Yeahhhhhhhhhhhh!

Mar 2, 2024 5:40 AM

wingineer

Views

3714

Likes

79

Dislikes

5

It’s…it’s so beautiful!

Original here: https://bsky.app/profile/aedwardslevy.bsky.social/post/3kmo75emme42e

If you’re wondering what the joke is: Gregor Mendel performed a series of experiments with pea plants that established many rules of heredity; p-hacking is a kind of scientific malpractice where you take data then look for patterns that can be presented as statistically significant.
Gregor Mendel: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor_Mendel
p-hacking: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_dredging

pun

peas

statistics

mendel

genetics

Like Freud, it was all about the peaness.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If one believes in fate, or whatever one wishes to call it, perhaps he lived with peas all his life while experimenting with them, then eventually developed an empathy with the pea council.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

From the Wikipedia article "In celebration of his 200th birthday, Mendel's body was exhumed and his DNA sequenced."... the heck kinda birthday present is that? What are they gonna do to this poor sod on his 250th? Dig him up again and use his dick meat as a piñata? A peeñ-ata... or pea-ñata...

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No one has ever been able to reproduce it! Except for most 9th graders who took an actual science class...

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Your ninth grade science class made you cross-pollinate and grow thousands of pea plants, and you then observed uncorrelated ratios of resulting traits even though modern experiments and DNA sequencing show that some of those traits should be correlated? Your school was way more botany-oriented than mine was. Did y’all publish your findings?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The question is "how was science done at the time?" . You do the experiment and from the results you develop a theory, so you present the results that allowed to build the theory. Maybe it was done that way and maybe they were not giving all the data, including the experiment problems, the bad result that could come from accidents or things that you don't understand. I don't see how his experiments cannot be replicated, crossing plants together to obtain flowers is something done for centuries.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The nobody ever been able to replicate part sounds like a science mal practice.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

His experiments can’t be replicated in the sense that if you do them as he described, you won’t get the results he did. To my mind most damningly, some genes are linked because they’re physically close together on a DNA strand: if you breed pea plants, you should see a correlation between them. That would’ve looked bad for Mendel’s theory, but he found no such linkage. https://bsky.app/profile/c0nc0rdance.bsky.social/post/3kert7bnbdc2v

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm more concerned that that's clearly Rainn Wilson.

2 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

False, that is clearly a drawing

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0