FDR

Sep 26, 2020 7:52 PM

afallingempire

Views

86731

Likes

3001

Dislikes

116

We could have such a nice country here. We have all the makings for it. But goddam human character defects muck it all up for everyone.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

So if minimum wage is viable, maybe Congress should live off of it. And get the same healthcare plan as well.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I just want you all to know. I upvoted this form 666 to 667. You're welcome.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 12

Talk about increasing wages, how about those pixels too while you’re at it!

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

its almost like we should stop bailing out corporations cause if they die they die, thats just how fucking capitalism works

6 years ago | Likes 119 Dislikes 1

Privitize the gains, socialize the losses.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The employees that lose their jobs, should they receive unemployment benefits?

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 13

Most likely the company would declare bankruptcy, get restructured and bought out, and business would continue.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes. See in most countries the costs of welfare programs are what encourage the gov to regulate & tax companies better.

6 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

A high nationwide minwage & even higer casual rates in Australia hasn't caused sweeping unemployement.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Our 2 biggest supermarket chains pay $20-$50 per hour with an 80% market share between them. Wallmart would go broke paying a living wage.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Nice

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

are employees a company that thrives on capitalism?

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

With a non-answer like this I can already tell you don't want to have a reasonable conversation as I'd hoped. Thanks.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

for every article you link me of a company using bailouts to keep workers, pay better wages, or hire more. ill link you two of corruption

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

where they lay people off and take the money for themselves

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

This was popularly understood for a good 40 years, and then our parents voted in Reagan and fucked things up. We've gotta get back on track.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yep Nixon fucked things up, but Reagan is were we completely lost it.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

it's hard to imagine a president from the 40s using the term spending cash. If this wasn't right wing propaganda it would be corporate.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He said it in 1933: http://docs.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/odnirast.html

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

he also said social security should be out of the governments control by 1960. He didn't trust congress with the money. he was right.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think FDR was neat and cool

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Joe should plagiarize this speech next. It would be a good one.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 21

Nah. This speech delivers the news about exactly why unemployment isn't working today: It required big business to be on board with it.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Australia’s minimum wage $20 per hour. CEO’s billions , investment bankers $30000 a minute. Extra $ for USA workers, “No can’t be done!”

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Just remember if every minimum wage vote went Sen.McConnell’s way over the last 35 years it would still be 3.25.

6 years ago | Likes 484 Dislikes 4

The US flirted with civilization a few times.

6 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 1

https://www.ontheissues.org/SenateVote/Party_2005-26.htm, voted no on same raise 2 years earlier, but it wasn’t a change of heart

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the party decided not to taint their brand right before an election on a vote that they would lose anyway

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think some people don't understand what it means when a company only pays a minimum wage. They'd pay you less if they could.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

My first job paid $4.85 an hour. It was 10 cents over minimum wage. I was 16 and working at McDonald's.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Man, I'm old! I think that was federal minimum wage, too, before they changed it according to cost of living for certain areas.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a comparison, 15 years ago when I was 18 I worked at McDonalds in Australia and was paid $21 an hour.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This was in 1996, so 24 years ago.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, still a crazy gap. Even after you factor in exchange rate/cost of living differences.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Im in pa and a lot of my coworkers say that we should NOT have a minimum wage .... Somehow they think they will get more... Bunch of Moron

6 years ago | Likes 98 Dislikes 2

Yeah it's definitely illegal immigrants being the cause. Not the people deciding that people need to make less money.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That was sarcasm.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I feel like that an alternative play to the Book of Morman where they show a country where Rs won every vote and the consequences thereof

6 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

It's called the DRC (Democratic Republic Of The Congo)

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Lots of companies would pay 50 cents an hour if they legally could.

6 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

They would actually pay?

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Aren’t there prison laborers who make like 29 cents an hour?

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

You're highballing them a bit

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Of all places, PA should have a living memory of coal mining conditions and be a hotbed of labor organization.

6 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Also depends where in PA, remember outside of Pittsburgh and Philadelphia most of the state is boonie.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Truth. Heck not far out of Pittsburgh and you are in the boonies

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Depends on the industry. Walmart is so heavily anti-union, they will outright close a store if tries to unionize. I work for a grocer that's

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

based in NY (I'm in VA), and part of it's distribution warehouse is union, the rest isn't. Every employer I've had very carefully words a >

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

statement that isn't overtly anti-union, but leaves space in between the lines to let you know you're canned if you talk about it.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I actually saw something that put the actual wage we should be getting at "minimum" around 21+ if we actually took everything into account

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that we did prior to the bastardizing after the 60's that happened.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But wait... isn’t that a *socialist* idea?! The GOP told us so! Hur-de-dur-de-do, another hard cider for you

6 years ago | Likes 408 Dislikes 27

You mean hard seltzer?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We lost the Cold War so hard that giving a shit about other people is Communism.

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

I mean in the same speech he said the idea wouldn't work without industey cooperation to fix prices and be anti competition so yes.

6 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 2

He also took the US off the gold standard. That’s still being debated. Mostly by goldbugs, TBH.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's not really socialist, just solid regulations put in place.

6 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 5

Which the founding fathers of the capitalist system insisted on because they knew about it's weaknesses. But nooooo, invisible hand etc etc

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

The invisible hand works, so long as long term profits are considered, and not just short term. Good wages means better workers and turnover

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's almost like the founders were a bunch of wealthy business folks who knew higher economic theories that existed since before them.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Any politician that has a chance of being elected will never buck the corporate overlords.......

6 years ago | Likes 104 Dislikes 11

Insert “Republican” in front of politician, and you’d be correct.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Corporate taxes have steadily declined over the past three decades.....no democrats during that time?...lol

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Lol, effective corporate tax rates dropped sharply under R pres, and rose slightly under D pres. Another ex

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Source please

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Show me yours and I’ll show you mine.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Really? Someone better notify AOC

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We need them less and less.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I want to downvote this but you are correct. ?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Justice Democrat movement is trying to get super pacs and money out of politics. People need to realize there's real positive options

6 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Oct 15, 2021 10:26 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Oct 15, 2021 10:26 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

No point if superpacs and lobbyists still have legal corruption, that should be the first step.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Iv lost faith in nething associated w/ the "d" name. But justice dems r still fighting th good fight. If we could only get nething passed

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If we start w/ ranked choice voting. We can public fund elections +ban $/bribes in politics. W/o that, the rich'll always win at our expense

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

unless they can afford to pay all of their campaign with their own money, they all have to bend the knee/kiss the ring

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Bernie had enough money. The rest of the party he needed to hitch to tho...

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Plenty of elected officials who have refused to take corporate donations of late.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Personally, I'm waiting for the fully funded grass roots internet candidate that finally does an end run around corp donations.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All of the justice democrats do that, including AOC

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Many companies base pay is $12 which still isn’t enough. Data jobs are $15, I was making $11 at Walgreens.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Didn't FDR also say "What's up with a third and fourth term, fam?"

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

At the time nothing was up.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well nothing official anyway.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Damn right. I remember arguing this with my first boss when I was 19 and hearing that a president had said it before me made me very happy

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When I bartended at YANKEE STADIUM I made $4.25 an hour

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When I was a teenager in the 80’s, minimum wage was $3.35/hour and it had stayed that way for 8 years. Currently, it’s $11.00/hour.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

$11/hr? It's still $7.25/hr here (in KY)

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am from New Jersey, the cost of living is pretty high here.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Where

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

New Jersey, but property taxes are ridiculously high and rent is very expensive.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Federal minimum wage is $7.25, not $11.00. Adjusting for inflation, $7.25 now is almost exactly $3.35 in 83-84; cost of living, meanwhile 1/

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/ has increased by 260% since ‘83-‘84, AFTER inflation is taken into account. Your $3.35 in ‘84 had purchasing power of $18.85 in 2020 $$.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, I made $3.35 in 1987, not sure if that matters much.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 532 Dislikes 19

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In this economy?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To be fair, FDR was president a long time ago so the image is probably several decades old

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Digital photos had lower resolution in the FDR administration.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

6 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 1

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nice

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Apparently yes, he has more of those pixels.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Now we need the "do you got any more of those pixels" with full pixels and the caption "thanks for the pixels"

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yet rent and food is not considered into the current equation. Rent is too damn high!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What is this, a post for ants?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Remember when the Alberta Premier axed the different min wage for under 18 and 30 years later the same party went "This is a good idea"

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We have a minimum wage in NZ which is $18.90 as of this year. Pre-covid since they started increasing the minimum wage, our economic growth

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

halved, and our unemployment doubled. Businesses were not able to hire more staff to grow, and few were willing to risk the cost of training

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

up unexperienced staff. Sometimes it's better to ask why is the cost of living so high? rather than asking why are wages so low?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

For us in NZ at least, the cost of living is so high, because of high sales taxes, high house prices, too much legislation, etc.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

That being said, I don't agree with the argument that minimum wage shouldn't exist at all. Large businesses WILL take advantage of people.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I've always thought the minimum wage should be progressive. Bigger companies have to pay an increased minimum wage as they can afford it.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ppl against min wage increase ignore how expensive housing is. My "cheap" 1br apt is 1k/mo with utilities. Min wage pays 1.2k/mo before tax

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Im making $5 over min and am still $5/hr short of renting a studio.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They don't though. They just think min wage workers deserve to be homeless. But better stay out of sight when they are.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Yup, pretty much

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Either that, or they're all supposed to be kids who are still living at home and don't have much in the way of debt or bills. It's such BS

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That’s not what we are against.its about the strain it would put on our economy forcing employers to pay more when they might not be able to

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

If only employers didn't have to pay their employees, we could get unemployment down to 0%.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Lol

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It’s basic economics

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:51 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Minimum wage is not made for living on tho it’s for you to start then go get a better job

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

And how do you live while your "starting".

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The debate keeps going on and on about "what probably would happen" if min wage goes up vs "what is happening right now".

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What's happening right now is min wage workers are being strangled every month, every week, just to live. That's not life. That's torture.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Purposely vague. What’s “decent”? Enough for that person alone? Or a “decent” wage for that person AND their family? How about ppl should be

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 16

able to choose what they want to work for and for how much. If your employer disagrees then go somewhere else.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 14

Why do you think the labor movement happened? Because it's not that fucking simple when you have to always have a job to live.

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

That hinges entirely on the idea that any employer would willingly pay an employee anything to begin with. If Walmart could get away with...

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

it, they'd be paying every employee a single piece of stale bread. A year. The reason the minimum wage was established to begin with was...

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

because 90% of employers were exploiting peoples desperation during the depression to pay them as little as possible. You seriously think...

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

any company would happily agree to negotiate for anything more than the bare minimum, even if they could afford more? Could you also tell...

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3