Screw -AI

Jun 12, 2026 1:37 PM

chrispandaboss

Views

11880

Likes

296

Dislikes

46

#memes #socially_awkward_penguin#facts#google#the_more_you_know#computers#learning

facts

google

memes

socially_awkward_penguin

the_more_you_know

Didn’t work for me ai overview was the main result

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

uBlock Origin and Disable AI are your friends.

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Google search is all AI. Using -ai doesn't work.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It affects the results a lot. It removes a lot of regular results too. Local blocking is the only way I found to get rid of slop.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's actually not true. Even looking for certain types of characters in google image search, with the -AI, it will still show AI-generated images as long as the website doesn't have AI in the name, and sometimes even if it does.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"your" means "belongs to you" if you mean "you are", you can do what's called a "contraction" in which you use an apostrophe to replace one or more letters, "contracting" the two words into one: "you( a)re" -> "you're"

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

also, https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/socially-awkward-penguin

welcome to the internet

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That would require that everything ai is tagged which it isn't. But you can use "before:yyyy-mm-dd" to exclude anything posted after that date, chatgpt launched in 2022 btw, also only real way to exclude ai images from your search

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

My welcome what?

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Really good info, but for future reference when it comes to the penguin memes Red = Rad, Blue = Bad. I don't know why, but that's just the way it is.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This seems like bullshit; it will just hide results matching the word. This is also what I found on other sites that promoted this (https://9to5google.com/2026/05/23/google-ai-overviews-turn-off-modifier/ about a month ago). Sadly commenters are still very confused even when confirming it doesn't work.

3 months ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

One thing that works is to use profanity. Ask How many Fu****g grams in a cup for example.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes I have to do that every time because the "ai" just makes shit up. It will link to sources that say something completely opposite of what it's synopsis is. 100% worthless.

3 months ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

Maybe just add it to the default query so you don't need to do it.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ah but did it predict a potential word that could follow the previous? Well, here's an ad.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But it still says that AI can make mistakes and you should check the accuracy. In which case you reply "fuck off AI - you're supposed to know everything so you check your own answer in an extra micro second."

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No matter which search engine you use? Horseshit.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I had a browser extension remove any links that were autotranslated (like steam or reddit). Had to turn it off because google made me do a captcha too often because it saw me using an uncommon search option.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You could also just use https://www.google.com/webhp?udm=14

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If I did it right, I tried this the other day to no effect. It might be browser or site specific, or I might have erred somehow

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It won't SHOW you the AI elements. It still uses the AI.

3 months ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 1

I hear somewhere that cursing will remove the AI so I set up Firefox to always add "-arse" to my search terms. It looks like it works, but I do suspect it's just hiding stuff and still sending it off on it's AI journey.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, search engines ARE AI. I think people confuse Generative AI with AI in general. Google's been AI driven for over a decade.

3 months ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

My welcome?

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is it too cynical of me to fully expect that before too much longer they will start delivering AI results anyways, and just hide any references or mention of them being AI if that is in the search? It’s getting pretty clear that the ones pushing this crap don’t actually care that most of us actively don’t want it

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Neat! Also, blue is bad and red is rad.

3 months ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 4

It's bad that we have to do it.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

except in politics

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I will always abide by Red = Danger = Bad

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

More than that, it's about social interaction (hence why it's called "socially awkward penguin", which this isn't. This is just advice and should use the Actual Advice Mallard.

3 months ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Atleast someone around here has culture!

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just set your browser search engine to https://www.google.com/search?q=%s&udm=14 if you use google.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/05/google-searchs-udm14-trick-lets-you-kill-ai-search-for-good

3 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

change your search engine to duckduckgo

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Google is on the record admitting (or having it whistleblown I forget?) that they deliberately made search worse so you have to search at least twice. The most obvious time I've seen this, I searched "cast of The Celebrity Traitors" and it gave me the cast of the upcoming unreleased season. So I searched "cast of The Celebrity Traitors season one" and it gave me a bullet-point list and NONE of the names were hyperlinks to the specific people. What I wanted was a bio of one of them. 4 searches.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

*you're

3 months ago | Likes 183 Dislikes 6

-AI

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No. Your. The welcome is yours to give.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

your's*

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*awesome

3 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

You'erer-ureer.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Here you go, @OP:

3 months ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 2

Since we're being pedantic, don't they also need a question mark instead of a period?

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Did you know that if you type into you're search engine (-AI) at the end of whatever your searching it won't use AI at all or give you AI info.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

*awesome

3 months ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

No. The welcome is all ours

3 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

3 months ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 8

Grammar is the difference between knowing your shit and knowing you're shit.

3 months ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

3 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

And the difference between helping your uncle jack off a horse and helping your uncle, Jack, off a horse.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And don't forget the plug-ins which help to do that everytime

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Which ones?

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Ross was a horrible person.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Weren't they all, at one point or another?

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ross sabotaged Rachel's relationship so he could fuck her. And then after marrying her, she wanted a divorce, He lied about getting the paperwork done leaving them still secretly married to each other.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

if you add profanity google will also not show ai crap. be careful what you appending 'fucking' to though.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I keep seeing people say this and I can't imagine why it'd work to begin with. Is it actually working for anyone else, because... well...

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

i guess they fixed it in the last few weeks, that is annoying.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've been using the custom default search engine "trick" to default to the Web tab in the search results in order to not see the AI overview shit to begin with, so I had to specifically test this. I'd just taken it at face value before :)

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0