This is something I frequently bring up when arguing with the maggots because they like to whip out "so much for the tolerant left" like it's some sort of grand checkmate.
A little too fucking late on that front, twice. Allowing confederate idiots to keep saying "the south shall rise again" and literal Nazi ideologies dismissed as fucking free speech so as long as it won you the space race. Congratulations!
Oh I agree. The point is to get people talking with a purpose toward action though. Also to explain how I wouldn't even piss on a maggot to put them out if they were on fire is an entirely understandable mindset.
I agree. Above is a philosophical argument by John Popper. I actually meant to put his name in the tags but for some reason it was removed or maybe I just forgot. It's meant to engender discussion though.
It is the very definition of a paradox. To be tolerant across the board means to be tolerant of intolerance but to be intolerant of intolerance cancels out said tolerance.
rydecker
that is what is happening to us right now
UnoriginalPieceOfRepeatingShit
This is exactly why x-ianity needs to be eradicated.
Clockworkdancerobot
Contrapoints - Debating the Alt Right.
TheLastSpaceman
A little too fucking late on that front, twice. Allowing confederate idiots to keep saying "the south shall rise again" and literal Nazi ideologies dismissed as fucking free speech so as long as it won you the space race. Congratulations!
dooremouse
Oh I agree. The point is to get people talking with a purpose toward action though. Also to explain how I wouldn't even piss on a maggot to put them out if they were on fire is an entirely understandable mindset.
foreverinchains
The paradox of tolerance disappears once you realize that tolerance is a societal contract rather than a moral obligation.
If a person or group refuses to abide by the terms of this contract, then they are no longer eligible for its protections.
dooremouse
*I meant Karl Popper, not John
dooremouse
I agree. Above is a philosophical argument by John Popper. I actually meant to put his name in the tags but for some reason it was removed or maybe I just forgot. It's meant to engender discussion though.
Johnsky
Tolerance is a social contract, the moment one group violates that contract they are no longer protected by it.
Johnsky
IE, there is nothing wrong with being intolerant of intolerance.
ragazzino
Because it's not a paradox.
Johnsky
Precisely.
hohohoooo
Karl Popper
Johnsky
Who?
dooremouse
The philosopher who credit for the paradox tolerance is credited to.
Johnsky
I don't see it as a paradox.
dooremouse
It is the very definition of a paradox. To be tolerant across the board means to be tolerant of intolerance but to be intolerant of intolerance cancels out said tolerance.