In 100 years, Russia has attacked 19 countries, while no country has attacked Russia during the same period, according to Kaja Kallas, High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy

Nov 28, 2025 2:34 PM

UNITEDMEDIAUA

Views

109883

Likes

719

Dislikes

31

"None of THESE countries has ever attacked Russia". Nazi Germany is obviously excempt in this context since it attacked Russia and started the war, and Russia was fine with the Nazis until they did.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How many has America attacked?

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Germany? Germany is and was a country when it attacked Russia in 1941. Sure, Russia is a big cunty pop-poo-head of a country, but let's not just lie about shit like this.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The rich are about to cull the heard.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I totally agree Russia sucks. I am curious how many counties USA has attacked in that same time.

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So when are 19 countries going to attack Russia?

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can’t wait for the US history books to footnote this as 19 wars Trump has personally solved in the last 100 years /s

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Didn't Germany attack Russia during WWII?

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The actual video says something different than the (wrong) post title.

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

She is a badass

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sounds to me like it's high time they got a taste of their own medicine. Ramp up the kinetic sanctions, as Zelenskyy called them. ;)

9 months ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

It depends on what you mean by "attack." For example, the US has been under a major propaganda and mis- and disinformation attack, as well as their efforts to subvert American politics through Citizens United and manipulation of politicians through money. If you're just talking Russia, then you have to exclude the Soviet Union, but if you include the latter, then you get to include countries like Germany. It was Soviet Ukrainian troops who entered Berlin first. Then there's the question of -

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

applying this question to other nations. How many countries did the US attack in the last 100 years? Are we talking about aggressive expansion of empire? Military intervention? Large scale invasions? There are a lot of ways to cut this pie to get different answers.

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I dunno, I think the Nazi attack on Russia in 1941 counts as an "attack".

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

https://youtu.be/9I-UZiLTQNs?si=mxTS_-4C11Gp47yP

Kaja Kallas is the same person that claimed Russia winning WW2 was "something new".

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Now do the USA!

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I mean... I'm as anti Russia as you can be, but @OP's title is fucked, whereas the clip is correct.

9 months ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 1

Agree. Significant difference between "no country has attacked Russia during the same period" and "none of these countries has ever attacked Russia".

9 months ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 1

Well Germany attacked Russia and Russia then attacked Germany.

9 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

True.

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Are you sure that she counted Germany among those 19 countries? If she didn't, she might be correct. The total number of countries that Russia attacked (including the ones that attacked Russia) might be higher. I haven't researched the numbers though.

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That says nothing of the post truth asymetric feces they have poured into every open communications system in the world. They've shitified the planet so they could sit at the big boys table.

9 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Let's count them and their population : Poland (40M), Finland (5M), Latvia (2M), Estonia (1M), Lithuania, (3M), Romania (6M), Afghanistan (14M), Moldova (3M), Georgia (6M), Ukraine (40M). The others were "internal" to the Warsaw Pact (Hungary, Czechoslovakia), internal to the Russian federation (Chechnya) or part of a larger conflict (Mongolia, Iran, China, South Korea). I got 17 and missing 2 but the evidence is clear, they are a bully and they mostly fail against larger countries.

9 months ago | Likes 93 Dislikes 2

*Azerbaijan and Armenia

9 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

bullies almost always fail afainst anyone close to their size who actually know how to fight

9 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

The one I saw you missed was Syria still not sure what the last one is

9 months ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

Germany? They got to Berlin first in WW2

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

True but they were attacked by Germany first... they just defended really really well

9 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That’s not accurate. Winter defended Russia really really well. Russians died like dogs.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Azerbaijan

9 months ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Germany invaded Russia in 41? So 84 years?

9 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

None of the 19 countries attacked in the last 100 years, of which Germany is not included in…

9 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Just replying to the text in the title: "In 100 years, Russia has attacked 19 countries, while no country has attacked Russia during the same period"

9 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Same. The video isn't much clearer in this clip, but I *think* the intent was "Russia has attacked 19 sovereign nations that had not attacked Russia first." But, yes, the title is misworded for sure.

9 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

She says Russia has attacked 19 countries and non of these countries has attacked Russia. How is that not clear?

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Technically no as at that time Russia was just a part of the USSR, but that's spitting hairs

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Did you mean splitting heirs?

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Did you mean splitting hares?

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Mayhaps, although I've only ever heard hairs before

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's splitting hairs, not not spitting.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The only thing you've ever heard is hair?

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately not only the OP title is wrong, she is as well. Several of those countries (or earlier installments of them) *have* attacked Russia in the past. She’s giving the Russians an opening to use their usual schtick and focus on this error and conclude that these Europeans are just spreading lies against poor Russia and ignore all else.

9 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Which ones? When?

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Earlier installments of Poland, Lithuania and Hungary have attacked Russia at some point. Since she included the USSR while counting Russian attacks, the same method of counting should apply the other way as well.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can you give me a source? I would love to read more about it

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Are you perhaps considering the Soviet Union as Russia?

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If they didn't have nukes they'd have been stomped into the ground ages ago.

And with how pathetic everything else in Russia is most of those probably aren't even functional.

Unfortunately even one glowing crater is too many so we have to sit and play footsies with them instead of forcing a regime change.

9 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

And even non-functional nukes can become dirty bombs (which can be worse in some ways).

9 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

True, though to be fair, if they didn't have nukes they wouldn't have tried any of this shit to begin with. It's their "pass" to go in and their "threat" to being forcibly withdrawn.

9 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

if Russia was a person, they would be jailed for life, if not executed. Maybe it's time to exterminate their leadership and let them start clean. Ditto for the united states.

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Sure, Operation Barbarossa was just a picnic.

9 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Peaceful tourists, like all nazis

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

ww2 was just a german special military operation /s

9 months ago | Likes 238 Dislikes 17

Right? Extreme levels of Hitler particles here.

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

The invaded Poland and the allied with Germany, so fuck them

9 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

She said that the 19 countries that were attacked by Russia in the last 100 years never attacked Russia. Presumably, Germany wouldn’t count here as Russia acted in self-defence and didn’t attack Germany outside of WWII.

9 months ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 1

Germany attacking Russia wasn't self defense. They betrayed an alliance at the time to attack Russia. At the very least @OP's title is wrong.

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

The fact we're all arguing about it tho does mean her wording could probably have been a little more clear.

9 months ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

Her wording is clear. The headline is not, but that's also not verbatim what she said.

9 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Ehhh... she has also recently publicly mocked the idea that China fought in WW2. Kallas is an idiot. We don't have to play that little "She's on our team, so we'll defend anything she says" game.

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Got a reference on that? I seem to have missed those comments.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Probably true, but that ignores Finland. Two wars, the USSR attacked in 1939, Finland attacked in 1941, along with the Germans.

9 months ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

German here: Yeah that one was on us

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, the title is wrong and so are you. She said "none of THESE [=attacked] countries ever attacked Russia". In other words, Russia attacked 19 countries that never attacked it. I am not saying her statement is correct, but OP certainly misunderstood it.

9 months ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Okay, can we get a list of those 19 countries? It's not as if she in particular has a history of showcasing her ignorance of history.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I got to 12/13: Afghanistan, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia (now 2 countries), Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Poland, Romania, Ukraine. But you may also count Chechnya, Syria and other less obvious involvements. Her statement could have been better worded and supported, sure. Anyway, care to provide a source for her "ignorance of history"?

9 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

She recently publicly mocked the statement that China fought in WW2. Not the first time she said something dumb.

As to the lists, I ask, because I have seen lists passed around (you know, like the sharepicks of US wars/invasions/interventions, just with Russias wars) by the polish-baltic bubble and quite often, they tried to sneak stuff like a little "Germany 1944" in there. That's why my warning signals ring when I hear statements like that from that bubble. The anti-Russian sentiment in >

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Poland and the Baltics is more than understandable, but it is often very uncritical/unreflected to the point of being carried away into eally stupid bullshit, like conveniently forgetting that the "Grandpa that fought the Russians" waa wearing a black uniform with Sig-runes on it or more commonly, just going full fledged racist about it.

That we are faced with a russian revivalist/revanchist fascist Regime right now is not a card blanche to full on a chauvinist circlejerk.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd add Finland, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Iran

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Someone pointed out that Finland also attacked Russia. As for the other 3, two happened slightly over 100 years ago. Still, I never know Russia invaded Armenia, nor Iran. Thanks for letting me know.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Here's the equivalent list for the US:

9 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Nicaragua (1926–1933) – Military occupation.
Japan (1941–1945) – Declared war; bombings, invasion, nuclear strikes.
Germany (1941–1945) – Declared war; bombings, invasion.
Italy (1941–1945) – Declared war; invasion.
Morocco & Algeria (1942) – Invasion of Vichy territories.
France (1944) – Normandy invasion (liberation).
North Korea (1950–1953) – Korean War.
Iran (1953) – CIA coup.
Guatemala (1954) – CIA coup.

9 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Lebanon (1958) – Troop deployment.
Cuba (1961) – Bay of Pigs invasion.
Laos (1964–1973) – Aerial bombardment.
Vietnam (1965–1973) – Ground war and bombardment.
Dominican Republic (1965–1966) – Invasion/occupation.
Cambodia (1969–1973) – Bombardment and incursions.
Chile (1973) – Covert support for coup.

9 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Grenada (1983) – Full invasion.
Libya (1986) – Airstrikes.
Iran (1987–1988) – Naval attacks.
Panama (1989) – Full invasion.
Iraq (1991) – Gulf War invasion.
Somalia (1993) – Military raids.
Haiti (1994) – Intervention/regime removal.
Bosnia (1995) – NATO airstrikes.
Sudan (1998) – Missile strikes.
Serbia / Kosovo (1999) – Aerial bombardment.

9 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Afghanistan (2001–2021) – Invasion and occupation.
Yemen (2002–Present) – Drone strikes/raids.
Iraq (2003–2011) – Invasion and occupation.
Pakistan (2004–2018) – Drone campaign.
Somalia (2007–Present) – Airstrikes/raids.
Libya (2011) – Air and naval strikes.
Syria (2014–Present) – Airstrikes and ground forces.

9 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Not quite equivalent. I may be wrong, but I seem to remember the Japanese attacking us first, for example.

I'm not saying we aren't bastards who led a lot of these fights (we did), but Russia conquered the whole of eastern Europe and folded them into an empire. They're taking Ukraine for the land. How many of the conflicts listed here did the US use just to expand their territory? Influence, maybe (or to stop others from expanding their land or influence). But just to conquer, take, and keep?

9 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Y'all did a lot of taking and keeping as you genocided your way across the continent

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is not a question of being "bastards", I'm simply listing all overt offensive military actions of the US in the past 100 years, for perspective. Reasonable, I think. Of course one can argue that some, most or all of these were justified. Either way, Russia and other countries aren't acting in a geopolitical vacuum.

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

German here. I hate to say it but that thing with Germany 41-45 was kinda our own fault. (Sorry, btw.)
Seriously, I can't blame anyone for attacking the Nazis. I even wish they'd done it earlier.

9 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's not really the discussion here. Obviously every single attack, coup or invasion can be justified by one perspective or other. This post only lists the number of offensive military conflicts Russia (or the Soviet Union) has been involved in over the past 100 years. For perspective, I've posted a list of the equivalent number for the US. I'm not saying that Russian military policy was justified, or that the US policy was not. 1)

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

What I am saying is that the US has been involved in the largest number of offensive military operations of all countries over the past 100 years. When speaking of the actions of Russia, China, India or any other of the key international players, this is relevant to keep in perspective. The US is, by far, the most warlike nation on the planet. And I'm not sure American schools teach the specifics of that. 2)

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Now do the USA.

9 months ago | Likes 155 Dislikes 36

No thanks, it's got the maga trumps. I don't want to catch that.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They weren’t “attacks”… they were “special military assistance operations to help take down… er overthrow… er remove non-democratically-aligned leaders from countries with great resources… er people”

9 months ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

What-aboutism is never a good look. The USA invades other countries, yes. But *IN GENERAL* if the USA has a treaty they are actually upholding it most of the time. Any treaty with Russia makes the paper it was written on less valuable.

9 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

US is the new Britain. Minus theft of artifacts, just theft of oil, and their democracy.

9 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Bah! America is easy:

9 months ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

I think a lot of countries are like this. Doesn't make it ok though.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

38 by my count.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What are you pro Russian?

9 months ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 14

No. I'm sure Kaja Kallas knows the USA did the same (read: much worse) but she simply can't mention it to avoid the current fascist us regime going even more anti EU and pro Russia. There was a post the other day were it was explained, with facts, the USA is a country of war for profit. Btw... no European country is clean either. This world is a mess...

9 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

It was a sarcastic comment bud

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thats incorrect. Russia invaded Ukraine to completely end its statehood, and annex the territory. There's also reason to believe they intend to commit genocide. No US war in the last 100 years was like that.

9 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

Are we living in the same world? The US started so many wars, most people can't even count em all.
Their history is filled with war crimes and crimes on humanity, much worse than what Russia is doing in Ukraine right now. But as the US doesn't accept intentional law and the ICC they just get away with every shit every time.
Because nobody can force his ridiculous war monster country to follow the law.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

While true, bringing it up in this context makes it seem like you're trying to deflect from Russia's crimes with "whataboutism".

9 months ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 12

If one military super powers invasions are being listed, also listing another's is putting things into context, rather than "whataboutism".

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 10

Not when the specific topic is that country's current invasion and everyone there is an expert on geopolitics and doesn't need such basic context.

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Russia hasnt been a military super power in a long time.

9 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yeah, you have a point. When I see a pot accusing the kettle they are black I kinda have to say something.

9 months ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 52

I mean Kaja Kallas isn't American, she's from Estonia.

9 months ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 1

I mean... she's the European High Representative of Foreign Affairs... she won't say anything to upset the current us fascist government.

9 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 36

My point is that she's not a 'pot' then. She'd be the strainer off to the side.

9 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Not all of us feel the need to pick a preferred dictator. They are all shit. I swear Americans need to make everything about themselves. The US wasn't mentioned in this post.

9 months ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3