Felt cute, might pop a balloon later

Mar 16, 2023 11:31 AM

gtferrari

Views

1598336

Likes

1567

Dislikes

43

DCS
B-2 with F-22 Raptor Escorts

I genuinely thought this was footage of real aircraft until I read "DCS," fuckin insane how far sims have come.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

the 4th plane with camera is invisible from the ground

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

God, I love the look of the Sky Dinosaur and Death Boomerang.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Our jets are popping balloons meanwhile Russian Jets are killing drones --and blowing up over Ukraine

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Man, Russia is going to freak out when the US actually decides to respond.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It’s all they can do these dayz anyways

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

so that's what the pitot tube is for...

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Where ya goin’ cutie

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pfff, stealth, my ass. I'd see them coming from miles away. /s

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The Johnny Carson comment about about the stealth bomber having a radar signature resembling a flock of birds … going 700 mph. /s

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That would pop a balloon factory

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I know, I know, we could have a functioning public health system and housing for all these billions... but they're still hella cool

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Where would Ukraine be right now if it wasn’t for our military expenditures

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Off spreading the vapor trails making the frogs gay again I see. /s

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Horten bros. would have approved.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They both lived into the 90s and one of them became a officer in the new Luftwaffe so they might've seen it fly, nodding germanly.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It’s taken me almost a year to get hearing aids approved through the VA and watching this much money fly almost makes it worth it.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

say what you want about the military industrial complex (believe me I do) these are gorgeous works of engineering.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

IMO F-16 is also a beautiful aircraft. Love the canopy and sheer efficiency of design.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So many marvels of engineering are a result of wartime innovation.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Wouldn't the escorts usually be on either side, not both on one side?

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

What escorts?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Video game dude

3 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

This isn't a real tactical formation. You should never see your escorts

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I thought those multibillion dollar whiz bangs didn't need escorts. However, those ARE beautiful killing machines.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The sneaky Dorito.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I wish DCS has a n00b setting so you can fly and not crash. Enjoy Ai Tight Formation flying like Blue Angels. Fly over famous landmarks

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It's from a video game. The future is going to suck, the internet will just be renders and gullible people.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I knew those girls were high maintenance.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Cute title, might hit the front page later.

3 years ago | Likes 298 Dislikes 3

be careful of the russians, they may nudge you

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Star Wars canyon, not DCS

3 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

Where is star wars canyon?

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Death Valley National Park in Inyo County, California

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This clip desperately needs sound.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

heres where i stole it from https://youtu.be/SiAW6u4Yt1w?t=24 one day i might go back put sound in it, made this back when i didnt know how

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Comments are a mess when OPs don't mention the game/movie in the description because people mistake it for real. Turns out they still do.

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Or when all they say is "DCS" and most don't know what that is. I had no idea until the SR71 vid.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm more impressed than anything at how good graphics are when I didn't notice until I saw the amendatory comment. +1

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I like to believe that I'm somewhat perceptive, but this show how easily I can lose sight of the peripherals, because I focused on a thing.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Have an XB-71 as a nostalgia take.

3 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Wow that thing must have had really big wheels for those tail things to not hit deck

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Have an Falken because I wish it was real.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The complete opposite of stealth. Maximum radar cross section, flying as high and fast as possible.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I'm reminded of the SR-71. "Missile countermeasures? Nah just fuckin' floor it."

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

XB-70

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

XB-70 XB-71 whatever it takes.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yep, you’re right. Got in a hurry. Thanks for catching the mistake. v

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

FF tail code is Langley AFB. They always got the new shiny stuff.

3 years ago | Likes 149 Dislikes 4

These are cool and all, but I would rather we have socialized health care/education.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

Yeah, but it's DCS. Everybody that wants it has the shiny new stuff... or an old biplane.

3 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

I mean, the F-22 is like 25 years old at this point. It's almost too old for Leo to date.

3 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

I still would

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1) it's a combat flight sim 2) the B-2 is 33 years old and the F22 is 25

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Repotedly crap at taken care of them when other bases get one of their jets on loan.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They should get some new radios where you can actually understand the other person. Cmon! It's 2023 already!

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

If I were to guess, I’d say it was intentional and even edited. The footage shows only pretty planes, no other details.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

I thought FF was Luke?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

FF is 1st Fighter Wing at Langley.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The F-22 is a more beautiful aircraft than the F-35, fight me

3 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 1

And both are witihout question a huge waste of taxpayer $$$T dollars. Without Question.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why would anyone fight you on this? You're objectively correct.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Its way more beautiful and i shall not fight you sir!

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Whoa there with that "controversial" opinion there cowboy. Ok I'll go next. "Jennifer Lawrence is more attractive than Trump. Fight me."

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Different kind of plane. The F-22 is a dedicated air superiority fighter, it's sole purpose is to kill other aircraft. The F-35 is a >>

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

>> multi-role aircraft that can do a little of everything. To be clear, it sucks at most of them.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

anyone trying to fight you would (and should) lose.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Sadly, the YF-23 was more beautiful than the F-22

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Give me the YF-23

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But can it hover and be a gajillion dollars over budget? I think not.

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

F-22 is already discontinued

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

And in spite of being nearly 20 years before the last one rolled off the line, it is estimated to be another decade before it gets (1)

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(2)uniformly matched in performance.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

F-23 would've been even better...

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

the F15 / 16 / 18 series are prettier than all of them.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh, for sure. My personal favorites are the F14, F16, and F18

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Agree for f16 but not the other 2

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The F-35 is more versatile and cheaper per plane... but I can't disagree.

3 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

The F35 is less capable than the A10 for CAS, the F/A18 for carrier, and the F-22 for air superiority. Overbudget and pointless.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pure Air Superiority fighters tend to look cooler than multi-role aircraft. ;) (ps. i know the F-22 can do more than just AS, but still...)

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Ehh the F-22 got hit with a lesser version of the B-2 problem, small order pushed up the unit price well above where it should have been.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

more versatile is fair though.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To be fair, we also haven't had a need for a large number of F-22's.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sadly, only got 7 more years to appreciate it.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

They say that about every aircraft and then when they're too cheap to replace them they keep them in service for 50 years.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

A-10 liked your comment

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Eh, not sure it'll apply to the F-22. It's too expensive to fly and maintain. The tech is from the 90's and can't be upgraded. There's

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

too few of them, and they're too short ranged for the next predicted outbreak of war in the Pacific. Plus they've got a replacement coming

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Word is NGADS has accelerated design due to faster computer modeling. I just hope they can keep production smooth to keep $ down.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

down the pipe that, like the F-35, is meant to be able to grow and take on new tech.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the flying wing is a goddamn miracle of aerospace engineering

3 years ago | Likes 139 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Mar 16, 2023 5:59 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Original designed by Germans in WW2, it was wood then and would made it over the channel to London undetected.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Technology is pretty great. It’s easy to forget that all of this is miraculous I reckon.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sure is pretty on the outside…but it’s what’s on the inside that counts

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And without question an absolute waste of taxpayer $$$B dollars. Without Question.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Same for the B1 bomber. Pres Carter cancelled that program because USSR came out w look down shoot down radar rendering it useless.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If you haven't, read Skunkworks (And Bomber Mafia) both excellent books

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i did a book report in like 9th grade on skunkworks!

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

My grandfather worked there.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Old tech now can't wait for next gen.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Should be completely invisible for $2B per

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not a miracle. Just incredible engineering. It's flying because a computer is making it stable. Same as the F22s.

3 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 2

fly by wire!! I remember hearing about stability in fighter aircraft and wondered if the newer ones were stable or not. turns out not

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

“Relaxed aerodynamical stability” makes it more responsive. FBW makes constant corrections to follow the commanded attitude.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Afaik inherent instability helps with extreme maneuvers. It's just that we couldn't really exploit it until we had good enough computing.

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

The more stable an aircraft is the less maneuverable.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I love how it goes from tradeoff to pure asset once we could just brute force compute for stability when it's needed

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It’s also because stable shapes are much easier to detect with radar and these are stealth aircraft.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm pretty sure everything since the F-16 is impossible to control without the computers involved.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Was the F-117A not the first one to use computers for stability?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

F16 came before it, so doubt it.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe. I know that the X-29 with forward swept wings was flying with a computer in the 80s because it was unflyable otherwise.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How does that work?

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

A computer works with electricity, but thats not important right now.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The F22 computer is amazing. A kid could fly that plane. Just point the stick where you want the plane to go and the computer does the rest

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1/2 Simple answer, theres a VERY complex matrix equation (9x9) that represents all the ways the plane can be controlled. Aero engineers

3 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

2/2 solve that equation and then program the flight computer to solve it continuously while the plane is flying, in order to keep it stable

3 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Oh god a 9*9 matrix equation and not some piece meal Lagrange equation… my brain hurts just thinking about it…

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

like riding a unicycle - computers are always measuring the plane's attitude and adjusting the control surfaces to match the pilot's input

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

So those type of aircraft’s are sassy?

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Heh. More like high strung with a bit of ADHD.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0