Do it.

Jun 16, 2025 7:07 AM

sleeperkid

Views

8760

Likes

717

Dislikes

12

cops

police

police_brutality

acab

pigs

Dont forget they have won discrimination cases for rejecting applicants that score *too hire* on IQ tests.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Literally there was a court case that set the precedent that police departments can weed out smart people.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What needs to happen at a Federal level: Every. single. fucking. person. with a Domestic Violence conviction needs to be disallowed from owning or using firearms. That's it. Gets guns out of proven shitty people's hands, and purges law enforcement at all levels from those who would repeat that behaviour on the populace.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In Norway once you are hired you are required to obtain a three year degree in policing. Sweden is similar

1 year ago | Likes 80 Dislikes 0

Police academy you said ?

1 year ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 1

Police dogs get more training, Think about that

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'd also accept a 2 year course and anabolic steroid use being a fireable offence

1 year ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 1

I went to a party at my brothers and this dude was being a HUGE douche (wasted, screaming at his GF, he actually left her there). Then my bro tells me he’s been taking a ton of testosterone and just become a huge asshole. Surprise surprise he’s also a cop

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

What's needed is for a body OTHER THAN the police to handle screening and leadership at the top levels who aren't career cops. As long as police pick who they work with things will get worse, because they want to work with people who will support them, no matter what. A body that chooses people based on their empathy, compassion, and intelligence rather than blind loyalty, with the support of leadership, would have police forces fixed in a decade or two.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a former Police officer i can state this is a great idea...plus raise the age limit. I was too immature at 21 to have that amount of power.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Physically and mentally fit for the job? No? What about a disdain for your fellow man and a willingness to unload if you hear a noise? Yes? You're in!

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's a lot of years listening to a police academy classmate making siren sounds with his voice.

1 year ago | Likes 97 Dislikes 1

1 year ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Been saying this on here for years. Police
Officers need to be treated like the other professionals who hold peoples’ lives in their hands, like doctors and nurses, for example.
Currently, the minimums to be a police officer in Texas requires you to be 18, a HS graduate or its equivalent (GED), pass a 6 month training course and pass a certification test.
They absolutely need a degree, preferably a bachelor’s, and a license with rigorous training and testing.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If you are too intelligent, you can't be a State Trooper in my state. They don't want smart people, they want people who can follow orders without questioning them, my droogies.

1 year ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Yep. There was actually a lawsuit over that. Dude applied but was rejected because he was "too smart". So he sued (and lost). Thing is, police departments generally "promote from within" so the brass is no smarter.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm a barber. My schooling is 3x as long as theirs. I don't even get a gun.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cop shops resist extensive and detailed training requirements for the same reason the military does. They know 80 to 90% of the bottom of the barrel scrapings will fail and they won't be able to justify spending millions of tax dollars on Tactical Military gear...

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its almost the same amount of time required to become a security guard in a shopping mall in Norway. You were always a police state put in place to protect the rich from the poor

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, make it a combination of law and psych classes with a focus on conflict resolution. There are too many cop seminars about kill or be killed.

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

6 months? - it's around 8 weeks here and only 2 hours of that is actually about "law"...

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

First test: throw a handful of acorns. Whoever doesn't lose their shit can pass to the next test, which will be writing their full name and simple multiplication.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They aren't taught the law. They are taught to be above it.

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Mahoney!

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

BuT tHeN wE wOn’T hAvE eNoUgH cOpS!

This proves the point. Too much power in the hands of those with too little training.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pay them more, too. It’s such a shit job right now that only the bullies find it worth.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thankfully it takes 1 year of beauty college for hairdressers so that nothing really bad happens when they are let loose on society

1 year ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Also have all lawsuit payouts come out of the police pension fund. The problem will start sorting itself out pretty quick.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Welcome you discovered most of the other first worlds education program for police, consisting of a physical and psychological screening before the actual education of 2 to 4 years minimum.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Almost as if it's about building up a militia to control the population a political entity in charge doesn't like more than about upholding the law

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That’s the Canadian system, just FYI. Police foundations for 2 years + another emergency related certificate/degree at minimum if you want to get accepted.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Is it nationwide or provincially mandated

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Force them to take psych evals to prove they are of sound mind - and after each traumatic incident. Make them take out malpractice insurance out on their guns so they have to be held accountable for every bullet they shoot. Make them sit for a law and ethics exam to ensure they actually understand how the law also applies to THEM. Make social work and mental health classes part of their education curriculum so they understand how to actually help and support their communities.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And set a limit on time engaged in active duty before they have to leave - if we acknowledge burnout as a part of the job then we shouldn't be putting the burnt out apples on duty - they rot the barrel too.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hell, just requiring a 2-year degree and a squeeky clean record would be a huge step up.

1 year ago | Likes 291 Dislikes 0

My police academy was a single semester program. Some people do silly things to rebel against their parents. My parents were druggies, so growing long hair didn't bother them (it was too much work in the morning, so I quit that), later, I did the police academy thing.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Demilitarization of Police Means Disrupting the Army-to-Police Pipeline https://jacobin.com/2020/06/military-police-veterans-ptsd-recruitment

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Isn't that mandatory to get the job? US police is weird.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

i cant say too much about the police in ontario, but requiring any sort of post secondary education did make it better. Though i expect that to be going downhill now that police arent required to have the degree anymore

1 year ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Squeaky clean doesn’t seem fair… dude gets caught with a joint in college shouldn’t be a full disqualification

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Realistically, the joint shouldn't be a problem at all but we aren't there yet. Consequences of a long fought culture war to demonize people who use it and the US's general cultural supremacy.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's a disqualification for a lot of jobs. Why not this one?

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I struggle to send that point cause I don’t smoke… but the people that I know who do don’t seem to let it impact their job performance

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Irrelevant. Those who enforce the laws should be beyond reproach. Untouchable. And it's still illegal at the federal level so every person who's lighting up is willfully violating federal law. That's the fed's take on it, and I don't see why LEO should be held to anything less.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Requiring liability insurance for police just like doctors have to have would be a huge step. Taxpayers should not carry the financial burden for police atrocities.

1 year ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 0

It depends what outcome you want - liability insurance doesn't stop medical malpractice and it won't stop police shootings. It just makes the cost of the respective jobs more expensive and given that payouts for police shootings are already significant, I doubt it will result in any change of culture that isn't already happening (i.e. areas where police are accountable will continue to strive to be more accountable but areas where police shootings are tolerated by unions, management and....

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

...politicians, the status quo will remain other than adding another vested interest (the insurance industry) to the existing mess.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Doctors used to rally around each other and protect even the worst of their own just like cops, until it became clear that this was harming trust in they're own practice and cost of insurance, and they became the strongest advocates of reform. It turns out people stop protecting assholes when they are a liability to them and not just others. Jesus Christ dude, your analogy counters your own fucking point.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ok, let me try another angle - making this an economic problem rather than a training problem will mean that the people or organisations with the most money will get the outcome that they want. If that's not clear, look at American law enforcement's approach to protecting property versus protecting people.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When I've seen insurance stated as a requirement, the idea is not insurance for police in general, but insurance for Each Individual Cop - By Name. The point being that if A COP becomes uninsurable, he becomes unemployable.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

And you think the police unions will allow it to be truly individual? Yes, it may be paid per officer, but between unions and politicians being "pro-cop", getting it to truly be per individual will be difficult in the areas that need to change. And it doesn't address the lack of training that is the root cause.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1