How can you tell a Republican is lying? Read their tweets...

Jan 12, 2021 9:30 PM

overworkeddad

Views

693

Likes

42

Dislikes

11

https://twitter.com/RepMoBrooks/status/1347171347043115008?s=20

lying_gop

corrupt_politicians

gop_pos

i_need_whiskey_fir_this_shit

Less Mo Brooks and more Mel Brooks.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Relevant. v

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So the MAGAtards are so easily duped that they willing followed agitators in to an attempted coup?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I know how to tell, you can see their lips move.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is mando the evidence?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The evidence was intentionally cropped misleading pictures that with actual context line up with the fact that these people were MAGA folk

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

How desperate do you need to be to claim antifa did this. You saying antifa went deep cover for years in preparation for this?

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Fascist Antifa? Evidence follows? This should be good for a laugh.. * checks tweet * ..well that's disappointing. The evidence was.. /2

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

2/ .."bigger boys did it and ran away". Which, I have to say, in terms of evidence is probably stronger than the "rigged vote" nonsense.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Mo Brooks is as guilty as the rest of them.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

No shame, no sense of hypocrisy and no empathy in the simple mind of republicans.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1/2 So I'm not saying it's stupid as fuck to think antifa organized a right wing protest to an election the left won, that there isn't a

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

2/2 single shred of proof of antifa involvement other than continued claims from right wing apologists, but I sure am thinking it loudly.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

His evidence is "Someone told me".

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

It works for Trump

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"fascist anti fascists"

5 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 2

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Aren't we're all supposed to be anti-fascist? Like, does the right really admit to being fascist and that it's good thing?

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Let’s say he’s wrong (most likely is) but what is so bad about waiting until investigations are done and we have scientific info?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 14

yeah, thousands of known far-right personalities livestreaming the event like WE OUT HERE isn't enough.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Because the evidence is there and that is the tactic of the right to push it down the road until it is forgotten.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

there IS a mass doxxing incoming from the parler leak that was (or will be) transmited to the FBI, evey step of on how it was orechestrated

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

and the names+ID'S of some of the perpetrators are there too,also as @alwaysupvoteprincessbride said, they livestreamed themselves

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Making baseless claims is a tactic to ultimately discredit findings they don't like. The right does this all the time, and it works.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

1) This type of speculation poisons the well and encourages conspiracy theories. 2) What scientific info do you think needs to be gathered?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This isn't that though. He's not waiting. He's spreading made up bullshit. You can't lie, then when people condemn you be all "we dont kno"

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Occam's razor. "We did what we said we would & got caught" vs "false-flag deep cover op to shame a side that already lost the election"

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because there's a good chance Trump will try this shit again in the mean time.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

We can’t base events off of what we think will happen again, but only on scientific proof. I get where you’re coming from tho.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

The military, Stock market, insurance, safety measures... all things based off of what we think will happen again.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Seems like far Right and Left majorities like to jump to conclusions before all evidence is processed and out. That seems pretty stupid lol.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 17

lol at downvoting siding with scientific proof. This is the problem with far right/left extremists.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 12

Stupid both sides argument is stupid

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What, in your mind, would constitute evidence? This was all done live, on camera, and with mountains of photographic proof....

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure anything that gives any excuse to pass blame would be the only thing acceptable.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Because it's a disingenuous tactic meant to prevent us from discussing it or holding anyone accountable, like always.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I would say the opposite. We can’t hold those accountable without proper proof. Thousands of wrongly accused inmates are an example.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

I don't actually care what you would say. I'm telling you how it is.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

while ignoring facts haha. typical

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4