Papabehhr
372
17
21
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/blackwater-founder-held-secret-seychelles-meeting-to-establish-trump-putin-back-channel/2017/04/03/95908a08-1648-11e7-ada0-1489b735b3a3_story.html?utm_term=.0a4957b5da99
notmyfirstrodeo
Where was this insight when the Crimea was invaded and an "Anschluss" was held?
fornostrangereason
I'm pretty sure the Washington Post doesn't live in reality.
Papabehhr
Really? Pray tell, who does?
fornostrangereason
What I mean is that they have a very strong political bias.
Papabehhr
Maybe, but this is not a political opinion piece, is investigative reporting. The question still stands, what news source do u prefer?
fornostrangereason
Investigative reporting? The whole article is speculation. Local news stations tend to do a bit better at even coverage, but still.
Papabehhr
Speculation is how you put together news stories when the subjects are not being forthright. Funny thing, much of this is self inflicted.
ManiaGamine
A bias does not make it wrong. I wish people would stop using "political bias" to discount the validity of facts and evidence.
fornostrangereason
Facts and evidence are great but it's the conclusions some networks jump to that is the problem.
Papabehhr
IMakeStuff100
I am pretty sure Fox News is really a propaganda machine for Russia.
fornostrangereason
Yeah, they're almost as bad. It's hard to find news sources that don't try to tell you how to think or make things up to fit their agenda.
Papabehhr
Try Google news or another aggregate need source, that way you get everything
fornostrangereason
Or Bing, I don't even trust Google not to censor things anymore.