So inefficient!

Dec 10, 2016 1:14 AM

I don't understand why, but I have an irrational hatred for them! In a universe with powerful Anti-grav capabilities it makes no sense to have any ground vehicles to start with, much less ones with legs. But that part is logical. I don't mind the AT-ST and I love the AT-TE, but still can't stand that slow lumbering elephantine fuck. It's just so useless to use something so big and slow to move a few dozen dudes and a couple speeder bikes.

Hmmmmmmmm, the nerd is strong with this one.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People used to play drums while advancing although few drums can kill people. I think it's about shock value and not effectiveness I think.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its supposed to fill the role of large, ground based siege weapon, but yeah, just do it from orbit dammit.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was just thinking something similar. They don't really talk about the tech in canon (because it would be pretty dry, I guess).

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Starwars, logic? Pick one and only one.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait, is it explicitly stated they have "anti-grav" technology and aren't just relying on chemical/nuclear propulsion?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The "Wookiepedia" (<-real) describes it as a repulsorlift, and most every ship and speeder uses it I believe.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Anti-gravity tech is canon in Star Wars (usually called Repulsorlift technology) but I don't know how widespread it is in practice.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

@OP. Tarkin Doctrine. Its not meant to be effective, its meant to be feared.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Best explanation offered this far.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Best irl example is: Aircraft carrier fleet off of your coast vs B52 at 50,000ft

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think it's point is it's height and size. Less likely to suffer from mine attacks, easier to shoot straight/down than in an arc.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This makes a lot of sense. Also the slow movement is more of a preventative measure and the outer casing is more of a tank-level protection.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And then the size strikes fear at those who would oppose the empire.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think the whole physiological warfare bit is it's saving grace

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It makes more sense if you imagine the Empire holding a contest where they let a randomly-selected child design a new war machine.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Transport McTransporty Face?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ill play the devil's advocate here, yes, they seem useless, but during the Battle of Hoth they are able to take down an entire rebel base1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

During the battle, there were able to take down speeders, and brushed off all forms of blaster fire, they are walking behemoths and are 2/3

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Meant to take on countless amounts of infantry and tanks, while traveling over all terrain while holding troops for transport. Only few kill

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The at at

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The star wars fandom is the only one I've come across where the bigger a fan you are, the more you hate it.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

It makes sense in a way. The more you get into it, the more you see and think "Wait, what?" while the casual fans take it at face value.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It totally makes sense, it just makes me think Lucas really dropped the ball. Think how great it could be if they just answered my letters!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Word, once you get deep enough you start leaning more and more towards Star Trek lol. Though in a lot of the novels you can see talented>>

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Star Trek = Space Whales, Blue Hand, and Abe Lincoln in space.... lol

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

authors struggling hard to make some logical explanations for Lucas's technological tom-foolery. Some even do a fair job!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Exactly!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0