Charlie was a monster dump

Sep 11, 2025 11:28 PM

monkofshadow

Views

36987

Likes

282

Dislikes

13

current_events

politics

ussiowa

aww

maga

#10 He has a facial tic, yes? Is this well known and I’m late to the party?

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

gummy dummy

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Think about it this way,
The last thing going through Charlie Kirk's mind as he died was Gun Violence.

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hey Guys... maybe we shouldn't go down to their level.
It's cold underground.

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Steven Crowder still ducks San Seder...

11 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

What a fucking nightmare!

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I want every picture of Charlie Kirk posted anywhere to be edited to bits so when news articles moved on, its the first stuff anybody who wants to know who that guy was, sees so all memory of his "normal" look is erased.

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

#1 with all that practice ducking he still didn’t get it right

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#11 At least Charlie Kirk died doing what he loved: being racist

11 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

One down, many to go!

11 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Now I know who he really was. His children will know who he really was after seeing a few of these.

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

. And damn

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He also said, the Bible verse Leviticus 20:13, which endorses the execution of homosexuals, serves as “God’s perfect law when it comes to sexual matters.”

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/charlie-kirk-political-views-guns-lgbt-trump-b2824580.html

11 months ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

So fun fact, that's an intentional mistranslation by the Catholic Church as a snub towards King James, who was a flamboyant homosexual. The original line is about pedastery.

11 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

That is how it is taught in Hebrew schools... (the pederasty thing, not the King James thing)

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So much of that damned book is old ambiguous language and extremely free "translation"

11 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Whaaaat? You're telling me the book that was built in the 300s by a council of christian groups of the time by cherry picking source material definitely without an agenda in doing so, that is also definitely the immutable words of god, that then passed through another 1700 years of a highly corrupt church that did shit like selling passes to heaven, had intentional "mistranslations" to suit the agenda of the church at the time? Surely THAT'S only happened once in its history.

11 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I don't think anyone is saying he wasn't a trash human being, but I would like to believe a lot of the people singing praise about his murder are just tired of all the negativity and insanity from the right and really aren't for it. We need to not forget our empathy and become like those monsters, the guy had friends family and children who are devastated right now because someone thought murder was great.

I want to know the motives personally, though I'm guessing it's right wing insanity.

11 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 12

If you had a gangrenous toe, would you keep it until it poisoned you to death? Nah, you'd cut it off. He was a gangrenous toe and won't be missed.

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Empathy? For absolute monsters?

11 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm a trans person. He would have celebrated my death. Laughed about it. Praised god in thanks for it. He would have just killed me if he could have gotten away from it. Nah, I'm celebrating. Rest in piss, loser. And those family members, friends, relatives, children you mention? He was more than happy to make sure all of them - impressionable children particularly - felt the same way. So no, the world is better now. And we should celebrate a better world.

11 months ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

11 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Fuck his kids and his wife and his friends too, my only thoughts for them is that it's a shame that they won't share the grave with him. He actively celebrated the death and suffering of innocent people, and built his entire life upon causing it, anyone connected to him deserves the same fate, as is the way for all fascists and their families. His kids are just gonna grow up to be just as big a piece of shit as him and will deserve his fate in turn, so just gonna skip the middleman there.

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I am personally celebrating his transition to being a corpse, and the lamentations of his family and those on the right. His death is pure catharsis for everyone who has watched everyone on the right cause the deaths and suffering of countless people, and who have watched them mock, justify, and celebrate the tragic deaths of innocent people.

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Why his kids? His daughter had to see that. She didn't and doesn't deserve to suffer for the sins of her father.

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Errr.. well, that's the same logic an Israeli rabbi said to the soldiers going in slaughter children in Gaza, they're going to come to kill us when they grow up so we might as well kill them now. Since then 18k children have been killed in Gaza. I would just re-asses really where do you draw the line? I'm not mourning Charlie Kirk but also don't celebrate the killing of an innocent man. There's also the irony of having no empathy for a man because you hate him for not having empathy for others

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And yet none of it warranted his assassination, and to celebrate the deaths of those you disagree with, makes you an evil ghoul.

11 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 12

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 months ago (deleted Sep 12, 2025 2:59 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Stochastic terrorist found out that knife cuts both ways. That's all that happened. Now he'll be a martyr forever. Oh well.

11 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is extremely disingenuous. This is like saying Jews and Nazis just had a disagreement. He was a racist, homophobic, misogynistic fascist who wanted people stoned to death in public for being gay. He believed children dying every year was a reasonable price to pay for guns. By every metric, he deserved what he got.

11 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

He was none of these things and he did not deserve to get shot. If you want to understand why people are upset about the Charlie Kirk assassination, try to picture it happening to someone you emphatise with, like a black rapist or something.

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

He was all of those things, and you too are a racist which is why you don't see it in him. You don't understand empathy, hell you can't even -spell- empathy, so do not presume to lecture me.

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

To quote a cartoon you probably watched: "Your boos mean nothing to me, I have seen what makes you cheer."

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1