Someone take this apart line by line

May 24, 2026 8:52 PM

mcoulter876

Views

1347

Likes

33

Dislikes

6

Hope for the little clot who could

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The real deal was the enemies we made along the way

2 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Obama's deal included the UK, France, Russia, China, and Germany. And it included international inspection of nuke agreement. And took 20+ months.

I'm gonna bet Trump's deal only opens the strait again.

And I bet Saudi Arabia and Israel, who talked Trump into doing a regime change, will not be happy with that not happening. But instead just replaced hardliner dad with hardliner son.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

English Translation" "I fucked up"

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1. Create the problem. 2. Come up with shitty solution to problem. 3. Take credit for shitty solution, falsely criticize predecessors.

2 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

I'll do it: lies, lies, more lies, delusional statement, lies, lies, lies....and more lies.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"I don't make bad deals!"

Seems like the war was a pretty bad one, big orange.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm telling you what the deal is.... But no one knows what the deal is.... I don't even know what it is yet no one knows but I'm not telling you but it'll be a great deal that no one knows about a deal that is great because I am great and everyone else is bad https://media3.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTZjMDliOTUyYmowMGQzZGtxdHdhMjk1dW5wcmJza2tnMmNpM3l3eHc2OHN2Nm1jOCZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfYnlfaWQmY3Q9Zw/A363LZlQaX0ZO/giphy.gif

2 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Is this deal (that nobody has seen) in the room with us now?

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The deal is that Iran gives the uranium to China and Iran can charge "only" 800k per ship instead of 1 million per ship that passes through Hormuz.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It kind of takes itself apart. No need for us to *yawn* waste our time.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, "IF" being the operative word there. Making a deal involves the other side agreeing to the terms & both sides abiding by them over time -- neither of which have we seen since he broke Obama's agreement with Iran. We had a goddamn working deal, the strait was open to all, UN inspectors were routinely verifying the results of their nuclear waste disposal & everything was working as planned until pedodent dumbass decided he had to stuff his tiny wiener in the world's oil pipeline keyhole.

2 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Pretty solid summary.

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He'll be lucky to get back to what Obama negotiated. As for the cash, Trump is likely to release $20B in frozen assets, far exceeding the $1.7B frozen assets that Obama let them have.

2 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*draws sentence diagram, but every line and branch says either "stupid" or "fucking stupid"

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In shgort, he's gonna surrender andm in the new deal, provide Iran with the technology they currently lack to build a nuclear weapon. Fucking moron!!!!

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That cunt doesn't have the cards to bluff with, anymore. He already threw everything he had at them before even starting negotiations.

Fucking 5D chess, my arse.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

https://imgur.com/pv62Uyx

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Heh. They misspelled Dumbshit.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

is the post real or not? is the deal real or not?

2 months ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Well, he says nobody knows about it, so it doesn't exist.

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Who knows or cares anymore

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I don't know, that doesn't look like Truth Social and that is better worded than usual.

2 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Is Trump even real? He seems made up. Like a poorly written villain from a B series movie.

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The deal is not real. As usual, Trump thinks that agreeing to what the substance of negotiations will be about, is “a deal is near.” Last I understood, Iran is still effectively claiming that the strait of Hormuz is an internal waterway that they will regulate, and charge for, and have stated that discussions about uranium could be weeks/months away

2 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

That should read *may* charge for. My bad.

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The deal is not done, the statement is real. The part about Obama is half truths and lies, the problem was created by Trump himself when he tore up the treaty signed by Obama. Screwed the entire world because he thought he could take Iran in three days. Wants a bigger payoff to stop.

2 months ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

its real, unfortunately

2 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Obama did, in fact, give Iran millions of dollars in cash and gave them a deal where they basically pinky swore not to make a nuke as long as we pinky swore to let them sell things to europe. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/investigating-obama-administrations-400-million-payment-iran nominally this was "reparations" for when the US responded to Iran overthrowing its government by not following through on a deal it made with the now-nonexistent government. it was also transparently a bribe.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

As with most things in diplomacy, there was an abundance of trust involved in this agreement, which is no doubt why Trump, whose brain is incapable of trusting his own bowels from shitting his pants, immediately renegged on the deal.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Calling the JCPOA a “pinky swear” ignores that Iran dismantled centrifuges, shipped out enriched uranium, and accepted the most intrusive nuclear inspections in the world. The $400M wasn’t a “gift” — it was Iran’s own pre-1979 money tied up in a legal dispute the U.S. was likely to lose anyway. You can argue the timing made it look like ransom, but pretending it was simply Obama handing terrorists cash for promises is propaganda, not history.

2 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

>ignores< no, it acknowledges the fact that they could have lied about these things and/or made them in secret. Because that's literally how EVERY government operates, the only way to believe anything ANY government says is through trust. The US, for example, leaves certain planes governed by nuclear disarmament treaties to rust in the open so that satellites can see them there...but they COULD be still building those planes in secret.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

>it wasn't a gift< As I said, it was NOMINALLY "reparations," it was also transparently a bribe. It was the US saying "sure we'll give you this money and stop fighting you for it if you give the US what we want."

You'll note that nowhere did I say Iran was a terrorist state. That is your words, not mine. I said that two capitalist governments did a bribery deal, which is true. Any perceived corruption by you is you subconsciously recognizing that capitalist governments are inherently corrupt.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

For a great example of how you can't rely on government's "proving" their supposed innocence on a subject, look at the US' attitude about hacking. In the 90s and earlier the official narrative from the US government was "we do not hack other countries"

Now the US cyber attacks on foreign nations are talked about openly and described as "good ackshually." And if you look into the declassified documents, the US government was hacking people the whole time they said they weren't, too.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Or even on a smaller scale of how you can't "prove" That people aren't doing something: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perverse_incentive people were paid to kill cobras, to reduce the amount of cobras in the country. So they started breeding cobras in secret, increasing the number of cobras in the country.

You can't PROVE someone isn't doing something. you MUST trust them, because that's the only thing you can do.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It wasn't based on trust. It was based on inspections. Which they were complying with.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And the trust is that those inspections were 100% accurate, not in any way tampered with and, most importantly, were done at all possible locations where they could be making the things they pinky swore not to make.

You'll note the third feature is literally impossible to verify without having inspectors on every square inch of Iran-affiliated land 24/7

Hence, trust.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well, we got to pick the inspectors, and the locations. It's one of the most surveilled countries in the world. And you can't exactly put a centrifuge in the back of the broom closet and store your material in a shoebox. Hiding fissible material isn't exactly easy. Between safety equipment and radiation its pretty detectable. So again, not about trust. It's about watching what they were doing, getting eyes (that we picked) on the ground (in locations we picked) .

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1