Norfolk on the hook for up to 3x the EPA's cleanup expenditure costs and $70k per day until compliance

Feb 21, 2023 10:43 PM

nasukkin

Views

95988

Likes

1345

Dislikes

10

Good to see some actual action on this. Norfolk will also be held responsible for compensating and making whole the people of the community it displaced. If it refuses, the EPA will begin cleanup work immediately, bill Norfolk TRIPLE the cost it takes for the EPA to clean up, and up to $70k USD per day until they change their tune.

Sauce 1: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64722765

Sauce 2: https://apnews.com/article/ohio-train-derailment-epa-61ff5fec89c452f4ff7f56b5b8b4e44e

And que ten years of legal battles trying to get out of it.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I hope at least a portion of that goes to medical care for the affected people. I know it won't. But I can hope...

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

You mean the way Exxon paid for the Valdez? Fuck corporations.

3 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 0

Exactly. EPA should have to do it an charge 3x. This was caused by cutting costs, they will do the same with the cleanup

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Better fuckin do

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Shittiest cleanup job ever. Will spend 100 million to advertise what a great job they are doing on safety and the environment.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think some are underestimating just how bad this disaster is. Norfolk Southern doesn't have enough money to make this right.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

70K per day fine? Gosh, I'm sure they'll be devastated behind their billions in profits.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They have a budget specifically to handle "tough penalties" Just the cost of doing business

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No problem, They can use the money they saved by not improving their braking systems.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Rule of thumb on spill clean ups, once it is federalized, add a zero to the cost. Oversight and legal fees will cost more than the response

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

they burned most of it, converting it to air pollution and socializing the cost, danger; corporate socialism

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Feb 21, 2023 11:36 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

They'll cut corners on the cleanup. Guaranteed.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The EPA would typically have strict oversight to make sure it is done right.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Ah, so, "trust the government" is what your going with, huh?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Where I live, there was a huge asbestos contamination from decades ago. They had a local place clean it to make it safe to live there.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

On top of all this. This is just punishing the shareholders. The people whose objections managment ignored when neglecting safety.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They probably have insurance that covers this, so they're probably getting bank while they'll find some shitty 3rd party company to pay 1/

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

for faux cleaning services as a tax write-off or some shit. Like BP, they'll come out ahead while everything else suffers./

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Quick poll of Imgur: how do you pronounce "Norfolk". Because the way I have heard it said on the news this past week has me rolling

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Norfook

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nawfick if you are older or have a southern drawl, otherwise NorFuck, Norfick. Nor-folk pretty much tells you they arent from around here.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Been hearing so much "Nor-folk", it's hilarious.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Obama: upgrade brakes, Trump: don’t bother guys just pay me. Carter: make tankers have double hulls, Reagan: don’t bother guys, just pay me.

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

In both instances, you see a direct path to a major industrial accident in which deregulation was the cause. Who can think of more of these?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Did a judge order this? Because I severely doubt it was Buttigieg.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They were expecting that and it's cheaper than reinstating the laws.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So, I'd guess they'll file bankruptcy after funneling the money out. Start another company and funnel the money in to that company.

3 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

Just kick the issue up through the courts until the SC dismisses it. Also bribes to get the EPA defunded and shutdown in Senate/Congress.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This sounds great on paper but http://www.nscorp.com/content/nscorp/en/news/norfolk-southern-reports-q4-and-full-year-2022-results.html

3 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 1

Big megacorps inundated by profit wouldn't blink at $25.5 mil per year, which is what $70k/day works out to be. Cut profit down to $500 2/

3 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

million per quarter to account for low points in the year and they're making about 2 billion. 70k/day is 0.01% of their profit. 3/3

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

A bit of a correction on my math - forgot to do the % conversion. It's actually 1.25% of their yearly profit. Still atrociously underpowered

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

And 3x the cleanup costs. This is all before the lawsuits start. Norfolk Southern will def feel this

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They'll just go bankrupt and start a new company.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

the one way trump runs a business...into the ground

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They burned it so the damage is so spread out that they won't have to pay for it. Fines are cheaper than cleaning the original spill.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Tough penalties" but they'll never actually clean it up, just make some shell Corp they'll foist it off to then bankrupt like the rest.

3 years ago | Likes 461 Dislikes 6

Will be paying for republican presidential ads 2024 so all will be forgiven.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfund its not as bleak as it seems

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"We sold all our stuff to this new company at .1% of its value, & all our workers quit to join them too. We have nothing left to surrender"

3 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 0

That's actually fraud, though. Like, corps do get away with *a lot*, don't get me wrong, but... what you just described is super illegal.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Yeah, that specifically sure. But Johnson and Johnson just put all of their liability for cancer lawsuits into a different corp and >

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

> bankrupted it. It's called the Texas Two Step (literally) and the way that plays out will inform corporate liability for a long time

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I say start removing the money from each executive's personal accounts, @ the same rate: $70k/day. Bleed them until they get off their asses

3 years ago | Likes 107 Dislikes 0

"The current executive team has resigned and collected enormous bonuses on their way out the door" -response probably

3 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 0

Seize the company, loss of business liscence

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just freeze all their money and send it to the victims. It worked with russian money so why not here in this case?

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Ya, just think, that would only take 40 years to bankrupt them if they are billionaires. Think about that...

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not opposed to adding 4-5 0s to the number...

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People being ok with billionaires existing confuse me.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I'm just as confused as you are on that one lol

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

y'all need to start rioting like the french smh how many deaths these people caused? get them out ur society ffs

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Until the majority of us can no longer afford food and shelter, we won't riot. ?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's getting there, but we've got a few years yet to go.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10$ says they’ll just increase their rates to pay for it and then eventually that cost will end up paid for by us

3 years ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 4

Nah, they’ll make more money writing it off on their taxes

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Where you do think a businesses money comes from if not from charging customers for their product?

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 23

You're talking about gross earnings. They're very obviously talking about net earnings.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

His point was, the consumer, not NS, will eventually for our poisoning. This isn't quantum physics, try to keep up.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

My money's on them taking the cheapest, most incomplete, most "fuck them people" approach to "cleaning" this up.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

EPA is on cleaning duty now, not the company. The company is the ones paying for whatever it costs for EPA to cleanup.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I may be wrong but the wording was that the company is responsible for cleanup and if they fail to do so the EPA will do it at 3x rate plus>

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fines of up to $70k per day.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0