answer that... with the help of a simple baseball bat.
StickyKiwi
I worship the sun... but pray to Joe Pesci.
BillBarian
C’mon man. The word “advocate” tripped her up. It’s a 3-syllable word. Not everyone uses professor talk. /s
BlairT1
Leesten hear, collage man! Yez big fawncee werds Kant hurts me and mi knowlage