I will have to read the opinion, but in the US there are some arcane rules around copyright, including the need to register your copyright before you can claim significant damages. Small players often fail to do so which severely limits what they can claim and pursue in court.
Basically the judged listened to the facts with WHAT WAS PRESENTED TO HIM and done what is normal. not the judges fault. he also left it open so other people can still sue if they have more evidence/ reason. he judged based what was presented to him and the current law. people shouldn't get butt hurt over this. it just means more evidence and support is needed for a second run which they should have had for the first run in the first place.
Sheldonian
This is the "catch"
PowerPedant
The catch: "this ruling does not stand for the proposition that Meta’s use of copyrighted materials to train its language models is lawful"
SlowerDwightYouIgnorantSlut
Bought and paid for.
Sneeje
I will have to read the opinion, but in the US there are some arcane rules around copyright, including the need to register your copyright before you can claim significant damages. Small players often fail to do so which severely limits what they can claim and pursue in court.
MoopsyLD
Basically the judged listened to the facts with WHAT WAS PRESENTED TO HIM and done what is normal. not the judges fault. he also left it open so other people can still sue if they have more evidence/ reason. he judged based what was presented to him and the current law. people shouldn't get butt hurt over this. it just means more evidence and support is needed for a second run which they should have had for the first run in the first place.
Dictionary420PhraseIt
RIDICULOUS! Blockbuster went out of business in 2014!
Grumptious
My thought exactly. Why drag Blockbuster into this? I mean, do you think AI is kind enough to rewind?