Feb 21, 2019 2:23 PM
Deadpolio
3495
47
26
DrDresDog
On wikipedia it says she has an international relations and economics
elcee50
I haven't seen the right this terrified and obsessed with someone since Obama lol
v
The more I think about it, you're right, y'all still bring up Hillary
Imissrandy
??
ThisIsFrigglish
Imagine if a university had issued Trump a degree in Communications; do you think they'd be eager to advertise he graduated?
UranusSpelunker
Op is saying Alexandrea Ocasio-Cortez is an idiot who understands nothing about money or how anything other than fantastical daydreams work.
derschweiz
The model for all of her proposals come from countries that have successfully implemented the same or similar policies.
Except those countries are a fraction the size of the USA’s geography and economy.
Sure, I’m not saying anything to the contrary, but our economy is far more similar to European economies than South American economies.
Oh sorry, I’m having two similar conversations- the first point is still relevant but ignore the S.A. piece.
tittiemcjiggleboots
Still have yet to see anyone show her economic position(s) to be flawed. Just trolls intentionally misrepresenting her initiatives. Meh
SenorCardgay
That's because they prove themselves to be flawed. No one needs to prove it because they just repeat what she says.
No they either repeat their interpretation according to their misunderstandings or they intentionally misrepresent her. Hence the 70% tax
Have you looked at Erik Engquist’s thingamd her subsequent freak out? See below for a research launching point
https://www.aol.com/article/news/2019/02/19/ocasio-cortez-fires-back-at-critics-of-her-opposition-to-amazon-deal/23673540/
Your point? You are proving my point, Enquist is misrepresenting her point which is that Amazon is not as net positive for long islanders
MasterKrieg
She doesnt even understand how tax revenue and new job creation works to benefit a community...
For example...
I'll keep go9ng if you would like more examples
"OK NY we will build a facility, but you need to use some of the tax revenue to fix the roads near it for our trucks" everyone wins
Noone said this.
It was just an example that was requested....
A big company brings 25k new high paying jobs, brings in tax revenue, and most of the time helps improve infrastructure
Are you assuming if Amazon doesn't go to new York that no other company will? Because that would just be silly & you're not silly are you?
Not at all but nothing quite like this particular opportunity, and the fact that it was already on the table is better than waiting
In no way at all was denying this good for NY, and if you try to argue that you are a fool
She thought 3 billion in tax breaks for Amazon was money that existed already and should be used for schools / infrastructure.
Or does she think that providing Amazon with a subsidy is essentially giving away benefits when another company would pay those taxes?
But the point is which company? A company is going to go where the incentives are. Its like a bidding system for contracting job.
The money doesnt currently exist. They aren't taking any money away from anything.
Which benefits? All they are saying is we are going to make you pay 3 billion less in taxes. They are the one generating the money.
DrDresDog
On wikipedia it says she has an international relations and economics
elcee50
I haven't seen the right this terrified and obsessed with someone since Obama lol
Deadpolio
elcee50
The more I think about it, you're right, y'all still bring up Hillary
Deadpolio
Imissrandy
??
ThisIsFrigglish
Imagine if a university had issued Trump a degree in Communications; do you think they'd be eager to advertise he graduated?
UranusSpelunker
Op is saying Alexandrea Ocasio-Cortez is an idiot who understands nothing about money or how anything other than fantastical daydreams work.
derschweiz
The model for all of her proposals come from countries that have successfully implemented the same or similar policies.
UranusSpelunker
Except those countries are a fraction the size of the USA’s geography and economy.
derschweiz
Sure, I’m not saying anything to the contrary, but our economy is far more similar to European economies than South American economies.
derschweiz
Oh sorry, I’m having two similar conversations- the first point is still relevant but ignore the S.A. piece.
tittiemcjiggleboots
Still have yet to see anyone show her economic position(s) to be flawed. Just trolls intentionally misrepresenting her initiatives. Meh
SenorCardgay
That's because they prove themselves to be flawed. No one needs to prove it because they just repeat what she says.
tittiemcjiggleboots
No they either repeat their interpretation according to their misunderstandings or they intentionally misrepresent her. Hence the 70% tax
Deadpolio
Have you looked at Erik Engquist’s thingamd her subsequent freak out? See below for a research launching point
Deadpolio
https://www.aol.com/article/news/2019/02/19/ocasio-cortez-fires-back-at-critics-of-her-opposition-to-amazon-deal/23673540/
tittiemcjiggleboots
Your point? You are proving my point, Enquist is misrepresenting her point which is that Amazon is not as net positive for long islanders
MasterKrieg
She doesnt even understand how tax revenue and new job creation works to benefit a community...
tittiemcjiggleboots
For example...
MasterKrieg
I'll keep go9ng if you would like more examples
MasterKrieg
"OK NY we will build a facility, but you need to use some of the tax revenue to fix the roads near it for our trucks" everyone wins
tittiemcjiggleboots
Noone said this.
MasterKrieg
It was just an example that was requested....
MasterKrieg
A big company brings 25k new high paying jobs, brings in tax revenue, and most of the time helps improve infrastructure
tittiemcjiggleboots
Are you assuming if Amazon doesn't go to new York that no other company will? Because that would just be silly & you're not silly are you?
MasterKrieg
Not at all but nothing quite like this particular opportunity, and the fact that it was already on the table is better than waiting
MasterKrieg
In no way at all was denying this good for NY, and if you try to argue that you are a fool
MasterKrieg
She thought 3 billion in tax breaks for Amazon was money that existed already and should be used for schools / infrastructure.
tittiemcjiggleboots
Or does she think that providing Amazon with a subsidy is essentially giving away benefits when another company would pay those taxes?
MasterKrieg
But the point is which company? A company is going to go where the incentives are. Its like a bidding system for contracting job.
MasterKrieg
The money doesnt currently exist. They aren't taking any money away from anything.
MasterKrieg
Which benefits? All they are saying is we are going to make you pay 3 billion less in taxes. They are the one generating the money.