The horrible cost of a four day hospital stay in Australia

Jan 2, 2016 7:54 AM

The horrible cost of a four day hospital stay in Australia

informative

awesome

It's cheap because everything can kill ha down there. Wait.. Everyones killin everyone here too...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

....?... But that isn't the bill for the hospital, it is the bill for the Television in a hospital room/bed.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Geelong

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is this going to turn into a 'my country is better than your country' thing? Cos as a Brit I feel that our love of tea and queuing is a win

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Oh Britannia, Britannia rules the way

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Add in the amount of money you pay in taxes

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Taxes here are relatively low (previously lived in Germany though).

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

As a Canadian, I've never seen a hospital bill....

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

In the UK we don't get charged, unless we choose to go private, but even on the NHS you get charged for TV and phone use, as far as I know

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As an American I went three months with no insurance. Scariest period of my life. Thank you planned parenthood

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Was there enough of after tax paycheck left to cover it?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

As an American who is going to have surgery next week... I don't like you very much right now...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now, you know some of my countrymen (Americans) are freaking out cause you say 3 days but to those that don't know you...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

(And by you I mean pretty much everywhere else) write dates differently, and think you were in for exactly 3 months.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

As an American, add 50K and call it free.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

damn man you were in the hospital for 3 months?!?! *snickers*

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, someone paid for it. Just not you.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

It's cheaper for everyone because less complex. And enables long term planning for average people => pays back to society.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cheaper because people get stuff looked at when still cheap. Not emergency. Cheaper because standard prices not complex departments. Etc

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Cheaper because prevention and negotiating for cheaper meds are in the Govt's best interest.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Unless they dodge taxes, they certainly do.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Exactly, society decided that health care should be affordable .. Human rights and all

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

$85K if he's got dependents on the insurance. Prior to AHCA, it was about $30-45K.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I had to fire 5 people, so the rest of the my workers could keep receiving free health insurance (that I pay for) for themselves and fam.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Like I said, from personal experience, I have to pay double, and 5 men and women paid with their jobs.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Total tax and insurance to hire 1 person is $75K. That doesn't include salary, just fees and other taxes for hiring a person.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

What the fuck are you talking about ?? Free health care in Australia has nothing to do with your employer

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If your employers aren't paying for it. Then the government is... and they're taxing your employers to do it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Exactly. The best use of tax I can think of. And to think a "Christian" nation is so anti the idea of healing the poor

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Not sure what employers have to do with this...we pay our own taxes and in Australia u get medical levy on tax return.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You keep using that word "free." Someone always pays. Doctors still get paid, products still have cost.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's free to the recipient. Tax payers pay. That's probably the best use of taxes I can possibly think of

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1