newsguycraigevans
38105
1007
49
Credit to Benjamin Slyngstad.
May 4, 2026 2:23 AM
newsguycraigevans
38105
1007
49
Credit to Benjamin Slyngstad.
RevolutionOnHerLips
They wanna disenfranchise anyone who won't vote for conservatives because conservatives don't regulate capitalism. They'll remove it from POC, from queer people, from women, even from young adults if they think the young adults aren't gonna vote in favor of old white men. It's coincidence that a lot of these people also happen to be superchristians who believe in prosperity gospel.
bikergeek6249
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_paper_bag_test
5omeWhiteGuy
BUt bOtH PaRTiEs aRe tHE sAMe!
ThatGuyFromJustSouthOfTheMiddleOfNowhere
Grimlinnan
mycatsings
TheWeebleWobler
But they can be on the supreme court.
nimeton0
Supremacist KKKourt
firlefranz
thinkybrainpains
Supreme KKKlerics. Aka White Christian Nationalist religious extremists.
ImmaCatImmaSexyCat
At least one of them would have red or purple robes. They've been at it for years and gotta have ranked up in that time.
nimeton0
What about pink ones?
Stanistani
It's actually much worse, and a bit more subtle: "Go ahead and vote all you want, it doesn't matter any more."
Aranon1183
There's a particular word I want to use for one of them, but it's an insult to Tarzan's mom.
Blackmetalhappiness
Just like the "Good Ol' days," right assholes?
VitaminJay
And if you're white, they think there's a White and wrong way to vote...
lightfoot2
Remember when Trump told Black people to vote for him because "What have you got to lose!"
Pepperidge Farm remembers.....
chiefrunswithscissors
Remember when they did
mycatsings
IHateApostrophes
He also said to vote for him, and you'd never have to vote again
TI99Kitty
"What have you got to lose?" The right to vote, apparently.
joshuasplinth
They fooled ME, Jerry!
DarkParn
"Vote for me once and you won't have to again"
SalmonTheWise
Oh, they can lose so much more. But so much to gain too, new bathrooms, new drinking fountains, new work (wouldn't call it a job exactly) at the plantation...
MAN9000
Christian Supremacy and White Supremacy Arlington because both of them think that you're better than everybody else and have the divine right to kill people they're bad. Let's not forget that in the end, Jesus tells people that they need to love and obey him otherwise he's going to come back and kill them all up like a fire. Sounds like an abusive relationship to me.
notsurewhattocallthis
I guess Clarence's rulings don't count!
5knotcans
Everyone gets one vote seems fair to me.
OrkenMork
Looks like there's one amongst you who cannot vote then!
xizar
I am greatly curious to see the gymnastics involved if/when they get a challenge to Loving v. VA.
PunnyTiger
well let's start there and by their rules remove Clarence from the bench. no vote for those with a low refractory index. of course this black man, married to a white woman, voted for a law to ban interracial marriage. of course if you've experienced his wife, that one is completely understandable.
MissDameaner
Left out the Male and Female symbols as only MEN should be allowed to vote per the SAVE act
NicoretteJunkie
FTFY
egoAristippos
HeywouldJablowme
What did I miss?
UseYourVoice
This is the worst Supreme Court in decades, possibly since the Civil War. Everyone pictured above don't care about the Constitution, freedom, democracy, or the highest ideals this country represents; they only want to advance the cause of white Christian fascism, and this nation will be better off when they are all gone and all their decisions reversed and undone by sane, compassionate and empathetic people.
Toqom
The president should not appoint judges at all.
5omeWhiteGuy
And.... 3? Were appointed by trump
cytherians
There's a massive smorgasbord of corruption and broken promises offered up by the Republican Party that is now telling you that it's essential they win the midterm election so they can "keep America Safe!"
Safe from what? Republicans are the crooks doing all the pillaging. In our faces. And all the while telling us that it's the Leftists who are doing all the stealing. It's insane. It's unforgivable.
HeywouldJablowme
What did I miss?
jankyupeblik
Wut?
FiftyShadesOfTiramisu
The once-supreme court gutted the Voting Rights Act, allowing red states to gerrymander Black Americans out of government representation. Now they can redraw the congressional voting maps so that all districts have a white majority, which effectively nullifies the Black vote.
ParallelParkingInABurka
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/04/29/politics/takeaways-supreme-court-voting-rights-act
FortifiedWhine
Given her wacky religious cult, shouldn't Coney Barrett be in a maid outfit or something? All the other righty justices being men and whatnot.
MrSatisify
jankyupeblik
They don't care if a supreme court justice is black as long as they hate black people, or a woman as long as they hate women. Their replacements should republicans again get their way will obviously be white men if at all possible, though, for sure.
J3lek
Honestly, it's not about race, it's just a means to an end. The end result they are looking for is limiting how many people vote for Democrats. Not all whites vote (R) and not all colored people vote (D) but enough do that this system works to accomplish the goal.
Pardonmygarlicfarts
The Left are their ultimate enemy and time is wasted figuring out specifically which group they are targeting. Instead of resistance, we check first if our group is the Soup of the Day, find comfort in our exclusion, horror in the inclusion and wonder at why someone else won't fix it all.
lostlittletimeonthis
And next the chart will have female and male symbols
WibblyWobblyTimeyWimeyFox
More than one thing can be true at the same time. For example, they can be doing this to create a Racial Out Group that is marginalized under the law because they're racist fuckwits, AND aiming to reduce democrat voting numbers.
tachyx
It absolutely is about race. Remember that one time a black dude became president.
jankyupeblik
It can be about race and also other things like despising the non-affluent and being unwilling to pay taxes for things you actually adore and so on. And it is.
noWhiteHorseHereJustBatturuPrinsu
If race is inextricably intertwined with the argument, then it is about race. It's like saying "I'm not racist, have black friends, they're law-abiding people. I just don't want crime in my neighbourhood so let's keep the blacks out". Crime is the 'main' argument, but it's not really is it?
DukeDarkwood
Banning interracial marriage is on Project 2025. Tell me how it's not about race.
ImmaCatImmaSexyCat
I'm pretty sure that isn't an item on the list. There's enough fascism there. We don't need to invent stuff.
mineoc
I can’t find a sauce for that. Do you have one.
Don’t get me wrong, P2025 is bad enough. We don’t need to invent anything new here.
cadesama
It is about race because the foundation of their power is preventing Black people from gaining money or social equity
kittyfajitas
If dems ever somehow manage to take back the govt (including presidency), the absolute first order of business needs to be putting 4 more justices on SCOTUS. I believe that only requires a simple majority Then we need an enforcement mechanism/consequences for ethics rules/violations.
jankyupeblik
Including suspending the filibuster, I think you're technically right. In the case of the supreme court I think it would be worth suspending. It's not a great precedent, but it's already been done for the supreme court (nominations) and that court has already caused exactly the unwanted actions that not suspending the filibuster is supposed to protect: insane partisan policy swings.
jankyupeblik
The court is obviously a real problem as is, mostly, ultimately because it's so hard to pass a constitutional amendment, which is the only way congress can be guaranteed to override the court, which is something they might have to do if a war of increasing the size of the court continues.
jankyupeblik
I think another route might be more successful long term. There are a number of republicans on the supreme court right now that have *very plainly* lied in their confirmation hearings. They should be impeached and removed from the court. The court could then remain the same size with justices replaced *and* the idea that justices *should* not be lying sacks of shit reinforced. It would be two wins. Unfortunately it takes a two-thirds majority in the senate, no filibuster involved.
jankyupeblik
If we could pull that off, then we could make it even better and switch to a model as in Sweden, where supreme court justices are nominated in the first place not by politicians in the executive office, but by jurist peers.
Zeddicuszull
You can get rid of a scotus judge without a two thirds majority in the Senate.
First, you initiate impeachment against a Republican judge. Simple house majority. Next, judges don't have executive privilege so they can be forced to testify under oath in front of Congress. Said Republican judges are going to lie under oath and or refuse to answer questions, which is obstruction of Congress.
DOJ indicts and arrests the judge which removed them from the bench since you cannot judgify from jail.
jankyupeblik
I mean I wouldn't mind if it went that route. Can't say it sounds quite technically correct myself, but it's not like I'm a constitutional scholar, and obviously people are cutting corners around here anyway.
Zeddicuszull
Anyone besides the president can be indicted and arrested for Obstruction of Congress. Including SCOTUS judges.
In addition, Congress by themselves can punish people with jail for obstruction.
BabeAfett
One of those is not like the other. Wonder what it's gonna take for him to realize his 'friends' are actually leopards.
unluckyandbored
I'll get banned if I say it...
jaecyk10
My dude, this is a man that would vote to make his own marriage illegal. He's never going to change.
PineappleIsDeliciousOnPizzaFightMe
These things will never affect him, personally, so that's all that matters to him
MortimerMango
nothing, he's railed this stuff his entire career, at this point the people driving the boat are cribbing from his notes
RevolutionOnHerLips
You talking about Uncle Ruckus?
Einstein9073
Clarence Thomas is the expensive and valued possession of the rich man Harlan crow. Mr Crow will not let anything happen to his expensive possession .
HearMeFart
Made me think of this one...
BabeAfett
Absolutely!
Mikeiller
His face would be half gone before he'd admit to anything
AngelBolen91
Or her friends
BabeAfett
I guess, technically, 2 of these are not like the others.
AngelBolen91
https://media0.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWE1NzM3M2U1anlwcjk4eTRkejZxYW1qNjdxOWFsYXoyaGN5eGx0NnU0eG83aHduZiZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/1hMk0bfsSrG32Nhd5K/200w.webp
ImHereToGetDownvotes
He has unlimited power thanks to the position he's in and regularly takes bribes from them. They support him as "One of the good ones" because of the power his position grants. They could oust him, but having him there gives "legitimacy" to their "it's TOTALLY not about race, even the black guy said so!"
SalmonTheWise
His wife's family says he's so conservative they forget he's black.