keep it secret, keep it safe

Mar 4, 2016 6:06 PM

BOBNOBODY

Views

13093

Likes

19948

Dislikes

341

keep it secret, keep it safe

rep_ost

reposttimesamillion

the_more_you_know

Funny, I've been reading up on this in the past week. Only thing I miss here is the mention of logging

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

What I miss is a big red warning saying most of this is fucking bullshit and doesn't add any really security what so ever.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

There are better VPNs that are cheaper and more secure out there if people look. But that's just my 2 cents.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Most VPNs will have the exact same security, but their privacy models are unknowable. It is impossible to prove they do not log, or they do

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

not spy on users.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

https://www.goldenfrog.com/blog/myths-about-vpn-logging-and-anonymity

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

goldenfrog is about the worst possible authority on privacy, but generally speaking you will never lose your privacy with ethical VPNs

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Ethical" VPN's will be selling your data as soon as they are forced to.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Literally all of the suggested VPN's are shit. Go to r/VPN

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Angry downvote for "data you send or receive is protected from anyone". If you don't know shit then don't post shit.

10 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 2

Yeah this is all BS written by someone marketing VPN providers.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

We get it you VPN....

10 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

Some of those VPN suck ass

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

DO NOT TRUST HIDEMYASS

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Why?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because they snitch

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I dont think this is how it works..

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Dunno, i stopped reading when it says it protects you from incoming hackers right at the start.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

+1 for title. HACKERS, YOU SHALL NOT PASS

10 years ago | Likes 118 Dislikes 6

PIA has gone to shit in the past two months

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just canceled my account last week. Slow...like old people fucking.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

replacement suggestion. I also found that they recently started throttling many... how do I say this... "social file sharing" sites.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Came for title. Stayed for useful info, gollum.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I will file transfer the Ring to Mordor! ~And you shall have MY Firewall! And MY Encryption Key! And My offsite server!!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

HMA will hand over your info in a second if told to and the rest are in five eyes country's so they are worthless (although I use it 1/

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

PIA sometimes. Cyber ghost might no be in a 5 eye country but log your data. There's like 3 vpns that are actually safe and they aren't 2/

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Even that great. Plus each vpn has its own setup process and openvpn is different too. This post is worthless. 3/3

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This infographic is such crap.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The location of your VPN matters, as well. iirc US based VPN's can still be required to divulge information due to patriot act and such.

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

PIA does not keep any logs that are useful to anybody. Pretty much all they can prove is that you used the VPN at whatever time

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

At least Comcast doesn't know I'm torrenting

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yeah, the government can see all my sweet, disgusting porn as long as Comcast doesn't try to nail me for torrenting Game of Thrones.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...exactly

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most of listed vpns keep the logs saved..so not THAT anonymous...just sayin

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

None of these are anonymous. They cannot be by definition of being a public, subscription VPN service. Anonymity is total privacy, these can

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

provide a certain level of privacy in certain threat models. Against copyright enforcement groups for instance.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

ok so one tip, do not get a vpn provider become the vpn :PPPP

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

VPNs do not provide anonymity. If you want anonymity, use Tor.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is just misleading techno-gibberish.

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 5

It's a list of 6 vpn services and a basic explanation of vpn benefits. You call that techno-gibberish? Watch "Hackers" w/ Angelina Jolie.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Very first two paragraphs. Okay, I won't call it techno-gibberish. I'll call it FUD. Marketing. Lies.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That seems to happen a lot when you try to simplify a highly technical thing. But yeah OP is trying to sell VPN to us, hence the marketing.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As someone who works in IT: Yes. Yes it fucking is.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

There's no internet in the chicken coup even if you're a magnificent chicken.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

classic Security Theater

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm probably late to the party, but if you click on a malicious link via VPN, you're just downloading malicious code in an encrypted fashion

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That means you are bypassing all perimeter defenses which could detect and provide eventual mitigation of such threats

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You are preventing spying eyes from gazing upon your credit card info as the data flows through the system, which is still good

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But you've put everything in your personal internal environment at risk. Which you do anyway. So yes I agree.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Step 1: don't favorite this.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I use PIA, but also consider that it may very well be a NSA/FBI run honeypot.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

one does not simply mitm when hacking... also i wouldn't use a vpn service by a five eyes country (no uk, us aus or nz) get a Swiss one

10 years ago | Likes 124 Dislikes 2

canada

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

wait... 5 eyes?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's an international intelligence alliance. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Eyes

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

comment for later reading

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I can recommend AirVPN

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which is the fifth eye?

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

What about the eleventh eye?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ask your girlfriend / tell you when your older.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Canada

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

FUCK YEAH CANADA

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

it's a lot easier to assume it's all insecure, and act accordingly

10 years ago | Likes 725 Dislikes 9

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Aug 5, 2020 6:29 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

A tor browser is only as secure as its user. Tor doesn't provide anonymity. It simply makes it a bit easier to become anonymous

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Doing it right

10 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 1

Everybody will be dancing and be

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Doing it right

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

“You had to live - did live, from habit that became instinct - in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

in darkness, every moment scrutinized.” (2/2)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1984?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

ye

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I always act insecure.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Why not both?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This makes the most logical sense. This only protects you from home to site. But that doesn't included the sites you visit. 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 0

So this is truly pointless for normal Internet usage, unless all websites are accessed within the sender network. Hence why we have https. 2

10 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:42 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I think you did a good job. The VPN only protects the connection between the user and VPN host. This what most businesses use for 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Remote workers. If you use this, you will only be protected from your PC to the host. MIM can still sniff packets between the host and 2/3

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Guys, you have to explain this to me. Say I'm on free wifi, I use encrypted tunnel to exit through vpn server. How does this not protect 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 me from let's say MIM attack or a packet sniffing bad guy? Assuming I am using services of a legit vpn provider

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*unsecured

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

see definition 2: "unsafe." ... "able to be broken into or illicitly accessed."

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

IDK, my browsing history has low self esteem.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

So...why not just use Tor?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well if you torrent on tor you're a jerk wad.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

WTF? Why? The only time a VPN protects you is if you have two networks (can be single nodes) and you need to connect them over the internet.

10 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 12

I think the theory is the VPN provider is harder to MITM than your local internet provider. Pretty sure neither are trivial.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not to worried about them ratting me out for upvoting posts with boobs on imgur.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And stuff like pages you enter credit cards into online are already encrypted (or should be), so MITM wouldn't even help there.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I make sense for my company to use them for remote access but at home I'd have no use for one.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Yep, in that situation they want a worker's network to connect to the main network. Usually best to restrict that remote network a bit, 1/

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

because who knows what is on the worker's laptop, home computer, etc. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This is exactly right. All your doing us making a "tunnel" from one computer to another and then going to the public Internet from there

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

True, but if you are on the same public wifi as me, I can intercept your communication incredibly simply. VPN keeps it all encrypted past me

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

With a VPN the Packets are encrypted from the point of the equipment hosting the vpn all the way to the client. Then from the client back.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So even if your in a coffee shop the client side VPN encrypts before the packet hits the Client NIC.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you are using an insecure protocol it is just a question of who is going to intercept it, not if.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

I travel a lot and mostly use one for when I'm on unencrypted Wi-Fi, like most hotels. Also good in countries where they block things.

10 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

For the former it doesn't help. The unencrypted wifi is no worse than the rest of the 'net if you are using an insecure protocol. For the 1/

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 10

latter, be careful. Such countries sometimes have laws against circumventing those blocks in any way. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

It helps for people just packet sniffing in a hotel, that's super easy to do. And you only have to worry about circumvention laws if you 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure VPN traffic sticks out like a sore thump to on their internet providers network logs though.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Live in that country. They don't care about visiting foreigners, and they's not too much they could do if they did.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Thanks, now every 12 year old who threatens to DoS me I'll send them this.m

10 years ago | Likes 205 Dislikes 5

Just tell them you're behind five boxies. That'll scare 'em.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

*Shivering Intensifies*

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

MS-DOS?

10 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 5

Don't know if sarcastic but 'DoS = Denial of Service' attack in this context

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

That's only when a girl does it.

10 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 0

Clever girl +1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thoroughly enjoyed this.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Department Of Science in this case.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

DDoS* (Dee-Doss) you

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 19

You bully you! Yer justa big ol bully!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's just DoS if the attack originates from a single machine. DDoS *only refers to multiple attackers with a single target machine

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ahhh...I did not know the difference =D. So wouldn't DDoS still be the practical use? I assume only the best of hackers DoS...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

A DoS is nearly the exact same thing as a DDoS but with one computer instead of many. DoSing works for small applications and is easier

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh ok..that makes more sense. Thank you! Just curious...are you Google certified?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

DDoS attacks are usually done with botnets that a person pays for and are more for attacking servers than personal computers

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

incorrect. DoS and DDoS are both vaild terms... one is Denial of Service and one is Distributed Denial of Service.

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 2

Hmm..interesting. I counter with this: are we talking technical or practical? Because wouldn't any hacker, 12 year old or not, want to DDoS?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

As a Cisco certified network associate, can confirm. And thank you.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

with multiple machines?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

yep. to my knowledge, DDoS uses a large network of computers to spam a server until it crashes from the excess of packet requests... (2/2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think thats the "distributed" part, but not totally sure

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And (I could be wrong), the network can be (mostly?) anonymous, meaning some machines can be used without their knowledge (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As someone who has been paid to legally sniff net traffic: Most of this is hogwash. Public VPN is good for avoiding blocks, nothing else.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Deep packet inspection? Or something like that? Genuinely curious.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Plain old IDS (snort). Company had 100s of sensors at customer locations to catch potential threats. Full packet capture.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

DPI is very similar to IDS, except it's not just about intrusion, and tends to refer to ASIC-based equipment. Otherwise similar capabilities

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If looking to download with privacy and not get piracy lawsuits- avoid all this, and use Tribler for free! Works like a charm.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Mixnetwork routing is slow though. I have 350Mbps full duplex line, so I will stick to newsgroups. Usenet downloaders never get harassed.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Please reveal your secrets on how to do this!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Find a Usenet provider (Tweaknews, NGroups, Supernews are pretty good - Avoid GigaNews) and sign-up for their binary post service (usually

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thanks!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

a monthly subscription rate). Install a client like SabNZBd+ or NZBGet. Use sites like NZBIn">ndex.nl">NZBIndex.nl, Binsearch.info, or newznab sites like

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

">"zbs.or">zbs.org">nzbs.org, nzb.su, oznzb.com to get NZB files (basically .torrent files, metadata locators for files on your usenet providers' server)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not really Anonymous online. Some places are looking to block VPN nodes, and it won't save you against LEO investigation.

10 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 3

VPN plus Tor is rather safe. Even if they control enough endnodes to figure out that it is a VPN connection, then they would need the record

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Of the VPN hoster. Depending on country (Romania f.e.)us LEO cant do shit

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Whats a LEO investigation?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

What would have happened if he hadn't finally won the Oscar.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Law Enforcement Officer. ie: if the police, FBI, or NSA wants records.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Yes it will. Especially when combined with Tor and a VPN provider who doesn't keep logs

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Most hosting providers won't allow you to host a VPN service if you don't keep logs. My abuse team checks all of them.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*Tor, beta app acting weird, as I was saying: Good luck doing anything on Tor with a VPN turned on

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

VPN + Toe.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

and i2p+tor using a os like tails

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tails is the least important part of the chain. I'd stress the networking part heavily first.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

TOR has weaknesses, they go after US based TOR exit nodes and add in their own nodes to narrow down source points.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Just get a VPN provider that starts your connection overseas. Those two technologies combined are well above the protection I need.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Be careful with overseas connections. The country likely doesn't have obligations to keep your info secure, and the US has very little..

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

PIA the first on the list has connections to dozens of countries to pick from. I use the Netherlands myself usually.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Regulations regarding the interception and collection of foreign data.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, if you're a drug kingpin you need to do some more homework, but for lighter, random law breaking you're probably ok.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Providers who don't keep logs tend to go out of business. Just ask Lavabit.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

You are correct. They are usually resellers from larger providers such as AWS, rack space, OVH etc etc that will cut the server.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If they find you hosting a free/anonymous VPN service

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lavabit was a mail service, not a VPN. Private Internet Access claims to not keep logs and they're doing just fine.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yes, but its naive to think they ignore VPN services. They target TOR so much they had Carnegie Melon university research it to break it.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The US government is major finding source for TOR. They are also the ones trying to break in.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've yet to see evidence that logless VPN+TOR is totally compromised. You're just generally handwaving without specifics.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We let government spy on us to keep us safe, then pay services to create methods that prevent us being spied on, that those we're being ..

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

we let? were you asked in your country?

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

They opted in for us, because it's safer that way...with the terrorist and everyone trying to hurt us. (this is % sarcasm)

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Wait! How much % sarcasm was that?? 0% or 100%? That's a big difference of sarcasm!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hahaha. I swear I typed in "100". Man, I bet a lot of people read that and were like "depending on the percentage, he might be right!"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

lol, amen brother

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

'protected from' can also use, which causes us to pay for governments to better be able to crack our protection from them. Smart.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Hey friend, any evidence that our gov's have some kind of back door to US hosted VPN's? Something to consider if so..

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Hey non-friend, https://lmddgtfy.net/?q=Was%20the%20Juniper%20backdoor%20mystery%20all%20NSA's%20fault%3F Wired paragraph "The only problem"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If based in the US than they are subject to US laws. So they can get served a warrant and not have to tell you.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's not a backdoor, technically. A warrant from a magistrate is the front door, using the Judiciary to approve the Executive gov action.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"gib records" "need warrant sign by judge" "k, gib records" "Lol k" "dis is blank sheet." "ye. is all record we keep."

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What a terrible VPN provider list :/

10 years ago | Likes 136 Dislikes 4

Yup, too true

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tunnelbear ftw

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

GRANDMA AND I WILL BE ABLE TO MAKE IT. THE FIRST ONE TO THE VET :)

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yes but what does it MEAN

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH YOU AND YOUR FAMILY AND THE 3RD REICH. IF YOU WANT ME TO DO WITH A FEW YEARS AGO. THE FIRST TIME I AM INTERESTED?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm surprised people still recommend "Hidemyass" these days...

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

They have the biggest database of individual proxy ip's and the widest range of locations. So yeah thats why.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

As a newbie, why?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Seriously, the last time hidemyass was good was years ago.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Recommendations?

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I work for cradlepoint, grass roots company now potential IPO cantidate. Check us out. https://cradlepoint.com/products/cp-secure-vpn

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

F-Secure Freedome, no hassles, simple to use, and it being a Finnish company you avoid many US based risks regarding your privacy.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I've been looking at VikingVPN for various reasons, most notably lack of logs and plenty of obfuscation. I mean... no I haven't.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Tunnel bear

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

ZenMate. Very easy to use.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you for recommendations

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I use this one https://www.blackvpn.com/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Something that lets you pay in Bitcoin, or use pre-paid credit cards. Any that aren't in the US, UK, AUS, NZ or CAN.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

https://www.reddit.com/r/vpn sidebar.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Thanks!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thanks.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I use PIA, works fabulously for me. What's so "terrible" about it?

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

Used it before, capped at 20mbps (I have a 200mbps connection). It also kept forcing me to use PPTP rather then SSTP/L2TP. No good!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I said list. I use PIA. Although I am switching after my sub runs out as they've gone down in my opinion.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What would you recommend in that is in that price range and has the simplicity of PIA?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm going over to AirVPN. Better client. Better options. Better servers. PIA has been poor IMO for a while.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I use it PIA sometimes but it's US based so it has to obey US laws so it isn't the safest option.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

You can connect to any of their many non-US based nodes. PIA has been great for me regardless. Netherlands is my usual.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes they have to obey US laws but they don't keep logs. So the laws really don't matter

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

That's rich coming from GoldenFrog, who do log what you do and forward DMCA requests. I know they're transparent about it, still. Not ideal.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even still, I'm not too worried about the government coming after me for torrenting backyard sluts pt.9, just my ISP.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

It doesn't matter, if a government wants to know about you, they will found out. I use VPN to hide from copyright trolls when I torrent.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1