Another loss for the Orange Skidmark

Mar 4, 2026 9:27 AM

AyatollahBahloni

Views

12047

Likes

257

Dislikes

5

As a child of New York City, I know this is unpopular with some people, but given the congestion of a growing metropolis, I always thought it made sense. The Orange Fuckstick came out against it with a knee-jerk reaction when it was implemented, not because he understood a fucking thing about the dynamics or economics but probably because someone with a vested interest and lots of money whispered something in his ear. So I was glad to see him humiliated on this front.

Any loss for the Orange Twatnacho, anything that makes him mad, anything that shows him that he's not King of the Universe, is a good thing in my eyes.

Fuck You, Donald Trump. Fuck you in the ass. With a cactus.

Cat tax: Our sweet demon in her lair (now gone to Hell to bite other demons in the ass for not being as evil as they might)

congestion_pricing

fuck_trump

judicial_win

new_york_city

politics

The party of small government sure likes the federal government to butt into a lot of state and city issues

4 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Congestion pricing works.

4 months ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

He is a man who knows how to waste other people’s money and drive his own businesses in the bankruptcy.

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Excuse me, what did the cactus do to deserve this fate?

4 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The cactus is a noble martyr for the sacred cause.

4 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Congestion pricing has been a huge win. It was controversial beforehand, but seeing it in practice convinced most skeptics. And of course, it is absolutely none of the federal government’s business.

4 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"Everything is mine! Mine!" - The Orange Fuckstick

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And this is why even the lawsuits matter. Every single one.

Sure hell ignore any he can

But many he can't. And many the rank and file won't ignore when they actually do their jobs. And it ties up resources that might be spent doing something even worse.

This is why we need to fight and resist *in every way possible*. In the streets with signs or molotovs, in court rooms with lawsuits, in red tape and everything else.

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh he will just file a new case. After all he can do anything without consequence. People just need to stop listening to him

4 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If the purpose is honest and the money goes to the city, then I see no problem with it. The problem is in other places those are not true. On Seattle’s East side is a highway 405 where toll lanes have been put in simply to increase the average speed of the freeway. Not to make lives better but to receive more federal highway dollars based on the average speed. Also, Washington state doesn’t get the money. Some company in Arizona does.

4 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Source? Because everything I have read on Washington's toll roads is that it's handled by the "Good to Go" system which is managed by the state of Washington Department of Transportation, and that the funds gathered for it pay for road maintenance and construction.

I couldn't find anything about an AZ company being connected and the comment honestly sounds like a typical conservative "I heard someone claim a negative thing about a gov program and repeated it without verifying" conspiracy junk.

4 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I retract that last bit if inaccurate. Referring to the Texas based company that handles the tolls. Again, just saying I hope the op one works out well.

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A severe congestion in his intestines please, until he pops. Good riddance.

4 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

as long as congestion pricing does turn into surge pricing at the grocery stores

4 months ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Is there a link between the two that I'm not aware of?

4 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Precedence. It is almost assured that court precedence on one will be used to support the other, as they've classically been tied together. It's one of the reasons why Surge Pricing on delivery apps hasn't been fully shot down in court yet. They use "undue load on merchant traffic infrastructure" to 1-to-1 compare it to "undue load on physical traffic infrastructure".

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Do you have a citation for this?

4 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Okay, I'll bite. How does:

A fee on entering an already congested metro area, which has direct impacts on travel speed, air quality, and road damage

Correspond to:

Surge prices in privately owned business, where an increased # of customers has essentially zero impact on the store's operating costs AND the tiny amount that they DO impact operating costs is already offset by the fact that more customers means more income for the business?

4 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Whoo hoo! I live in NY and take an express bus to work. Congestion pricing has cut ~10 min from my commute

4 months ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 0

Congestion pricing is a tax on the poor

4 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 32

User account location: not NYC, that’s for sure.

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Tell us you don’t actually know what you’re talking about without saying it.

4 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

then lets improve public transport so damn much that nobody even wants to drive :)

4 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Are you retarded? Pretty much only rich people have cars in nyc. Poor people take public transit.

4 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yes, all those poor people who ... own cars in ... New York, and ignore the cost of their time, and ignore all the other poor people who gain from it.

4 months ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Ok big fella. I need a car for work, I absolutely cannot do my job without it, and I’m definitely not rich

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

So just a down vote but no counter argument. Cool

4 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

It's a good deal for NYC, but I kinda feel like it just keeps the 'poors' out of the city. Would be nice if the surcharge could be tied to your income...

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The ‘poors’ don’t drive their personal cars from the suburbs through congestion zones into the city. They live here and hop the turnstile like god-fearing New Yorkers.

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So, those thousands of commuter cars lined up on Brooklyn and Queens streets are owned by rich people? My Dad drove into Manhattan every working day of his life and we were far from 'rich'...

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

fdr, west side highway, and battery tunnel are free

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

queens midtown will literally get you a rebate, as will holland and lincoln

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

of all the very, VERY good reasons to say people are being priced out of new york, this is simply not one of them

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Only a dozen or so people work for the Bridge and Tunnel Authority in those areas, the thousands of commuting shop and resturant workers can't just park in the tunnels and ride the R Train to work. The only reason I took the subway is because I lived on the lower West side and took the L and A to work at the MONH...

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I believe congestion pricing punishes the public for governmental infrastructure failures, but I am also satisfied if it pisses off Trump.

4 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

There is no possible way to provide enough roads/parking in a large city for everyone to drive their own car. Providing better public transport is the only option. Taxing the use of the road to provide the better transport is a good government policy.

4 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Public transport is infrastructure.

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If NYC does not have public transit infrastructure, or “failed public transit infrastructure,” we should just give up now because everywhere else in the country is worse than here by a country mile. Many places in the DEVELOPED WORLD are worse than here by a country mile.

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Downvote me if you want, how does your 24/7 subway system run? Is it smooth?

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Does it sometimes smell like piss while it’s taking you across the city in one fell swoop at the ass-crack of dawn?

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Congestion pricing for NYC (Manhattan) was inevitable. Other international cities use it with success.

I just find the way it was implemented to be a bit severe. It would've been nicer to have prices a bit lower and just raise them gradually over time. I also think the zone perimeters need a "grace period" time. Let's say you cross over it by mistake, or have to because of traffic, but then leave within a few minutes. You shouldn't be charged. Also 1 time per day should be implemented.

4 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Your grace period idea would simply lead to many people "accidentally" cutting across congestion zones...leading to congestion.

4 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, this is the danger. Also perverse incentive for speeding, cutting people off, driving recklessly to get out under the grace period.

4 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The reason why we can’t do it like this is the exact reason people were so scared of congestion pricing in the first place, chaos theory and the mass of variables involved in automotive traffic makes even a small change potentially massive over time.

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The borders are water on all but one side. And that one side, Manhattan's 60th street, is a block north of Central Park's lower border. I presume that was deliberate, so that the very busy 59th street at the park edge was included. You're unlikely to cross the border "on accident" except for 4 blocks west of Central Park and 5.5 east.

4 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They already cut the prices more than they should have at implementation. Manhattan below 60th is just about the most transit-dense place on Earth. There are vanishingly few people who actually have any reason to drive a private car there. The last thing we should be doing is coddling the moneyed idiots who can't bear the thought of sharing a vehicle with- gasp shock horror!- the POOR people.

4 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I’m always blown away by people who drive cars in the city because 1) you don’t have to, and 2) it’s honestly a massive inconvenience if you aren’t filthy rich. Parking is all paid and metered relentlessly by people who you’d really think would have more important stuff to do, your commute immediately becomes like 15-20 minutes slower because driving is a nightmare. If it’s UN day or the marathon or pick another city event, it’s a fucking disaster.

4 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Have you seen the prices for Uber and Lyft lately?

There are times I've checked prices for such a service and find their prices astronomical. Cheaper to drive in. And yes, you can take public trans... but if you're lugging some necessary things and have a time crunch, it's not feasible.

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Then if you’re hauling and on a deadline, use the congestion zones. They’ve been freshly cleaned out of jackoffs who don’t need to be there, it’ll be a faster ride!!!! This was, in part, exactly for this purpose!!

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0