He was asking for it tbh

Feb 16, 2020 7:09 AM

erdholden

Views

564044

Likes

7916

Dislikes

174

He was asking for it tbh

memes

funny

baseball_bat

preacher

Just to add more info, he was yelling this statement, with a megaphone, outside a high school when this took place

6 years ago | Likes 162 Dislikes 4

He was also arrested on assault charges himself at least twice that I know of.

6 years ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 3

I mean the guy is an asshole but we should not bash every asshole over the head with a baseball bat.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Aside from it being morally wrong I don’t think it’d work. It’d take to much time.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lol you’re righ

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Did he really tell her not to hit him with the bat? Or is he just saying this now because he regretted it the next morning?

6 years ago | Likes 348 Dislikes 14

Sounds consensual to me.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

“Preacher” = Loon who thinks middle eastern myths 3000-2000 years old should determine how everyone lives.

6 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 14

So most major religions in a nut shell

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 6

Look the blood even dried. See the body shut it down? He will be fine

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Update: he's now being forced to marry the bat.

6 years ago | Likes 90 Dislikes 4

Talk shit get hit

6 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 9

If God didn't want that to happen to him then it wouldn't have happened to him.

6 years ago | Likes 325 Dislikes 19

God was definitely like, “Fuck that guy!”

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Everything happens for a reason

6 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

Lets just agree please that this guy is an asshole and not bring imaginary friends into it

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

I don't know, seems very on point for Old Testament God.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Shouldnt have been dressed like that

6 years ago | Likes 1935 Dislikes 36

Never should have come here

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Understandable saying but there are also people who dress to feel "sexy" and feel creeped out after getting hit on and that too is a ???.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I said it's a understandable saying just saying some approach the saying incorrectly so that they can complain about the situation they know

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

They put themselves in

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

What was he wearing when it happened?

6 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 5

You mean what he WASN'T wearing.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

He was naked under his clothes, that wanton hussy.

6 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 2

It doesn’t matter that’s the point

6 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

Oh damn, I thought it said "shirt" and not "sign", so I thought the question was even funnier.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

A sign that said you deserve to be raped.

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

no helmet

6 years ago | Likes 101 Dislikes 2

What a slut!

6 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 1

No it was the sign carrying

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 24

Swing and a miss.

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

At least she didn't

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Whoosh.

6 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 4

Clearly you shouldn't hit people with bats. Now raping him, sounds like he's up for it

6 years ago | Likes 88 Dislikes 12

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes he's a total fucking (so many possible names) but assault with a baseball bat can land you in prison for 10+ years. He's not worth it.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Yep, Tabitha Brubaker was arrested and charged with felony assault. 5-15 years in prison. She ruined her life over that asshole.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

If God didn't want him to take a baseball hat to his head, then he wouldn't have allowed it. ~blessed~

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Go to the url, this is four years old. She was jailled at least until 2018 which is the latest article a cursory gooogle finds.

6 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 2

i mean it was assault with a deadly weapon _/(._.)\_

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

It's a shame they didn't take provocation more into account.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

if provocation was an excuse there would be quite a few people that would end up dead or beaten.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It is, in some jurisdictions. It's not a *complete* defense, but it does, where applicable, typically reduce homicide to manslaughter. »

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Poor bat, didn't deserve it.

6 years ago | Likes 605 Dislikes 23

That's not funny. Due to the recent accusations, that bat had to move. Think of its family!

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm sure its proud it could help

6 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 2

Trust me, they're fine with it.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

It was fulfilling.. The Prophecy

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

20 rapists downvoted you

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ya... That numbskull is thicker than the asphalt

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I hope he didn't catch Corona.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

His words said...” No , please no...” but his sign said “ Crack me in my stupid fuck’in head”.

6 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 5

I’ve heard the woman was an excellent competition swimmer, so she’ll be let off with a slap on the wrist.

6 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 11

it's four years old and she was jailed for at least two years. the latest article i could find was 2018 and she was still in jail then.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

Whoosh.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

It's a Brock Turner reference

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

I bet he wanted to be hit in the head at first but then regretted it later, tired of people like this crying assault.

6 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 5

i hope the woman is okay

6 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 18

I’ve heard she was an excellent competition swimmer. We wouldn’t want to damage her ability to compete by imprisoning her.

6 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 4

She should definitely be punished. As anyone else should get rightfully charged, no matter their job.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 13

Whoosh.

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

She'll probably be charged with assault.

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Yeah, this is an unjustified assault but it's typical of imgur that 90% of comments here focus on how he's a victim whereas on a post...

6 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 29

...about a woman getting hit for being aggressive, 90% of the comments will be "Equal rights, equal lefts" or something dumb like that.

6 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 25

You are entirely full of shit. This asshole guy received a bat to the head for words on a sign. The "woman getting hit for being (1)

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 20

aggressive" as you describe it, is getting hit by the person YOU hit first. Your gender does not make it OK to hit first. Ever. (2)

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 15

Yeah I said getting hit is never justified. But I've seen at least two posts here where a woman simply squares up to a man & gets hit first

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

The responses on those were pretty universally that she deserved it because if she wants to act like a man she should get hit like one.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

6 years ago | Likes 1112 Dislikes 28

Nit

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 2

6 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 2

"You got red on you" feels appropriate here!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unpopular fact: he's a real piece of shit for holding that sign but that doesn't justify fucking hitting someone with a baseball bat.

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Brother Dean, one of Tucson's more infamous residents. He would wander UA's campus following women around saying they were whores.

6 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 2

Time to set up a bat shop on the UA campus

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Super soakers filled with liquified Jenkem. If you’re going to spew shit at people it’s only fair to receive it in turn..

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How did he avoid stalking and harassment charges? Why didn’t the University charge home w/trespassing?

6 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

He did get kicked off campus occasionally (it's a public place, can't perma ban easily), and has been arrested at least twice I know of.

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

We banned Jason Kessler from many parts of uva campus I believe. Can’t be that hard if they really want to.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Dean Saxton, preaches misogyny 1) women are property 2) women deserve to be raped based on what they’re wearing 3) single-mothers are evil

6 years ago | Likes 213 Dislikes 14

I mean, have you seen Disney movies? Single step mothers be crazy.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Downvoters, he's explaining this guy's agenda, not agreeing to it. Expressing your discontent by downvoting is kinda... wrong :/

6 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 3

It’s sweet you assume that is why they downvote...

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

he sounds like an incel with a pulpit.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I wonder if he had a single mother.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

What if he had two mothers?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Could've just said that he takes the Bible seriously

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

This isn't taking something 'Seriously,' this is taking the 'Extreme', which is what this guy and others incapable of critical thinking do

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

So why does he matter?

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

I'll go one step further: Should have been late-term aborted.

6 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 7

Makes you wonder what they were subjected/exposed to during their formative years? Sad how something so pure, can become so hate filled

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 13

The phrase 'Post-term abortions' was invented to push fake moral outrage not so long ago. Just saying, it's an existing concept now.

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

I am not quite sure what you mean.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

In a perfect world, retroactive abortion would be legal until at least the 120th trimester.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

Cool motive. Still assault

6 years ago | Likes 220 Dislikes 92

Yeah, why does no one side with the ones condoning rape these days? /s

6 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 11

Are you taking about his sign or the attack?

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

Both really. But using your freedom of speech to condone rape is pretty horrendous. People are gonna people.

6 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

This is why we have juries, to give the law some interpretation. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

She has a not totally unreasonable grounds to self-defence under fighting words doctrine. He did say "you deserve" not "x-group deserves"

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

For example if someone approached you and said "you deserve as ass whooping" that is effectively a threat of violence which is assault.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

A threat of violence is “I’m gonna hurt you” you’re wrong.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

No I'm right, the definition of assault doesn't require the perp make an explicit confession but merely create the apprehension.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

None of that is how the law works. Even if someone hits you, it's illegal to hit them back unless you are actively defending yourself -

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

(2) If someone flashes a gun saying "I don't want to use this, so beat it" still assault even if they didn't literally say "I'll shoot you"

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Well that’s different because the person brandished a firearm. It doesn’t stand in a court of law.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

So is rape, Argument still stands

6 years ago | Likes 111 Dislikes 31

We disagree and i was assaulted once so because we disagree I'm entitled to rape you?

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 39

6 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 2

Yeah but the point is that 'they asked for it' isn't valid, right? So why would this woman do it herself?

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That both assault and rape are illegal?

6 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

Yes.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're on to something

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Good point. If someone tells you "you deserve an ass whooping" that's 'Fighting Words' that can mean "I'm gonna hurt you" which is Assault.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

No. It isn't. It is a threat, not an assault. But you would likely never find a court hold that judgement up... because it's too loose.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

A threat can be assault, don't mix it up with "battery". https://injury.findlaw.com/torts-and-personal-injuries/elements-of-assault.html

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What it means by "more than just words" is someone can't commit assault via the internet as they can't punch through the screen.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

this is insane and ppl condoning this shit are insane, too; 2 wrongs don't make a right, get a grip..

6 years ago | Likes 84 Dislikes 55

Entire society built on beating the shit out of people in your way... But this is insane.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 17

While it's objectively wrong it doesn't mean he didn't deserve it.

6 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 8

Yeah beating up people is the governments job, fucks sake people...

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 9

You're being sarcastic, but it literally is. We, as citizens, have granted the gov't power to enforce laws and jail us. Same thing.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

When did we do that? I must've missed the memo

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Are you unaware of the existence of police? Of jails? Of courts? All those are normal systems needed by every civilization in history.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No I'm well aware of them. I just wasn't aware we the people at any point gave them the right. They just kind of, did it.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

The vast majority of publically open nazis who got punched the fuck out have stopped advertising that shit.

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 8

Which is bad. You want these people in the open. Freedom of speech lets you know who the idiots are. Punching them didn't change them.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

fuck that. dont apply your own context. These assholes were applying actual influence to the open public and now that is gone.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

If you feel hitting people changes them cool. In the case of the story, she did 60 days and he is still a cunt out there with signs.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I am not saying talking with them will change them either. Some people are just cunts.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I know! Like when the germans were all invading everyone, but then we went and invaded them? We should have had a civil debate instead!

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 9

Sorry son, but you are strictly on the wrong side of this question. Hope you or no one you care about ever suffers sexual violence, cuz it’s

6 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 20

...evident that the concept of “rape” is a mere abstraction to you.

6 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 16

Don't let your emotions get the better of you. Just coz they think hitting him was wrong doesn't mean they think rape is ok or don't get it.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Fair, I DID let my emotions get to me. It’s hard to stop it when A) ppl treat it like a joke and B) I’ve seen the trauma it causes.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a consequence, I’m forced to conclude that such people are (thankfully) too far removed it to treat it with the gravity it deserves.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean really.. Why do people still pull that shit?

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

This is assuming assault and rape are equal crimes in your eyes? Which would be so fucking messed up.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

the 2 "crimes" here are assault and having a shit opinion. things dont have to be equal to say that neither is okay. neither is okay here.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

When is violence acceptable?

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

Never to these people, they will happily ignore the severity and sheer number of women raped but will flip shit when they attack people.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

Hey ya know when people say that sometimes dumbasses need to get hit for being dumbasses? This is one of those times.

6 years ago | Likes 1185 Dislikes 48

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes...

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

Not just for being dumbasses, for spreading dumpassiness

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Apr 12, 2020 10:20 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Love when the ultra conservatives bring this up. I remind them who has been shooting up Walmarts and such most lately.

6 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 6

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

In Germany, when the discussion is about right-extremist terrorism and people bringt up the RAF cause that's the last left-extremists we had

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

>> that would count as domestic terrorism.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Baader-Meinhof was 1970, and the last murder by the RAF in 1991. Latest right-extremist murder was last year. So yeah.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Wonder what the responses would be if the genders were switched.

6 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 13

Probably ignore the sign and come to the woman's aid

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 9

I'd still laugh.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

I sincerely doubt youll find any women holding signs saying someone deserves rape.

6 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 9

Lol! Women have run human trafficking organizations that kidnap young girls and force them into prostitution... This is ABSOLUTELY not >

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

>outside of the realm of what morally superior idiots are capable of...

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

And if you do, hit Sarah Palin with a bat and blame Obama.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

There's always room for more idiots . You wouldn't have thought a preacher would hold such a sign, but here we are.

6 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 9

If you showed me a sign like that my first guess would be a religious person.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah no totally would have expected that. Judging by the “God hates gays” and “you deserve hell” signs they’re carrying around nowadays.

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Please don't equate those Westboro bastards and wannabes with the rest of Christianity. Most of us aren't like that

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

In America I sure as fuck would lol, have you not paid attention for the last decade+?

6 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 4

Why, what happened?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

It's not. He's a dumbass with a sign. Same reason u don't attack WBC, he isn't hurting anyone. Just call the cops 4 disorderly and move on.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

There's nothing disorderly about holding up a sign, peacefully exercising first amendment rights.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I agree, but people who have a problem with anything, should call the police, instead of deciding themselves to intervene.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

What, and get someone killed?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The amount of times that happens, isn't statistically significant enough to even bring it up in the discussion.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

That's why you need a bat.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

If you don't want to be hit in the head with a bat the body has a way of shutting it down. He clearly wanted it.

6 years ago | Likes 3381 Dislikes 55

He wanted it, he was just playing hard to get. Little tease.

6 years ago | Likes 397 Dislikes 5

He should have stayed home. Respectable men don't go to places frequented by such people anyway. That dumb slut got what he deserved.

6 years ago | Likes 288 Dislikes 4

Yes, his body would have shut down and prevented him from getting an injury.

6 years ago | Likes 80 Dislikes 0

Yea, if he really didn’t want it why didn’t he stop her and just raise his arm. Its not hard.

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Was that politician reelected?

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I think he was.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

He’s no longer allowed at the Little League fields.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Steve Rogers talking about flying monkeys.gif

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

I often think rapists should have to undergo the same thing, but like, 5 burly guys or girls (whichever is least attractive) locked in a ..

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

room with them, not being violent per se, but just coercing and grabbing endlessly for however many days until they give in. That kids rape.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

*that kinda rape. The type to super fuck with your head and let you know how that feels.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Assault with a deadly weapon is a felony. Words should not drive people to act violently. If you do, and promote this, you're pathetic imo.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 79

Too rational for imgur. Just like that woman, they can't think straight and don't know what this mentality leads to.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 18

I wouldn't assault him, but I'm sure as fuck going to mock him. It's just words after all.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Self defense.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

did he write down the names and addresses of women who criticized him? no? then this argument is nonexistant.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

So, you're taking the position that broad threats against entire groups are acceptable?

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

there were no threats.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

I still can’t believe in this day and age that the whole “the body has a way of shutting it down” line was actually said by an actual human

6 years ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 0

We are sure it was said by an actual human?

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Not just a human, a human with some form of governmental power

6 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

i mean, technically you do. Its called arms. but i get the joke.

6 years ago | Likes 92 Dislikes 34

No.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Its also called Ducking.

6 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

I found this humerus.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Probably hoping for a lawsuit, or could just be a dumbass, the Westboro church has a tactic like this 1

6 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

2 most of their members, who are also family, are lawyers, they are a cult. 3

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

A cult is a small religion. A religion is a large cult.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The members try to provoke violence so that they are assaulted, then boom lawsuit, these suits won are what fund them.

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Don’t have to pay someone if they’re dead. This is why I don’t “throw down” because I can’t reign in after being unleashed :(

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Tonight on /r iamverybadass. Man cant reign it in after "throwing down"

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yeah he's a cunt but you cant just go around caving people in with bats

6 years ago | Likes 201 Dislikes 81

It was... assault and BATtery :D

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He asked for it, walking around with his bare head...

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Especially because bats can infect you with rabies. :)

6 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 11

Cujo

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Or coronavirus.

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

And ebola

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

You can, it's just not a very nice thing to do.

6 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 7

It would feel good, but brain damage usually increases levels of religious crazy, so ultimately self-defeating.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Just make sure you get a good connection. Really shoot for that coma.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Well, you can, but you have to be ready for the legal repercussions.

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

It's also a crime

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was fine till we got over populated with lawyers.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

You can if they're in some way politically maligned and therefore an irredeemable human. Just ask twitter

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 12

How in the living fuck is rape a political issue? What kind of backward ass bumpkin town are you from where rape is remotely debatable

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

well thats not just political. "you deserved to be raped" is a direct attack xd

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Are you suggesting that people saying others should be raped is now a...political issue? :/

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I remember learning in school that everything is political

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Well, it's frowned upon at any rate.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean he has a tiny trickle of blood and heads bleed everywhere normally so I wouldn't say he's been caved in, but I get the sentiment

6 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 10

Hit in the head with a baseball bat and blood running down your face? Psh tis but a scratch.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It could be enough to cause internal bleeding and swelling that can lead to death.

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Still not 'caved in'

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I understand your point. But, would it actually be a bad thing if that POS died ? He’s clearly not a constructive human.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

If he died then the person that attacked him is no better then him. Both spreading intolerance of another group. Better to use reason -

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

With that logic we are no better than the Taliban.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

to try to find a middle ground where they can both learn how to move forward in a peaceful way.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Would you extend that same sympathy to ISIS propagandists?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

You can't be serious. That's like comparing a fever to having cancer.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

How? Both say you deserve to be raped for being who you are.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

My father almost died from that kind of head wound so yes, I would. No one deserves to suffer that kind of injury.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No-one DESERVES any kind of injury.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fighting_words this is up to debate but by him phrasing it as "you" it crosses the line.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Into physical violence worthy of physical retaliation?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Depends on EXACTLY how he phrased it, did he phrase it as a threat, as in "you deserve an ass whooping", hard to explain in 140 characters.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Yes. Absolutely. God forbid you or someone you love get raped. But maybe then you’d understand.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

My sister was raped. The rapist did not commit the sin of talking, he raped someone.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

But bringing a bat might push it into premeditated assault.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Premeditation isn't a factor in assault nor battery.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No, but it definitely removes the fighting words defense.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No it doesn't. Fighting words isn't so much a "defence" but the constitutional basis for why the law can't protect all speech.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Are you gonna step in and defend him?

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 10

Yes, because there was a time people advocating for my race not being exterminated was as offensive as what he's advocating right now.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Only on the grounds like a piece of shit like that is just the sort to use that as an excuse to retaliate excessively to a fight he provoked

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Him as a person or his right to think and say shitty things without fear of violence? Because those are two VERY different things.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I was referring to the former.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'll defend his right to speak and not get beaten, yes

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 6

Me too. As fucking hideous as his thoughts are, Freedom of Speech protects him too. This gets lost on Imgur a lot. People want the (1)

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

system to ONLY allow speech they personally agree with and want to actively prevent anyone they disagree with from ever speaking. (2)

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

That is a Thought Police mentality. It's anti-freedom. It surprises me how many times I've had that debate on here. (3)

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Correct... and then call him a piece of shit.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes, then do that

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not what I asked.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

My apologies, what are you asking specifically?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Would you step in to defend this guy physically? As in put yourself in harm's way for him?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I agree we should aim to be beyond physical violence, though I cannot defend or condone hate speech.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

When does violence towards a person become something meritable?

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 7

This comes close.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Um, when they are committing violence against you.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When that person is evil. I think that description applies in that man's case.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Usually when it becomes justifiable, which is normally difficult. But protecting people from things like rape is always meritable.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

IMO - it doesn't. It may absolutely be the least bad thing to do out of a set of bad things to do, but that doesn't make it a good thing.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Fighting Words doctrine may give her a substantial defence especially as it was "you deserve" not "x group deserves".

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

That's a legal argument, but I would attest not a MORAL argument.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

The moral argument is much easier, but depends how deep you want to go. Morally the person approves of people being violently attacked.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

However he is allowed to be a hypocrite and he is allowed to demand hypocritical laws... but democracy doesn't work by threats.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

When a person is trying to instigate violence towards other people

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Killing Nazis?

6 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Mar 10, 2023 11:56 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Did they though... They seem to be back... and they're running the USA it seems.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Congratulations, you dont know what a nazi is

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

When the person upon whom the violence is being visited seeks to harm you or your loved ones. If someone looks me square in the eyes and...

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

So all people killed by drone are unmeritied, or anyone killed by cannons/bombardment?

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

...and says “imma wait in that bathroom, and when I see your son, I’m snatching him, and sodomizing him in a stall” and I know he’s serious,

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

...then he’s not going to even get a chance to do anything even remotely to that. It’s always been OK to defend yourself from threats.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I agree rape is abhorrent, but this asshole's sign isn't a threat. Saying something SHOULD happen to someone isn't directly threatening them

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

When that person is so irredeemably terrible that they are a stain on the species. Like someone cheerleading rape.

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 7

An eye for an eye and all

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A saying that only encourages escalation. You don’t have to worry about them coming for an eye if they are all blind. The cycle of vengeance

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Can only occur if there’s some who’s both capable and willing to come for revenge.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

People can learn and change. Remember that before you start cheerleading assault

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Do you say that before or after someones raped?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

They can, but the problem is they often won't unless directly confronted.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Who's morality standard do you wish to have applied to the answer?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Christian? Jewish? Muslim? Sikh? Hindu? Agnostic? Atheist? Zoroastrian? Buddhist? Taoist?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Your own, should you have one :)

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Then its a pretty low bar. I don't like setting high standards I can't maintain. :)

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

if i were a woman that got raped before and saw that disgusting dude with his sign, i'd shove the bat right up his ass.

6 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 9

And you'd have become that which you hate, a penetrative rapist.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 16

Honestly he deserves it.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

He deserved to be raped, then.

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

I guess you both deserved it then if you agree with him? Kind of awful.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 12

it's called karma. And he'd deserve that too

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

He's the one preaching it, he obviously wants to be raped. Practically begging for it with that sign.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Did he deserve it? Yes. Was it the right thing to do? No.

6 years ago | Likes 190 Dislikes 50

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Feb 16, 2020 11:42 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I mean, probably a spit in the face would have been fine

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

In my experience no lube is more painful for the dude fucking than the dude being fucked

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

...Not if you use a broom handle...

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

No one said it had to be a dude. How about a cactus?

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Thinking outside the box, i like it

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Hell, since a baseball bat was already in the picture... just use that.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Depends how he said it. Just like how if someone told you "you deserve as ass whooping" can be a threat you're justified to respond to.

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 15

6 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 7

"I'm not saying I condone it, I'm just saying I understand."

6 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 5

Looking more into the guy, yes I’d say it was the right thing to do. In the name of humanity.

6 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 9

It wouldn't have been the right thing to do to Hitler... Nobody is above the law, it makes you just as bad as the other person...

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 13

Just as bad? No. Sorry. You can argue I shouldn’t assault the guy but you’d be wrong to equalize the offenses.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

True, I suppose the person that assaults someone is worse then the person who only holds a sign. Don't get me wrong, he's a terrible >

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

>person for that, but stupid people don't know their opinions are stupid, if we allow what she did, we allow stupid people to attack >

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Right thing and lawful thing are not synonymous. Legality does not define morality. And the moral thing here is up for debate and subjective

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

True, but people with stupid opinions don't know they have them. So if we allow this, we allow people with stupid opinions to attack people>

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

>that have normal opinions... That's dangerous AF... Only reasonable thing is to disallow all assaults, deserved or not...

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

All it takes for evil to triumph, is for good men (mankind) to do nothing.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

You’re right of course, Debbie Downer :)

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 10

Was it the right thing to do? Yes. Was it legal? No. Should it be? Probably not, but there *should* be other ways of dealing with him.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He got what he deserved and that's not right? Right and legal are different. The law often lacks justice.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

but most important : was this a useless but fun thing to do ? YES !

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Neither is telling human beings they should get raped

6 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 4

There is a difference between being an idiot and being violent. There is no law requiring US citizens to not be racists, sexist, or +

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

or believe dumb things. But if your condone violence because it's against people you don't like, don't be surprised when people who are +

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

really good at violence and believe insane things start killing their political enemies. Fascism breeds fascism. Don't use violence on +

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

peaceful people, but don't be scared to use violence when necessary.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

The phrase "I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend your freedom to say it" comes to mind. Freedom of speech applies even here.

6 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 17

Yelling at people with a megaphone that they deserve to be sexually assaulted is not protected speech, its harassment and disturbing the

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

peace. If you're going to try to advocate free speech, please learn what it is first.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Yeah and when people break the law what do you do, hit them with bats or call the fucking cops?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

No what he did was harassment of minors. Potentially a sex offense since it was sexual in nature.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Freedom from repurcussions is not guaranteed in the Constitution.

6 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 6

True. And it's important to remember that the constitution only protects you from direct government action.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

No but it is protected in the law. You can't go around assaulting people because you don't like the things they're saying.

6 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 9

Yes you can. You just go to jail for it. ;)

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2