Psychology

Nov 21, 2016 2:13 PM

DoughBoar

Views

241853

Likes

7337

Dislikes

686

the_more_you_know

#40 = Batman

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This has fuck all to do with psychology

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

#3 is kinda right. it's such a strange thing but damn! It's a real thing

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nope

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

#2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

People who feel emotions tend to feel emotions more than people who don't feel emotions.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

how the fuck would you know that hearing is the last sense you lose when you die? Jesus, shitposting taken to the extreme.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Posting intellectual sounding bullshit, that borders on mysticism, without a source? Call it psychology!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

So are deaf people already dead?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

#15 v

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

"Psychology"

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Don't mind reposts if they're good. This one is not, and this is like the 4th or 5th time in six months. Leave it the fuck out.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Psychology major here.. do not listen to these

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

I just found out I am an eccendentesiast who suffers from lalochezia and dysania.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

#12 why yes other Barry it does

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#3, I teach Latin, so I guess I can be creative like people 200 years ago!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So many of these are like buzz feed cliff notes of actual facts. Some only have the topic correct.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

So linguists are more likely to suffer from anxiety and depression because they are creative enough to feel pain?

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

on the bright side, slower rate of alzheimers.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Facebook is over ------------------------------------------------------>

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The "first impressions can be changed by spending more time with a person" one? Is dumb. It's called a "first impression" for a reason.

10 years ago | Likes 186 Dislikes 5

When I first met my wife, she hated me. I give shitty first impressions.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If you spend enough time with someone and they develop dementia or Alzheimer's, then you could change their first impression of you

10 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

Well not necessarily, while I do agree there is a lot of nonsense in this post; it could be true that positive exposure over a longer 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Period of time could lead a person to confabulate their first impression into something more positive: no such thing as static memory

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Got any references for that? I'd like to read about it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fancy comment is fancy.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Proper use of the English language is refreshing*

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Um ...

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

Psychologist here. Please ignore this post.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

Fellow psychologist here. Stuff like this makes my toe nails curl up backwards.. So. Much. Pseudoscience. Bullcrap.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Don't worry, most people here are pretty aware

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

OMFG NOT PSYCH - Psychologist and Neuroscientist have spent years crafting a wonderful science mapping the brain and predicting behavior

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

Its these types of posts that make psychologists look like jokes!

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

I could do a whole big talk about how awesome the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology are and how they have evolve

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Please do!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is not psychology. This is buzzword shit. Source:my gut

10 years ago | Likes 159 Dislikes 5

Which is never wrong! Trust your gut!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The only thing my gut tells me is when to go potty.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

#2 The correct term is "Imgurian".

10 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 7

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

That's the spirit!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#2 is spelled "Eccedentesiast" and pronounced "imgurian". Sorry @HighSlayerRalton, i stole your joke.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Little known fact: all jokes originated with me, and were slowly but surely whiled away by practical Prometheuses.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#10 That's not psychology, that's just down to our having more senses than just sight. We're not telepaths.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 5

10s actually true, learned/studied it in Psych Stats. It's more complicated than the statement made, but it is statistically significant

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Probably based on Dean Radin's work which is has been debunked and makes him a laughing stock, it's not true.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Shit like this gives psychology a bad name

10 years ago | Likes 238 Dislikes 4

Psych already has a bad name imo

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

No kidding

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Shot through the heeeart.. sorry

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

And op s to blame

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Shit like gives phycology A BAD NAME

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You, uh, missed a word there buddy.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yaaaaaa, these sound like pseudoscience.

10 years ago | Likes 947 Dislikes 9

the language one checks out, I speak 3 languages and am at least 3 creative

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

You are now +1 upvote too.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The regular use of two languages does inhibits the onset of Alzheimer's by about 5 years. Source: Linguistics Major

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Inhibit* goddamnit

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

#10... I know it feels real, but unless you hear them or something, how on earth could that actually be possible?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A few are, some I could believe if I saw the article that proved them.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

Never trust an article. Read the actual study, not the science magazine report about the study.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Buzzfeed never lies.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Some are. Some aren't even psychology.

10 years ago | Likes 256 Dislikes 1

Yeah, some are correct, most don't seem to be.

10 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 3

Like the one about sensing other peoples' watching you?

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 1

No, that ones true. Its called Gaze-Sensing Reflex. But for it to work, they have to be within your field of vision

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Long story short. Specifically designed cells in the brain can detect someone's vision based off their sclera

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Most are. It's been on tumblr for years, and most fail a fact check.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I didn't even make it through the list and I can confirm that many of these are too farfetched to even be pseudoscience

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Some are accurate, some are half-truths... e.g. #9 would work on simple tasks, anything requiring concentration and it'd be detrimental

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

but I would LOVE to know how the hell anyone is meant to research #18

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"If something feels wrong trust yourself" yeah your whole post feels wrong....I'm torn

10 years ago | Likes 141 Dislikes 4

1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hahaha well done! +

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It's pretty bullshit. No longer friends with someone who had a gut feeling and started ignoring me. I got upset they said they were right.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Basically ignored me so I'd get upset then validated their gut feeling because of it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They are. Source: I have a PhD in cognitive psychology. These are bullshit or mis-telling of things that are half true.

10 years ago | Likes 101 Dislikes 2

I am also interested

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Leaving this here, because I'm interested, as well.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Can you elaborate? I'm interested

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

did my best above. There's a lot of them and comments are not the place to easily discuss science!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Makes sense. Didn't know if you had any immediate examples

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So I don't really have space but to elaborate for instance - the attention span thing. Attention is complicated. That time come from 1/?

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Studies where you're given a task to complete. but I mean, you pay attention all the way through a film so clearly bullshit 2/?

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Or humans and cats having identical regions for emotion - that's just wrong. Emotion isn't solely located to start with 3/?

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Cats have much smaller and less complicated brains, and if they mean we both have amygdala then that includes a LOT of animals 4/?

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

It pretty much is pseudoscience I would say like 1/3 of psychology is solid science.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

This is either a great use of irony or blind ignorance.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sounds like someone is a psychology major and thinks their degree is worth something.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Haha. Your initial statement has no evidence behind it. You've just stated an untrue opinion, whilst discussing "solid science". Hypocrisy.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not really practical to state an opinion/fact and then list off sources in 140 characters, nor should I be expected to.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

My example of pseudoscience in psychology is Jane Elliott. Treat someone poorly and they react to that... that's science? OK.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1