"If it's Boeing I'm not going"

Mar 12, 2024 12:50 AM

Reminds me of the MCAS incidents, but I don't think any of the 787 variants even have MCAS. Whatever it was, Boeing can NOT catch a break...

I experienced Clear Air Turbulence a couple of times. Some surprising people used unexpected adjectives and nouns.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Lots to hate about Boeing right now, this isn't among them. Clear-air turbulence affects all aircraft sooner or later. For example, last year: https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/lufthansa-airbus-sue-passenger

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's important to note that while Boeing has a lot of issues with the 737-MAX, other aircraft types have been in service for quite some time, and problems with those are more likely with the airline's maintenance.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Had that happen on a school bus as a kid. Fricken hurts.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How to taint a whole brand.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Did they go... Boing off the ceiling?

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

I suspect it was more of a series of sharp cracks, a few dull thuds, and quite a bit of profanity along with some pleas for divine intervention.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is what happens when engineers are replaced by people wanting to make the maximum profit. Boeing has been unfortunately down the hill for years. Now it's just predictable consequences of its enshittyfication.

2 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

I was at Boeing when "Shareholder Value" became the #1 priority for engineering over "Air Safety" etc. Management's position was that things like safety and efficiency were ways to deliver shareholder value, but you can only trim so much excess weight and achieve so much optimization before the only thing left to do is cutting progressively less innocuous corners. The trajectory of 'shareholder value' was clear to us engineers, and we knew it was only a matter of time before it caused problems.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1